The Automated Ban List - Page 1877

On May 07 2013 23:18 corumjhaelen wrote:

Are we back at the beginning of the XVIIIth century, or have I read something implying atheists are immorals ?

On May 08 2013 00:14 DHD wrote:
at least back then people had principles and the common belief of morally right and wrong when religion was a fundamental staple of life...

just to set a few examples : now a 14 year old girl can be legally slutty , get contraceptives without a parental consent , get abortions + get abortions without parental consent etc. etc.

i can turn the TV on and witness over a dozen channels at any given time featuring rappers talking about selling drugs +raping women+murdering , women stripping , acting like $2 tricks , being bastards (literally and figuratively) making bastards and generally degrading society as a whole

you think this current generation is bad? just wait when the ones inspired by lil wayne nicki minaj and obama take charge...

you can argue on and on about this and that in regards to causes and effects , but its undeniable that it all stemmed from the amoral and deprived sycophants that is basically the liberal party aka left wing socialistic nutcase hippies and sometimes communists like mr. obama and his merry band of cultists he presides over ( he is a communist , anyone who looks into his past will discover his marxist political origins)


but is conservatism also morally corrupt? yes and no - some facets of it can be just as bad and possibly worse if allowed , but currently it is nowhere near as bad as what the liberalists stand for


edit: why was i warned for saying liberals should be banned? i've seen much worse posted on this thread and no such warning given...





User was temp banned for the unsourced claim that Obama is a communist.

On May 08 2013 01:15 cLAN.Anax wrote:


Lol, that sounds like the dumber part of the post if you ask me, backseat moderating in the same thread. X-D

His conclusion may be correct, but I would base it on Obama's policies and beliefs happening to align with Communism (redistribution of wealth, strong support for public education, class warfare) than blindly asserting it to "Marxist political origins."

*sigh* Why can't we have smarter right-wingers in the politics megathread?... >_<

On May 08 2013 01:15 cLAN.Anax wrote:


Lol, that sounds like the dumber part of the post if you ask me, backseat moderating in the same thread. X-D

His conclusion may be correct, but I would base it on Obama's policies and beliefs happening to align with Communism (redistribution of wealth, strong support for public education, class warfare) than blindly asserting it to "Marxist political origins."

*sigh* Why can't we have smarter right-wingers in the politics megathread?... >_<

On May 08 2013 01:15 cLAN.Anax wrote:


Lol, that sounds like the dumber part of the post if you ask me, backseat moderating in the same thread. X-D

His conclusion may be correct, but I would base it on Obama's policies and beliefs happening to align with Communism (redistribution of wealth, strong support for public education, class warfare) than blindly asserting it to "Marxist political origins."

*sigh* Why can't we have smarter right-wingers in the politics megathread?... >_<

On May 08 2013 03:09 dAPhREAk wrote:

because smart right-wingers are too busy redistributing the world's wealth to themselves instead of whining on a forum. we're busy; lots of wealth still available. ;-)

Luolis was just temp banned for 1 week by KadaverBB.

That account was created on 2012-05-24 14:32:01 and had 292 posts.

Reason: Fourth mod action due to balance whine.
Maybe you should stop.

Holy fuck WM so op. Nerf it now!

On May 08 2013 04:26 farvacola wrote:

That's funny, I seem to remember that a fair number of "smart right-wingers" had plenty of time to waste posting in the US general election thread.

I wonder what happened?


If this is indeed sarcasm, as AlternativeEgo suggests, it evaded me.

On May 08 2013 05:04 DeepElemBlues wrote:

Which countries has the US forced into extremism, this seems like a far cry from the history of the US supporting non-extremist dictatorships during the Cold War or the 1990s. Oh and which countries has the US bred deliberately bred instability in as opposed to say the countries China or Russia has deliberately bred instability in, or the countries the US has unintentionally bred instability in, seems to me we're getting just a teeny bit close to conspirazee! territory here.

Foreign involvement in the Simba Rebellion

The Soviets, the Chinese, the Americans and their Western allies were now all involved in the Congo, providing money, arms and advisors to their chosen factions. In addition, the "Radical" Leftist leaders of the African continent were outraged at the specter of white mercenaries and "Neocolonial" Western powers intervening on behalf of the Leopoldville regime, and openly supported the Stanleyville rebel government. In addition to Massemba-Debat's Marxist "Congo-Brazzaville" People's Republic, these supporters included: Ahmed Ben Bella in newly independent Algeria, Gamal Abdel Nasser in Egypt, and Julius Nyerere in the neighboring socialist nation of Tanzania, among others.

By early August 1964 Congolese government forces, with the help of the groups of white mercenaries under their own command, were making headway against the Simba rebellion.

A mercenary fighting for the West in the Congo gives the following account:

It seemed to me we had been taking villages apart, innocent villages of peaceful farming folk who did not want any part of this war, all the way along the track from far down in the south.
We would turn up unexpectedly, open fire without warning, race through the place, burning every pathetic shanty and shack to the ground regardless of who might be inside. The idea was to spread the image of our determination and ruthlessness; to terrorise the whole area; to give the rebels an example of what they were in for...
It seemed almost certain that the villagers knew nothing about the activities of the rebels...
Unsuspecting women were hustling around, carrying water and going about the last of their day's chores. Children were playing in the dust, laughing and shouting to one another.
We paused for a few minutes, and then came the order to fire. There was a great crackle of shots from machine guns and our deadly new Belgian rifles. Women screamed and fell. Little children just stood there, dazed, or cartwheeled hideously as bullets slammed into them.
Then, as usual, we raced into the place, still firing as we went. Some of us pitched cans of petrol on to the homes before putting a match to them. Others threw phosphorus hand grenades, which turned human beings into blazing inextinguishable torches of fire.
For a while, as we raced along, there was bedlam. Shrieks, moans, shrill cries for mercy. And, above all, the throaty, half-crazed bellowing of those commandoes among us who quite obviously utterly loved this sort of thing. Then, as we moved away beyond the village, the comparative silence, the distant, hardly distinguishable cries of the wounded, the acrid smell of burning flesh.

These mercenaries were trained to never, 'in any circumstances', take prisoners:

Even if men, women and children come running to you... even if they fall on their knees before you, begging for mercy, don't hesitate. Just shoot to kill.

Fearing defeat, the rebels started taking hostages of the local white population in areas under their control. Several hundred hostages were taken to Stanleyville and placed under guard in the Victoria Hotel.