EPTO_O :D <3
NASL Week 7 Day 3 - Page 10
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
oDieN[Siege]
United States2904 Posts
O_O :D <3 | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:46 Drazerk wrote:  Axslav is located at the Top right While Naniwa is located in the Bottom right 4:30 Twilight council For Naniwa Expansion on the way for Axslav | ||
|
Serelitz
Netherlands2895 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:46 Serelitz wrote:  NaNiwa vs Axslav Game 1 on Crevasse0:00 Naniwa spawning @ 2 Axslav spawning @ 7 4:00 Naniwa gets a zealot. Axslav is getting an earlier 2nd gas, but only 1 probe on it. Axslav takes a Nexus and Naniwa is making a Twilight Council. | ||
|
Ocedic
United States1808 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:45 Mailing wrote: Yes, a terran can a-move zerg without infestors. He spent so much on infestors he didn't have enough banes to be too scary. And no, you can't kill the infestors if they NP thors, since there will be a wall of broodlings and fungals to keep you out of range. That's why you make 5 ghosts when you are ahead, spam EMP, stim and go go go and win. I don't remember that last god damn time I saw EMP hit an infestor. It's like countering HT tech with thors. You act as if building ghosts has zero repercussions for the Terran. Notice how Slush had a very small army? Because Infestors took up a **** ton of resources. Those fungals were annoying, but without a backbone army to back them up, they were pointless. Same thing with ghosts. They cut into your marine/tank/viking production: backbone units that win the game. Ultimately, Nada won the game so I don't see what point you're trying to make at all. That he would've won the game also if he had gone Ghosts? | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:48 Drazerk wrote: 4:30 Twilight council For Naniwa Expansion on the way for Axslav 5:30 Forge going down for Axslav Blink started for Naniwa | ||
|
Falcor
Canada894 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:44 mistgun_EU wrote: Why do u think his knowledge is better than gretorp ? bitter is asking gretorp about some insight all the time... Well thats what you do as a caster to keep the conversation going, but imo i would have to agree bitter is more knowledgeable or at the very least is able to communicate his thoughts more clearly. When gretorp trys to go into detail about zerg strategy most of the time it makes me cringe | ||
|
Scila
Canada1849 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:47 sermokala wrote: this is why Nada is a god in korean esport history. He has always done things like that that should be impossible. Yeah even top terran pros from eu/na can't macro well while they're microing and doing multiple harass. This kind of skill to be able to macro/micro so well only comes from years of work. | ||
|
gh0un
601 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:43 FallDownMarigold wrote: I made an effort to watch NaDa's minerals the whole time. Rarely saw either gas/minerals top 200-300. Seems like when he's in practice-form he really is the best mechanics guy out there in SC2 right now... 3-4 mining bases and still no resource pile up, while microing everywhere? sheesh Or he queues up stuff because he is out of form and therefore, in actuality, has terrible macro. You cant really tell anything from watching the minerals if we are talking about terran, as they can queue up stuff. The only race you can apply that to (looking at minerals in order to evaluate how good the players macro is) is zerg, as they cant queue up anything besides Queens. Im not saying that nada did that, but you cant be sure, therefore you shouldnt make such bold statements. Even with zerg, having low resources can be deceiving, as people sometimes do stuff like building 10 spinecrawlers, which does make it look like he had good macro because his minerals stayed low, but actually he wasted 1000 minerals for static defense, that mightve been better off spent into units. Having a high amount of unspent resources does imply bad macro. Having a low amount of unspent resources DOESNT necessarily imply anything. The implication only works one way, not both. | ||
|
oDieN[Siege]
United States2904 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
I guess geoff didn't actually cannon, but still | ||
|
mistgun_EU
309 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:49 Drazerk wrote: 5:30 Forge going down for Axslav Blink started for Naniwa 7:20 Naniwa tries to run up the base of Axslav but is caught with good force fields losing some stalkers before he escapes with blink further into the base of Axslav | ||
|
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:49 Scila wrote: Yeah even top terran pros from eu/na can't macro well while they're microing and doing multiple harass. This kind of skill to be able to macro/micro so well only comes from years of work. EmpireKas and Thorzain can. | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
CCa1ss1e
Canada3231 Posts
| ||
|
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
| ||
|
ffadicted
United States3545 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:50 Drazerk wrote: 7:20 Naniwa tries to run up the base of Axslav but is caught with good force fields losing some stalkers before he escapes with blink further into the base of Axslav 9:00 The blink stalkers run into the probe line and starts to kill probes Axslav GGs and leaves the game Naniwa is now 1-0 up in the series | ||
|
Serelitz
Netherlands2895 Posts
On May 28 2011 10:48 Serelitz wrote: 4:00 Naniwa gets a zealot. Axslav is getting an earlier 2nd gas, but only 1 probe on it. Axslav takes a Nexus and Naniwa is making a Twilight Council. 7:00 Naniwa with blinkstalkers at Axslav's ramp. Axslav making cannons at his ramp. Naniwa blinks past and kills a LOT of probes, and is almost thwarted due to good forcefields by Axslav. 3 stalkers vs 1 sentry and 1 stalker + 3 cannons. Naniwa's reinforcements blink up as well and he runs behind the main's mineral line. Axslav GGs. | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
| ||
| ||
