The Automated Ban List - Page 1330
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
and i swear to god, if that red warning at the top gets any larger, even old men like me will be able to read it without a magnifying glass. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42991 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:48 dAPhREAk wrote: i wonder how bad kwark wants to ban pillage right now. lol. and i swear to god, if that red warning at the top gets any larger, even old men like me will be able to read it without a magnifying glass. Not at all. He's an idiot but if idiocy becomes bannable on the internet then I'd never have enough time to ban them all. The idea that I'm foaming at the mouth and slamming my fists against walls as I ban people is absurd and the idea that rape apologism would become more acceptable if I just calmed down is nonsense. I think Pillage just really wants to fight a machine. | ||
Pillage
United States804 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:45 Blazinghand wrote: Man Pillage get off your high horse, all of those were great ban reasons, some of them were thoughtful, and a couple were hilarious. All those people got what they deserved AND some awesome commentary. If you really think Kwark is out of line, take it to website feedback or something. I'm not going to bother addressing this here anymore because no one is willing to take it seriously. Fine, get your popcorn ready, I'll put something in website feedback, but it will be pointless because everyone is so willing to utilize emotions to feel superior to others, especially on the internet. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
Seriously though I think Pillage what has an issue with is Commandment 1, so this discussion probably goes in website feedback. | ||
Pillage
United States804 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:51 KwarK wrote: Not at all. He's an idiot but if idiocy becomes bannable on the internet then I'd never have enough time to ban them all. The idea that I'm foaming at the mouth and slamming my fists against walls as I ban people is absurd and the idea that rape apologism would become more acceptable if I just calmed down is nonsense. I think Pillage just really wants to fight a machine. Why are you being so disrespectful? What did I ever do to you? Insulting me is absolutely uncalled for. | ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:52 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah there's some unjustified over-condescending tone going on from Pillage, for sure, but I don't think Kwark would ban a critic mid-criticism. That's what GMarshal is for huehueuhue Seriously though I think Pillage what has an issue with is Commandment 1, so this discussion probably goes in website feedback. Actually, I do my very best never to ban my critics, and rather explain to them why they are wrong. It doesn't often work, but I prefer to convert rather than kill. | ||
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
![]() | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:54 GMarshal wrote: Actually, I do my very best never to ban my critics, and rather explain to them why they are wrong. It doesn't often work, but I prefer to convert rather than kill. Oh no I meant more like, since it's not good to ban one's own critics, KwarK would bring in a friend to do it instead so it would look good. Didn't mean to imply you hammer your own critics. Not a well-worded joke I guess. On August 24 2012 08:53 Pillage wrote: Why are you being so disrespectful? What did I ever do to you? Insulting me is absolutely uncalled for. Well to be fair you were being kinda dickish. Actually, fairly dickish to him. so yeah. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42991 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:53 Pillage wrote: Why are you being so disrespectful? What did I ever do to you? Insulting me is absolutely uncalled for. Calm down. | ||
Pillage
United States804 Posts
On August 24 2012 08:55 Blazinghand wrote: Oh no I meant more like, since it's not good to ban one's own critics, KwarK would bring in a friend to do it instead so it would look good. Didn't mean to imply you hammer your own critics. Not a well-worded joke I guess. Well to be fair you were being kinda dickish. Actually, fairly dickish to him. so yeah. Dickish? Really? I was pointing out that I didn't agree with some of his methodologies, how is that dickish? I didn't insult him whatsoever nor did I disrespect him, I merely expressed disappointment. . | ||
Pillage
United States804 Posts
I don't take kindly to insults, Kwark, especially personal ones. Now I don't agree with a lot of what you believe in but I never felt the urge to call you names. You may not be out of line here given your status on TL, but anywhere else that stuff doesn't fly. I'm not going to let you wiggle off the hook when you step out of line like that. | ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
Pillage, take it to website feedback please. Do not continue to derrail this thread. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42991 Posts
On August 24 2012 09:10 Pillage wrote: I don't take kindly to insults, Kwark, especially personal ones. Now I don't agree with a lot of what you believe in but I never felt the urge to call you names. You may not be out of line here given your status on TL, but anywhere else that stuff doesn't fly. I'm not going to let you wiggle off the hook when you step out of line like that. And yet when you accuse me of being unprofessional in something that I clearly take very seriously (I've been on tl and been involved in running shit on tl for many years now) and tell me I'm getting all emotional and need to calm down that's not in the least bit insulting? You think you're upset but you're not actually and the only reason you think you should make this post is because your judgement is bad. You should probably take a few minutes to really think it through because you can't trust yourself to just post like a normal person. ^the above was a parody of you ^yes I was being condescending and disrespectful ^so were you | ||
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On August 24 2012 01:11 jdseemoreglass wrote: Waste of time... Wow, I'm impressed. After a half a dozen bans you've finally learned not to back-sass the mods. Congrats. On August 24 2012 04:41 NicolBolas wrote: Why is this discussion happening here? I was wondering that myself. 100 new posts in this thread since yesterday, and I'll be honest I skimmed through all of them. I haven't the time nor the engery to read through that much totally un-ABL-related stuff. Really belongs in Website Feedback. All I know is that while I don't always agree with Kwark's tact or attitude, I will say that I've never ever seen him perm someone who didn't totally deserve it. So I don't see what the issue is.... On August 24 2012 08:48 dAPhREAk wrote: i wonder how bad kwark wants to ban pillage right now. lol. and i swear to god, if that red warning at the top gets any larger, even old men like me will be able to read it without a magnifying glass. I think we should see how big we can get Ares to make it without ourselves getting banned.... Come'on Ares, just a little bigger... *poke* *poke* ![]() On August 24 2012 08:54 GMarshal wrote: Actually, I do my very best never to ban my critics, and rather explain to them why they are wrong. It doesn't often work, but I prefer to convert rather than kill. Convert them all... to Pony-tology.... yes.... moar RBD... On August 24 2012 08:53 Pillage wrote: Why are you being so disrespectful? What did I ever do to you? Insulting me is absolutely uncalled for. Pillage, meet Kwark. He's Scottish. That should answer all of your questions. + Show Spoiler + | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42991 Posts
| ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?37032 Posts
Stay on topic please, discuss bans here. Damn... Oo;; | ||
![]()
motbob
![]()
United States12546 Posts
EDIT: actually, hold on. | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On August 24 2012 10:41 motbob wrote: I tried to make it move across the screen, but html tags didn't work. EDIT: actually, hold on. What next, ban gifs? XD | ||
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On August 24 2012 10:41 motbob wrote: I tried to make it move across the screen, but html tags didn't work. EDIT: actually, hold on. Let me help: ![]() -edit: even better + Show Spoiler + ![]() -edit2: It also might be *actually* helpful to remind some of the new ABLers that we do have an IRC for the non-ban related stuff #TL-ABL Also, I love how I have the ability to get this thread off track with one post. I am the off-topic masta'. :D -edit3: [21:01] Aerisky|work it's not the most annoying gif in the world by a long shot actually [21:01] Aerisky|work imho Remember, you caused this: + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
| ||