|
On August 20 2009 10:07 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2009 10:05 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: I dunno what we are supposed to talk about either. JimTudor's illogical reasoning would be a good place to start. I agree. Wasting KP never helps the town. All we gain from letting the day pass without a lynch is info about 1 dead player and who the mafia may fear/think is blue. We have to talk about suspects and force the mafia to post/make a stand.
|
On August 20 2009 10:26 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: just got back - rereading but first thigns i have noticed is that foolishness is making sense and qatol has voted w/out posting Qatol posted..... Reread yo.
|
On August 20 2009 10:27 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2009 10:24 SugiuraMidori wrote: As I explained to Qatol.. I picked the person whose name was most known to me in the not-yet-posted list.
Notice how two people have now voted for Zato-1, causing a tie with Ace... that would end in a no lynch tie... c'mon folks.. don't let it end like that.. it only helps the mafia. wait wtf tie results in no lynch? that seems like a bad rule to me, especially in such a small game where ties are very likely. 6. If the final vote count shows a tie between the top two candidates, the day ends with a no lynch. We will have to keep close tabs on this
|
Ok no deaths. So either vet took a hit or medic stopped one. Medic is NOT INFORMED they made a save nor is their target informed of a save. Vet is informed, but they should not claim the hit because it confirms their role
|
EBWOP: however, when medic dies, vet should claim if they took a hit. We don't want to hand the mafia new info, but we want to have as much info as possible without giving them anything new
|
On August 20 2009 10:40 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Well if it's a medic, claim to who you protted. Absolutely not. The medic doesn't know they made a save.
|
On August 20 2009 10:48 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2009 10:44 Zato-1 wrote: Okay, so. I'm still suspicious of SatouxKisei, because he was really fast to defend himself but he isn't contributing much. Anyone have a better suspect? I agree with this. I can agree with this too. It also fits his play from the other game he was mafia. He was a bit implusive with his voting.
|
EBWOP: I mean BC game 2. Kisei = Heavonearth
|
On August 20 2009 10:51 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2009 10:50 Qatol wrote:On August 20 2009 10:48 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On August 20 2009 10:44 Zato-1 wrote: Okay, so. I'm still suspicious of SatouxKisei, because he was really fast to defend himself but he isn't contributing much. Anyone have a better suspect? I agree with this. I can agree with this too. It also fits his play from the other game he was mafia. He was a bit implusive with his voting. Yeah, maybe he is too impulsive. When he was mafia he never voted as crazy before... Yes he did. His election vote (the only vote he did without asking first) was insane. He voted sog without sog even running (sog was in our family).
|
On August 20 2009 10:58 Ace wrote: can someone update me on everything that happened? I skimmed and saw people suggesting to lynch me? You were inactive. Lynch day 1 was because JimTudor advocated not lynching anyone (which doesn't give us any info). Mafia didn't get any hits so either they hit the vet or the medic blocked (medic isn't informed of prots so we can't be told which) and then we decided Kisei was a bit fast in defending himself, which fits his profile when mafia.
|
On August 20 2009 11:08 Ace wrote: Actually I really was playing DOTA. I really did forget about the game. If I was Mafia do you really think I'd make myself suspicious like this? How can we believe a comment like that? Your play is UNPREDICTABLE!
|
Ver says day post is delayed because he can't check his PMs due to TL lagging
|
On August 20 2009 11:24 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2009 11:22 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: on the other hand both Foolishness and Midori accused Chezinu yesterday Why would we kill him then if we were mafia? Agreed. If anything, it makes them LESS suspicious, not more. Why put a bunch of suspicion on someone only to kill them?
|
I think we should lynch Infundibulum. Look at his posts on this page. He is throwing out names rather quickly with just one line justifications of each suspect hoping we will latch onto them. This is throwing up red flags to me
|
On August 20 2009 11:39 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2009 11:37 Foolishness wrote:On August 20 2009 11:36 Ace wrote: hold on a sec. Three of you voted for Inf out of no where with barely any reasoning except that he's throwing names out. That happens every mafia game. And Foolishness voted for Inf out of no where first with no reasoning. Do you have a better candidate? Outside of me since I can't really vote for myself well between you, Qatol and Pyrr something isn't right 1.) You voted for Inf 2.) Qatol votes for Inf and THEN posts a reason for it 3.) Pyrr votes for inf and also posts a reason Seems odd doesn't it? Especially since you're vote came in first before any reasonings. You're really worried that I voted before posting my reasoning? Maybe I voted while figuring out exactly what to write because it's a speed game?
|
On August 20 2009 11:42 Foolishness wrote: But like I said, I cannot speak on behalf of Qatol and Pyrry. Qatol has been following me everywhere, maybe he has a crush on me? You know I love you <3
|
EVERYONE change your votes to vivi for now No time for reason yet will explain shortly
|
EBWOP: crap. Infundi roleclaimed to me right before that happened. Sorry man, I tried.
|
On August 20 2009 12:06 Zato-1 wrote: Folks: Let's direct further analysis towards a suspect. I'm all for people defending my innocence, but we need to lynch someone today. What do you all think of Qatol? I'm going to look over his posts now. Don't just stop at my posts. Look at my voting record too.
|
Here's another piece of food for thought: Infundibulum claimed he protected me night 1. While it may not be true and may not matter, it could also tell you what happened to that hit. Obviously, I cannot prove this, but I'll bet he didn't make that claim to anyone else.
|
|
|
|