|
Chaoser, indeed. WBG Layabout Qualis my reads, top being the strongest. They are crumbling though. Most of the suspicion on WBG comes on soft-defense of Sheth and ressurecting Schworz and being backed up by individuals like BM. Layabout.. Terrible pictures useless at the beginning and actively lurking voted cc without reason only defends himself Qualis defending Kenpachi saying that claiming d1 is completly fine and gives no info or indication of alignment
|
On February 08 2012 12:10 kitaman27 wrote: kurumi, if you're trying to blue claim to dodge the lynch, give us a name. You already claimed vig so its not like its going to make the scum less likely to hit you and if you're not counter-claimed, you can shut down all this lynch discussion and focus on what's important. I am not trying to dodge the lynch, I don't give a fuck. Lynch me, fine. I understand why You're thinking that's a good decision. No need for claiming anything. Let's say, stars aligned perfectly with something. Somehow I am on a vig spree lately.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 08 2012 12:14 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 12:10 kitaman27 wrote: kurumi, if you're trying to blue claim to dodge the lynch, give us a name. You already claimed vig so its not like its going to make the scum less likely to hit you and if you're not counter-claimed, you can shut down all this lynch discussion and focus on what's important. I am not trying to dodge the lynch, I don't give a fuck. Lynch me, fine. I understand why You're thinking that's a good decision. No need for claiming anything. Let's say, stars aligned perfectly with something. Somehow I am on a vig spree lately.
You agree that it would be a pro-town move to name claim though correct? You already claimed vig so there is no harm. That way we can stop talking about you and whether or not your claim is real. Thanks.
|
Ok then why did you first push for a lynch change onto layabout, and then sheth, and then qualis? Why not stick to trying to change the lynch to one person instead of jumping around like that? It looks like your goal isn't to lynch someone you think is scummy but rather to get the lynch off Cyber_cheese. Also, since you switched around on them so much, it seems like you think all three are equally likely to be mafia when I'm sure that's not the case. As you said yourself, you think WBG is the scummiest. And yet where's WBG in all this?
Your votes from when it started to matter:
On February 08 2012 10:28 Kurumi wrote: ##vote layabout
On February 08 2012 10:38 Kurumi wrote: ##unvote ##vote Liquid'Sheth
On February 08 2012 11:59 Kurumi wrote: ##vote -_-qualis
|
I just read Jayjay54s case. It's not worth picking apart but I'll address it generally. I'm a spammy player who second guesses himself a lot. I switch votes a ton and I'm very gullible. It's a habit I'm trying to curb and I've taken note of my bad early play here.
Why am I the only player taking heat for talking about third parties? Because I'm pointing out the anti-town motives of the other players who are addressing it. When people don't understand what I'm saying and ask me questions about it, don't blame me for answering, thanks.
I don't buy that WBG's case on rG was so terrible either. I still think CC is the better vote. He tunneled Kenpachi way too hard and wasn't really able to make a strong case for it. We all know his little green claims are stupid. He claimed it's just a random useless vote when he got pressured for his shitty case even though it was obvious he was trying to get votes on Kenpachi. And he FoS's and unvotes in the same post. If someone can explain to me what was so shitty about that case please do, I'll go ahead and listen, if I'm wrong I'll admit it. I've already learned a bit and changed my mind coming into this game and reading a little bit of L. I put my vote there and was as of yet unsure if I wanted to push Cyber_Cheese who was, at the time, my #1 scum read. I think I explained my reluctance in the mason group, maybe I didn't, but I dislike voting for players who attack me right away because I'm a very emotional player and there have been a lot of games as town where I've wrongly convinced myself a player was scum because they criticized me too much.
That is what it is. I'm pretty sure CC is batman/mafia anyhow, unless he really is as bad as WBG claims.
|
Hey Kurumi, if you're the vig you might as well tell us which one right? Surely, no harm in that.
|
My train of thought WBG is scummy. No way of swinging lynch on him. He defends Sheth, high probability of being scumbuddies. Proceed to vote Sheth. Then I get caught in my stupidity. My faith in my read on WBG crumbles. CC is the guy I never investigated because I tunneled people I've seen on my scum list. Layabout is on me now, was on CC. No way to get him up for lynch either. Forfeit him in favor of WBG. Then I get caught on being narrowminded and that most of my reads are for shreds. Although, Qualis still rubs me wrong way. Low activity, scummy behaviour, like, I can't be that wrong.
|
If you're the vig tell us which one. Don't you dare dodge.
|
On February 08 2012 12:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote: If you're the vig tell us which one. Don't you dare dodge. Vigilantes are in the danger zone. I refuse.
|
The scum already knows you're a vig. Tell us which one. You have absolutely nothing to lose by telling unless you're scum worried about getting caught in a fake claim.
|
WBG is scummy. No way of swinging lynch on him.
I don't understand this point...If he's your most scummiest, can't you make a effortpost on why he is scummy to you? And thus get people to lynch him? Why not take a stance instead of being wishy washy? I see stuff that you wrote on him but they're spread all over and seem weak in general. Why not just make a big post on why you think he's scummy?
Also, like people said, you claimed you are vigi, might as well give the name. Regardless, you're going to get shot tonight.
Also, STOP FUCKING CLAIMING EVERYONE
|
On the off-chance I die, look into all the people that called my plan anti-town.
|
On February 08 2012 12:25 DoctorHelvetica wrote: The scum already knows you're a vig. Tell us which one. You have absolutely nothing to lose by telling unless you're scum worried about getting caught in a fake claim.
I think attracting three bullets during the night is better than one. No.
|
You have one hope at surviving this game which is getting your name out (scum will hit a vig why wouldn't they?) which will confirm you are who you say you are when no one challenges you, then getting medic protection. You know you can at least survive tonight so the mafia gets your KP, you don't care what happens since you're toast on Day 2 probably so just spill it
|
On February 08 2012 12:26 Cyber_Cheese wrote: On the off-chance I die, look into all the people that called my plan anti-town. No one is taking that seriously except you, I trashed your shitty plan already so drop it.
|
On February 08 2012 12:26 chaoser wrote:I don't understand this point...If he's your most scummiest, can't you make a effortpost on why he is scummy to you? And thus get people to lynch him? Why not take a stance instead of being wishy washy? I see stuff that you wrote on him but they're spread all over and seem weak in general. Why not just make a big post on why you think he's scummy? Also, like people said, you claimed you are vigi, might as well give the name. Regardless, you're going to get shot tonight. Also, STOP FUCKING CLAIMING EVERYONE The last time I made a big post on someone and the first time I believe was Merc Mini 2, pushing Radfield the Town Day One. I was Town.
|
On February 08 2012 12:26 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 12:25 DoctorHelvetica wrote: The scum already knows you're a vig. Tell us which one. You have absolutely nothing to lose by telling unless you're scum worried about getting caught in a fake claim.
I think attracting three bullets during the night is better than one. No.
well ok that makes sense
|
In case You did not get it: I suck at making cases, choosing targets and pushing them. I am a lot better at using my gun, though.
|
Why would mafia waste three bullets on you if you don't say name versus only one if you do? That doesn't make sense unless you're the Joker. If you're the Joker you're still gonna get guarded. Your argument is as impressive as wet clay.
|
On February 08 2012 12:28 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 12:26 Cyber_Cheese wrote: On the off-chance I die, look into all the people that called my plan anti-town. No one is taking that seriously except you, I trashed your shitty plan already so drop it. Catwoman had her way, and that's regretful. That doesn't mean it was a bad plan.
|
|
|
|