• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:23
CEST 15:23
KST 22:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles1[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China7Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL64Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 730 users

Every click counts (or should it?)

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 20 21 22 Next All
lowlypawn
Profile Joined January 2009
United States241 Posts
December 21 2009 06:12 GMT
#1
"Gamers also become good at these unintuitive systems, which seems to be another reason for resistance.
That debate happens in StarCraft. There is a unit selection limit, and you can only select certain number of units at once, but now, in modern era, we could have that anything we want. Maybe you could select hundreds of units in StarCraft II, but there are some players who are absolutely against the idea of making the limit whatever they want, because there is a skill in selecting the units you need to select in a game of StarCraft, particularly under time pressure.

Someone can make this argument, but I disagree with it. What these players are really saying is that they want a skill test in the game, which is fair enough, but they are also demanding that the test of skill be a specific skill test that they have all mastered. I think that's not only greedy and self-centred, but short sighted ― there are many ways to test a player's skill in a game like StarCraft, so why does it have to be a test of your ability to manipulate the interface?"

Full article here: http://www.edge-online.com/features/interview-david-sirlin

I agree with Sirlin...Do you?
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
December 21 2009 06:19 GMT
#2
In the words of FA

This thread is so 2007
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Rufio
Profile Joined December 2009
241 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-12-21 06:22:35
December 21 2009 06:21 GMT
#3
Sirlin is still talking about SC2 eh. He even attended the Berkeley SC class right? I agree with him a little but maybe SC2s interface will bring a whole new way to test a players skill. Maybe it won't be the interface at all but something new and fun.
"Rufio Rufio Ru Fi OOOooo" - The Lost Boys
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5540 Posts
December 21 2009 06:38 GMT
#4
As usual, he doesn't even bother to try to understand what we're actually arguing for. I had little respect for him to start with, but now I have even less.
Lokomis
Profile Joined July 2009
United States72 Posts
December 21 2009 06:45 GMT
#5
It isn't like being able to put your entire army into control group 1 and then sending it to your opponent's base is going to guarantee you wins. Anybody who has watched noobs conga their lings into a wall can attest to that. Going by the quote they're making it out to sound as though the old limit of 12 units to a control group makes it any more difficult for new players or less difficult for the old. Whether you could assign 30 units to a group or not, the skill resided in being able to break down your army into distinct control groups and manage them properly. It sounds like this will remain true for SC2. Even the matches we've seen in Battle Reports seem to be played with a familiar fluidity though we aren't able to fully observe the control involved. I suppose I can't agree or disagree with Sirlin because it currently sounds like a non-issue. I've seen so little of first-person gameplay, especially on a professional level, to formulate a solid opinion.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
old times sake
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
165 Posts
December 21 2009 06:46 GMT
#6
According to Sirlin, Warcraft 2 did not have micro, players just patrolled and ignored their units apparently, and SC didn't until Zileas invented it. When challenged on this, he forwarded the e-mail to Zileas who then told me that yes, he did in fact invent micro.
Lol it's so funny watching the level of posting deteriorate so rapidly when supporters of this decision are confronted with such nefarious things as REASONS. --fanatacist
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
December 21 2009 07:14 GMT
#7
Sirlin doesn't know what he's talking about when he talks about Starcraft. He should stick w/ SF
Writerptrk
251
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States1401 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-12-21 07:22:26
December 21 2009 07:14 GMT
#8
Sirlin is really easy to understand when you look at it from a fighting game perspective. Unfortunately starcraft isn't a fighting game.

But I can relate my own experiences of just playing SF4 on xbox live to this argument. I played a lot of street fighter 2 growing up but I wouldn't call myself 'tournament worthy'. But all SF characters have special moves that require an amount of dexterity and skill to pull off. Like if I'm playing with Ryu in SF4, my opponent's low on health, and I want to shoryu focus cancel into my ultra, if I flub this up on the 360 controller, it doesn't land, and I end up losing the match due to this missed opportunity, then I wrestled with the interface which eventually lead to me losing the game. Sirlin came up with HD Remix which had easy inputs for the special moves to attract a new audience, I don't know how successful this was, but obviously he wants people to be able to do the moves they want to do cleanly to allow for the best competition possible among a wider audience.

Which makes me think about a game I was easily more skilled at than these games, super smash bros melee. The interface is simple yet refined. Controls are tight and responsive, and all moves being intuitive and easy to do doesn't hurt the gameplay nor the competitiveness. (yes I know wavedashing and L-canceling and whatnot take some precision to do, but I wouldn't compare the technicality of it to a move list from street fighter). Anyway, despite how blanced, fun, and competitive Melee was, Nintendo (or the new company Sora) kind of messed up a perfect formula with the sequel, Brawl, by lowering the game speed, changing the physics engine, making it harder to kill quickly, stickier edges, etc.

Which brings me back to SC2 and the nature of good game design vs bad game design. A 'good game' (such as melee) can have a simple interface and very intuitive controls, and it doesn't hurt the competitive nature of it because a. everyone's on the same playing field b. the game is inherently well made, is balanced, etc. In contrast, a worse game for competitive play (such as Brawl) suffers because while the game has the same interface and controls, it is not as balanced (see metaknight) and has characteristics that don't welcome high level play, or a significantly (drastically?) lower skill ceiling.

SC2, to me then, relies on what should be two obvious factors. Is the game naturally 'good' - well designed, balanced, polished, welcomes competitive play - and we know Blizzard is designing this game with all these characteristics in mind. Of that we can be assured. And second, does the intuitiveness of the interface lower the skill ceiling to a point where the game suffers in 'high level' competitive play (Brawl), or does it complement it to allow for depth in strategy, positioning, etc (Melee).

I can definitely see Sirlin's argument and I'm not necessarily against easier inputs in a game. In Street Fighter's (and almost all 2d fighters) case its just been a formality for so long that its integrated as part of the accepted gameplay. I don't feel like I would be mad if a player using the easier inputs in HD Remix beat a player using the traditional inputs, so long as his spacing, gameplan, and execution were all strategically sound.

I'm NOT good at Starcraft. Probably high D at best. I like to play Terran but I still find myself 'wrestling' with the interface when playing on iccup (full use of the F keys, hotkeys, unit control, etc). And to me, that is a formality of starcraft. If you're planning on playing competitively, don't you want to have ALL of these things down before even getting in a match? If you don't, then you're simply not playing at your full potential. I've come to learn at D level, mechanics (ability to macro properly and control attacks and defend properly), far above strategy or even a perfect build order, is what wins games. So to me its the most important step. The games I'm good at are the ones that have controls that feel perfectly natural.

This topic seems sooo old, but I never really wrote my thoughts about it relating to my own experience with competitive games, so thought I might as well chime in while I could. I hope it made some sense and I don't get flamed too bad.
"If you can chill..........then chill."
randombum
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2378 Posts
December 21 2009 07:18 GMT
#9
I think he's wrong. The ability to use the interface is the physical part of starcraft. Remove that and it turns into a pure strategy game. Perhaps limited unit selection is part of an outdated interface, but having skill outside of actually being able to control buildings and units is useless.

Its like saying being able to dribble, pass, and shoot is a bad skill test in basketball because the good players have mastered this and there's plenty of other ways to test players in basketball.
cerebralz
Profile Joined August 2009
United States443 Posts
December 21 2009 07:35 GMT
#10
In some ways i think the idea that the skill set for sc2 will be slightly different is true and it will take us all time to get used to it. While it is true that you can have infinite unit selection, you will still have to have sub groups hotkeyed within your army because so many units have some sort of micro involved. Group selection makes it easier to 1a your way across the map, but once u get in combat, it will have to go back to using all your hotkeys. This i think, accomplishes the goal of having distinct possible playstyles.

For example, a terran ball marches across the map, you can just 1a click, but when you engage an army you will want to have hotkeyed your hellions to position correctly in front of your tanks and hold position. You will want to have your tanks hotkeyed to be able to siege and unsiege quickly. You will want to have medivacs/mauraders together, yet seperate from ghosts so you can emp/nuke/stim appropriately.

For players who just aren't that good like me(D+ on a GOOD day) we get the awesome feeling of attack moving a huge army so we can feel heroic like our favorite pro player. I get why people don't like the new mechanics/interface, i just think in the end, we will all get used to it and agree it was the best thing to do for the game.
0mgVitaminE
Profile Joined February 2009
United States1278 Posts
December 21 2009 07:42 GMT
#11
I totally agree with randombum. I play StarCraft because of how difficult it is. Your macro can always be better, you could always be a little faster, and it seems to me like sc2 is going to lose too much of this feeling.
Hi there. I'm in a cave, how bout you?
Kaneh
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada737 Posts
December 21 2009 07:54 GMT
#12
What he (Sirlin) is saying is he'd rather have more strategy and less dexterity.

What some here are saying is they're rather keep the dexterity.

What puzzles me is why a strategy game would require such high dexterity before you even got to competing in the strategy aspect of it.
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
December 21 2009 08:37 GMT
#13
On December 21 2009 16:54 Kaneh wrote:
What he (Sirlin) is saying is he'd rather have more strategy and less dexterity.

What some here are saying is they're rather keep the dexterity.

What puzzles me is why a strategy game would require such high dexterity before you even got to competing in the strategy aspect of it.

if you want pure strategy play chess
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
December 21 2009 08:46 GMT
#14
Sirlin needs to actually play some starcraft before he can understand why his SF analogy doesn't work here, I don't know what has kept him from putting in some time learning the game over the past 2 years.

Its funny that he brought up the unit selection limit specifically as that seems to be the one interface change no one gives a shit about.
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
December 21 2009 09:10 GMT
#15
On December 21 2009 17:46 heyoka wrote:

Its funny that he brought up the unit selection limit specifically as that seems to be the one interface change no one gives a shit about.

its because hes never bothered to understand why people argued against mbs and automining and easy micro, he just assumed it was stubborn attachment to the old interface, which would included limited unit selection.
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
ShadowDrgn
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States2497 Posts
December 21 2009 09:27 GMT
#16
On December 21 2009 16:54 Kaneh wrote:
What puzzles me is why a strategy game would require such high dexterity before you even got to competing in the strategy aspect of it.


Starcraft wasn't designed with fastest speed in mind. "Normal" was supposed to be normal! Even the original ladder was played on the "fast" setting. Starcraft requires such high dexterity because that's what the community wanted, not what Blizzard intended. Even in e-sports we still value physical attributes, interestingly enough.
Of course, you only live one life, and you make all your mistakes, and learn what not to do, and that’s the end of you.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4838 Posts
December 21 2009 09:39 GMT
#17
There are a few steps to general unit control (i.e. mechanics).

1) Knowing/Deciding what your units should do.
2) Knowing/Deciding how to best approximate your desired unit behavior as orders within the Starcraft interface.
3) Executing those orders.

All three steps must occur quickly and precisely for good control. #1 is tactical thought, honed to occur subconsciously for faster processing. #2 is a translation job, converting #1 into the language of Starcraft. #3 is physical execution with mouse + keyboard.

#1 is uncontroversial. #2 and #3 are the point of contention. Some players see them as merely a means (or an obstacle) to the perfect expression of #1, and therefore they should be as convenient and clean as possible. Others see value in them as a process, or for the way they affect step #0 - prioritizing focus. If you can perform a round of production by pressing "5m", you never have to decide whether or not to pop away in the middle of a fight to build more stuff. (Or queue units beforehand, which is less efficient.)

On December 21 2009 16:54 Kaneh wrote:
What he (Sirlin) is saying is he'd rather have more strategy and less dexterity.

What some here are saying is they're rather keep the dexterity.

What puzzles me is why a strategy game would require such high dexterity before you even got to competing in the strategy aspect of it.

You're copying several years of hundreds of players' strategic developments (on top of thousands of years of theory in war/competition, which often apply). If you were building your own strategies from scratch, they would be far more important than your ability to point at a screen with a mouse. (Which is not that big a deal for a habitual user of the PC.)
My strategy is to fork people.
Puosu
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
6985 Posts
December 21 2009 10:40 GMT
#18
I remember the last time Sirlin tried to use his SF analogy in StarCraft, it did not turn out pretty.

The guy should either learn StarCraft or just shut up.
niteReloaded
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Croatia5281 Posts
December 21 2009 11:03 GMT
#19
I agree that the ideal scenario would be to have some sort of innovative dexterity challenge.

But since that is likely to turn out forced and unnatural, it'll be similar to SC.
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
December 21 2009 11:08 GMT
#20
Sirlin has no clue about Bw or competitive RTS.

I don't want to be rude but i also think that he is an ignorant idiot.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
1 2 3 4 5 20 21 22 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#43
WardiTV1279
OGKoka 547
Harstem408
Rex175
IndyStarCraft 164
CranKy Ducklings122
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 547
Harstem 408
Rex 175
IndyStarCraft 164
Hui .154
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 2542
Flash 2177
Bisu 2145
Hyuk 1227
EffOrt 786
ZerO 728
firebathero 627
Larva 519
Snow 393
actioN 390
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 377
Stork 363
Soma 306
GuemChi 144
Pusan 122
Mind 100
JulyZerg 87
PianO 85
Light 82
hero 77
TY 56
sSak 54
Sharp 52
Sea.KH 48
Barracks 36
Yoon 36
sorry 36
Aegong 34
Free 26
GoRush 25
soO 24
Movie 22
zelot 22
JYJ21
HiyA 21
yabsab 20
Terrorterran 13
IntoTheRainbow 12
Shine 7
ivOry 3
Dota 2
qojqva3112
Gorgc1285
XaKoH 604
syndereN386
XcaliburYe346
League of Legends
singsing2458
Counter-Strike
byalli245
markeloff79
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King168
Other Games
B2W.Neo1045
hiko974
crisheroes379
Lowko280
Beastyqt185
ArmadaUGS126
Liquid`VortiX66
rGuardiaN46
ZerO(Twitch)17
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick36341
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 790
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2838
• WagamamaTV313
League of Legends
• Nemesis5748
Upcoming Events
RotterdaM Event
2h 37m
Replay Cast
10h 37m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 37m
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 10h
The PondCast
1d 20h
WardiTV European League
1d 22h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.