GSL Open Mini Mafia - Page 5
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
I can't believe that Risen can be serious about this. It's three posts into the game and the two posts before me were nonsense. He is actually trying to make a full case on me and I just can't believe he is serious about this. No benefit of the dumb here. Contrast this with his first vote in his latest game (clink). It's a pressure vote for someone who made a dumb vote but it's a while into the game and it's got more of a "whim" feeling about it. This looks a lot more careful but [u]we're three dumb posts into the game. I just can't believe this. ##Vote Risen[/url] | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Fuck it. I can't believe that Risen can be serious about this. It's three posts into the game and the two posts before me were nonsense. He is actually trying to make a full case on me and I just can't believe he is serious about this. No benefit of the dumb here. Contrast this with his first vote in his latest game (clink). It's a pressure vote for someone who made a dumb vote but it's a while into the game and it's got more of a "whim" feeling about it. This looks a lot more careful but we're three dumb posts into the game. I just can't believe this. ##Vote Risen | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On the other hand, a rule that seems to work a lot is Kenpachi Rule extended: everytime someone cares about some bullshit from the first post of a player, he's scum. This applies for both prplhz and Risen here, but only one of them is an OMGUS. That was quick huh ##vote prplhz | ||
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On September 06 2012 06:43 Zephirdd wrote: Risen is not scum, or at least he doesn't look scum based on meta. I could tell you why, but it's information about an ongoing game. Suffice to say he flipped scum there and he looked very differently from these initial three posts. On the other hand, a rule that seems to work a lot is Kenpachi Rule extended: everytime someone cares about some bullshit from the first post of a player, he's scum. This applies for both prplhz and Risen here, but only one of them is an OMGUS. That was quick huh ##vote prplhz Something to look at later. Why not just say I don't look scum based off meta? Scummy brosephemon. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Kenpachi rule my ass. It looks to me like you're thinking "Hmm, I should vote for either Risen or prplhz.. I guess I'll go for prplhz" and then you cling to whatever dumb rule instead of trying to form an opinion yourself. | ||
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On September 06 2012 06:57 prplhz wrote: Could you explain to me how my vote qualifies as an OMGUS and how this makes me scum? Kenpachi rule my ass. It looks to me like you're thinking "Hmm, I should vote for either Risen or prplhz.. I guess I'll go for prplhz" and then you cling to whatever dumb rule instead of trying to form an opinion yourself. He's saying instead of defending yourself you took the oh my god he sucks route and voted me. | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On September 06 2012 06:59 Risen wrote: He's saying instead of defending yourself you took the oh my god he sucks route and voted me. I don't think so. I think he's saying that you first post was Kenpachi Rule based on prplhz's first post. Then prplhz Kenpachi Rule'd you first post, and added OMGUS. Kenpachi Rule < Kenpachi Rule + OMGUS is basically what he was trying to say I think. The math makes sense, but the premise doesn't necessarily. I've seen plenty of townies go out of their way to make bogus cases based on someone's first post just to get discussion started. I don't think its particularly alignment telling. | ||
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:03 Keirathi wrote: I don't think so. I think he's saying that you first post was Kenpachi Rule based on prplhz's first post. Then prplhz Kenpachi Rule'd you first post, and added OMGUS. Kenpachi Rule < Kenpachi Rule + OMGUS is basically what he was trying to say I think. The math makes sense, but the premise doesn't necessarily. I've seen plenty of townies go out of their way to make bogus cases based on someone's first post just to get discussion started. I don't think its particularly alignment telling. -> Post based on someone's first post to get discussion started = Risen -> OMGUS on someone's first post because of that = prplhz One of these is scummy. Hint: I have my vote on him | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
stop being dumb | ||
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
@Keirathi Do you actually have an opinion or are you satisfied just trying to clarify stuff that other people said? | ||
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:06 marvellosity wrote: prplhz's vote is definitely not worse than Risen's stop being dumb You know very well my first post was meant to start discussion and point out some mildly scummy things prpl had said in his post. Then he comes back with an extreme overreaction in the form of OMGUS? Scum. | ||
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:10 prplhz wrote: I'm not really going to defend myself against your case because it is beyond horrible. It's "You are friendly and confident and you are going to rely 100% on other people's opinion on Ange777 instead of forming your own this makes you scum". Yes, this is your case. First argument makes no sense, second argument is speculating about what I might or might not do in the future which makes it void. It's like if I speculated that you were going to claim scum in the future and then I'll just vote for you now because of it. Zephirdd's case makes no sense because my vote wasn't an OMGUS, his entire post is sketchy. @Keirathi Do you actually have an opinion or are you satisfied just trying to clarify stuff that other people said? There is no defense for you at this point if you keep digging yourself a hole. It's early in the day, relax and just scumhunt as the day goes on. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:10 Risen wrote: You know very well my first post was meant to start discussion and point out some mildly scummy things prpl had said in his post. Then he comes back with an extreme overreaction in the form of OMGUS? Scum. No it wasn't. I asked you if you were serious and then you pretty much said "Yes". You wrote "Man this is so quiet" and then I asked you what the hell you were doing and then it took you 10 mins to write a carefully written 6 line bullshit case about 5 posts into the game. It doesn't look at all like you were just trying to start discussion which was what I was trying to make sure before considering to vote you. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
he called you out on your bs and he stuck a vote on the end. like whatever. | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On September 06 2012 07:10 prplhz wrote: I'm not really going to defend myself against your case because it is beyond horrible. It's "You are friendly and confident and you are going to rely 100% on other people's opinion on Ange777 instead of forming your own this makes you scum". Yes, this is your case. First argument makes no sense, second argument is speculating about what I might or might not do in the future which makes it void. It's like if I speculated that you were going to claim scum in the future and then I'll just vote for you now because of it. Zephirdd's case makes no sense because my vote wasn't an OMGUS, his entire post is sketchy. @Keirathi Do you actually have an opinion or are you satisfied just trying to clarify stuff that other people said? What is there to have an opinion about? Both votes are almost equally dumb, but I'm not sure how to read them alignment wise. TL Mafia in general is full of dumb early votes that almost never actually catch scum. This recent post brings up some more questions though. If you weren't "really going to defend [yourself] against [his] case because it is beyond horrible", then why did you feel the need to OMGUS his vote with a vote of your own? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
| ||