On May 02 2015 02:01 SharkStarcraft wrote: uk BlinG is at 0.01% Blizzcon Chances. 19.8% of the time they win this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0%. 80.2% of the time they lose this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0.01%.
so if bling loses he has a better chance of going to blizzcon than if he wins? :D
margin of error, there aren't enough samples for when Bling wins since it's pretty unlikely combined with how unlikely he is to qualify for Blizzcon
you are saying that Bling as a progamer is a statistical mistake?
On May 02 2015 02:01 SharkStarcraft wrote: uk BlinG is at 0.01% Blizzcon Chances. 19.8% of the time they win this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0%. 80.2% of the time they lose this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0.01%.
so if bling loses he has a better chance of going to blizzcon than if he wins? :D
margin of error, there aren't enough samples for when Bling wins since it's pretty unlikely combined with how unlikely he is to qualify for Blizzcon
you are saying that Bling as a progamer is a statistical mistake?
That could make a sick and clickbaity headline : "Progamer scientifically proved to be a statistical mistake"
On May 02 2015 02:01 SharkStarcraft wrote: uk BlinG is at 0.01% Blizzcon Chances. 19.8% of the time they win this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0%. 80.2% of the time they lose this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0.01%.
so if bling loses he has a better chance of going to blizzcon than if he wins? :D
margin of error, there aren't enough samples for when Bling wins since it's pretty unlikely combined with how unlikely he is to qualify for Blizzcon
you are saying that Bling as a progamer is a statistical mistake?
That could make a sick and clickbaity headline : "Progamer scientifically proved to be a statistical mistake"
On May 02 2015 02:01 SharkStarcraft wrote: uk BlinG is at 0.01% Blizzcon Chances. 19.8% of the time they win this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0%. 80.2% of the time they lose this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0.01%.
so if bling loses he has a better chance of going to blizzcon than if he wins? :D
margin of error, there aren't enough samples for when Bling wins since it's pretty unlikely combined with how unlikely he is to qualify for Blizzcon
you are saying that Bling as a progamer is a statistical mistake?
That could make a sick and clickbaity headline : "Progamer scientifically proved to be a statistical mistake"
Can Foreigners Even Be Considered Real?
How Can Foreigners Be Real If Their Blizzcon Chances Aren't Real?
On May 02 2015 02:01 SharkStarcraft wrote: uk BlinG is at 0.01% Blizzcon Chances. 19.8% of the time they win this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0%. 80.2% of the time they lose this match and their Blizzcon Chances go to 0.01%.
so if bling loses he has a better chance of going to blizzcon than if he wins? :D
margin of error, there aren't enough samples for when Bling wins since it's pretty unlikely combined with how unlikely he is to qualify for Blizzcon
you are saying that Bling as a progamer is a statistical mistake?
That could make a sick and clickbaity headline : "Progamer scientifically proved to be a statistical mistake"
Can Foreigners Even Be Considered Real?
How Can Foreigners Be Real If Their Blizzcon Chances Aren't Real?