Fraps is the program I use to record my games for YouTube, but unfortunately Fraps only has two size settings when recording: Full size or Half size. In StarCraft 2 I can change my resolution to 1280x720 and produce good, crisp-looking 720p videos for YouTube, but basically any tricks I try to upload a 1920x1080 or 1440x1080 picture look miserable because of my monitor's native resolution and Fraps being unable to customize recording size. I do not have access to a 1920x1080 resolution in SC2, so am I basically out of luck until I can afford to upgrade?
Need 1080p help.
Blogs > JoshSuth |
AskJoshy
United States1625 Posts
Fraps is the program I use to record my games for YouTube, but unfortunately Fraps only has two size settings when recording: Full size or Half size. In StarCraft 2 I can change my resolution to 1280x720 and produce good, crisp-looking 720p videos for YouTube, but basically any tricks I try to upload a 1920x1080 or 1440x1080 picture look miserable because of my monitor's native resolution and Fraps being unable to customize recording size. I do not have access to a 1920x1080 resolution in SC2, so am I basically out of luck until I can afford to upgrade? | ||
xmShake
United States1100 Posts
On June 14 2010 06:52 JoshSuth wrote: Hey folks, I've got a retarded native resolution on my monitor, it's 1680x1050. Why they chose to produce such a strange, non-standard size is beyond me, but it's what I have. Fraps is the program I use to record my games for YouTube, but unfortunately Fraps only has two size settings when recording: Full size or Half size. In StarCraft 2 I can change my resolution to 1280x720 and produce good, crisp-looking 720p videos for YouTube, but basically any tricks I try to upload a 1920x1080 or 1440x1080 picture look miserable because of my monitor's native resolution and Fraps being unable to customize recording size. I do not have access to a 1920x1080 resolution in SC2, so am I basically out of luck until I can afford to upgrade? 1680x1050 is not non-standard. It was very popular several years ago before these 16 : 9 monitors became cheap to produce. I actually prefer 16:10 monitors (1680x1050 and 1920x1200) and I think it's a shame that they've become "non-standard" Yes you're out of luck. If your monitor can not physically display 1920x1080 its not possible for starcraft 2 to use this resolution, thus you can't make 1080p videos. Just buy a 1080p monitor if you really want 1080p, they're pretty cheap nowadays. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236053 | ||
Glider
United States1348 Posts
| ||
NevilleS
Canada266 Posts
| ||
udgnim
United States8024 Posts
| ||
QuothTheRaven
United States5524 Posts
Though the only way to get true 1080p footage is to have a 1080p monitor and run Starcraft at 1920x1080. | ||
jgad
Canada899 Posts
On June 14 2010 07:01 xmShake wrote: 1680x1050 is not non-standard. It was very popular several years ago before these 16 : 9 monitors became cheap to produce. I actually prefer 16:10 monitors (1680x1050 and 1920x1200) and I think it's a shame that they've become "non-standard" qft. I run 1920x1200 and I would never trade it for a 1080p display. That bit of extra vertical is so nice when you're doing real work. The ONLY redeeming quality of a 16 : 9 display is that it fits HDTV, which is great for TV, but sucks for everything else. | ||
AskJoshy
United States1625 Posts
| ||
IskatuMesk
Canada969 Posts
The monitor is 24" widescreen. | ||
ffswowsucks
Greece2291 Posts
| ||
JohannesH
Finland1364 Posts
| ||
NevilleS
Canada266 Posts
| ||
| ||