| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/8hi8htJ.jpg) Second submission for TLMC. Standard Desert design. The third and the low main are risky but i like it. Overview: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/6rPdKVE.jpg) General: + Show Spoiler + Texture: Phaeton Playable: 144x136 Expands: 10 Xel'Naga: 0 Pictures: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/V1dNedz.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/YjN6RiK.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WCFqHox.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/vb9SclI.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/No8Ma0z.jpg) | ||
|
WedRine
Denmark64 Posts
| ||
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
Low ground main seems silly since you could raise it up two levels, but whatever. Good to find out if it works, anyway. Seems like the unpathable high ground bits could use some more doodads. Layout is neat, though. I like the style. | ||
|
moskonia
Israel1448 Posts
| ||
|
Kruxxen
United States149 Posts
| ||
|
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
However the general layout of the map is really cool imo. The way the thirds are quite close and straight forward to move to by ground, yet blocked by rocks. And even if you'd expect your enemy to take out the rocks and pressure you hard third to third, you can take another alternative corner base that's very far away instead. The last base has a very interesting neutrality going on, kinda between the nat of one player and the fourth of another, yet not a strong strategical position to take and also very close by air to the main. Overall the bases are all very unqiue, nothing is too turtly or too hard. Brilliant map layout imo. | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
| ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
naw but 4 real great job with the map  I wonder if the low main will be a bit easy to siege? However it's something new and that's good. | ||
|
Fatam
1986 Posts
Securing 4ths + 5ths should be important here, since they are far away. | ||
|
KingCorwin
United States134 Posts
1 point for perfect use of map space/boundary 1 point for low ground main 1 point for layout (bases flow well, alternate paths flow well) .5 points for textures (getting tired of seeing endless phaetheon, even tho theres a little temple mixed in here) .5 for the awesome temple corner bases (i feel like if i were to play this, id just ditch my main and go make new base up there where its so neat) Thats 4 out of 5, very good work on this one! | ||
|
Caviar
70 Posts
Very unique layout. I just wish the aesthetics were as interesting as the layout | ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
| ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
| ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
On April 22 2013 06:33 WedRine wrote: the low main, i love it! the third, i love it! the middle, i love it! - but whats up with the reactor doodads? great aesthetics aswell. mereel can correct me if wrong, but they seem meant to harken back to the BW badlands doodads, which is awesome, like this map. skeptical about lowground but it's probably the best take on it I've seen. | ||
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
On April 22 2013 11:23 EatThePath wrote: mereel can correct me if wrong, but they seem meant to harken back to the BW badlands doodads, which is awesome, like this map. skeptical about lowground but it's probably the best take on it I've seen. correct | ||
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
On April 22 2013 10:40 Quakecomm wrote: is this published anywhere? on EU ofc | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
You can't hold the ramp against cheese because the defenders won't be able to shoot up while the attackers can shoot down. | ||
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:00 gobbledydook wrote: There is a glaring problem with lowground mains. You can't hold the ramp against cheese because the defenders won't be able to shoot up while the attackers can shoot down. Well, players will need to take that into account when picking builds and such. Might still end up being deemed broken, but can't we give it some time? | ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
NA Please? I really want to test it, and I get a lot of lag on EU. | ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:13 Gfire wrote: Well, players will need to take that into account when picking builds and such. Might still end up being deemed broken, but can't we give it some time? I agree, the meta game will never evolve if we never put players in uncomfortable situations. That's why Blizzard is taking so long to patch HotS and I think it's a good thing. | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea Dota 2 24672Rain  8769Bisu 3654Pusan 530Stork 425Hyuk  325Last 233Leta 153Barracks 132ToSsGirL 120[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games singsing1666 B2W.Neo326 crisheroes325 Pyrionflax237 Fuzer  195DeMusliM187 Happy177 XaKoH  127SortOf96 Sick77 Organizations Counter-Strike StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
LAN Event
OSC
The PondCast
LAN Event
Replay Cast
OSC
LAN Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Korean Royale
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
