EPTThe same goes for the only slightly less obvious maneuver of "hey, poster X, maybe you didn't see my last response to you, or are you ignoring it?"
US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 99
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Introvert
United States5001 Posts
The same goes for the only slightly less obvious maneuver of "hey, poster X, maybe you didn't see my last response to you, or are you ignoring it?" | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On February 17 2018 03:09 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I got to ask, do people I argue with really have problems with my posts? Everytime I engage in debate I seem to always get some weird brush off about my "post history" or "other people already criticise you" or "you have been such a massive ass". Is it really that different in tone to everyone else? What is it in particular? Yes, your posting is particularly atrocious. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On February 17 2018 03:09 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I got to ask, do people I argue with really have problems with my posts? Everytime I engage in debate I seem to always get some weird brush off about my "post history" or "other people already criticise you" or "you have been such a massive ass". Is it really that different in tone to everyone else? What is it in particular? I haven't watched you enough to say, and I don't track everyone in such detail; but such criticisms are common, and such behavior isn't that uncommon, so you could be similar in tone to others and receive such complaints. if you want I could review a specific exchange and provide an assessment of it. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18866 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On February 17 2018 03:31 Dangermousecatdog wrote: What is it you find particularily atrocious specifically xdaunt? I'll put together a post later. I'm tied up with work right now. | ||
|
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On February 17 2018 03:59 farvacola wrote: Your posting is fine, if not sometimes abrasive; xDaunt is just only approves of the posts of people who eat out of his hand like he wants them to. civility overrated? | ||
|
farvacola
United States18866 Posts
A lot of terrible shit happens beneath the guise of civility, so maybe? Not sure that's relevant here though  | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On February 17 2018 04:56 LegalLord wrote: I look forward to reading the list of itemized grievances. The work day can't end fast enough! I'll leave this one here as a teaser. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18866 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On February 17 2018 06:09 Danglars wrote: I’m hoping for something close to the Kwark takedown earlier in this thread. Don’t let me down xDaunt. I want to see some squirming. Which one? | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
The one with 5+ direct quotes. Rather close to when Micronesia refused to apply the same standard for singling out xDaunt to other staff/writers. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Sent.
Poland9319 Posts
On February 17 2018 03:09 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I got to ask, do people I argue with really have problems with my posts? Everytime I engage in debate I seem to always get some weird brush off about my "post history" or "other people already criticise you" or "you have been such a massive ass". Is it really that different in tone to everyone else? What is it in particular? Please don't take it as a personal attack, I'm just trying to help. I think it's because quite often you get yourself into arguments that look more or less like this: 1. Controversial view or action is mentioned 2. You respond by presenting that view or action in a caricatural way, either because you want to mock the poster or because you don't understand the position and for some reason pick the most evil interpretation of it possible (recently I'm leaning toward the latter, years ago I thought you just like to make fun of bardtown, but now I'm starting to think you genuinely don't understand people like him and those more radical) 3. The poster feels insulted by your post and replies with calling you a "massive ass" 4. You and the poster continue the fruitless exchange that turns into arguing about semantics / repeating your positions over and over / trading insults In short, it looks like you have a tendency to demonize certain opinions. It's easy to remember because of point 4, but I think the root of the problem (if you consider it a problem) is in point 2 - you present the views of your opponents very wrongly (in their mind at least) and it's very annoying to them. In your defense, it may look like this because you happen to get into those long exchanges with bad posters like sc-darkness whose posting is just indefensible. Yeah, you might be correct in pointing their wrongs out, but I don't get what you're trying to achieve by continuing to exchange posts with them once it's clear the discussion is going nowhere. It makes both of you look petty. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
| ||
