EPTI've played in two newbie mafia's so I should be good.
Newbie Mini Mafia LI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I've played in two newbie mafia's so I should be good. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
/in and .. yeah :O Although I haven't played SC2 in monthsssss | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 02 2014 04:17 Crossfire99 wrote: Oh snap, it's suki. I remember the good ol' days when I mislynched her in LYLO. Oh, the memories. How have you been, suki? Hey Crossfire! :D Yeah the memory of that game is still fresh in my mind.. I told my boyfriend that I signed up for this mafia and he was like 'seriously? you were so stressed the whole time you played the last game' Haha. But I'm kinda glad that it ended the way it did, it makes for a really good story  | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 03 2014 15:13 JonnyLaw wrote: So lynch balla day1 and suki day2. Balla wagoning scum partners all day long. And bigdad day3 apparently. Don't listen to Jonny, look what he's trying to do - get all the most active townies lynched and letting the game-delayers off scott-free. Obviously a scum ploy. ##vote JonnyLaw | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 07:47 TheChyz wrote: Why so eager to have people help you achieve your goals? Maybe they don't agree with them. If onlywonderboy is right, then your rules help you if you are scum as well since you seem to be very active in which lynching lurkers would help your cause of staying alive. Also having people fight can cause confusion in the town. So I don't see a reason why people should just help you achieve your goals. Let me get this straight. TheChyz is implying that Balla, by promoting an active town and "lynching" lurkers, helps Balla if he's scum. What? I want to point out that nobody said anything about lynching lurkers at this point except TheChyz himself, who seems to be putting the words in Balla's mouth. Discouraging lurking is not scum play. It is a good idea to let everybody know from the start that lurking will be considered suspicious behaviour, because whether or not they are ultimately lynched for it, lurking is not helpful to town. I find TheChyz's logic flawed, and I really don't like the way he misrepresented what Balla said and then accused him of scum motivations for that misrepresentation. TheChyz please explain to us why discouraging (or even lynching) lurkers is beneficial to a scum Balla but not a townie Balla. ##vote TheChyz | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
You clogging up the thread by continuing to push every single person for a response is not a helpful way to create activity. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I'm going to hold off on any reads on OWB until he starts posting some analysis. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Just realize that clogging up the thread is not beneficial to town, that's all I wanted to say. I'll leave it at this for now, if that's alright with you. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 10:21 Balla24 wrote: In the meantime, while waiting for something else to happen in regards to Chyz.. ##vote JonnyLaw I would have expected you to enter the thread already. If you're here, let's get the chemistry we had last game going. The game start time has been known for a while and i believe you're generally active during this time. If not, then get here! On January 06 2014 10:42 Balla24 wrote: What's up with people posting and dis-appearing right after? Having conversations in this game is the best way to get reads off people and move in a proper direction. Please make time to actually sit in the thread and talk to people. I don't want you to lower your activity, I just don't want to have to read these kinds of posts for the rest of the game. Fair enough? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 08:38 Balla24 wrote: Thread is dying fast... need backup ASAP. I also am not too fond of Asuna's entry, but there's nothing really scummy about it. I just feel you have opportunities to enlighten me about yourself and your opinions but you are hiding behind one liners for some reason. These kind of things don't need to be pointed out. The thread isn't 'dying', people just aren't on, and pointing out that people aren't on is just spamming the thread. Again, I don't want to fight with you over this, it's pointless and in the end it's a matter of playstyle preference. Other than these specific examples you have been actively promoting discussion which I find very good, so can we agree to just drop this? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Newbie Mini Mafia XV Can I ask you for the same Balla? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 06 2014 22:06 chinstrap wrote: [She] follows up with a lot of 1 liners and what can only be described as offtopic spam. Most worrying post: Followed by ominous silence On January 06 2014 15:19 JonnyLaw wrote: Suki - Balla's not clogging the thread at all. His posts have a purpose we have sub 100 posts in the first 8 hours. You're the person clogging the thread complaining about his actions. I made a single comment because I didn't like what I saw was a trend in Balla's posts. Balla then continued the discussion, and so I replied, trying to be succinct, and Balla asked for more clarification so I delivered. I never wanted to make it a big deal in the first place, but I won't ignore when someone's asking for explanation. Like I said, back to scumhunting. The rest of my posts will be about that and not trivial things like this. I really like the activity so far, this is a lot better than my previous game which had a few players that were replaced/modkilled for inactivity. There's some heat on Asuna, however I see his play as defensive townie rather than scummy. I like how direct Asuna's attack on Jonny is, although I don't agree with the reasoning. I see Jonny as town as well. TheDragoon and BigDad are popping up a lot of red flags for me right now. TheDragoon: On January 06 2014 14:45 theDragoon wrote: Acting scummy on purpose is a bit of a stupid plan for a townie, all it does is put a target on your back and force you to defend yourself early, you might get a little insight into how people are reacting to it but it's a really risky move. A risk that a regular townie with no powers should be willing to make. A mafia putting his name out there this early is a bad plan if enough people jump on the bandwagon. I'm conflicted, all TheChyz has done is create confusion. If enough people get off the bandwagon and he turns out to be a mafia, then he's won and the risk he took with putting his name out there would be totally worth it. Whether or not it's true that TheChyz was telling the truth about the whole act like a scum thing, all it's really done is create confusion among the town. ##Vote: TheChyz This post is really WIFOM-y. Not only that, but he doesn't even come to a solid conclusion about TheChyz, essentially saying 'TheChyz's play is confusing so I'm voting for him'. On January 06 2014 15:49 theDragoon wrote: That's enough of a reason to lynch Asuna? I don't see that as good enough to suspect Asuna of being mafia, unless you know more than what you've said there. Those 3 things you listed there is just a sign of an inexperienced player, it has nothing to do with being a scum. Here, Dragoon defends Asuna by hinting that Jonny knows more than what he's said. I think this is a possible scum slip, as only mafia are really ever thinking about hiding information. BigDad BigDad's initial posts really rubbed me the wrong way. Here are some things that stand out for me: As someone coming late to the thread it gives me an external perspective so bear with me on my reads so far. Im leaning towards Balla and TheChyz being townie. However I may be completely off on this one. I'm more skeptical of TheChyz, his loose play followed by claiming it to be "some trolly remark" is either a 180 freak out after he got voted OR its a great play drawing out the scum bandwagon. BigDad is being really wishy-washy here. He's stating reads but he isn't committing to them. This is typical scum behavior. The dragoon has an early point that seems to me to stifle conversation rather than nourish it then jumps on the aforementioned bandwagon. At this stage theDragoon has my suspicion. This attack is a twist of TheDragoon's words, and a weak one at that. He states TheDragoon has his suspicions, and yet in his next post he says: just because i'm suspicious doesn't mean i'm 100% sold theDragoon is scum. I admit that I don't have an ironclad filter however if you look at theDragoon's filter i feel like he is dodging a lot of questioning without actually adding anything to the debate: ie. With so many votes on TheChyz we really need to start determining whether he is scum or not, I know the probability of a mislynching is higher at the start of the game but i'd rather not lynch someone who is contributing a decent amount. So TheDragoon has his suspicions but he's not "100%" on it. Again, more wishy-washiness. Also note how he still hasn't decided what his opinion on TheChyz is. I don't buy his read on DayWalker, which amounts to "If TheDragoon is scum, then DayWalker is scummy because TheDragoon trusted him' I'd be happy to lynch either of them. For now, I'm going to ##vote BigDad BigDad, answer me this: Aside from Dragoon 'trusting' Daywalker, what else about DayWalker makes him look scummy to you? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
TheChyz I think the casual tone of Chyz's self-defense is a plus in his favour, as I would expect a mafia to be much more defensive. If TheChyz is scum, I see the twisting of Balla's words as a scum slip (trying too hard to pin someone as scummy from the get-go), not an intentional move that he can later go "haha I was just testing you guys". I also agree with his analysis of Daywalker's list post. For the moment I will give him the benefit of the doubt and believe that he was deliberately trying to drum up conversation. ##unvote TheChyz - - - and just for clarity, my vote is currently on BigDad | ||
| ||
