EPTcann you invite people like palmar syllo sandro wbg toad radfield gmarshall kitaman etc so i dont get shot n1 even if i play terrible? :-/
TL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
cann you invite people like palmar syllo sandro wbg toad radfield gmarshall kitaman etc so i dont get shot n1 even if i play terrible? :-/ | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 14 2013 23:58 marvellosity wrote: If I get all my shit together, I might start this 1 or 2 hours before deadline so maybe some euros could say hello at the start. dunno yet. do it | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
I don't even consider giving my vote anyone else. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:01 yamato77 wrote: electing someone so they don't get shot is not my idea of how D1 should play out That is exactly how we should play. And your ideas are exactly the reason, why you're no serious candidate. Who guarantees me that you not just fold and leave the game after d1 if we elect you? Seriously yamato... | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
oh god, you're reatarded. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:19 VisceraEyes wrote: This is false. Please address the post where I explain what my reasoning for not liking your statement actually is. You mean this peace of wisdom??? | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:22 VisceraEyes wrote: super does stuff like say controversial stuff to see how people react. Is it bad? Who's to say? I'm willing to write him off as arrogant and observe others. What do you think of Oats and his blatant lies? Typical non-reading-shittalking? Or something slightly more sinister? Write me off and "observe others" you're pretty dodgy. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:27 Pandain wrote: Yamato is part of your play making people feel bad and then seeing how they react to being called out. This is out of game but I'm noting now you do that a lot. Or do you actually believe all your tiny reads you get in the early game. where does he do that? Quote. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:31 VisceraEyes wrote: Dodgy? Or Dodgy? I don't know what you want me to tell there... I expressed myself pretty clearly. going to sleep now. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:38 yamato77 wrote: Both Oats and super think VE is mafia, how entertaining. how do you peasant know what i think? I don't really know why you're joking about the term "dodgy", since my dictionary told me it's a common word if someone avoids, eludes, evades or dodges something, like a discussion with someone. Example, if you brand someone as arrogant (ad hominem) and you hereby avoid, elude, evade, dodge a discussion about other things. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 09:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: supersoft says dumb stuff idk what that makes him Your post is useless and i think you're scum What exactly is dumb? Do you just repeat what you read in this thread or do you think by yourself? Are you planning to keep "playing" like that? Because this is completely useless. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 10:03 VisceraEyes wrote: So is attacking everything that moves super. And it's not going to get you reliable information either. how is raynpelikoneet "moving"? he doesnt deliver ANY reasoning for his reads. He just repeats what he thinks is the general consens in this thread. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 10:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: LXI ended how it did because of too many dickwavers like this. I suggest you don't try to repeat it unless you plan on getting lynched. VE actually i called HF's campaign bad, you called him town for it. Why no you say anything about it to me? LXI? Plan on getting lynched? Who are you? I don't even know you. I never got lynched. Ever. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 10:11 VisceraEyes wrote: You haven't given any reasoning for thinking I'm scum either - you say dodgy, but I can obviously be dodgy as town too so I want you to explain why you think it makes me scum so I can explain why you're wrong. You refuse - I've asked you a couple of times to elaborate and you haven't.. I never called you scum. I said your dodging is looking scummy to me. The dodging, not the person, since dodging always looks suspicious. The fact, that your townplay may include dodgy play, is not relevant here. I didn't refuse anything, i explained, why dodgy play is suspicious. Of course i cannot explain why i think that you're scum, since i don't think that you're scum just yet. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 10:23 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh, so what you're saying is that in spite of making that observation about my scumminess, you have actually, NO opinion of me. Good deal. Well if/whenever that threshold is crossed you just let me know. <3 I fear you won't cross any threshold anytime soon. I have a strict not-to-lynch-potentially-useful-people strategy d1+d2. If you're town, you will probably be dead d3, if the medics do their job like the usually do... | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 10:44 Oatsmaster wrote: Basically the point is, why are you assuming that he didnt prewrite it? Prewriting it doesnt mean anything to his current alignment. What you do is different to what other people do. I think super is intentionally doing stuff like the 'only vote vets for mayor' and stuff. So probably town. On November 15 2013 12:55 yamato77 wrote: Even if I misinterpreted hiro's singular post, the rest of his filter is still drivel and I think he fits nicely in the category of useless players posting nonsense when there's reads to discuss. Pandain looks better than he did early game, but grack is still being a useless fuck and is in the same category as hiro. Super is more belligerent than I've ever seen him and also overall not seemingly invested too much into the actual game. His start to the game was rocky at best and he came under fire for it rightly so. His response was to OMGUS and insult the people calling him out, and then never to commit fully to any reads. Mig's one post was pro town but it was essentially meaningless. Of the "conversation" Moc talked about, this is the most interesting aspect because Mig never followed up on the question or offered his own thoughts. Perhaps he is a generally lurky player, but I expect better if he,s supposedly a vet. Oats and VE are my two solid town reads. Everyone else either hasn't posted at all or isn't posting anything I find alignment indicative. On November 15 2013 15:48 VayneAuthority wrote: oats, supersoft, and austinmcc I guess would be the people on my watchdar, but these opinions are too popular so they are probs wrong "popular" - okay... Can you please explain a little, why you think that I am suspicious? | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 19:48 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'll also support any supersoft lynch on the base of him being a dick. So you support a lynch on me, because i am a dick? What? You realize this game is about winning and killing scum. You think I am scum? | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 15 2013 20:04 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I don't think he's town, I think he's null right now. So you happily lynch people that are 0 ? | ||
| ||
