|
Yeah well I'll just sit back quietly voting for Scumeling. You guys can do what you want.
|
On May 22 2014 10:29 geript wrote: Yeah well I'll just sit back quietly voting for Scumeling. You guys can do what you want.
We won't forget about him.
Not for a long time.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 22 2014 10:27 Cavalinho wrote: Christ sqrt your reads are so bad I swear.
I'm actually legit considering HF super confirmed town because you scumread him. You scumread people for the worst reasons, and it isn't even a tell because you played like this last time too.
The fuck.
Also, I'm gonna take my vote off of Steve because I'm pretty sure geript can just shoot him during the night sequence, and he probably isn't getting lynched anyway.
so who's scum other than steve now?
|
On May 22 2014 10:30 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:27 Cavalinho wrote: Christ sqrt your reads are so bad I swear.
I'm actually legit considering HF super confirmed town because you scumread him. You scumread people for the worst reasons, and it isn't even a tell because you played like this last time too.
The fuck.
Also, I'm gonna take my vote off of Steve because I'm pretty sure geript can just shoot him during the night sequence, and he probably isn't getting lynched anyway. so who's scum other than steve now?
I have no goddamn clue.
I'm probably just going to sheep Foolishness because his mtam case seemed pretty good.
|
On May 22 2014 09:41 Holyflare wrote: austin are you still around? you still want to lynch ritoky even though half your case on him fell through? Wasn't. Now am.
No, don't want to lynch him today. Part of my case is not there. Him being worried about people who think they can catch scum is still scummy to me, and I'm still not buying the small game --> big game = wishy washy thing that people seem to like.
But part of my case WAS bass ackwards, and...I don't know what to do with his responses to me. Like he posts a new single post that's a list of people, answers me on a thing, then jets. If all we get is list list list, don't forget him. Will unvote.
On May 22 2014 10:22 sqrtofneg1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:20 Holyflare wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:16 Holyflare wrote: well let's talk through this read on me then because i get a feeling i already know what you'll say about cav and your read on me is really strange because half of it was disproved
so what part of my play is different that makes you think i'm scum? would i be so "carefree" if i was trying to push lynches on not-scum? carefree isn't something i associate with mafia play Yeah, carefree isn't the best word. But something is different. I'm not sure what, but something is different. well like i said to steve at the start of the game i'd drop any of that line of thinking because i'm most definitely town and you'll be wasting your time seeing as you think i'm scum, do you disagree with my lists i've been posting then? you seem to agree with a few names i've been putting up but still maintain that i'm scum which is strange that it's not evolved over that period of time I agree with quite a few of the names you have in your lists, almost all, actually. But I do still think that you're scum. Can you...go through what you're thinking here? You agree with a bunch of reads, do you agree with the reasoning that HF uses or just the idea that this guy and that guy are mafia?
|
On May 22 2014 09:15 mattisfoolish wrote: Austin, I'm not sure what your purpose was in asking me that question. Are you looking for proof that I am who I say I am? It's in the hydra name and signature. I don't think there's a specific rule about lying about this sort of thing but I feel it would be in bad taste to do so. Was, but drop it, ongoing game, etc.
That one post on slam just read very unlike other posts of yours, imo, if you're Foolishness. Not sure if bad taste or next level smurf/hydra strats to fakeclaim the person behind the keyboard.
|
So cav jumps on the crazy train with geript about me. After I proved the whole meta ordeal wrong he casually lifts his vote off me. Meanwhile he completely ignored my post as to why he's thinking I'm scum and suddenly, right when his name is targeted he miraculously appears to defend himself!!
Such miracle.
|
On May 22 2014 10:35 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:22 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:20 Holyflare wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:16 Holyflare wrote: well let's talk through this read on me then because i get a feeling i already know what you'll say about cav and your read on me is really strange because half of it was disproved
so what part of my play is different that makes you think i'm scum? would i be so "carefree" if i was trying to push lynches on not-scum? carefree isn't something i associate with mafia play Yeah, carefree isn't the best word. But something is different. I'm not sure what, but something is different. well like i said to steve at the start of the game i'd drop any of that line of thinking because i'm most definitely town and you'll be wasting your time seeing as you think i'm scum, do you disagree with my lists i've been posting then? you seem to agree with a few names i've been putting up but still maintain that i'm scum which is strange that it's not evolved over that period of time I agree with quite a few of the names you have in your lists, almost all, actually. But I do still think that you're scum. Can you...go through what you're thinking here? You agree with a bunch of reads, do you agree with the reasoning that HF uses or just the idea that this guy and that guy are mafia? I like his reasoning and his reads. But I do still think that he's mafia.
|
On May 22 2014 10:45 Steveling wrote: So cav jumps on the crazy train with geript about me. After I proved the whole meta ordeal wrong he casually lifts his vote off me. Meanwhile he completely ignored my post as to why he's thinking I'm scum and suddenly, right when his name is targeted he miraculously appears to defend himself!!
Such miracle.
I'm confident that you're going to get shot tonight, so why bother trying to lynch you?
I've seen nothing to make me change my read on you. Have fun being dead.
|
On May 22 2014 10:47 Cavalinho wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:45 Steveling wrote: So cav jumps on the crazy train with geript about me. After I proved the whole meta ordeal wrong he casually lifts his vote off me. Meanwhile he completely ignored my post as to why he's thinking I'm scum and suddenly, right when his name is targeted he miraculously appears to defend himself!!
Such miracle. I'm confident that you're going to get shot tonight, so why bother trying to lynch you? I've seen nothing to make me change my read on you. Have fun being dead.
Can you explain why I'm scum according to you? Also my shield will protect me.
|
On May 22 2014 10:46 sqrtofneg1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:35 austinmcc wrote:On May 22 2014 10:22 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:20 Holyflare wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:16 Holyflare wrote: well let's talk through this read on me then because i get a feeling i already know what you'll say about cav and your read on me is really strange because half of it was disproved
so what part of my play is different that makes you think i'm scum? would i be so "carefree" if i was trying to push lynches on not-scum? carefree isn't something i associate with mafia play Yeah, carefree isn't the best word. But something is different. I'm not sure what, but something is different. well like i said to steve at the start of the game i'd drop any of that line of thinking because i'm most definitely town and you'll be wasting your time seeing as you think i'm scum, do you disagree with my lists i've been posting then? you seem to agree with a few names i've been putting up but still maintain that i'm scum which is strange that it's not evolved over that period of time I agree with quite a few of the names you have in your lists, almost all, actually. But I do still think that you're scum. Can you...go through what you're thinking here? You agree with a bunch of reads, do you agree with the reasoning that HF uses or just the idea that this guy and that guy are mafia? I like his reasoning and his reads. But I do still think that he's mafia. Any in particular you like more than others or dislike? I can understand agreeing with "modkillable" and stuff that summarizes as "low/no activity" on just general grounds, but a LOT of the reasoning at least in the main list is that.
|
On May 22 2014 10:49 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:46 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:35 austinmcc wrote:On May 22 2014 10:22 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:20 Holyflare wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:16 Holyflare wrote: well let's talk through this read on me then because i get a feeling i already know what you'll say about cav and your read on me is really strange because half of it was disproved
so what part of my play is different that makes you think i'm scum? would i be so "carefree" if i was trying to push lynches on not-scum? carefree isn't something i associate with mafia play Yeah, carefree isn't the best word. But something is different. I'm not sure what, but something is different. well like i said to steve at the start of the game i'd drop any of that line of thinking because i'm most definitely town and you'll be wasting your time seeing as you think i'm scum, do you disagree with my lists i've been posting then? you seem to agree with a few names i've been putting up but still maintain that i'm scum which is strange that it's not evolved over that period of time I agree with quite a few of the names you have in your lists, almost all, actually. But I do still think that you're scum. Can you...go through what you're thinking here? You agree with a bunch of reads, do you agree with the reasoning that HF uses or just the idea that this guy and that guy are mafia? I like his reasoning and his reads. But I do still think that he's mafia. Any in particular you like more than others or dislike? I can understand agreeing with "modkillable" and stuff that summarizes as "low/no activity" on just general grounds, but a LOT of the reasoning at least in the main list is that.
I think you're town. Jampi and Ceph are higher up in my list. Thrawn seems town.
|
On May 22 2014 10:48 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:47 Cavalinho wrote:On May 22 2014 10:45 Steveling wrote: So cav jumps on the crazy train with geript about me. After I proved the whole meta ordeal wrong he casually lifts his vote off me. Meanwhile he completely ignored my post as to why he's thinking I'm scum and suddenly, right when his name is targeted he miraculously appears to defend himself!!
Such miracle. I'm confident that you're going to get shot tonight, so why bother trying to lynch you? I've seen nothing to make me change my read on you. Have fun being dead. Can you explain why I'm scum according to you? Also my shield will protect me.
Go reread my case. Nothing I think about you matters anymore.
|
On May 22 2014 10:51 Cavalinho wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:48 Steveling wrote:On May 22 2014 10:47 Cavalinho wrote:On May 22 2014 10:45 Steveling wrote: So cav jumps on the crazy train with geript about me. After I proved the whole meta ordeal wrong he casually lifts his vote off me. Meanwhile he completely ignored my post as to why he's thinking I'm scum and suddenly, right when his name is targeted he miraculously appears to defend himself!!
Such miracle. I'm confident that you're going to get shot tonight, so why bother trying to lynch you? I've seen nothing to make me change my read on you. Have fun being dead. Can you explain why I'm scum according to you? Also my shield will protect me. Go reread my case. Nothing I think about you matters anymore.
Right. You deny to explain. Well you are scum.
|
Holy shit you're annoying.
|
On May 22 2014 10:51 sqrtofneg1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:49 austinmcc wrote:On May 22 2014 10:46 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:35 austinmcc wrote:On May 22 2014 10:22 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:20 Holyflare wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:16 Holyflare wrote: well let's talk through this read on me then because i get a feeling i already know what you'll say about cav and your read on me is really strange because half of it was disproved
so what part of my play is different that makes you think i'm scum? would i be so "carefree" if i was trying to push lynches on not-scum? carefree isn't something i associate with mafia play Yeah, carefree isn't the best word. But something is different. I'm not sure what, but something is different. well like i said to steve at the start of the game i'd drop any of that line of thinking because i'm most definitely town and you'll be wasting your time seeing as you think i'm scum, do you disagree with my lists i've been posting then? you seem to agree with a few names i've been putting up but still maintain that i'm scum which is strange that it's not evolved over that period of time I agree with quite a few of the names you have in your lists, almost all, actually. But I do still think that you're scum. Can you...go through what you're thinking here? You agree with a bunch of reads, do you agree with the reasoning that HF uses or just the idea that this guy and that guy are mafia? I like his reasoning and his reads. But I do still think that he's mafia. Any in particular you like more than others or dislike? I can understand agreeing with "modkillable" and stuff that summarizes as "low/no activity" on just general grounds, but a LOT of the reasoning at least in the main list is that. I think you're town. Jampi and Ceph are higher up in my list. Thrawn seems town. What made you go fromOn May 21 2014 12:04 sqrtofneg1 wrote: @Ceph, I disagree on your case. I think bunnies is mafia. However, I don't think you're mafia. Although it's a bit strange you went straight for her, I think you're town. I would, however, like to see what your reads are, other than bunnies. to wanting to lynch him andOn May 22 2014 10:21 sqrtofneg1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:19 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Oh, and I want to lynch Ceph too. Why Ceph? Regardless of what you are reading me as, what do you think of Ceph's case on me? I don't like how Ceph jumped right on you, as soon as he came into the thread. Plus, as many others have stated, the case itself isn't all that good. Like, what's the reason behind the transition from "this is wonky but I think you're town" ---> "that was wonky and I want to lynch you"
|
On May 22 2014 10:56 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:51 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:49 austinmcc wrote:On May 22 2014 10:46 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:35 austinmcc wrote:On May 22 2014 10:22 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:20 Holyflare wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:16 Holyflare wrote: well let's talk through this read on me then because i get a feeling i already know what you'll say about cav and your read on me is really strange because half of it was disproved
so what part of my play is different that makes you think i'm scum? would i be so "carefree" if i was trying to push lynches on not-scum? carefree isn't something i associate with mafia play Yeah, carefree isn't the best word. But something is different. I'm not sure what, but something is different. well like i said to steve at the start of the game i'd drop any of that line of thinking because i'm most definitely town and you'll be wasting your time seeing as you think i'm scum, do you disagree with my lists i've been posting then? you seem to agree with a few names i've been putting up but still maintain that i'm scum which is strange that it's not evolved over that period of time I agree with quite a few of the names you have in your lists, almost all, actually. But I do still think that you're scum. Can you...go through what you're thinking here? You agree with a bunch of reads, do you agree with the reasoning that HF uses or just the idea that this guy and that guy are mafia? I like his reasoning and his reads. But I do still think that he's mafia. Any in particular you like more than others or dislike? I can understand agreeing with "modkillable" and stuff that summarizes as "low/no activity" on just general grounds, but a LOT of the reasoning at least in the main list is that. I think you're town. Jampi and Ceph are higher up in my list. Thrawn seems town. What made you go from Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 12:04 sqrtofneg1 wrote: @Ceph, I disagree on your case. I think bunnies is mafia. However, I don't think you're mafia. Although it's a bit strange you went straight for her, I think you're town. I would, however, like to see what your reads are, other than bunnies. to wanting to lynch him and Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:21 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 22 2014 10:19 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 22 2014 10:18 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Oh, and I want to lynch Ceph too. Why Ceph? Regardless of what you are reading me as, what do you think of Ceph's case on me? I don't like how Ceph jumped right on you, as soon as he came into the thread. Plus, as many others have stated, the case itself isn't all that good. Like, what's the reason behind the transition from "this is wonky but I think you're town" ---> "that was wonky and I want to lynch you" He didn't do, and still hasn't done anything after.
|
On May 22 2014 10:24 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 10:23 layabout wrote: Looking at tamburini i think the most worrying thing is how quiet he (she?) has gone
holy i think bkqyr posts make decent sense and they are confident to say things that no one else is i might choose to interpret this as town but even if i don't i see no reason to lynch bkqyr
i like kush's posting and after scrapping a case i also like hapa hapa scrapped a case? or do you mean austin? as in i wrote stuff about happa then scrapped it because i found something.
Ima go to bed soon
Currently i could support lynches on: jampidampi - unsupported vote that looks to be jumping on a wagon to disappear tamburini -started enthusiatic and with some messy posts gone quiet for over 24 hours having come under pressure possibly worried to post koshi - very many posts but nothing substantial, hiding behind sheeping WoS - watching the thread but not adding to it alakaslam nothing of value + disruptive
|
As in, he came in, interacted with bunnies, and then disappeared.
|
On May 22 2014 10:55 Cavalinho wrote: Holy shit you're annoying.
Great argument.
|
|
|
|