EPTOn December 16 2011 02:10 flamewheel wrote:
Skip it.
Skip it.
I wouldn't feel good about that, speed it up so L can be the first game of the year!!
TL Mafia L
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I wouldn't feel good about that, speed it up so L can be the first game of the year!! | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 16 2011 04:01 Incognito wrote: You lies. You said you couldn't play in Ver's game because you were going on vacation! Traitor! *the plot thickens* I might need to hire myself as private detective to monitor this drama! ..and of course... ..spread it to the world!! | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
"Oh flamewheel, I bought you this" ![[image loading]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gl7e66hzbL4/TaS8kfvuADI/AAAAAAAAAY4/l-68lUmkJ5Y/s1600/ICECREAM-774327.gif) | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 04 2012 08:23 flamewheel wrote: Going to tinker with a setup tonight and all that jazz. /include bombs, hippies and something only caller would think of. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 04 2012 21:00 prplhz wrote: Is this going to have 50 players because it's game 50? No. The game is going to last for fifty days and fifty nights, Lynching and nightactions will require you to solve a riddle every time to unlock it. If you don't win in time it ends in a draw. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 08 2012 04:08 GiygaS wrote: Also, through my powerful deducing abilities, I have determined that there are not ? goons, but 7! ? of 1 means it can be either 0 or 1 so there is the possibility of beeing 10 goons. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/7780/alwaystownie.png) risk.nuke for mayor I'm not the best townie here so you might be asking yourself why am I running for mayor, I came here to win and I think the best thing to do as a townie is to try and win the election. For those who have read my history you know I am passionate player. A few times in my last games I have found myself losing my mood. I can promise you that will not happen in this game. I don't like to be angry. I like to be helpfull, it makes me feel better and when I feel better I perform better. I will fight for a friendly town in order to keep the peace. So that logic and reason may reign the lynches, not tunneling, omgus and bandwagons or other scumtricks or anti-town shenanigans. I am reliable. I have the time to play, I wont disappear and I won't make excuses. I will be here so you can often have my thoughts on anything. I am persistant, I won't just sheep but I will stick to my beliefs and argue for them aslong as I have them. So If you want to elect a serious person, a person who you will always know where he is at, a person who will give this his best. Then vote for risk.nuke!! always townie, never not townie!! | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 13 2012 16:36 Nisani201 wrote: risk.nuke - doesn't talk about how he will mayor powers Mayor powers? Beeing the mayor isn't beeing god. The mayor powers are 3 votes: Okey I'll tell you how I'm going to use 3 votes. I'll vote 3 times for the one I think is scum. Day 1 lynch: I'll lynch the person I think is scum. When I have decided on a person I am leaning on I will post that in the thread an keep you updated. If I become the sheriff I will use incarcerate to the best of my abillitys. It's a 3 shot jailer who can't target same person twice. I'll use it conservatively and intelligently. On January 13 2012 18:02 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: That is not at all what I said. I don't loose interest. In fact, I actually use the fact that I don't loose interest as a one of my merits. I said I won't loose my calm and start raging or call names which is quite different from loosing my interest.Risk.nuke does the same thing as kita and says he isn’t the best townie, he also says he’s lost interest a few times but swears he won’t do it this game. Famous last words… No offense risk but this isn’t very compelling. On January 13 2012 20:59 rgTheSchworz wrote: /confirm Ok, I have been looking for clues in the first 6 pages,I'll post stuff as I go, day 1 it's hard to get a good case going against anyone,but this is to note: By Risk.nuke Things that strike me: This guy wants to win, but recognizes he is far from the best townie.What do we do, as townies? Think logically, not run for mayor cause we have a BIG ego.And this is basically what he is doing. The amount of GREEN in his post made me lean towards mafia instead of a blue role, cause he wants to slip under the radar. Conclusion:I think he wants DT immunity, and shows some scumminess. A decent choice for a day 1 lynch. Else he is a bad townie with a big ego, but ,,always townie, never not townie,, doesnt fully convince me and I think he's feeling a bit guilty. Wordbender. A person who takes what someone says and push it alittle bit further. There are several reasons why I don't like this behavior. First of all it's imo just an acceptable lie. What you do is you're trying to change the appearance of something to make it fit your agenda or theory. Why are anyone doing this. FoS. I said I not the best townie but I am not bad. If I thought I would be a bad choice for mayor I wouldn't run. Beeing good at scumhunting in the end comes down to 3 pillars imo. Effort, Logic, Experience. I may not have the most experience but I have played a few games and I know most of the ropes. And even though I may be slightly behind some other candidates in experience I have a vast supply of logic and effort. Anyone can scumhunt, it's just the the veterans love to pretend that it's their secret superpower. "A decent choice for a day 1 lynch. Else he is a bad townie with a big ego" Beeing a bad townie is a terrible reason to lynch someone for. It's just an excuse to make it seem as lynching a bad townie is okey. Double FoS. always townie, never not townie is a pun on the fact that I have played 5-6 games on team liquid and I have always been townie (Veteran in one game) | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 14 2012 00:59 rgTheSchworz wrote: Biggest reason is that I think you're red.Lynching scum is good.Lynching bad townies is middle-to-bad. Lynching townies who really think well is bad. Lynching blues is terribad. Really,I have a big mouth and am not afraid to admit it. So i start pointing fingers. So far i see that you have returned my accusation against me.I could counter-argue that you make me a wordbender when I quoted your post word for word. I can't make anything out of a mayoral campaign that says''Vote me.I am bad at playing scum, I am very good at getting scum lynched''.That is generic. We want a mayor that comes up with sensible,spot-on accusations, not Vagueness. Like others also said, there is bound to be scum trying for mayor.That combined with your post which showsreturned accusations, like you would need to defend by attacking another.Do you feel guilty? Who are you and what is your mafia history? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 14 2012 03:39 VisceraEyes wrote: BC, I consider your claim to be scummy for this reason: you're essentially leveraging your role to win you this election. Discuss. I agree the motive is no doubt to win the election, I don't think it's scummy though. It just seems too cooky and there are motives for town aswell as scum to win the election. I think town has more to win on his move then scum. He also seemed to already have taken a lead in the election and judging from his post efforts I feel confident that if he were scum he could had won the election without resorting to this. And if he could have won the election without it it just feels like a bad scummove to put himself in this much spotlight. Even if he is the scum mason he will have an impossibly hard time to achive any scum agendas with his pm abillity. I will watch him closely for signs that he doesn't play as he preach and I don't think I will be the only one. It's just to much trouble to actually benefit the scum so I will choose to assume his claim is legit. It makes much more sense seeing how much this could potentially strenghten the town. Compared to what a risky long-shot high effort/low reward move it would be from scum. You will have my vote. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Risk.Nuke- He disappeared off the face of the earth after a few posts. - CC First of all. "A few posts", is this your sub-appeal to tell everyone to spam up the thread? Because it really sounds as if my post "numbers" aren't enough for you. Secondly, I'd hardly call not beeing present for a few hours a friday evening qualifies for disapearing of the face of the earth. As regard to my candidacy I thought about withdrawing it but I didn't really want too and also it just seems like a waste of space to announce you're withdrawing when not a soul is supporting you anyway. So thats where my candidacy is right now. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I agree it's really about time to get the candidate numbers down, and start discussing. People needed to have voted by now so we could have had a decent idea of where people were standing, L I think you just might be alittle late to the race to run for mayor now. 4 On page 39 its stated that roles who get elected cannot be roleblocked; All of the current candidates for mayor are crumbing or have claimed roles that don't benefit from this. This issue is brought up a grand total of ONCE in the 12 pages since then and not discussed any further. - L Abot this. What do you want to do, elect a dt? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On January 15 2012 01:18 Mattchew wrote: What? you want to out a dt? are you crazy? I have no experience with anything like this before so if you wouldn't mind feel free to explain it warrants an "are you crazy?". It might be crystalclear to you, sorry but it's not to me. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
He made some bad posts and then disappears, agree. It's odd, but some people have to do stuff on the weekend. He's def a candidate though - Jay I just realised this. Look at my posthistory and tell me if you would describe it as "I made some bad posts". SCUM for softdefending me without seeing my filter. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
| ||
