|
|
|
On November 01 2017 07:44 ShoCkeyy wrote:
lol at this early game posting. Is this the new meta? To just claim something and then hope no one notices you lied?
On November 01 2017 07:48 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 07:45 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 07:44 ShoCkeyy wrote:
lol at this early game posting. Is this the new meta? To just claim something and then hope no one notices you lied? we’re just ‘avin a blast mate. how are you? I'm doing well, just got off a work call, gotta shower and hoping that there's more posts when I'm done.
Mafia AF
|
On November 01 2017 07:50 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 07:47 Damdred wrote:On November 01 2017 07:45 darthfoley wrote:On November 01 2017 07:42 Damdred wrote:On November 01 2017 07:40 darthfoley wrote:
On more serious terms, let's hope that we don't have AFKers this game.
Krogan's combo brrreak thing felt the most forced of any entrance. Except maybe HF You know I was abour to tr you for your carefree attitude a d then you say something i really disagree with. I think krogan had third best entrance, hf is meh but meh That's fine. You can give me the town read anyways can you explain why yoi dont loke it more for me? Idk. Scum often have trouble entering. Especially new scum. It makes sense for scum!Krogan to try and be funny by copying someone rather than having his own entrance. Also don't like shockey's entrance
Also super scummy post, soft bus teammate for bad entrance but only explain why the townie (krogan) is scummy.
Darth and shockey down already, damn guys and I thought this was going to be challenging.
|
On November 02 2017 03:40 darthfoley wrote:
But noted that Vivax's first scum reads are thread sentiment
I'm totally going with thread sentiment if it lynches scum.
Should I scumread him less cause others already did? Nice logic there.
My attitude this day will be lynch schockey or feed. You can keep underhandedly defending him while calling him mafia though.
|
I'm here now, will read the other 90 % of the game. Highly doubt I will do much besides repeating that we should lynch shockey.
I've checked a bit of his meta already and am not much the wiser as a lot of those are old or themed games. But since DF called him lynch bait as of late, in the one game where he actually got lynched D1, his filter looked much better than here:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/184673-mini-mafia-iv?user=ShoCkeyy#
Also, Damerion wants to lynch him, Damerion has awesome reads and until you think he's mafia you should sheep him.
|
Coppola already called, he wants a movie with shockey as the protagonist cause he's so scum
|
On November 03 2017 05:39 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:35 Vivax wrote:
Coppola already called, he wants a movie with shockey as the protagonist cause he's so scum Do you think rux is mafia?
I don't think much besides that shockey is obvious mafia. My literal strategy this game is to lynch mafia shockey D1, then skate by as confirmed town for the rest of the game. Reduces amount of effort and shitposting to a minimum, I do like efficiency.
|
On November 01 2017 10:39 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:20 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:
[quote]
Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other Also, how is his read soft? He straight up called shockey mafia, voted for him and asked people to follow him. It scares me how much I find myself agreeing with Ruxx this game.
I can't exactly word why but this post comes from town 90 % of the time. It simply is a genuine approach to the game. Not voting TT.
|
On November 01 2017 23:19 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote:
the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. All my spermicidal evidence gathered suggests that tunneling is a town trait rather than a scum trait.
On November 01 2017 23:19 ruXxar wrote:
Empirical*
WTF LOL
|
On November 03 2017 05:50 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
It's interesting that he doesn't engage me anymore though Who? Also notice how Vixax has pivoted off of me when thread sentiment did so
In fact I don't think you're scum atm. I also have a separate filter called thread sentiment obviously that I check regularly.
|
On November 03 2017 05:51 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:48 Vivax wrote:On November 01 2017 23:19 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote:
the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. All my spermicidal evidence gathered suggests that tunneling is a town trait rather than a scum trait. On November 01 2017 23:19 ruXxar wrote:
Empirical* WTF LOL One of my finer moments. I'm surprised you were the first to notice.
Possibly everyone calling you scum didn't even read your filter then.
I'm still in the process of.
|
On November 01 2017 09:45 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Look at that, I got two almost three pages worth of info out of my one little measly post.
Still haven't seen these people post either:
4. The_Zen_Man
5. Oatsmaster
10. Breshke
12. Vivax
13. Tictock
So we'd still have to wait till they show up.
What info did Shockey get? What's the point of listing all nonposters besides trying to look helpful.
On November 01 2017 12:00 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 11:43 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 11:39 ShoCkeyy wrote:I mean the game just started, there is nothing to really post about other than Conversion getting triggered about being "grilled"... I also posted the list because I mentioned it's too early to even try to vote because these "list" haven't posted yet. I haven't really played with any of you other than Holy, Damred, Vivax, and what may be Oatsmaster (but I don't recall). So I'm still just poking around and seeing what comes out of what. I don't mind taking the fall for now until some one slips, cause it's what I usually do. So far those who are "suspicious" of me, one of them have a good chance at being scum  So what are your thoughts on me getting triggered? I especially liked DF's posts on Ruxx and his response to being questioned. What's your thoughts on that? Meh... too me it's fluff. Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 11:10 darthfoley wrote:On November 01 2017 08:49 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote:
##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments. Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around. Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced. I dislike ruxxar's early game filter. Super fluff with no substance. Yea, sure, lots of people are posting fluff kinda. But ruxxar's gives me the vibes of feigning activity to seem interested. It's pretty easy to do early game especially, when people are dicking about. Besides that, I have no idea why he feels the need to dictate how Damerion votes, the aggressiveness of his vote, and the subsequent commentary Let me break down the bolded sentence for you 1) "Don't get me wrong" = apologetic, not trying to tread on anyone's toes, like scumversion last game 2) "I like your more confident approach" implies a town lean of some sort, with buddy potential 3) So he likes the confident approach, BUT it's throwing him off because it's so different from last game. So you like it... but it's throwing you off? 4) It's also "a bit too much over the top and feels forced" implying it's scummy. So to conclude, Ruxxar likes Damerion's aggressive and confident play even though it's throwing him off but it's over the top and feels forced. So why do you like the approach if you are going to call it scummy one line later? This is a whole lot of nothing burger I can kinda understand ruxxar questioning Damerion's reason to vote so early, and it's not that he's dictating, he's just saying to take it slow. I think this post clearly explains Ruxxar's thinking. Show nested quote +[B]On November 01 2017 09:20 ruXxar wrote: On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:
[quote]
Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other Also, how is his read soft? He straight up called shockey mafia, voted for him and asked people to follow him. [b] I know I post like shit, but I do it for a reason, it's easy to be able to see who jumps on the "vote shockeyy" bandwagon, and of course one of the mafia members is easily going to jump on it, if not two cause my posting is so "shitty". Damerian is trying to use his credibility from his past two games to try and have a following into voting some one off easily. It's kinda scummy in my opinion.
He even admits looking scummy and justifies it with doing it on purpose. Also no explanation whatsoever why Damerion shouldn't have done what he did as town. If I was right on 3/3 mafias last game, obviously I'm going to expect people to follow my opinion. Shockey tries to turn it into something scummy.
Should I even go on? This guy screams mafia all over.
|
Some of his accusations are "you didn't read", "I've done more than you", "Breshke never posted" , "He voted me and didn't post again", "he tried to start a bandwagon on me and then didn't post again" and to me "you didn't finish reading but call me scum", "you're spamming for large filter" to conversion.
If you take the pants off your head, you will realize he isn't actually finding reasons for people to be mafia, he's just finding reasons to blame people for something.
|
Well my vote stands and I explained why I'm not going to vote TT.
I'm not feeling a Ruxxar lynch either atm.
Shockey is simply the best lynch and I'm not going to do anything besides pointing to today's arguments and voting him for the rest of the game.
As I said, lynch shockey or feed.
|
Good stuff, I don't see bussing here so that's 4 very very likely townies for now.
Shockey is still mafia, cya.
|
On November 03 2017 07:53 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 07:30 Vivax wrote:
Good stuff, I don't see bussing here so that's 4 very very likely townies for now.
Shockey is still mafia, cya. Wow dude you're so edgy, and aloof and subtle!!!
Well I didn't see TT being mafia here so I'm slightly salty
|
On November 03 2017 07:58 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 07:56 Vivax wrote:On November 03 2017 07:53 darthfoley wrote:On November 03 2017 07:30 Vivax wrote:
Good stuff, I don't see bussing here so that's 4 very very likely townies for now.
Shockey is still mafia, cya. Wow dude you're so edgy, and aloof and subtle!!! Well I didn't see TT being mafia here so I'm slightly salty So basically your whole "shockey is mafia" thing relies on Ruxxar being town. So you buy his come to jesus "OMG TICKTOCK HAS HAD ME FOOLED ALL GAME! Wowzers!" moment 2 hours before deadline out of nowhere?
idk what you are talking about in regard to the 2 h before deadline. Shockey being mafia has nothing to do with ruxxar or TT. But Ruxxars vote timing speaks for him being town and not bussing.
|
On November 04 2017 04:51 Holyflare wrote:
and the fact you have written about 5 words about your scum read when normally you write a big wall of text
This is a terrible argument.
Along with a terrible claim that only the most gullible would believe.
|
On November 04 2017 05:06 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2017 04:57 Vivax wrote:On November 04 2017 04:51 Holyflare wrote:
and the fact you have written about 5 words about your scum read when normally you write a big wall of text This is a terrible argument. Along with a terrible claim that only the most gullible would believe. you think I can't prove it when he's dead?
Let's say there's only one kill and it happens to be Damerion.I'd still believe mafia killed him over a vig whoever that is shooting him.
I'll believe that a vig is in the game if breshke drops dead tonight as that is the only shot a vig should take this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
