• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:51
CEST 18:51
KST 01:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202528RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me)
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Corsair Pursuit Micro? Pro gamer house photos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 863 users

US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 102

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 100 101 102 103 104 325 Next
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9617 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-02-28 19:13:26
February 28 2018 19:05 GMT
#2021
connotatively, someone against trump, meme of the alt-right.

denotatively, a man whose wife is fucking someone else.

the former was definitely started with all the knowledge and implications of the latter. intended of course as an insult.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-02-28 20:19:46
February 28 2018 19:27 GMT
#2022
Thanks. Teh interweb is so weird. A niche sexual fetish slang turned into another niche alt-right internet slang. Who can keep up with this meme crap?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 28 2018 20:58 GMT
#2023
It’s from 4chan, who’s ironic detachment about everything made it a lovely home for racists.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-02-28 21:21:34
February 28 2018 21:21 GMT
#2024
4chan appears to be an anonymous forum without focus. I've never visited 4chan before. This, I think, is a good thing.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 28 2018 22:25 GMT
#2025
It’s not the darkest part of the internet. But it is the part that loves being filthy.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-01 18:12:16
March 01 2018 18:09 GMT
#2026
On February 28 2018 05:48 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Dang it all, I must have confused you with someone else.

Hey, at least I am not so "confused" to quote someone, accuse them of changing their post, and continue to insist that post was unfairly editted post-quote, even when it was pointed out that the quote was exactly the same as the post. Because dang, clearly I have psionic powers to force you to right all over the place.

xDaunt is the one constantly arguing with a "y'all on the left" he keeps in his head. Danglars is definitely the one who did the thing you describe though.

And for sure, it's not the y'all people have a problem with. Used properly, it can be very charming. The problem is when you keep using it to lump people into a box that doesn't exist, so you can have an argument with people that doesn't exist.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
March 16 2018 19:46 GMT
#2027
@Seeker: I don't think the "both sides stop now" approach is an appropriate response to that at all.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
March 16 2018 20:14 GMT
#2028
There wasnt even a discussion going on anymore. It was back and forth mudslinging and personal attacks.
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
March 16 2018 20:15 GMT
#2029
Yeah, it was time to put that to rest lol
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
March 16 2018 20:23 GMT
#2030
On March 17 2018 05:14 Aveng3r wrote:
There wasnt even a discussion going on anymore. It was back and forth mudslinging and personal attacks.


How do you suppose that happened?

Here's Serm's opener in the last exchange:

On March 17 2018 03:47 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2018 03:36 a_flayer wrote:
Yeah. If you post any form of suggestion for change people always zoom in on that little thing they dislike, ignore everything else, and proclaim that "it is impossible". It's easy to shoot things down like that. Come up with your own better suggestions, or link to articles from what you think are more credible sources on the subject if that's your complaint.

Edit: stop drinking and posting Acrofales

But theres nothing about GH's suggestion that people like. His suggestion is literally to get rid of the police and maybe do stuff afterwords. Theres some talk about creating reservations for minorities and reforming the police at some point but it all begins with just getting rid of the police and not expecting society to quickly fall apart.


Especially you farv since you piped up, is that literally my position? I suspect you know it's not.

My response:

On March 17 2018 03:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2018 03:47 Sermokala wrote:
On March 17 2018 03:36 a_flayer wrote:
Yeah. If you post any form of suggestion for change people always zoom in on that little thing they dislike, ignore everything else, and proclaim that "it is impossible". It's easy to shoot things down like that. Come up with your own better suggestions, or link to articles from what you think are more credible sources on the subject if that's your complaint.

Edit: stop drinking and posting Acrofales

But theres nothing about GH's suggestion that people like. His suggestion is literally to get rid of the police and maybe do stuff afterwords. Theres some talk about creating reservations for minorities and reforming the police at some point but it all begins with just getting rid of the police and not expecting society to quickly fall apart.


I don't understand how people can still say this without feeling foolish. If you think I want to disband the police and figure it out from there you didn't understand my argument. That almost all of you made the same mistake doesn't mean I did a poor job of explaining it (maybe to an audience of neoliberals) but that almost all of you were far more focused on disagreeing than understanding.


To which we got:

On March 17 2018 04:13 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2018 03:51 Slaughter wrote:
On March 17 2018 03:47 Sermokala wrote:
On March 17 2018 03:36 a_flayer wrote:
Yeah. If you post any form of suggestion for change people always zoom in on that little thing they dislike, ignore everything else, and proclaim that "it is impossible". It's easy to shoot things down like that. Come up with your own better suggestions, or link to articles from what you think are more credible sources on the subject if that's your complaint.

Edit: stop drinking and posting Acrofales

But theres nothing about GH's suggestion that people like. His suggestion is literally to get rid of the police and maybe do stuff afterwords. Theres some talk about creating reservations for minorities and reforming the police at some point but it all begins with just getting rid of the police and not expecting society to quickly fall apart.


I don't know. Seems like GH plan is more slow? I may be misunderstanding but he seems to be pushing for working slowly towards making police obsolete or at the least have a much greatly reduced roll. Pretty sure he never said abolish the police in one swift strike.

See GH has this problem with plans is that he doesn't really have them. He says something stupid and instead of realizing what he said was stupid he doubles down and scrambles to try and justify what he said. He believes that he can't be wrong and doesn't need to elaborate on any of his ideas because again he can't be wrong. When people ask him simple questions about his ideas or about obvious issues with his ideas he attacks them because again he can't be wrong. He brings up questions that can't be answered like "how efficient are the police" and when people ask him what that even means he knowing he can't be wrong proclaims he is right because his enemies can't prove him wrong. People ask him how creating reservations for minorities could possibly work alongside reservations for other minorities and he posts a rolling stone article as support.

He doesn't have anything past just saying "abolish the police" or "End the democratic party" because he doesn't care about legitimacy or practicality. People think that because we're talking on a forum and assuming everyone's legitimately supporting the shit that comes out under their name. This doesn't apply to GH beacuse he can't be wrong.


If it should stop than serm should have been told to stop or warned at least for the clear personal attacks. What doesn't make sense is responding in a way that makes it appear our arguments were equally substantive when his was a clear caricature of an argument I wasn't making.

I get that I'm irritating, but that doesn't make me wrong.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
March 16 2018 20:28 GMT
#2031
As is always, always, always the case in that thread, the undying need to "be right" is the root of the problem.
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-16 20:35:08
March 16 2018 20:32 GMT
#2032
On March 17 2018 05:28 Aveng3r wrote:
As is always, always, always the case in that thread, the undying need to "be right" is the root of the problem.


Sometimes someone is right, and someone is wrong. Simply telling them both to stop talking is one of the worst possible solutions to the person in the wrong refusing to see it.

EDIT: I'd note that the wonderful replacement conversation in the US politics thread is now about Russia and the UK, but go on....
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
March 16 2018 20:38 GMT
#2033
So we've got you saying you're right and hes wrong
If we ask him I bet he would say that he's right and you're wrong

Neither side appeared willing to stop the argument and try to better understand the opposing view or acknowledge any semblance of doubt in their own position. Throw in some personal attacks and insults, and we get a moderator who's had enough and mercifully stops the whole thing.

This happens frequently.
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-16 21:35:57
March 16 2018 20:45 GMT
#2034
On March 17 2018 05:38 Aveng3r wrote:
So we've got you saying you're right and hes wrong
If we ask him I bet he would say that he's right and you're wrong

Neither side appeared willing to stop the argument and try to better understand the opposing view or acknowledge any semblance of doubt in their own position. Throw in some personal attacks and insults, and we get a moderator who's had enough and mercifully stops the whole thing.

This happens frequently.


But we can read the argument and make a determination based on the facts. That's totally an option. As is evidenced by your take on this, this serves as a great example of why I think it was a poor way to handle it.

It's not as if we were arguing over what the best color of the rainbow was. We were arguing over what in fact my argument even was. There are posts we can read that can tell us the answer to those questions. I really hope farv takes the responsibility to respond appropriately since it is his thread and he already opined.

If it's an issue of me clearly demonstrating it in a single post with links I can do that, but I don't think it's necessary.

EDIT 3: My petty leaked through and it's not why I'm here, so I spoiled it. Moving on:

If there's a substantive counter argument to the one I'm presenting here (regarding my feedback, not the political one, outside the aforementioned context) I'm open to hearing it here or in PM, or if it's just a 'US Politics thread is irritating, GH in particular, I don't/didn't care who was right or why + our house' thing, I can accept that as well. But if it's the latter, I think Seeker should own it (since your names on the post), take the hit (a bit of why I think that's counterproductive), and we can move on. I'll be disappointed in farv too, but I can cut him some slack, I know he's a busy guy.

That seems like a fair and just way to handle it, and one befitting of the situation and context.

+ Show Spoiler +
EDIT: If the reason for stopping us was that it was off topic/derailing as suggested, I think we need a bit of an explanation as to how a story about the UK and sorta Russia (that didn't even get traction in the UK or EU threads), is getting things 'back on track'.

EDIT2: I guess p6 found a way to connect it to the US, sorta, in a conspiracy theory kinda way at least. Which I heard aren't allowed.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
March 17 2018 15:36 GMT
#2035
On March 17 2018 05:28 Aveng3r wrote:
As is always, always, always the case in that thread, the undying need to "be right" is the root of the problem.

The thread really has been a waste of time lately. Discussions in the thread are way more interesting and edifying when you have multiple people on each side of the issue, but in the last many pages it's just been GH trashing on everyone who doesn't agree with him on everything. I keep checking up on it, and don't actually feel like I missed anything.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-17 16:14:42
March 17 2018 15:50 GMT
#2036
On March 18 2018 00:36 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2018 05:28 Aveng3r wrote:
As is always, always, always the case in that thread, the undying need to "be right" is the root of the problem.

The thread really has been a waste of time lately. Discussions in the thread are way more interesting and edifying when you have multiple people on each side of the issue, but in the last many pages it's just been GH trashing on everyone who doesn't agree with him on everything. I keep checking up on it, and don't actually feel like I missed anything.


They are mostly struggling to even engage my argument. I don't have a problem with disagreeing

it's the not reading something and then thinking they can accurately critique it.
Then refusing to acknowledge when they realize they did in fact fabricate the position they were arguing against.
Then throwing out ad hominems.
Then a bunch of people who didn't read it trying to undermine my position without engaging with it AT ALL
Then complaining about how bad the thread is.
Because it interrupted the constant stream of giggling at gossip about Trump.
People worried their clever quip about some dumbass tweet will get ignored and buried because people can't help but argue with me even if they have no idea what they are arguing about.

Some of that pattern you've conveniently displayed here for us.

I think the easiest way to dead this issue with the least effort is just keep a Russiagate thread open until the conclusion of the investigation.

That way the people who want to talk all russiagate all the time, can do that and the people who want to talk about all the other topics of US politics can do that in the US politics thread.

EDIT: Maybe I'm misreading this, but I think if I was just trashing people without at least arguable just cause I would be actioned far more frequently and severely. Or people would more clearly demonstrate how I was wrong and not just upsetting them.

I've been wrong before, I remember what it's like. I made one slip up on misreading one part of an argument and got hit with a "you didn't learn English in school did you" and the condescending "this is how words work" post. I can admit it.

It's a chronic inability of some folks to both resist disagreeing with me and actually reading and quoting the argument I'm making that's resulted in what we've seen recently

. I couldn't make it up if I wanted to. If I was, there is a legion of people that would leap at the opportunity to prove me wrong. Their absence speaks more than they wish it did.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-18 10:56:26
March 17 2018 16:53 GMT
#2037
This is the website feedback thread right?

Farv wanted me to take up him posting in bad faith, without intentions to argue within the rules he set out for the thread, with the moderation staff (or respond in kind, but that seems ineffective).

I asked him not to snipe at me/my arguments if he's knowingly doing it without any intention to support it with any semblance of a legitimate argument and he's just flat out refusing. As such I merely request that he either change that plan or if he does snipe at me or my argument he be immediately actioned for knowingly and intentionally violating the thread rules.

I suppose it still wouldn't quite apply here, but it certainly would to the US politics thread. Please and thank you

Any sort of response to previous posts would be appreciated as well.

k...
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13924 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-20 05:01:10
March 20 2018 04:44 GMT
#2038
I don't like vague changes to policy that is not outlined in any examples other then a symbolic notion at least of "Our intention is not to silence one side, rather, it is to ensure that values of TLnet are upheld." Ones perceptions of the values of TLnet is different the another values of TLnet especially when those perceptions are turns twords something nationalist as US politics. I don't think Euro posters have given anything of value to the thread in a long time but I always assumed that it was a function of the community instead of apart of the community.

Are there any examples or main points to be considered in this change or should it just be considered a general "shape up everyone"?

I also pointioningly protest the lack of relevant picture to look at whenever I open the thread.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23217 Posts
March 20 2018 11:51 GMT
#2039
Should probably at least send out more specific detailed mails to the posters you think are on the edge and why so they can actually improve their behavior, rather than just get blindsided with a ban for something you guys allowed for years.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19048 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-20 12:54:57
March 20 2018 12:53 GMT
#2040
On March 20 2018 13:44 Sermokala wrote:
I don't like vague changes to policy that is not outlined in any examples other then a symbolic notion at least of "Our intention is not to silence one side, rather, it is to ensure that values of TLnet are upheld." Ones perceptions of the values of TLnet is different the another values of TLnet especially when those perceptions are turns twords something nationalist as US politics. I don't think Euro posters have given anything of value to the thread in a long time but I always assumed that it was a function of the community instead of apart of the community.

Are there any examples or main points to be considered in this change or should it just be considered a general "shape up everyone"?

I also pointioningly protest the lack of relevant picture to look at whenever I open the thread.

The values of TLnet include actual discussion, not ranting at people with opposing views. So that's a part of it.

We also want to be more open about users in the thread, as we've found that plenty of godawful posters are usually pretty okay outside the USPol thread. This means fewer site bans and more thread bans, which promotes (non-USPol) discussion elsewhere on the site rather than shutting a user down completely.

On March 20 2018 20:51 GreenHorizons wrote:
Should probably at least send out more specific detailed mails to the posters you think are on the edge and why so they can actually improve their behavior, rather than just get blindsided with a ban for something you guys allowed for years.


That's what warnings are. All of the bans in USPol are following a warning from a mod who explains why their behavior is unacceptable. You, for example, have received several warnings and then you altered your behavior enough to not get banned.
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
Prev 1 100 101 102 103 104 325 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 1
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimELIVE!
Classic vs RogueLIVE!
EWC_Arena7253
EWC_Arena_22766
ComeBackTV 2308
TaKeTV 780
Hui .483
3DClanTV 369
Fuzer 308
CranKy Ducklings241
Rex237
Berry_CruncH227
UpATreeSC217
EnkiAlexander 204
mcanning189
Reynor169
davetesta8
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena7253
EWC_Arena_22766
Hui .483
Fuzer 308
Rex 237
UpATreeSC 217
mcanning 189
Reynor 169
StarCraft: Brood War
Barracks 1343
Bisu 1246
EffOrt 764
Mini 731
Larva 459
Stork 376
Trikslyr76
Aegong 48
soO 27
Sharp 26
[ Show more ]
PianO 25
Movie 19
scan(afreeca) 17
JulyZerg 9
ivOry 3
League of Legends
Dendi336
Counter-Strike
fl0m1680
byalli238
oskar202
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor249
XaKoH 119
Other Games
singsing2175
ceh9659
syndereN218
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 7
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2143
League of Legends
• Nemesis4951
• TFBlade917
Other Games
• Shiphtur316
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
17h 10m
Esports World Cup
1d 17h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.