EPTHogwarts Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 16 2013 02:51 Sn0_Man wrote: I-be-Pro is totally bh. Guess I have to shoot him day one | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Or Griffindor | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
What do you think of Grack? | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:35 Mattchew wrote: a lot of soft accusations being thrown at Skanjab1s and dont we always have to lynch the self aware miller or is that some other weird role? On October 17 2013 10:58 Mattchew wrote: nothing, other than that he claimed miller in the first post and that was either really bold play as mafia or smart play as town saying lol at the end of a sentence is what you do when your texting a girl and you're nervous she wont understand what you're saying is a joke, aka weakness On October 17 2013 10:59 Mattchew wrote: i want to change my use of "smart" to "correct" Suspicious weak justification, and if it was in his opinion correct play why would we lynch him. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
The fact they could be asleep is also offset by the fact that Cephiro recently made a long post that clearly showed thought yet put off contributing in thread. Cephiro would you like to explain that? I have a town read on Grack because he is embracing his role but is still making some good points, but he is making a really weird point about not contributing which is really nonsensical to me. There could be a scum motivation to it, such as if his house is only him and therefore he doesn't want to help contribute, or there is the more likely instance that he simply hasn't thought it through. I want to eliminate the possibilities. Skanjab I have a town read on and I don't have a good read on Toad yet. Was your intent with this post to pressure me or are you serious; you've been looking for flaws where there really aren't any and it's contradicting with what I think you would be doing in looking for actually suspicious people. You don't think StorrZerg, being an esports mafia veteran taking a back seat in his first game of forum mafia is suspicious? You are putting assumptions about what I'm doing without any real logic, and I don't see any town reason. On October 17 2013 15:13 Holyflare wrote: What I really actually want to know Pandain is why the summary but leave out the entire starting argument? What did you glean from Skanjab1s replies to Toads pressure. Deflecting? If you say this, is any response really going to help you? You say I left so much out, do you really expect me to put everything? You set higher standards for me then what is expected and I am interested in why. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
He posted a lot early on and made jokes. I haven't seen scum do that early on though I acknowledge it could happen. Usually town are the very first ones to post, and him making jokes amplifies my town reads. He also made very weak arguments in Thug Life which is why I thought he was scum, but it ended up being wrong. On October 17 2013 06:48 Grackaroni wrote: 1) the voting thread wasn't even created when I posted. 2) It's not a real vote 3) Watching for players being afraid to put votes in the voting thread at the start of the game is a silly and ineffective method of scumhunting. This is fine for an explanation, what about you? | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Holyflare is quite interesting, but he'll slip up eventually if he is scum. Storr we will see. And there are probably at least two scum in the lurkers, if not more. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
People need to contribute to the thread. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 17 2013 23:41 yamato77 wrote: Well, at least this idiotic push if me gives me a read on you. I don't think it proves anything, never really see mafia go after vets. Especially with weak reasoning and when they're all alone, its just a lone townie trying to lynch you. Mocsta and Yamato are my two strongest town reads. Mocsta because every single thing he's posted so far I've liked and he's not spamming the thread while still having an influence. Yamato because he is being his townie self without the incessant spam, and I heavily disagree that he isn't pushing people. You don't have to vote someone to push them. Rayne I cannot see how you read Vayne. When he's not contributing you think he's town and when he does contribute you think he's scum. He has already put more effort into the game then the first two days of the Thug. I am not sure of the alignment of Vayne, but there are better people to go after for a lynch especially when there are already suspicious people. Skanjab, you are tunneling Yamato and reading into things. He doesn't have to exactly fit with his town meta to be town, heck he was playing his scum meta up until the second day of play in Thug and he was town. Also why /would you lynch a potentially very valuable vet? We should lynch Palmar if he doesn't shape up for worst post he could have made; absolutely nothing of interest would have come out of that statement. This is exactly his scum play in Thug playing bullshit fake contribution which isn't original or innovative. Stutters hasn't posted in forever, Ceriph is of course a good lynch. Keeping mine on Mattchew because I actually have reasons but am interested to see three votes on Vayne | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Isn't that post scummy? | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Meta is way over used in lynches. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 17 2013 23:49 LastArgument wrote: What supposed town mentality? You've simply asserted that magically you now like policy lynching having been staunchly against it previously in your town career. This even misrepresents your own quotation, as the quotation in question clearly puts you against policy lynches in general, even though it was applied to one player at the time. Reading the quotation, you are obviously talking in general terms. Do you really think that two posts in different contexts mean that he always has to be against policy lynches? Even if it hinted at that, couldn't he change? Why are you voting him, is it just for that. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 17 2013 18:34 EchelonTee wrote: I really, really dislike this. The QT's are basically imperfect mason circles; while a mason circle with confirmed townies is extremely powerful to bounce reads off one another, one that almost definitely has scum in it is very open to manipulation. Any interesting information (people's town lists anyone?) that is listed in a QT, but not in the thread will still make it to the scum, giving them an edge. The QTs are also inferior compared to PM circles, as you can pick and choose who you PM and try to get share information only with people you believe to be town. The majority of the activity should be in thread. I don't doubt that Toad will be active in the thread, but hidden information in QTs is decisively negative. I'm also still considering if the town as a whole should decide on how to use the prizes from challenges or not; putting it up to a town vote would 1.) generate healthy discussion, 2.)allow the town to have more control how these power items will be used. What does this post do? It's a whole bunch of words but no end impact and it would never have impact. It is also negative and discourages people from QT play, which is bad. ET has 5 other people he can start to harass and question in thread, and he says woah that's too dangerous. On October 17 2013 20:09 EchelonTee wrote: This clearly articulates why I dislike the QT activity that does not get fully transferred over to thread Why? If I can confirm a whole house or lynch the scum in it, that's a town circle right there. QT activity can win this game and we should keep them active. I also don't like how he started to get the "dumb" response to Mocsta by saying "Are you kidding me". Responses like that indicate you feel threatened so you go after the other person | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Well if you want to convince me to vote for him, then lay it on the line. I only see that you think he should always value suspicions over policy lynches. | ||
| ||
