• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:05
CEST 13:05
KST 20:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week1[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL67
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 587 users

Significant Digits

Blogs > Ian Ian Ian
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Ian Ian Ian
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
915 Posts
May 20 2010 03:37 GMT
#1
Basically I need someone to convince me as to why leading zeroes are not counted as significant digits.

I've been listening to this bullshit in school for forever. And I've never had someone that has really explained it to my understanding..

As I see it, significant digits are a way of showing how much accuracy you took in you're measurements. If I weigh something and I get let's say, 10.000405 grams it is considered to have 8 significant digits. Let's say I weigh the same thing, but it loses ten pounds, and is now 0.000405 grams. I used the same tool to obtain this result and am measuring to the same degree of accuracy. But now I only have 3 significant digits. This does not make sense to me whatsoever.

*
synapse
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
China13814 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-20 03:39:31
May 20 2010 03:39 GMT
#2
.000405 kilograms = .405 grams

They have the same # of sig figs. How would life work if converting kg to g changed the # of sig figs by 3?
:)
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
May 20 2010 03:40 GMT
#3
0.000405 * 10 to the exponent 3 = 0.405

At least I think that's the reason.
meeple
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada10211 Posts
May 20 2010 03:41 GMT
#4
For the same reason that when you go 0121km/hr you've only measured 3 digits... the leading zero's tell you the size of the thing you're measuring... not a degree of accuracy of the the thing you're measuring.
Ian Ian Ian
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
915 Posts
May 20 2010 03:41 GMT
#5
Can someone maybe explain the flaw in my problem then?
crate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2474 Posts
May 20 2010 03:43 GMT
#6
I don't see why it's a problem that you get a different number of significant digits in the two cases given in the OP.
We did. You did. Yes we can. No. || http://crawl.akrasiac.org/scoring/players/crate.html || twitch.tv/crate3333
synapse
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
China13814 Posts
May 20 2010 03:44 GMT
#7
On May 20 2010 12:37 Ian Ian Ian wrote:
Basically I need someone to convince me as to why leading zeroes are not counted as significant digits.

I've been listening to this bullshit in school for forever. And I've never had someone that has really explained it to my understanding..

As I see it, significant digits are a way of showing how much accuracy you took in you're measurements. If I weigh something and I get let's say, 10.000405 grams it is considered to have 8 significant digits. Let's say I weigh the same thing, but it loses ten pounds, and is now 0.000405 grams. I used the same tool to obtain this result and am measuring to the same degree of accuracy. But now I only have 3 significant digits. This does not make sense to me whatsoever.


Actually, according to your loss of 10 lbs example, your final answer of 0.000405 g counts as "6 sig figs past the decimal place" since you performed addition/subtraction rather than multiplication/division.
:)
SoManyDeadLings
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada255 Posts
May 20 2010 03:44 GMT
#8
On May 20 2010 12:41 Ian Ian Ian wrote:
Can someone maybe explain the flaw in my problem then?


On May 20 2010 12:41 meeple wrote:
For the same reason that when you go 0121km/hr you've only measured 3 digits... the leading zero's tell you the size of the thing you're measuring... not a degree of accuracy of the the thing you're measuring.


wsrgry
motbob
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States12546 Posts
May 20 2010 03:44 GMT
#9
All I can do is explain why your proposed situations are inherently different.

In the first situation, the mass of the object is precise to the one millionths place, and the mass of the object is 10 million times one millionth. In the second situation, the mass of the object is precise to the one millionths place, but the mass of the object is only 400 times one millionth.

In other words, the first example is much more precise compared to the mass of the object. That is what significant digits tell us.
ModeratorGood content always wins.
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4199 Posts
May 20 2010 03:47 GMT
#10
Is it sad that I instinctively thought of "getting a chick's phone number", because I've used this line several times for that?
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
meeple
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada10211 Posts
May 20 2010 03:47 GMT
#11
The main flaw is that you've lost 10 pounds but it seems you've only lost 10 grams... heh but I guess you're talking about your problem there...

Well, although it seems unintuitional to "lose" significant digits in a measurement... it's actually perfectly common. There isn't any real problem with it...
meeple
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada10211 Posts
May 20 2010 03:50 GMT
#12
Also... I agree with what motbob said about you lose significant digits because your accuracy in relation to the size of the second number is much less than the accuracy in relation with the size of the first number.
Ian Ian Ian
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
915 Posts
May 20 2010 03:53 GMT
#13
Still stupid imo
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-20 03:53:57
May 20 2010 03:53 GMT
#14
extrapolate. Ever use a slide rule and you'll learn fast how you only use 3 digits for everything, frankly it's not as relevant as we have calculators...

significant digits is about precision, not about scientific notation.
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4199 Posts
May 20 2010 04:02 GMT
#15
On May 20 2010 12:53 Ian Ian Ian wrote:
Still stupid imo

This poses some problems in numerical modeling.

What you noticed is a simple principle of mathematics which eliminates precision by the use of subtraction..... In real situations, you need to be careful, because it can screw up the results greatly.

Lets imagine that your scale for removing the weight could only measure to 3 decimal places. You subtract 10.000 kg from 10.000405 kg. How sure can you actually be that the remaining amount is 0.000405 kg?

10.000405
- 10.000???
------------------
0.000???

Your precision is now down to 3 decimal places, for a total of 3 significant digits. You have no way of knowing the precise amount that is left.
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
Ian Ian Ian
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
915 Posts
May 20 2010 04:12 GMT
#16
Forget about the subtraction then..

Like it just seems to me that if you measure something to 4 decimal places or whatever, it should still have the same amount of significant digits, regardless of it's 0.000# or #.000#
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
May 20 2010 04:13 GMT
#17
lol its not stupid at all. the leading zeroes are just to get to the actual meat of the number because of our writing conventions.

write it out in scientific notation and wow all your zeroes are gone and meaningless.
Moderator
canucks12
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada812 Posts
May 20 2010 04:15 GMT
#18
Precision and accuracy are two different things. Something can be accurate, but completely imprecise.
For example: if something weighs 1kg, and a scale measures 1kg, it is entirely accurate. Likewise, if it measures it to be 1.00000000kg, that is also equally accurate. However, the second reading is a lot more precise. If something is a smaller mass and the scale is not adjusted accordingly, of course you will have a less precise answer, however that will not affect the accuracy of the measurement.

So to give you an answer, the leading zeros give no added precision to the number, so it should not have any significant figures. However, latter zeros add precision because it still adds precision (you know that the last zero is indeed close to zero).

You have to look at the way you see significant figures. They are not meant to measure accuracy at all. (An extremely precise reading could be entirely inaccurate)
YejinYejin
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States1053 Posts
May 20 2010 04:18 GMT
#19
Just saying, you called them significant digits in your title, and I usually call them Significant Figures. Significant Figures allows them to be abbreviated to "Sig Figs" (flows off the tongue nicely), but calling them Significant Digits forces you to abbreviate the phrase as "Sig Digs" (violently jumps off the tongue with acid-covered cleats).
안지호
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 20 2010 04:21 GMT
#20
# significant figures = # of digits used in exponential form.

So 100 = 1x10^2 has 1 sig fig, but 1.000000x10^2 has 7 sig figs - it's a statement of how much precision you actually measured.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 5
ByuN vs SHINLIVE!
Clem vs Reynor
Crank 1373
Tasteless899
ComeBackTV 684
IndyStarCraft 135
Rex120
3DClanTV 80
IntoTheiNu 52
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1350
Tasteless 882
RotterdaM 171
IndyStarCraft 130
Rex 113
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 22860
Sea 18650
Rain 5034
Bisu 2487
Jaedong 856
Hyuk 728
Light 679
Pusan 585
firebathero 412
Mini 359
[ Show more ]
Stork 278
actioN 267
EffOrt 196
Zeus 188
Backho 183
Hyun 163
ToSsGirL 128
Soulkey 116
hero 77
Mind 60
sSak 37
JYJ36
Sharp 23
Aegong 22
Shinee 21
Rush 20
Sacsri 19
Free 18
Noble 17
JulyZerg 17
NaDa 17
sorry 14
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Sexy 12
yabsab 12
Hm[arnc] 10
IntoTheRainbow 9
SilentControl 6
Movie 5
ivOry 3
Icarus 1
Dota 2
Gorgc6762
XaKoH 557
XcaliburYe296
League of Legends
singsing1487
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss881
x6flipin460
allub298
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor145
Other Games
tarik_tv22938
shahzam683
crisheroes485
DeMusliM346
Fuzer 249
Lowko167
Liquid`RaSZi155
Pyrionflax145
SortOf76
B2W.Neo0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick26469
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 639
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2112
League of Legends
• Stunt493
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 55m
Replay Cast
12h 55m
RSL Revival
22h 55m
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 4h
OSC
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 22h
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.