EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 3009
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18193 Posts
| ||
|
Sent.
Poland9268 Posts
| ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Volband
Hungary6034 Posts
On August 20 2018 06:33 Seeker wrote: Here's the really funny part though... Even after a perm ban has happened, a ban can still be overruled and the user can either be unbanned or have their perm ban reduced to a temp ban. But instead of waiting for me to reply to his PM, he straight up goes and reports me to Nazgul and Plexa in hopes of trying to get me in trouble. Lmao, that's what pissed me off the most. I basically grew up during the heyday of the internet boards, so butting heads with strangers is nothing new to me, especially given my nature. But man, there's something spineless in that when you rattle someone up, and then report them to the moderators. That's just disgusting. Also, what would you even expect? "Hey, the guy I keep sending private messages to keeps replying to them. Please punish him!" Reports are for disruptive (troll) behavior, and not a last ditch effort to signal Batman, so he may pull you out from the very hole you've dug yourself into. So to know that when even the higher ups agreed that he is a dum-dum, his response was not backing off a few steps, but instead doubling down on his shallowness... wow, if he keeps it up, you guys can soon expect a letter from Strasbourg. On August 20 2018 07:13 LegalLord wrote: He really seemed like a Shield clone in the making, as far as I'm concerned. Question is, will he come back on angry alts to complain about the ban now? I'm sure he's not back yet, because I would've gotten a response to my last PM, which was a gracious "rekt". Or maybe he's consulting with his lawyers now, I don't know. | ||
Falling
Canada11387 Posts
I've gotten a good laugh from how everything went down. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18193 Posts
On August 21 2018 07:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I wonder what's up with all these people I argue with blowing themselves up and getting banned. They're just the guys who argue with absolutely everybody. They are volatile and more likely to make it personal and get themselves banned. But before that, it's also more likely they argued with you: they argue with *everybody*!  | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
In sc-darkness case, we agreed on a few things anyways. I always got a sense of amusement over his hatred of British tourists. | ||
|
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
Neat. JD.Cursed was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker. That account was created on 2013-05-10 07:34:41 and had 8 posts. Reason: You have a total of 8 posts on TL and already have accumulated 3 mod actions. Things are not looking good for you... Please become a better poster before it's too late. Grumbels was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker. That account was created on 2009-05-02 04:58:17 and had 6807 posts. Reason: You were warned to drop it. You deliberately didn't listen. Please take a week off. IgnE was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker. That account was created on 2010-11-09 07:03:15 and had 6558 posts. Reason: Please stop posting low content one-liners that add nothing to the discussion. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23580 Posts
"He's on fire!" RIP comrades, next week should be better. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On August 27 2018 09:25 IgnE wrote: live free or die User was temp banned for this post. Honestly thought it was pretty witty by IgnE standards. Oh well. | ||
|
Jealous
10260 Posts
On August 27 2018 13:36 LegalLord wrote: Honestly thought it was pretty witty by IgnE standards. Oh well. Getting warned for that is insanity. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23580 Posts
It was a 1 week ban just fyi | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5298 Posts
if on the list, you get gunned down; if not, you at most get slapped around(for amusement mostly, sometimes made an educational example of). | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18193 Posts
On August 27 2018 17:57 xM(Z wrote: thing is, it doesn't matter the good one does here(excluding the working/affiliates dudes here obv.), it'll never compensate for the eventual fuckups, not even for minor ones. if on the list, you get gunned down; if not, you at most get slapped around(for amusement mostly, sometimes made an educational example of). Good around here is recognized with TL+ donations, liquipedia coins, featured blogs, and in the particularly outstanding cases, a star. I'm not sure what more you want. You want a get-out-of-jail-free token, so that every time you post something good (definition plz), you can post something bad and not get punished? Seems like a pretty awful way to run a site. But in addition, grumbels fully deserved the ban. He was told by seeker to stop that line of posting and didn't. I guess you can take it to website feedback whether seeker was right in telling him to stop it. But in all honesty, grumbels should have gotten banned for his first post in that topic. So it evens out IgnE likes to get himself into trouble. Not sure what is wrong with that joke, but IgnE getting himself banned isn't very surprising. | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5298 Posts
but, if you look at TL as being more than an address bar with specific data on <.xyz.> and see it as some sort of a community, it dings in your head that a good can be performed to/for another community member or something(like writings that would draw clicks/hits, make people laugh/breed positivity etc). | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18193 Posts
On August 27 2018 19:36 xM(Z wrote: what you exemplified there are TL's affiliates; even when voluntary, it(the deed, the helping), follows a (personal)choice which comes with its own responsibilities. that quasi-official position is not up for discussion because it's TL's personal territory. but, if you look at TL as being more than an address bar with specific data on <.xyz.> and see it as some sort of a community, it dings in your head that a good can be performed to/for another community member or something(like writings that would draw clicks/hits, make people laugh/breed positivity etc). And in the grand scheme of things, I think the community knows who are its good and bad members (okay, TL is both a community and a collection of quite a lot of subcommunities, and people "belong" to any number of them). I'd say both IgnE and Grumbels are "good" members of the community. But IgnE is known as a bit of a rebel, and Grumbels went and did something particularly stupid/nasty. So what exactly is the problem? And that 3rd ban: I have no idea who that is. Given the ban reason, I don't think you can even count him as part of the "community", but is rather just a troll? | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5298 Posts
A positive or negative relationship with the reinforcer; can be attained by building dependencies between the reinforcer and the response, as characteristic ramifications to a response, or by accidental means. Also known as: response-reinforcement contingency. REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY: "Reinforcement contingency is a positive or negative relationship between the reinforcer and the response." there is an overbearing preference here for putting good in line(via rules/definitions), in its place, questioning its meaning(semanticism) etc which culminates in"...the loss of rewards for positive behavior leads to eventual extinction of such behaviors." which according to psychotherapy means that eventually only assholes will remain. no one enjoys being good or doing good anymore because there's no one to share it with or it's to hard to even try. | ||
| ||
