EPTWhen will this start btw?
Dessert Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
When will this start btw? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 06:38 Ruuch wrote: /in If you're a smurf, I'd like to know. Thanks.[/QUOTE] He's not, he's my friend who has only played SC2 Mafia before (doesn't count I guess  ). | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 07:49 Dandel Ion wrote: I am concerned you had to reply for him, and he didn't. I hope you are sure you don't want him to play newbies before. If he plays this one I will assume he has done enough self-research to not get himself modkilled at least. Ofc regular rules I remind you guys of: Don't talk about the game, out of this game. Don't PM (about the game) don't tell each other's alignment, etcetc. Don't worry, if he doesn't participate I'll just kill him myself | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:01 jaybrundage wrote: The way your entering the thread is terrible your setting the town up for failure. Its hard enough to play mafia when people are trying there best. If your gonna play like shit and it make it intentionally hard to read you I have no problem lynching you. You looking scummy as it is. You can step it up, Or get lynched your call. That's just too aggressive for my taste. Did anyone else react like that to Kushm4sta's (trollish) posting? Why would it be scummy to draw attention without any need? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:30 Ruuch wrote: I'm town. Just putting that out there. Yay, you're confirmed now xD | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:32 Hapahauli wrote: Didn't expect the game to start tonight o_O I'll get right on that one though: + Show Spoiler + In all seriousness, I'd rather NOT have to be the one spamming this game. My last two games (Witchcraft Mini + British Mini), I was 33% of the thread in content and driving the discussion for the entirety of the game. I don't mind repeating it this time around, but it's much better for the town not to rely on one person for activity. The early burst of activity is quite good news though ^^ You'll be probably shot first if you're town, though, so you shouldn't refrain from posting. And it's best to establish yourself as town right away if you can. And if you're scum, posting a lot will drive you to a corner late-game. It's win-win for everyone, so why not. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:42 Hapahauli wrote: Oh I'll be posting for sure. Hell every time I say "I won't be as active" I end up spamming the shit out of the thread anyway. I just have some not-so-good memories of thread activity in recent games, and if I'm the one driving discussion again, town's screwed when if I get NK'd. Heh, that's fair enough. It seems like the same people are always driving discussion in every game they're in though (such as yourself). Dunno what could be done about it, I don't think you going less active will be of any help. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:53 Hapahauli wrote: Oh are you Xatalos's RL bud? Also, is there anything in the thread that sticks out to you right now? There's certainly MrZ's vote on you that I want your opinions on. Yeah, we're friends from high school. I'm trying not to say to him anything you couldn't find in a general guide or something like that though. I'm also trying not to determine his alignment outside of the game. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:50 jaybrundage wrote: Xatalos I dont know about you. But I dont want someone trolling in a mafia game. Why put up with someones bullshit so he can spite someone. If hes scum then he can just use to get away with scummy shit. I dont want to put up with that. So I rather put a stop to it now. Yeah, his behaviour is anti-town. But is it scummy? Have you ever seen a scum player opening the discussion with something that will make people less opposed to lynching him? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
Saying that Jay was pushing Kush is definitely taking his quote out of context, whether you realize this or not. I'm am almost certain he's town. Yes, it is possible for him to do this as scum, but it's extremely unlikely he'd be able to.[/QUOTE] Do you think he's playing similarly to British Mafia? I think there are some things in his filter that game (aggression, spamminess) that are similar, but it's far too early to say that. It's just a couple of pages so far. Also, it's not hard to spam a bit with useless posts like random voting (...) to emulate your town game. If you wanted to define fluff, that would be it. On January 13 2013 10:35 thrawn2112 wrote: NVM MY BAD ##unvote ##Vote: grush When we last played together, you were a most valuable asset for town. Why are you just throwing votes without explanation now? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 09:47 kushm4sta wrote: fyi i dont read megacases, so keep that in mind. k this is my last intro post. Next time I post it will be telling you who i think is scum. Why are you even playing this game if you don't want to put in effort? I can't imagine scum playing like that, but that's still not an excuse to play anti-town. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:09 MrZentor wrote: I'm leaning townie on him, but it's a pretty weak read. And I suppose my vote served its purpose. ##Unvote No, he's definitely not playing like he was in British Mafia. My posts have a lot more content than yours, and that vote wasn't random. Are you familiar with the idea of putting pressure on somebody to gauge their response and get a better read on them? I was talking about Jay in the last sentence. What's the biggest difference between his game now and then? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:08 jaybrundage wrote: @Xalalos Well Zentor is already defending me lol. I can see him being townie again. Althought i never seen a scummy Zentor. But as it is so far im leaning town. But regardless i rather not talk about town reads. Anything you think is scummmy as of yet? Well, I haven't seen anything really scummy yet. Mostly I'm concerned with your entrance to the thread and thrawn's lack of engagement. And Kushm4sta's attitude, although it's not actually scummy, but it's still anti-town. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:15 MrZentor wrote: What? You switched from referring to Jay as "he" to "you"? He seems a bit more confident this game than last. "You" as in you = one (you can see a great view from here / one can see a great view from here). Hmmm. So he's less careful than in his previous game (as town) and that's the basis of your confident town read? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:16 thrawn2112 wrote: my thoughts on the grush/hopeless thing have almost been reset to null for the following reason: -the reasoning hopeless gave for thinking grush is scum is pretty close to my own reasoning. if I HAD to pick out one of them as scum right now, it'd probably be hopeless ##unvote Apart from a few specifics in the ongoing grush/hopeless stuff, by biggest concern so far is super. A lot of his accusations and scumhunting techniques seemed fake/ineffective and he was obsessing over things that do not matter at all. He never actually came to any conclusions based on his questioning, and he seemed to disappear from the thread as activity was starting to pick up. What are you saying? You agree with hopeless so he's more scummy than grush whom you think is scummy with the same reasons as hopeless? Yeah, supersoft's focus on a single smilie was very overdone. But I think he looked pretty convinced about the matter. Why was it fake? Maybe he just wanted to pressure and get a reaction? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:25 MrZentor wrote: You didn't ask me what the basis of my town read is. You asked the difference between Jay's play this game and last. Yeah, but it's related. You saw Jay as townie last game and now you're at least equally convinced. I'm guessing more confident = more townish = very townish in your mind? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:36 thrawn2112 wrote: xatalos do you actually have opinions about any of this or are you just going to ask random questions? Just trying to make sense of your post. I didn't get the point you were making in your chain of logic about hopeless being scum over grush. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On January 13 2013 11:45 thrawn2112 wrote: hopeless comes away more scummy because if I look at each player objectively, without meta, and not thinking about them omgusing each other, hopeless is scummier. meta is a dumb reason to have a strong opinion on who to lynch, and hopeless actually seemed completely serious about wanting to lynch grush. his "wrong answer" post was strange as you've pointed out and "what would be the right answer" was the same question I thought about as soon as I read hopeless's post. no, he's not my top read. that title probably goes to xatalos/super. as I said, my thoughts on grush/hope have somewhat been reset back to null. fml if this is to be yet another incarnation of thrawn and hapa spamming at each other Why am I now one of your top reads? Because I questioned about your reasoning? | ||
| ||
