EPTUS Politics Feedback Thread - Page 101
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
Nixer
2774 Posts
On February 20 2018 03:03 zlefin wrote: I highly dispute gh's characterization, as well as tofu's highly inappropriate trolling. but i'm not going to get into it further at this time other than to note that. tofucake certainly wasn't trolling. Nor do I see anything particularly wrong with GH's "characterization" either. | ||
|
brian
United States9643 Posts
| ||
tofucake
Hyrule19264 Posts
On February 20 2018 03:03 zlefin wrote: I highly dispute gh's characterization, as well as tofu's highly inappropriate trolling. but i'm not going to get into it further at this time other than to note that. I generally don't troll. I'm just blunt and kind of an asshole. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On February 17 2018 22:15 Sent. wrote: Please don't take it as a personal attack, I'm just trying to help. I think it's because quite often you get yourself into arguments that look more or less like this: 1. Controversial view or action is mentioned 2. You respond by presenting that view or action in a caricatural way, either because you want to mock the poster or because you don't understand the position and for some reason pick the most evil interpretation of it possible (recently I'm leaning toward the latter, years ago I thought you just like to make fun of bardtown, but now I'm starting to think you genuinely don't understand people like him and those more radical) 3. The poster feels insulted by your post and replies with calling you a "massive ass" 4. You and the poster continue the fruitless exchange that turns into arguing about semantics / repeating your positions over and over / trading insults In short, it looks like you have a tendency to demonize certain opinions. It's easy to remember because of point 4, but I think the root of the problem (if you consider it a problem) is in point 2 - you present the views of your opponents very wrongly (in their mind at least) and it's very annoying to them. In your defense, it may look like this because you happen to get into those long exchanges with bad posters like sc-darkness whose posting is just indefensible. Yeah, you might be correct in pointing their wrongs out, but I don't get what you're trying to achieve by continuing to exchange posts with them once it's clear the discussion is going nowhere. It makes both of you look petty. Thanks. To be fair though, bardtown was a lot of fun. It was more enjoyable once mods caught on that British insults may sound cute and quaint, but you can't have a debate by constantly saying the equivalent of "fuck you" in British and he desperately tried to circumvent that till he blew up and called all muslims pedophiles as a passing card. Ironically, we shared more opinions than one ones we had disagreed. Unfortunately, what we disagreed on was leaving the EU. In the end though, I don't see a problem mocking a poster's viewpoint. If they view that the showing the absurdity of their viewpoint is a personal insult then they should refrain from expressing their absurdity in the first place, and they certainly shouldn't try to escalate by insulting me personally. Or maybe... I'm just blunt and kind of an asshole. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14218 Posts
On February 27 2018 06:29 Wulfey_LA wrote: I can't wait for the cavalcade of frail gunowners showing their butthurt as highschoolers trigger them. Oh wait! It is already here! Every last righty is a crying weak victim through and through. Not a shred of integrity or maniless in the entire lot. Zero exceptions. https://www.themaven.net/theresurgent/erick-erickson/david-hogg-is-a-high-school-bully-mSI3k3Njd0OcUaS-35pFDQ I mean I get that the thread has a lot of pointless cheerleading posts that are just rhetorical insults but at some point they have to fall in the "personal attack / insult" category. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18870 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On February 27 2018 17:32 Sermokala wrote: I mean I get that the thread has a lot of pointless cheerleading posts that are just rhetorical insults but at some point they have to fall in the "personal attack / insult" category. Every last righty is a crying weak victim through and through. Not a shred of integrity or maniless in the entire lot. Zero exceptions. Clearly attacking arguments not people. Mods, you here and reading? Comments? (Hypothetical "every last moderator is a crying weak victim through and through ... not a shred of integrity of manliness in the entire lot ... zero exceptions" - protest against moderation standard or attack on moderators?) | ||
|
farvacola
United States18870 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On February 28 2018 00:18 farvacola wrote: It's funny when someone engages in purposeful hyperbole (admittedly at a volume louder than a dull roar) that indicts the sweeping language of folks seemingly unaware that implication can speak just as clearly as explication. Looks like Dangles needs to go back and read his own posts, to borrow a condescending trope of his. It really sounds like you’re wishing I ever said that every lefty was guilty of such and such. So, go back and read my posts if you really think you can hang me with my own words. And you’re one small step away justifying as hominem bullshit as simple hyperbole. Of all posts to write excuses about rofl. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On February 28 2018 04:51 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Perhaps you should try righting a post without "y'all on the left" to describe anybody who disagree with you, or even as an imaginary poster, if you want people to take you seriously. You must have me confused with someone that uses y’all regularly. Am I supposed to take you seriously? | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Hey, at least I am not so "confused" to quote someone, accuse them of changing their post, and continue to insist that post was unfairly editted post-quote, even when it was pointed out that the quote was exactly the same as the post. Because dang, clearly I have psionic powers to force you to right all over the place. | ||
|
brian
United States9643 Posts
| ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
| ||
