TL Mafia Ban List 2.0 - Page 18
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
Acrofales
Spain17799 Posts
On December 24 2013 17:25 Risen wrote: I like how geript said I was mod confirmed scum and I was town :D You manage to get yourself mod confirmed as the opposite of your alignment alot, don't you? <3 In other news: ![]() | ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On December 24 2013 03:33 WaveofShadow wrote: Alright so now that PYP: LoL is finally over, it's ban time. Bans for Kurumi, OdinofPergo, geript, nyxnyxnyx, Storrzerg, Kenpachi, Bill Murray, gtrsrs, Onegu, and Roffles. Geript, Odin, and Kurumi are the ragequitters (the rest are inactivity modkills) I believe so I'm wondering if they need harsher bans or not (or whether or not that's up to me). I'm not sure that all of the inactivity modkills should be the same punishment as the ragequitters. Not sure if any warnings beside all this needs to go out---BC and marv are excused from bans due to extenuating circumstances. This game has been going on for a long time so I've messed something up here or people feel the need to appeal, by all means let me know. These bans have been approved. On December 22 2013 12:33 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I wasn't reading the Obs QT very carefully, and I'll admit my wrongdoing on that. GMarshal I think you might be right after all. With your permission I'd like to undo Coag's ban. I feel as though put together, neither of the two warrants a ban. At least a ban from the entire mafia forum, that is. K On December 24 2013 13:59 DarthPunk wrote: This is the second game in a row in which Geript has got himself modkilled in order to rage quit a game. 1 ban is not enough. Repeatedly getting modkilled due to rage quitting is really shit. 3 game minimum IMO due to the nature of the crime and repeating the offense in consecutive games. This is still being discussed, I'm inclined to agree, tbh, there is a large difference between deciding not to play in a game anymore and finding a replacement, not having the time to play in a game and being replaced out, and quitting in a huff because you don't think people are playing as well as they should. Furthermore this isn't a question of "is ragequitting ok", as we all know ragequitters usually get the same punishment as inactives, this is a question of "is a repeat offender to be punished more harshly?", which I think we can all agree is a yes. Hell we already give repeat inactives 3 game bans, right ? | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 25 2013 00:21 GMarshal wrote: Furthermore this isn't a question of "is ragequitting ok", as we all know ragequitters usually get the same punishment as inactives, this is a question of "is a repeat offender to be punished more harshly?", which I think we can all agree is a yes. Hell we already give repeat inactives 3 game bans, right ? 1. If rage quitting isn't ever ok, then why aren't we also discussing a 1 game ban for Darth Punk for his actions in Noir? 2. It's hard to tell because afaik there haven't been repeat inactives since the ban list was wiped clean and all the previous inactives were given absolution. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On December 25 2013 00:42 geript wrote: 1. If rage quitting isn't ever ok, then why aren't we also discussing a 1 game ban for Darth Punk for his actions in Noir? 2. It's hard to tell because afaik there haven't been repeat inactives since the ban list was wiped clean and all the previous inactives were given absolution. 1.) Host discretion. Its never ok, but a host gets to determine how much impact it has on his game. Also the "x did y and didn't get punished" is not a valid defense. 2.) Its written explicitly in the rules of this thread. | ||
Acrofales
Spain17799 Posts
On December 25 2013 00:50 GMarshal wrote: 1.) Host discretion. Its never ok, but a host gets to determine how much impact it has on his game. Also the "x did y and didn't get punished" is not a valid defense. 2.) Its written explicitly in the rules of this thread. Pshhh GM, what kind of a Mafia player are you? Don't you know nobody ever reads the OP?! GM clearly scum for tryharding the rules! ![]() | ||
geript
10024 Posts
I'll take 3 games then, I won't be banned again ever. The standard has been set and I will be a staple on this list for every single little infraction in the future. If anyone in the future pulls a Darth Punk then so help me god this board will blow up like the Hindenberg if a ban isn't requested. | ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On December 25 2013 01:02 geript wrote: Ok so this place is fine with preferential treatment given to vets. I'll take 3 games then, I won't be banned again ever. The standard has been set and I will be a staple on this list for every single little infraction in the future. If anyone in the future pulls a Darth Punk then so help me god this board will blow up like the Hindenberg if a ban isn't requested. This is the attitude that is poisoning tl mafia. This self centered arrogance that thinks the world is about them.. Darth Punk isn't a vet any more than you are. Feel free to "explode" the banlist. I'm ready to ban the shit out of everyone until we either become a sane community again or I'm the last man standing. Fucking try me. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On December 25 2013 01:06 GMarshal wrote: This is the attitude that is poisoning tl mafia. This self centered arrogance that thinks the world is about them.. Darth Punk isn't a vet any more than you are. Feel free to "explode" the banlist. I'm ready to ban the shit out of everyone until we either become a sane community again or I'm the last man standing. Fucking try me. YOU'VE GOT MY SWORD!!! | ||
justanothertownie
16316 Posts
On December 25 2013 00:45 Oatsmaster wrote: Seriously what the fuck is with the people saying "WHY DONT YOU PUNISH HIM TOO??". You broke the rules, you get punished. Don't care about what happens to other people. Exactly this! | ||
Alakaslam
United States17323 Posts
And my juggling grenades!... ... Oh and I promise to try and be sane. | ||
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
And my axe. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Alakaslam
United States17323 Posts
On December 25 2013 02:33 Hopeless1der wrote: Merry Christmas you filthy as animals. You too, o closer one to Santa. The northerness! | ||
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
I don't particularly care if you ragequit or not, or who did what, but your completely self-centered attitude during a time when the rest of the forum is trying to band together, combined with your proclamations that in all future games you will do the bare minimum in all future games, have led me to the conclusion that you will be a detriment to all future games I host. To the rest of you, merry Christmas! | ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On December 25 2013 03:50 iGrok wrote: With apologies to GM, geript has a semi-permanent ban from my games. I don't particularly care if you ragequit or not, or who did what, but your completely self-centered attitude during a time when the rest of the forum is trying to band together, combined with your proclamations that in all future games you will do the bare minimum in all future games, have led me to the conclusion that you will be a detriment to all future games I host. To the rest of you, merry Christmas! Don't do this. Don't do this. Feel free to ban whoever you want from your games, but posting it here isn't going to help. | ||
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
On December 25 2013 04:08 GMarshal wrote: Don't do this. Don't do this. Feel free to ban whoever you want from your games, but posting it here isn't going to help. Sorry, I've always made it public before. I'll keep it private from now on. | ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
If you *must* contact me, I'll check my pms every so often. Merry Christmas folks. | ||
| ||