EPTSurprisingly Normal Mini Mafia V
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
 | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
confirmed | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 22 2011 08:36 VisceraEyes wrote: Probably my most sincere hope is that we avoid some of the mud-slinging and nonsense that tends to go with these games. *slings mud* | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 22 2011 09:01 VisceraEyes wrote: *makes mud-pies* :D And ##Vote: redFF 100% of your posts are spam so far. Keep it up my friend. I got....well, I just got the one vote...but I got a lot of scowls and at least 10 fingers to point at you sir! Most people haven't even posted at all yet... As for what to do now for the newbies, just post and wait for someone to slip up/look scummy. Also please do not lie, there have been a bunch of games recently where bad townies have lied and screwed over town, so don't lie! LAL is a very extreme policy but it makes sense. I'm not suggesting LAL, but if someone lies then I will personally look at them carefully and trust them a good deal less. We have a lot of new players in this game so i encourage more experienced players to remember that there is a difference between DUMBand SCUM. Too often day 1 lynches end up with some townie getting lynched for trivial reasons when people dont realise the townie is just bad! | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:48 Palmar wrote: Holy shit redFF, thanks for giving advice on how to play. Here is a tip: LAL doesn't work unless you actually maintain the illusion that you'll follow through with it. But of course, you want to have an out if at some point someone actually fucks up, so you leave a hole in your policies for bad townies, something you're most certainly going to try and convince us of when one of your scumbuddies gets under pressure Why don't you just come flat out and say the plan is terrible? We all know it's not good, the problem is identifying which is more scummy, the idiots supporting the plan or the white knights fighting against it. But I think you're just posting random shit to make yourself look good. #vote redFF So in that first post you quoted I made a warning about lying to town because in recent games I have played/seen it has bit town in the ass. You yourself lied multiple times in PTP1 for terrible reasons and got yourself lynched... Ok, I said lying is bad but I don't want to LAL because sometimes dumb townies lie, how is that scummy? I'm just trying to lay out pro-town policies, which imo LAL is not. As for the second post, how is that scummy? It seems pretty dumb to me, because you could hit an active pro-town player just as likely as you could hit a lurking mafia. That looks like taking a stance to me, and wanting to see a game where it has been used is fair enough. I hadn't quite made a decision regarding it but yes I think it's pretty clear that we shouldn't random lynch. I really cannot fathom how you saw something scummy enough to place your vote on me in there... | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 23 2011 02:59 Lord Vatti wrote: It occurs to me that, as said previously, if Ace isnt a townie, he is A) a very good mafia, and B) we are all in trouble. we don't have enough of ace's point of view besides No Palmar. I'm not accusing ace, and i am inclined to think Palmar is scum, but even though ace seems like a focused townie, we should all be keeping our eyes on him... Why are you inclined to think Palmar is scum? | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 23 2011 03:16 DragonReborn422 wrote: palmar looks so scummy that he can't be a scum. he's just a confused villager imo Oh you're from Epicmafia! That explains it. On July 23 2011 02:50 Lord Vatti wrote: Sorry i was out so long, went to beach w/ family. didn't think so much would happen in a day. re-reading the post... ## vote Palmar he seems the most suspicious, and i definitely agree with ace. Palmar man, start defending yourself or your heading to the rope. wtf is this. Literally explains nothing and gives no reason for his vote, I agree with Ace and seems most suspicious are not valid explanations. so ##Vote Lord Vatti until he comes and explains his vote. Also On July 23 2011 02:14 Pyo wrote: I think we're better off putting some pressure on the guys who haven't said much of anything. Sevryn, Trotske, Fortress? Care to comment? (Lord Vatti was modkilled for disappearing immediately after SNMMIV started and wouldn't at all be surprised if he got modkilled here as well - I hope Curu has been keeping up, lol) 10 minutes later. On July 23 2011 02:28 Trotske wrote: Sure ill comment, I don't know what to think, DR seems like a douche but that doesn't mean hes scum I feel like all this back and forth between DR, VE, and Ace could be some elaborate plan to confuse the new players like me into getting behind one of these guys to lead them to a lynch. The way I see our D1 lynch options are Inactive > one of DR, VE, or Ace > RL. That's my view. So trotske was clearly actively lurking. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 23 2011 06:33 DragonReborn422 wrote: @Palmar I'm going to humor you and just go through all your posts and dissect them all and show how much you misrepresent facts or just plain make stuff up If you are going to make a reasoned fos out of it then do it but if you don't think he is mafia then don't waste your time. As to your experience as far as i am concerned you are a 50 post user on tl in your first mafia game and will be until you prove that you are good. Stop being so condescending! | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 24 2011 00:40 Trotske wrote: DR I think your reason's for trying to make a wagon on me have more to do with you trying to save yourself and less about me being scum. Please show me where I have acted as Scum and not just asked for clarifications on certain things due to the fact that this is my first game of mafia, EVER. This whole game I have tried to reason out some of the positions other people have held using logic and the Question "does this help the town?" From what I understand your main reason to think that I am scum has to do with me lurking, which is not the case at all of what I was doing. What I have been doing this whole thread has been asking questions when I don't understand something or only talking when I have something useful to contribute aka not just posting to post. If you think I am wrong anywhere in this post point it out and I will explain why I am not wrong or apologize for it. ##vote DragonReborn422 ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lpwlJ.gif) | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 23 2011 00:23 DragonReborn422 wrote: RE: redFF he really hasn't posted much. a couple one liners. I used to only post one liners and jokes on day 1....it was entertaining and easy to balance into your mafia game as well. He hasn't gone overly out of his way to look helpful (as viscera has). He's made like 2 quality posts....one in which he rants about newbies and one in which he is confused about randomness. These two don't really go well together to be honest. He's probably average or maybe a little above average scum candidate to me. I'm an above average scum candidate. On July 23 2011 01:47 DragonReborn422 wrote: 1. redFF - i actually have a slight town lean on him. i gave a little analysis on him a few posts ago. Oh no im town actually. On July 23 2011 01:47 DragonReborn422 wrote: 5. VisceraEyes - Heavy mafia lean. Very defensive and a I still like my read about his posts regarding the random lynch to be forced. Does post a fair amount so not lynching on day1 would be ok. 8. Trotske - pretty UTR. nothing stands out. thus a slight mafia lean. He has a heavy mafia lean on Visceyes, and a slight one on trotske. On July 23 2011 03:03 DragonReborn422 wrote: I actually think trotske is a pretty solid vote right now. he's playing so safe. ## vote trotske Trotske hadn't posted since Dragon made that list, but now he is voting for his slight mafia lean instead of his heavy, with pretty bad reasoning to back it up. There's a lot of contradictions in those 3 posts alone. Things im noticing is you refusing to take a stance against people and ideas ie random lynch and your mafia leans. Your voting of Trotske is ironic because you voted him because he was "playing safe". The vote for Trotske was the safest thing you could have done at that moment because a lurker vote is easy to explain and it's unlikely you will be pressured for it. Isn't it ironic, don'tcha think? ##Vote Dragonreborn | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 24 2011 09:22 VisceraEyes wrote: I LOVE your way with words Fortune, welcome to the site. I'm fairly certain he's a smurf lol. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
##vote trotske | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 27 2011 04:02 Trotske wrote: Alright Here is my thought process, 50% of me thinks Aces posts are him being a lazy town in a small game, the other 50% thinks he is scum being lazy in a small game. either way I think I would rather have him lynched than a no lynch so. ## unvote ##vote Ace at least this way we get some more info instead of just letting mafia get a free day. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
| ||
