|
On July 15 2016 08:02 Shapelog wrote: Oh shit there actually are blue roles in the game? I mean... I must of been RBed. are you lying about your claim?
hiding behind ambiguity is scummy and i saw no reason for you to claim at that point
|
On July 15 2016 08:06 Damdred wrote: Other mason should claim,.
I'm the other Mason.
|
On July 15 2016 11:33 DCWasabi wrote:I'm the other Mason.
So what does it mean that Snickers is convinced that I am town?
|
Meh tbh I was hoping it would be someone in the Lynch pool.
Well that works tbh
|
Looking at these along with shape, mostly agree... long post from my phone lol.
Wouldnt it make sense that mafia is only hiding in the Kush voters if Snickers is Mafia?
If Snickers is town, then I believe that they could join the bandwagon since lynching a town Snickers would not appear scummy due to his lack of activity. And the vote was pretty close with players like me possibly returning at the last second (and mafia know I'm town).
If Snickers is Mafia, then of course they don't want to Lynch him, unless he was being bussed, but I find that unlikely because how the fuck did that vote not pass if mafia is voting him too, a few unforseen life circumstances aside, lol + O's Razor.
Or is it deeper than this? I don't want to get outplayed by some scum mastermind (cough, shape, cough).
|
No DC, mafia don't even have to hide cuz nothing is happening. They are just having the easiest game.
We should be just hanging everyone switching to kush 1by1 cuz it was soooo obvious. Which way shall we go then, KSC or Snickers?
|
On July 15 2016 14:24 DCWasabi wrote: Looking at these along with shape, mostly agree... long post from my phone lol.
Wouldnt it make sense that mafia is only hiding in the Kush voters if Snickers is Mafia?
If Snickers is town, then I believe that they could join the bandwagon since lynching a town Snickers would not appear scummy due to his lack of activity. And the vote was pretty close with players like me possibly returning at the last second (and mafia know I'm town).
If Snickers is Mafia, then of course they don't want to Lynch him, unless he was being bussed, but I find that unlikely because how the fuck did that vote not pass if mafia is voting him too, a few unforseen life circumstances aside, lol + O's Razor.
Or is it deeper than this? I don't want to get outplayed by some scum mastermind (cough, shape, cough). Basically, 5 votes went through on Snickers. With KSC and emp originally on the wagon aswell, he would've been lynched. Now if he's town, I think they are not too bothered about it but a no-lynch is better for them and switching 1-2 votes is fine. The lazy votes last min kinda look like that. If he's mafia, they absolutely have to have come up with better reasoning for switching away from him cuz it will come back to bite them later on.
Also, 1 of them might be misguided town for whatever reason.
|
On July 15 2016 14:24 DCWasabi wrote: Looking at these along with shape, mostly agree... long post from my phone lol.
Wouldnt it make sense that mafia is only hiding in the Kush voters if Snickers is Mafia?
If Snickers is town, then I believe that they could join the bandwagon since lynching a town Snickers would not appear scummy due to his lack of activity. And the vote was pretty close with players like me possibly returning at the last second (and mafia know I'm town).
If Snickers is Mafia, then of course they don't want to Lynch him, unless he was being bussed, but I find that unlikely because how the fuck did that vote not pass if mafia is voting him too, a few unforseen life circumstances aside, lol + O's Razor.
Or is it deeper than this? I don't want to get outplayed by some scum mastermind (cough, shape, cough).
They don't gain much by lynching him if he's town, scummy townies are what mafia wants to drag into the lategame. They will only attempt to lynch them when they are in danger, while they kill universal townreads and roles.
Overall no lynching almost always favours mafia. We're basically still stuck in D1 cause that lynch didn't happen.
I just have no idea still why kush got killed.
|
Checked his posts which didn't take much time.
I think we're good if we kill snickers for a start, then I might work from the premise that he was killed for his reads.
|
Either way, at least one of KSC/Snickers/emp is mafia for sure and I just don't see emperor ever being town here: Lets go by the facts to start
On July 14 2016 22:51 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 14:24 Skynx wrote:On July 14 2016 05:35 emperorchampion wrote:On July 14 2016 05:31 Skynx wrote:Na man I gotta go sleep, I have to wake up in about 6.5 hours It's gotta be snickers at this point. Don't let this be a no-lynch emp I have faith in you. Oh and if he comes in and pulls out a sicklucker I might just flip tables tomorrow. HA, yeah... take 'er easy! You disappoint me. I know, I'm sorry I was going to switch near the end, but I honestly lost track of time Vote switch happened approx 30 mins to deadline (8:00 being deadline in the timestamp here)
On July 14 2016 07:32 emperorchampion wrote: ##unvote ##vote nnn_thekushmountains However, he was most certainly here on the deadline. He could, if he wanted switched back to Snickers.
On July 14 2016 08:01 emperorchampion wrote: Damdy what do you think about kush's scum lean on you?
But anyway, why did he switched votes still? He knows his priorities:
On July 14 2016 06:54 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 06:43 prplhz wrote: @emperorchampion How do you feel about lynching this Snickers person? Personally I think that kush would be a better lynch since I didn't like his posts and I've found that snickers is straight up null so far. Like I would expect more from kush even from his low effort games. kush > snickers > vorono >> no-lynch are my thoughts atm I guess you meta'd snickers saying that he's active tho? but yet
On July 14 2016 07:46 emperorchampion wrote: I don't see anyone :o
All 5 votes on snickers were locked btw, he's never convincing them to switch. So he needs to get absolutely everyone else to switch which very hard at best as Shape/vorono/Kruppe have been away for a while and is anyway impossible since DCW was confirmed not to be there.
He looks like best lynch to me before we get key information on KSC. Snickers flipping either alignment doesn't change much considering other two, where as if one of them is mafia, Snickers is confirmed mafia. If they're not, we're wasting a lynch on Snickers.
|
On July 15 2016 14:36 Skynx wrote: No DC, mafia don't even have to hide cuz nothing is happening. They are just having the easiest game.
We should be just hanging everyone switching to kush 1by1 cuz it was soooo obvious. Which way shall we go then, KSC or Snickers?
Lol wut. Why would they do it if it was so obvious? If they are just having the easiest game, then they are under no pressure.
They are only having an easy game if Snickers is town, otherwise they were randomly in a tough spot!
Why not start with emp then?
On July 12 2016 15:00 Skynx wrote: I'd wait til 2nd half of D1 to read emp.
This never happened except in your list post... what was your reasoning for thinking emp was towny early on, and how do you feel about him now?
|
aaaand we just posted at same time lol
|
+ Show Spoiler +On July 15 2016 15:04 Skynx wrote:Either way, at least one of KSC/Snickers/emp is mafia for sure and I just don't see emperor ever being town here: Lets go by the facts to start Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 22:51 emperorchampion wrote:On July 14 2016 14:24 Skynx wrote:On July 14 2016 05:35 emperorchampion wrote:On July 14 2016 05:31 Skynx wrote:Na man I gotta go sleep, I have to wake up in about 6.5 hours It's gotta be snickers at this point. Don't let this be a no-lynch emp I have faith in you. Oh and if he comes in and pulls out a sicklucker I might just flip tables tomorrow. HA, yeah... take 'er easy! You disappoint me. I know, I'm sorry I was going to switch near the end, but I honestly lost track of time Vote switch happened approx 30 mins to deadline (8:00 being deadline in the timestamp here) Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 07:32 emperorchampion wrote: ##unvote ##vote nnn_thekushmountains However, he was most certainly here on the deadline. He could, if he wanted switched back to Snickers.Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 08:01 emperorchampion wrote: Damdy what do you think about kush's scum lean on you? But anyway, why did he switched votes still? He knows his priorities: Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 06:54 emperorchampion wrote:On July 14 2016 06:43 prplhz wrote: @emperorchampion How do you feel about lynching this Snickers person? Personally I think that kush would be a better lynch since I didn't like his posts and I've found that snickers is straight up null so far. Like I would expect more from kush even from his low effort games. kush > snickers > vorono >> no-lynch are my thoughts atm I guess you meta'd snickers saying that he's active tho? but yet All 5 votes on snickers were locked btw, he's never convincing them to switch. So he needs to get absolutely everyone else to switch which very hard at best as Shape/vorono/Kruppe have been away for a while and is anyway impossible since DCW was confirmed not to be there. He looks like best lynch to me before we get key information on KSC. Snickers flipping either alignment doesn't change much considering other two, where as if one of them is mafia, Snickers is confirmed mafia. If they're not, we're wasting a lynch on Snickers.
I'm pretty content with this, especially since you answered my question 30 seconds before I asked it.
|
Happy days then You know what to do.
Sorry you rolled mafia 3/3 of your games btw emp lol
|
Most important thing to remember here is emperor did something he knew it was not the right thing to do while being 100% aware of it and then tried to cover it up.
|
On July 15 2016 14:49 Vivax wrote: Checked his posts which didn't take much time.
I think we're good if we kill snickers for a start, then I might work from the premise that he was killed for his reads.
Do you see a disadvantage to starting with somebody other than Snickers, for example emp?
|
On July 15 2016 15:19 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2016 14:49 Vivax wrote: Checked his posts which didn't take much time.
I think we're good if we kill snickers for a start, then I might work from the premise that he was killed for his reads. Do you see a disadvantage to starting with somebody other than Snickers, for example emp? I can answer that since I'm actually so focused on the matter right now lol. Yes there is. As a matter of fact, if there is 2 mafia in the trio, then Snickers is 100% mafia cuz both scum wont be risking that much switching 2 votes on a town to swap from ml to no-l last min.
How not lynching him is totally advantageous is a different story. Snickers vote is not alignment indicative since he should be trying to save hiss ass as either alignments. So if we lynch Snickers and he flips red, we still have to decide between two. If flips green, we still have to decide between two. Meanwhile we lynch KSC/emp and he flips red, we immediately kill snickers. If he flips green, we kill other one and if that one flips green we never kill snickers.
|
On July 15 2016 15:29 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2016 15:19 DCWasabi wrote:On July 15 2016 14:49 Vivax wrote: Checked his posts which didn't take much time.
I think we're good if we kill snickers for a start, then I might work from the premise that he was killed for his reads. Do you see a disadvantage to starting with somebody other than Snickers, for example emp? I can answer that since I'm actually so focused on the matter right now lol. Yes there is. As a matter of fact, if there is 2 mafia in the trio, then Snickers is 100% mafia cuz both scum wont be risking that much switching 2 votes on a town to swap from ml to no-l last min. How not lynching him is totally advantageous is a different story. Snickers vote is not alignment indicative since he should be trying to save hiss ass as either alignments. So if we lynch Snickers and he flips red, we still have to decide between two. If flips green, we still have to decide between two. Meanwhile we lynch KSC/emp and he flips red, we immediately kill snickers. If he flips green, we kill other one and if that one flips green we never kill snickers.
I love it. I think we should do this.
But... I want to add one little piece to the end. If they both flip green, we lynch you next.
I think I'm Paranoid. ##Vote: emperorchampion
|
|
On July 15 2016 15:47 DCWasabi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2016 15:29 Skynx wrote:On July 15 2016 15:19 DCWasabi wrote:On July 15 2016 14:49 Vivax wrote: Checked his posts which didn't take much time.
I think we're good if we kill snickers for a start, then I might work from the premise that he was killed for his reads. Do you see a disadvantage to starting with somebody other than Snickers, for example emp? I can answer that since I'm actually so focused on the matter right now lol. Yes there is. As a matter of fact, if there is 2 mafia in the trio, then Snickers is 100% mafia cuz both scum wont be risking that much switching 2 votes on a town to swap from ml to no-l last min. How not lynching him is totally advantageous is a different story. Snickers vote is not alignment indicative since he should be trying to save hiss ass as either alignments. So if we lynch Snickers and he flips red, we still have to decide between two. If flips green, we still have to decide between two. Meanwhile we lynch KSC/emp and he flips red, we immediately kill snickers. If he flips green, we kill other one and if that one flips green we never kill snickers. I love it. I think we should do this. But... I want to add one little piece to the end. If they both flip green, we lynch you next. I think I'm Paranoid. ##Vote: emperorchampion Hmm okay, can you vote for Snickers? Do you seriously think there's any chance we're lynching emperorchampion over Snickers today? Do you want another no-lynch?
Can you vote for Snickers?
|
|
|
|