EPTHammer Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 17 2012 06:22 Palmar wrote: I find his images a much greater contribution to the thread than the standard VE post. Oi, when not in a game you can't use the excuse of "Hey, it was in a game don't take it seriously" as to why you're a fucking asshole. /out Fuck this. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
 RoL, I am disappoint. I would expect you of all people to be all "Bitch please, it's in the OP. Don't like it? Don't sign up!" lol | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
>amused berating of puerile shenanigans here< | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 26 2012 01:31 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I missed risk.nukes /in on the previous page. Sorry. I am/was waiting for Zbot to be ready, but it's not fair to make you guys keep waiting so I will go without it if its not ready by tomorrow night. There are two reasons why I want Zbot, it makes my job a lot easier and ensures accuracy instead of me shitting all over some excel spreadsheet updating vote changes, etc. I'm not opposed to waiting RoL - the voting mechanic seems complex and I prefer guaranteed accuracy to immediate action...but that's just me. Just FYI | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 26 2012 02:52 prplhz wrote: I think it is bad practice to rely so much on something over which you have so little control. What if 15 people had signed up for the game the day you posted it? What if the bot encounters unforeseen circumstances, and Zona/Incognito/whoevermadeitIhaven'taclue isn't around to fix it? In my experience, bots can make games easier and more enjoyable, for hosts and players alike. I still think it is bad practice to rely so much on something over which you have so little control. ZBot has only been a thing for...what, 4 or 5 games? I don't think people are so much relying on it as they are trying to take advantage of it now that it's available. And as you said - it has the possibility to make games easier and more enjoyable for everyone. So why not use it if it's available? Don't hide behind an opinion on the bot prpl...you just want to play. Don't front. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
 | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 26 2012 08:00 layabout wrote: I can't find a win condition in the OP It's because in the end, we're all winners. Right guys? Right? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 27 2012 02:55 Palmar wrote: your plan is terrible paperscraps. It's so scummy you're probably town. Why is Paper's plan so scummy dude? If we all circle-jerk the votes, then we can see without a doubt whether or not the scums have vote-manipulation powers and ideally how they work. What makes Paper scummy for suggesting a system under which we'll be able to glean information regarding the setup? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
All right, I've heard enough. ##Vote: Palmar I mean, I get not wanting to "waste time" and "clutter the thread" but I feel like Palmar is avoiding answering simple questions about his mindset and calling anyone who questions him scum. Very scummy. VERY scummy. Palmar gets my vote. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 27 2012 04:07 Palmar wrote: That's actually not scummy. But you already know that don't you? I know that the action itself isn't scummy, but that you expect us all to go along with it so early IS scummy Palmar. I realize that if you're town, then you're the only one who you can trust and would therefor want to decide the lynch yourself - the reason I think you're scum is because you expect town to just listen to you without explaining any of your motivations. Prove me wrong bro. I'm not beyond reason - but the way you're approaching this game so far has been sketchy as hell. My vote stands. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 27 2012 05:11 layabout wrote: Stop bickering and lets come to an agreement about the plans that are floating around I've already stated - I'm for a plan that revolves one of our votes to a predictable person at night. I'm not bickering - I'm stating my intent to lynch. We do have to lynch today, whether we decide unanimously on a plan to follow or not. Who do you want to lynch layabout, and why? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 27 2012 05:35 layabout wrote: @ViceraEyes nobody yet. Voting for Palmar now is dumb though, and i don't like that you have done that. The thing is, i think the plan is good but there are drawbacks and we have not fully addressed them. After a few miss-lynches the scum could exploit the "circle vote trading" and win, so if we agree to follow the strategy then we should likely decide how long we shall do it for. At the same time it seems likely that there will be roles that can significantly affect the game and so it may be best to agree on the best plan for now and then adapt it as the game grows older and we gain more information. + Show Spoiler [likely there will be power roles?] + since all of the mechanics we are aware of seem pro-scum it seems probable that there will be pro-town mechanics that we are not aware of. I think we should consider something else: A player that trades votes to a player that gets killed will have their vote refunded. This will mean that for the next night they will have an extra vote to trade or they will keep an extra vote. If there are extra votes we need to consider what players who get them should do with them because the Mafia will essentially have the power to decide who gets the extra vote(s). I support the everyone trades 1 vote to the person below plan. This is actually something I hadn't even considered. However, we can't "decide" what to do about it now because scum would be likely to exploit it somehow if we decide to do the vote-rotation. Actually, with this in mind it seems more like a scum-favored decision to rotate the votes predictably. ##Unvote: Palmar Suddenly the thought of just giving our vote to the most town-seeming individual has merit. I'm just gonna shut up then. | ||
| ||
