EPTTLPD Feedback Thread - Page 107
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
We know team histories are not working correctly. Thank you. | ||
|
indxrje
227 Posts
| ||
|
drazak
United States479 Posts
I was speaking with Salle and some of the other LP guys, we were pining for TLPD integration in LP. I had some ideas for how to do it in a players infobox but I have no idea what the database schema looks like, or even if it's the same for the international and korean databases, if I had some more information I could potentially implement something. I'm not asking for a DB user or whatnot, I can leave those fields empty and allow someone else to input them. Is this something that you would be interested in collaborating on or letting me work on? Ben | ||
|
vgrezende
Brazil66 Posts
This game is attributed to the wrong Sang http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/games/118155_hOn_sin_vs_JJUB The right would be  Sangedit: Corrected =D | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
| ||
zere
Germany1287 Posts
backlogging like crazy atm, will get done soon (C) 1991-2012 Blizzard Entertainment | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50625 Posts
 By.Flash to handle it but you need to handle that. | ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + 12-06-01 HSC #5 NA Quali #2 Drewbie Machine + 12-05-25 HSC #5 NA Quali #1 Destiny Binski Is this intentional or in error? | ||
|
Sandermatt
Switzerland1365 Posts
I assume the way it currently works is that beating an unrated players is counted as a victory against a player with a set points of ELO's. The ELO system originates from chess. In chess the tournaments are assigned an elo number with which the strength of unrated players are estimated. A players performance during the tournament can also be used (or mixed with the predefined elo number). This could help to prevent players from rising far by beating weak competition. Another idea could be to just not rate the match until the unrated player has played a number of games and his performance (number of ELO's with which he wouldn't have lost or won Elo's making the results he did) can be evaluated. Edit: I hope this is the right place to post that. | ||
|
zere
Germany1287 Posts
On June 27 2012 22:00 Probe1 wrote:Is this intentional or in error? intentional; multiple versions of the same map within one tournament happens relatively often | ||
|
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On June 27 2012 22:56 Sandermatt wrote: There seems to be some problem, that players who might not be that strong rise far in the ELO by playing online cups against players that are rather weak. I assume the way it currently works is that beating an unrated players is counted as a victory against a player with a set points of ELO's. The ELO system originates from chess. In chess the tournaments are assigned an elo number with which the strength of unrated players are estimated. A players performance during the tournament can also be used (or mixed with the predefined elo number). This could help to prevent players from rising far by beating weak competition. Another idea could be to just not rate the match until the unrated player has played a number of games and his performance (number of ELO's with which he wouldn't have lost or won Elo's making the results he did) can be evaluated. Edit: I hope this is the right place to post that. There are a lot of problems with Elo ranking. Frankly you should not demand any sort of change and just take all the results with a grain of salt. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On June 28 2012 00:30 zere wrote: intentional; multiple versions of the same map within one tournament happens relatively often Oh it wasn't the map version that made me wonder. It was the listing under SC2 Korea when the tournament (appeared) to be a North American qualifier. | ||
|
phiinix
United States1169 Posts
| ||
|
Mairou
Finland144 Posts
Here's a good image for his profile. Also quick question: Which tournaments you guys add to the database ? I have won some famous players in online tournaments like Playhem or Zotac cups etc, but when i look at their TLPD they never show that game i played against them. | ||
|
zere
Germany1287 Posts
We usually skip bo1-rounds and start adding games from rounds on when Bo3-matches start. This may vary for each tournament, but it's kind of a guideline. If you have a tourney with prize money / and or enough well-known and/or accomplished players, and it's not in TLPD yet, you can always point us to it in this thread. (Tho there is a chance that it's already in our backlog but we just havent gotten to put in in yet because of the insane amount of SC2 games. We considered to record playhems once, with no result, because it's just an awful lot of work to do atm.). | ||
|
SugarBear
United States842 Posts
(T)Celious (Z)daisuki (Z)DwAy (P)EzaLB (Z)MilyCyrus (T)MurDeR (T)NGry (P)ReseT (P)Rickter (Z)Rigid (P)RockEr (T)SeoHyeon (T)Starkad (T)Treva (T)waffles Sorry for the huge update, someone just pointed this out to me. | ||
|
themask4f
138 Posts
| ||
|
zere
Germany1287 Posts
| ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
LE = Ladder Edition, the only one used since NASL S2 I believe. RE = Old one, no longer in use, first seen (and afaik last seen) NASL Season 2. Just as a note I am 99.99% sure this has not been used since LE was originally published as we took down the RE version. | ||
|
Grayson Carlyle
Canada219 Posts
| ||
| ||
