• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:51
CEST 15:51
KST 22:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 20258Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202579RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder1EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced26BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Serral wins EWC 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time
Tourneys
TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Afreeca app available on Samsung smart TV [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
How many questions are in the Publix survey?
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 651 users

[M] TPW Crystarium

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-21 12:41:50
April 19 2012 19:30 GMT
#1


TPW Crystarium
By Archvile



[image loading]

overview


Map bounds: 148x132
Nat-nat rush distance:154.9
Available: EU NA

Analyzer
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

[image loading]



Close ups
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
IronManSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States2119 Posts
April 19 2012 21:06 GMT
#2
WOW..... this is actually pretty freaking sweet! I love the flow of this map. A mixture of Xel'Naga Caverns and Cloud Kingdom.
SC2 Mapmaker || twitter: @ironmansc || Ohana & Mech Depot || 3x TLMC finalist || www.twitch.tv/sc2mapstream
Aerysta
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom49 Posts
April 19 2012 21:10 GMT
#3
This looks really really nice Kinda wish i had the time to try and make maps again
Liquid`Bumblebee hwaiting!
Kurumi
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Poland6130 Posts
April 19 2012 21:15 GMT
#4
This reminds me of some C&C map..
Looks nice, I think will work nice in-game as for balance and stuff.
I like the cliff backdoor to the mains!
I work alone. // Visit TL Mafia subforum!
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
April 19 2012 21:22 GMT
#5
I really like the layout in general. Really cool. Simple but pretty nice.

I think the concept might be shown a little more strongly if some of the ramps were smaller, especially the large central ones. As they are, it encourages players to just attack through the middle. With smaller ramps there, it could encourage more positional play where the defender gets a stronger advantage there and an attacker would be encouraged to start moving around. Kinda like how Cloud Kingdom has the smaller (and partially blocked by rocks) ramps through the middle.

Actually, this feels quite a bit like Cloud Kingdom. The actual layout is pretty different and I don't think it would play the same way at all, but it sort of has a similar theme. It also seems really similar to Chupung-Ryeong.

I think it's a great map.
all's fair in love and melodies
thurst0n
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States611 Posts
April 19 2012 21:27 GMT
#6
I like this map, I think it could be phenomenal. I feel like it may be too easy to get your last bases once you get up to 4, the 5th and 6th are no contest. But the third seems like it'd be the perfect risk reward.

I like how the towers are sorta out of the way also, I hate when i'ts like so obvious and you just are going to go that direction anyway, this sorta forces movement otherwise, also it seems like the "designated tower" might be opposite from early to late game..

How can we get this to NA, i want to play!
P.S. I'm nub. If you'd like you can follow me @xthurst but its not worth it ill be honest
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
April 19 2012 21:30 GMT
#7
On April 20 2012 06:22 Gfire wrote:
I really like the layout in general. Really cool. Simple but pretty nice.

I think the concept might be shown a little more strongly if some of the ramps were smaller, especially the large central ones. As they are, it encourages players to just attack through the middle. With smaller ramps there, it could encourage more positional play where the defender gets a stronger advantage there and an attacker would be encouraged to start moving around. Kinda like how Cloud Kingdom has the smaller (and partially blocked by rocks) ramps through the middle.

Actually, this feels quite a bit like Cloud Kingdom. The actual layout is pretty different and I don't think it would play the same way at all, but it sort of has a similar theme. It also seems really similar to Chupung-Ryeong.

I think it's a great map.


I went with bigger ramps(they were smaller initialy) because of the power of the highgrounds and especially the forward base. You will control so much space from that position that I fear smaller ramps will break the map - it becomes too hard to attack into so while it would surely turn into very long macro games they would becomes borring and static as well. I would love smaller chokes but I am worried it wouldnt work well on this map.
Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
RumbleBadger
Profile Joined July 2011
322 Posts
April 19 2012 21:32 GMT
#8
Dang, dude. Map is sweet. The only thing I would want is more variation in choke width. It's pretty similar all the way around the map. But otherwise, great work. Very well done concept, great flow.
Games before dames.
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
April 19 2012 21:32 GMT
#9
On April 20 2012 06:27 thurst0n wrote:
How can we get this to NA, i want to play!


I will probally get it up on NA in a few days when I have got a bit more feedback and finished up the last details.
Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
AnalyZ
Profile Joined January 2011
France32 Posts
April 19 2012 21:37 GMT
#10
it kinda looks like CLoud Kingdom :p
But definitly a better map.
Natespank
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada449 Posts
April 19 2012 21:49 GMT
#11
There are so many great maps posted in this forum these days. Great work!
Oxyjon
Profile Joined December 2011
United Kingdom31 Posts
April 19 2012 22:04 GMT
#12
ooooo, that's a sexy map. Well Played to you sir.
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
April 19 2012 22:10 GMT
#13
Its kind of like a 2 spawn Shakuras Plateau, except with a more interesting middle, and better harassment options for zerg at the 4th base!
Can ground units sneak past the watchtowers if they go single file through the center?
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
thurst0n
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States611 Posts
April 19 2012 22:43 GMT
#14
I'm just going out a limb here, i'm not sure how the current map would actually play out. But if I were to experiment with changing anything significant I would see how it feels with the lowground 6th moved it up to the highground by the main. This would allow you to make the middle high ground base(4th/5th) more centralized, you could open up those ramps a bit too if necessary..

P.S. I'm nub. If you'd like you can follow me @xthurst but its not worth it ill be honest
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
April 19 2012 23:54 GMT
#15
I suppose I'll be the party crasher and actually say I find this map quite boring, as this map encourages you to take a third that promotes boring positioning conflicts when on 3 bases. As the map is now, both protoss and zerg are encouraged to take the low ground third, and terran is really the only race that could get away with taking the forward third. Yet, the low ground third promotes really boring position conflicts when you're on 3 bases. What I mean by positional conflicts is that you don't actually have to have good map awareness to hold 3 base. You and your opponent are not pacing back and forth to maintain/look for a good position. Here is a pretty picture to demonstrate: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


In order to hold three bases, you just simpley park your army on the low ground area in front of your natural while having a wall/cannons/bunkers/spines at your third. If your third is attacked, you just take a few steps over to defend it. That's it. You don't need observers, overlords, and other means to see when your opponent is coming, and from where. Sure it helps to know they're going for your third, but assuming you have some defense, you'll have time to take a few steps over to defend your third if you don't have any map awareness.

To make such things interesting, many maps have a series of chokes that lead into a relatively open area in front of the natural and third. Here are some examples from ESV maps:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

On ESV Tanzanite, you can see there are two chokes that lead into a relatively open area infront of the nat-and third. Thus, in order to maintain a good defensive position behind a choke, you have to pace between chokes 1 and 2, and then sidestep to your third if it goes under attack. However, since your army is already positioned relatively close to the third choke, a backdoor into the third was included to make things a bit more interesting.

[image loading]

ESV Korhal Compound does something very similar to ESV Tanzanite, except there isn't a backdoor, the third choke is a bit further from chokes 1 and 2, and the third choke is on the low ground. Thus emphasizing the importance of map awareness.

[image loading]

ESV Cloud Kingdom however does something quite different, which makes positioning between the nat and 3rd very unique. Instead of dancing between a series of chokes in front of the natural with a third wall off/defense, you're dancing between the 3rd choke and choke 2 while having a defense at choke 1 by the natural. Where this may not seem like such a big deal, this actually emphasizes the idea of map awareness and positioning, as your natural is the vulnerable base rather than your third.

On maps such as Korhal and Tanzanite, you pace your army between the chokes in front of the natural, then just sidestep to the third if you see your opponent moving toward it. If you don't see your opponent coming or you're out of position, and you end up losing your third, you are suddenly way behind. Yet, you can still do a 2-base all-in or find a way to be aggressive while retaking third, etc etc. On Cloud Kingdom, it's the reverse. You pace your army between the two chokes at the third instead and sidestep to your natural to defend it. However, if you lose your natural you probably lose the game. Losing your natural means you've most likely lost some tech, supply buildings, and maybe even stuff in the main. Therefore, making it much harder to come back and stay in the game. As a result, the positioning conflicts on this map while on 3 bases are much more unique, interesting, and important. You have to have tower control, observers, overlords, etc to keep an eye on your opponents army in order to maintain a good defensive position. Thus, the map rewards you for having map awareness.


With that said, your map simply does not have that reward for being in position, as quite frankly sitting your army in a single spot instantly puts you in position. There are not spots where you dance with your opponents army, fighting for a positional advantage. Thus, there is no need to have map awareness until you're on 4 bases, thus making it fairly easy to hold 3 bases. Simply put, there is less room, if any at all, to find yourself out of position. Where this isn't doesn't break the map by any means, such a lack of rewarding players for having good map awareness is boring in my opinion. However, there is still hope for your map.

On your map, if you take the forward third, the positioning is super cool: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


However, that base is fairly open and is closer to your opponent, thus making it unattractive for both protoss and zerg. Yet, I understand why you designed it that way. A planetary fortress there would be incredibly hard to break if the area was much chokier. Nevertheless, I have a proposal that might deal with such an issue while maintaining the super cool nat-third positioning conflicts: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Doing something like this would REALLY emphasize the importance of map awareness. No longer is sitting in one spot, not having control of the tower, and not having scouting observers/overlords an option. This really makes for some cool positioning conflicts that, with map awareness, makes 3 bases quite easy to defend. Yet, without such map awareness, you can easily find yourself in trouble, just like on Cloud Kingdom.

Hopefully I got my thoughts out clear enough for you to understand, and I hope it helps. Cheers!
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Genome852
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States979 Posts
April 20 2012 00:47 GMT
#16
Any plans to make it available in NA?
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-20 02:35:01
April 20 2012 02:32 GMT
#17
@Timetwister: I disagree with the severity of your appraisal, though I empathize. It's okay for maps to open up more after the 3rd (aka at the 4th base) if they provide for it, and this one does in spades. An example of bad is Antiga, where the dynamics for the 4th base are really swingy and have little to do with finesse. That map says: here's 3 bases, fight each other. On maps like that, even a mild case of the problems you list (which I think are exaggerated and/or inaccurate) makes for a very undynamic map. The only reason Antiga produces watchable games is that the fight over the middle is sometimes interesting and multifaceted, or involves multi-wave engagements. On this map, the options for expanding after the 3rd are nothing but viable and interesting, expanding the possibilities and providing opportunities to win value through superior maneuvering.

Could the 3rd base defensive positioning dynamics be better? A little, sure. But you assign too much strength to the position that gives up the high ground. You will constantly suffer whittling damage while staying pinned if your only plan is to hold the bottom of the ramp and answer side-attacks as they come up, while your opponent can do whatever they want at home. Within the needs of any given map it's hard to make a dynamic 3rd that is also fair in all matchups. If the map is more dynamic the longer the game goes, all for the better, and this problem is much less significant. Lots of maps we have offer very little viable increased positional relevance or complexity. CK does well on both these counts, Daybreak doesn't much (the center base compacts the game and the relevant paths act the same the whole game, but it has good dynamics from the start), Korhal sort of, Ohana sort of. This map does.

If the low 3rd was removed as in your suggestion and the only 3rd was on a new deeper high ground pocket, it would be nearly impossible for protoss to take a fast 3rd in any matchup, zerg would suffer, and not just for those reasons terran would have it easy. (Although ZvT would have cool runby on the back loop.)

Good post regardless. I wish all map feedback and discussion was like this.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Archvil3
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark989 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-20 03:27:40
April 20 2012 03:04 GMT
#18
Available on NA now

EDIT: edited out short reply to timetwister, as i just woke up the reply was kinda off, not saying what i wanted to say, and I'm about to head to work so will do a more detailed reply when I get home.
Let thy speech be better than silence, or be silent.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
April 20 2012 03:12 GMT
#19
On April 20 2012 11:32 EatThePath wrote:
@Timetwister: I disagree with the severity of your appraisal, though I empathize. It's okay for maps to open up more after the 3rd (aka at the 4th base) if they provide for it, and this one does in spades. An example of bad is Antiga, where the dynamics for the 4th base are really swingy and have little to do with finesse. That map says: here's 3 bases, fight each other. On maps like that, even a mild case of the problems you list (which I think are exaggerated and/or inaccurate) makes for a very undynamic map. The only reason Antiga produces watchable games is that the fight over the middle is sometimes interesting and multifaceted, or involves multi-wave engagements. On this map, the options for expanding after the 3rd are nothing but viable and interesting, expanding the possibilities and providing opportunities to win value through superior maneuvering.

Could the 3rd base defensive positioning dynamics be better? A little, sure. But you assign too much strength to the position that gives up the high ground. You will constantly suffer whittling damage while staying pinned if your only plan is to hold the bottom of the ramp and answer side-attacks as they come up, while your opponent can do whatever they want at home. Within the needs of any given map it's hard to make a dynamic 3rd that is also fair in all matchups. If the map is more dynamic the longer the game goes, all for the better, and this problem is much less significant. Lots of maps we have offer very little viable increased positional relevance or complexity. CK does well on both these counts, Daybreak doesn't much (the center base compacts the game and the relevant paths act the same the whole game, but it has good dynamics from the start), Korhal sort of, Ohana sort of. This map does.

If the low 3rd was removed as in your suggestion and the only 3rd was on a new deeper high ground pocket, it would be nearly impossible for protoss to take a fast 3rd in any matchup, zerg would suffer, and not just for those reasons terran would have it easy. (Although ZvT would have cool runby on the back loop.)

Good post regardless. I wish all map feedback and discussion was like this.


To be honest I have no idea what you're trying to get across aside the last paragraph. However, I can assure you that protoss would be able to take a fast third as along as they have map awareness. If anything, protoss would have the easiest time with this third because of observers+tower. As long as protoss is aware of where their opponent's army is, they can meet them at any one of the highlighted chokes in yellow for a defenders advantage.

The point of my post in general is that you don't actually have to work to get and hold three bases on this map, and taking the tower and having map awareness is basically useless until you get on four bases. Just like Antiga and Shakuras. I find this boring. The extent of my proposal may be too drastic, yet it can easily be minimized with the same idea in mind if need be. However I feel if this map is to be enjoyable to play, it should be enjoyable right from the start, not until you're on 4 bases.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
April 20 2012 04:11 GMT
#20
On April 20 2012 12:12 Timetwister22 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2012 11:32 EatThePath wrote:
@Timetwister: I disagree with the severity of your appraisal, though I empathize. It's okay for maps to open up more after the 3rd (aka at the 4th base) if they provide for it, and this one does in spades. An example of bad is Antiga, where the dynamics for the 4th base are really swingy and have little to do with finesse. That map says: here's 3 bases, fight each other. On maps like that, even a mild case of the problems you list (which I think are exaggerated and/or inaccurate) makes for a very undynamic map. The only reason Antiga produces watchable games is that the fight over the middle is sometimes interesting and multifaceted, or involves multi-wave engagements. On this map, the options for expanding after the 3rd are nothing but viable and interesting, expanding the possibilities and providing opportunities to win value through superior maneuvering.

Could the 3rd base defensive positioning dynamics be better? A little, sure. But you assign too much strength to the position that gives up the high ground. You will constantly suffer whittling damage while staying pinned if your only plan is to hold the bottom of the ramp and answer side-attacks as they come up, while your opponent can do whatever they want at home. Within the needs of any given map it's hard to make a dynamic 3rd that is also fair in all matchups. If the map is more dynamic the longer the game goes, all for the better, and this problem is much less significant. Lots of maps we have offer very little viable increased positional relevance or complexity. CK does well on both these counts, Daybreak doesn't much (the center base compacts the game and the relevant paths act the same the whole game, but it has good dynamics from the start), Korhal sort of, Ohana sort of. This map does.

If the low 3rd was removed as in your suggestion and the only 3rd was on a new deeper high ground pocket, it would be nearly impossible for protoss to take a fast 3rd in any matchup, zerg would suffer, and not just for those reasons terran would have it easy. (Although ZvT would have cool runby on the back loop.)

Good post regardless. I wish all map feedback and discussion was like this.


To be honest I have no idea what you're trying to get across aside the last paragraph. However, I can assure you that protoss would be able to take a fast third as along as they have map awareness. If anything, protoss would have the easiest time with this third because of observers+tower. As long as protoss is aware of where their opponent's army is, they can meet them at any one of the highlighted chokes in yellow for a defenders advantage.

The point of my post in general is that you don't actually have to work to get and hold three bases on this map, and taking the tower and having map awareness is basically useless until you get on four bases. Just like Antiga and Shakuras. I find this boring. The extent of my proposal may be too drastic, yet it can easily be minimized with the same idea in mind if need be. However I feel if this map is to be enjoyable to play, it should be enjoyable right from the start, not until you're on 4 bases.


I was trying to say it's okay for maps to open up after the 3rd base. Maps so far have not been good enough to achieve this, except maybe CK, which also chooses to have a significantly contestable 3base stage. (This is probably how most maps should be.) I also disagree that the 3rd base is that easy on this map. Sorry I wasn't clear.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
Mondays #45
WardiTV872
Rex182
CranKy Ducklings120
IntoTheiNu 10
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 477
Lowko328
Rex 182
mouzHeroMarine 53
mcanning 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 2011
Bisu 1583
EffOrt 1207
Barracks 1130
Mini 706
Stork 624
Larva 573
Nal_rA 572
Soma 564
Hyun 420
[ Show more ]
ZerO 300
Snow 240
Killer 219
Mind 205
ToSsGirL 181
Rush 147
Dewaltoss 114
Sharp 84
yabsab 61
soO 57
Movie 51
Backho 49
sSak 48
sorry 38
Sea.KH 37
sas.Sziky 36
Noble 30
Free 29
Icarus 29
scan(afreeca) 28
[sc1f]eonzerg 25
JulyZerg 16
Shinee 14
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Terrorterran 6
ivOry 5
eros_byul 0
Dota 2
Gorgc5614
qojqva2931
Dendi1436
KheZu532
XcaliburYe313
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1764
olofmeister985
sgares309
flusha171
markeloff50
edward25
Other Games
singsing2113
hiko886
B2W.Neo539
crisheroes473
XaKoH 185
oskar150
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH137
• StrangeGG 73
• davetesta43
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4488
• WagamamaTV510
League of Legends
• Nemesis5589
• Jankos934
• TFBlade280
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 9m
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 10h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Online Event
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.