|
It's shit like this Activision.
Really, even if miraculously you are somehow not to blame for all the terrible stories we hear about (unlikely) just the simple fact that you are involved in so much shadiness makes it easy for the casual slightly-informed observer to say "Activision is a bag of dicks." They don't even need to read the stories.
You are pretty lucky you have the CoD bro crowd swaying from your sack like testicular cancer.
|
On December 23 2010 00:27 seanisgrand wrote: You are pretty lucky you have the CoD bro crowd swaying from your sack like testicular cancer. Says someone from a fan site dedicated to one of Activision's biggest franchises. Face it, if the company continues to make worthwhile games, people will still buy them. That includes me.
|
Activision doesn't make games, they just buy out large studios like Infinity Ward and Blizzard with the prospect of large funding and then proceed to take over these companies bit by bit.
|
Well, Activision may or may not win, depending on who told the truth. If the ex-IW employees told the truth, then Acti broke the contract first, if Acti is telling the truth then...
I'm rooting for EA in this one.
|
I remember the time most of us hated what EA stood for.
I also remember how many of us were intrigued with Activision buying Blizzard stock.
Now look at the pickle we find ourselves in. It's too bad no one wants to buyout Blizzard from Activision. Then again, I can see the cost being over a billion. :/
|
On December 22 2010 18:37 adrenaLinG wrote:Show nested quote +On December 22 2010 18:33 Polis wrote:On December 22 2010 18:14 adrenaLinG wrote:the intent behind this message is not so much "calling a buff" and 'being upset with activision and leaving for a better workplace' -- its to disrupt/hurt activision's business -- and illegal. So you can't leave the company that you work for because that hurts it? I don't get what they want to charge EA with, you have a right to leave job even in the land of the free no? you can leave a company whenever you want to, but you cant conspire to leave a company, take a bunch of workers with you, and hurt their business so that you can join a competitor
Depending on the terms of the contract, yes, you can. It also depends on how strong whatever jurisdiction this is in favors the efficient breach hypothesis.
But finding tortious interference for a breach of contract is not that common, to my knowledge, which is hardly the first and last word on the matter.
Courts are, depending on the circumstances, perfectly willing to look into noncompete clauses and declare them voidable, especially if there has been a breach by one party. In other words, if Activision is in breach, then they will have more difficulty in enforcing whatever noncompete clauses that they had in the contract.
But that reminds me, has anyone looked up the caption of this case? I want to look at the briefs myself.
EDIT: For those with Westlaw access, the citation for the pleading is 2010 WL 1751475.
|
On December 23 2010 02:02 StarStruck wrote: I remember the time most of us hated what EA stood for.
I also remember how many of us were intrigued with Activision buying Blizzard stock.
Now look at the pickle we find ourselves in. It's too bad no one wants to buyout Blizzard from Activision. Then again, I can see the cost being over a billion. :/ Pretty sure Kotick would rather sacrifice more kittens to the Great Xolotl than give up Blizzard. Blizzard and CoD are pretty much Activision's only two sources of income now that Kotick has successfully driven most other franchises straight into the ground.
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
easiest solution: stop shoving your money up activisionblizzard's ass. For me that meant, no SC:2
|
Eh, as a corporation Activision is doing a damn good job. Shadiest fucks in the gaming industry though. As for this lawsuit, I suspect they are doing it because they are expected to.
Activision's ass is getting bigger cause of CoD, WoW, and SC. Don't think it's about to stop either. Kotick is a conniving bastard but he knows how to bait the right people and fuck the right people. It's probably not unlike running a criminal organization.
|
A spokesman, Jeff Brown, in an email sent Tuesday night, said, "This is a PR play filled with pettiness and deliberate misdirection. Activision wants to hide the fact that they have no credible response to the claim of two artists who were fired and now just want to get paid for their work."
Source
|
MW2 sucked all the strategy and fun out of the series, I have yet to play Black Ops but i'm hoping all the cheesy crap in black ops will be amusing. Even if the LOLflamethrowers and RC bombs are fun it probably won't change how the dumb killstreak system and bad map design are dragging the series down. Activision wronged IW to begin with so the lawsuit is total BS, as if IW could derail the series any more than activision already had.
|
The politics and semantics of the corporate executives and the strategies of their companies is both dull and distant. Let them bicker in the courts over their money as long as they keep producing their product I am unconcerned with this upper class corporate banter.
|
On December 23 2010 06:48 Gecko wrote: MW2 sucked all the strategy and fun out of the series, I have yet to play Black Ops but i'm hoping all the cheesy crap in black ops will be amusing. Even if the LOLflamethrowers and RC bombs are fun it probably won't change how the dumb killstreak system and bad map design are dragging the series down. Activision wronged IW to begin with so the lawsuit is total BS, as if IW could derail the series any more than activision already had.
There hasn't been a good Modern Warfare since Modern Warfare. There hasn't been a good CoD since CoD2. The CoD series has just gone down hill rather quickly over the years. All these gimmicks are just boring, stupid and repetitive. They make being good at the game easy.
|
On December 23 2010 00:42 Cleomenes wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2010 00:27 seanisgrand wrote: You are pretty lucky you have the CoD bro crowd swaying from your sack like testicular cancer. Says someone from a fan site dedicated to one of Activision's biggest franchises. Face it, if the company continues to make worthwhile games, people will still buy them. That includes me.
its blizzards franchise and blizzards games why people are here. no one gives a shit about activision.
i try to avoid activision games as best as i can. and since i couldnt care less about the crappy COD or X Hero games its not that hard outside of sc2.
|
On December 22 2010 12:46 Amnesia wrote: fucking die in a fire kotick you fucking faggot
User was temp banned for this post.
On December 22 2010 22:00 DorF wrote: GOGO EA , CHALLENGE EVERYTHING
Probably the two best posts in this thread.
On a serious note, as most people have said none of these companies are any good, but imo, Kotick deserves all the hate he can get. Rooting for EA on this one.
|
I don't have anything bad to say about EA since they dropped the whole PUNISH CUSTOMERS WITH DRM policy. They release decent games and don't price based on region on Steam like Activision does.
MoH costs $60 USD as it should because it is new. BC2 costs $30 USD which is reasonable. BC2: Vietnam costs $15 USD which is the same as a MW2 map pack.
MW2 STILL costs $89.99 USD, same as Black Ops.
Not like I buy or want to buy any of the above games because FPS is a dead genre to me. Only Activision game I've bought since the original CoD is SC2.. which I regret.
Just annoys me to see what an awful company Activision is, it's like they have an internal company policy of milking everything dry and then whining about it. It's just a shame Black Ops sold so well
Anyone remember Tony Hawks Pro Skater?
|
CHALLENGE EVERYTHING.
If EA was a religion I'd join.
Bobby Kotick is fucking Sauron the fucking Destroyer. The Fellowship of Electronic Arts is the only thing that stands between him and the ultimate destruction of Middle Earth. I mean the fucking game industry.
Sure, EA might be quite douchy and remake a lot of their games, but so does Activision. This is more about choosing the lesser of two evils. WHICH IN DIS CASE BRO, WOULD BE DEM BITCHES AT EA. SO SUCK MAH BUTTERKNIFE BOBBEH.
+EA's got Bioware so that's like an auto-win.
|
On December 23 2010 02:07 Hieros wrote: But that reminds me, has anyone looked up the caption of this case? I want to look at the briefs myself.
I don't think there's going to be any writing of briefs, at least not until discovery is over, unless they get into a pre-litigation argument over whether EA can be properly included as a cross-defendant.
|
This is like when those two guys you don't like beat the shit out of eachother at school.
|
Lol wow, look at all this melodrama over an issue nobody has full access to. It's kinda funny watching people get convinced that one or the other is correct just because of their personal feelings over how each companies creates and handles their video games. Look, if those guys breached their contract then they deserve to get sued, it's that simple. If they weren't being paid and they breached the contract, then it was void anyway and Activision has no case. But I guess everyone should bust out the pom poms and start cheering for their favorite company as if this was a street fight instead of a legal dispute, lol.
|
|
|
|