EPTNoir Mini Mafia: Chapter 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
I think this is a good vote. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
I was on my phone and reading. I also think rsoultin is town. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
It's probably some shitty tone read. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On April 22 2015 05:17 rsoultin wrote: -pokes- your tonereads are pretty good. have you figured out what it was yet? I have read like 2 pages of this game | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
WoS, if you promise not to post for the next 26 hours I'll tell the thread why I think you're mafia. That would also solve the problem of me having to argue my read with which seems like a fuckload of effort and I'm having a massive case of the cba. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
He doesn't want me to explain to the thread why he is  | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On April 21 2015 09:52 WaveofShadow wrote: Dunno wtf yamato is doing, Artanis probably town, breshke with the safe vote could be scum Gg no re The bolded sounds like a mafia comment. Why is he even mentioning it if he doesn't know? Also the entire tone of the post just sounds like mafia to me. Also, he scumreads breshke here for a "safe vote", then when he understands the rules, something magical happens: On April 21 2015 11:06 WaveofShadow wrote: Extra scumpoints for being all concerned and shot over the only person in the game to scumread him. ##vote: Breshke I'm back from Draft night and I'm super fucking pissed 'cause I misplayed in the absolute stupidest way possible, cost myself a match and 2 packs, so it's time to take it out on scum. On April 21 2015 11:47 WaveofShadow wrote: Oh what the fuck? WOw I missed that completely. That's really odd. EVery IML game I've played has actually been IML gotta rethink Breshke then. Right, so the narrative here is that somehow if the game is actually properly IML, then Breshke's vote is "safe" and therefore kind of scummy. Whereas now that WoS has realized that it's only a "check-in IML" type of game, the vote is no longer scummy, so I must assume the vote is thus no longer "safe". However, unlike WoS I would actually think the vote is actually MORE safe given the 24 hour check in. He cannot be accused of bringing the vote to L-2 because no such thing exists, he can unvote at any time. So what I get from this is WoS just used some bullshit reason to back off of breshke. Thus he is mafia. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On April 22 2015 21:12 WaveofShadow wrote: That's your ironclad reasoning palmar? Calling me scum for shit I've already explained in thread and saying 'I don't know what yamato is doing?' Gj Yeah it pretty much is! And thanks | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On April 22 2015 21:18 Breshke wrote: Palmar you are obviously ignoring the context though. From what I understand the thrid vote in IML can be seen as safe for scum as they vote on a misslynch but arnt the creator of the push nor one of the hammers. Therefore one could say that scum might join a wagon at this time to blend into town while still getting the misslynch they need. So while WoS said the vote was safe he ment it was safe way for scum to try and secure a misslynch. Yes a third vote in this type of instant misslynch is even safer but in context it doesn't move towards scums goal of getting a misslynch as a push that early is not likely to be sustained over a 24 hour period. So yes while you are strictly right that the vote was infact safer it can't be seen as pushing for a misslynch as much. I don't even care about the context. He did something because of X Then it turns out X was even more right than he initially thought So he retracts because of X This makes no logical sense, thus he must be mafia. To be precises. He retracted NOT because of this new information he had gained. He retracted BECAUSE HE WANTED TO RETRACT and used this new information as an excuse to do so. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On April 22 2015 23:32 WaveofShadow wrote: Yeah palmar that's blatantly untrue, you're just as bad as BH inventing your own narrative for why I did what I did. Early votes in what barely amounts to an IML game aren't as indicative as those when every cote counts all the time. 'safety' isn't a factor when the votes 2h into a game generally don't mean shit. If safety isn't a factor why did you say breshke could be mafia for a safe vote? Also don't worry about it. These morons will never lynch you because reasons. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
| ||
