|
On June 15 2009 12:22 myfriendPlank wrote: I doubt Blizzard Entertainment will do anything about it Though....
Siege Tank, Marine Bayonetts, Zergling Wings, Scythe DT, Infestor, Nomad, SCV Blue Flames, Stalker, Tempest, Soul Hunter, Ghost Backpack, etc...
The community has a suprisingly good track record with this kind of stuff  And 85% is a pretty big chunk of the target consumers.
|
On June 15 2009 12:13 Schismotive wrote:
I don't like the way the DTs look in comparison to BW (The whole game just screams WC4 rather than SC2 in my opinion), but i think seeing two different skins for them wouldn't be a bad idea.
Ok now even the unit models are drawing Warcraft comparisons? I don't even understand this one.
|
the female ghost looks like she has D cups O.o
|
i dont understand why we have a photoshopped picture here. if you guys honestly want blizzard to think we want dwarf women as ghosts, then by all means keep it up.
|
On June 15 2009 06:06 Horangi wrote:every unit should be female 
totally agree
|
On June 15 2009 13:02 eMbrace wrote: i dont understand why we have a photoshopped picture here. if you guys honestly want blizzard to think we want dwarf women as ghosts, then by all means keep it up.
Its to motivate people like you to make a better one. He did a really good job with his version. If you want a taller one lets see it (and if its good ill put it in OP).
|
On June 15 2009 11:33 EchOne wrote: Tom I believe Archer wants you to clarify the reasoning that connects: "DTs are the only permanently cloaked unit." to "DTs will be easily visually recognizable regardless of slightly differing models." I don't think there will be any problem regarding recognizing the different DT models, but I also am curious how and why their being permanently cloaked contributes to this.
Beacuse unlike with other units, the first thing one notices about a DT is not it`s model, but it`s permanent cloaking. Afterall, other then the Obs, there is no other unit that remains transparent all the time. That is why the model is less important with the DT then it is with other units, since the transparency makes them fairly similar. It is for that reason that Blizzard can afford using seperate models for the DT.
If any unit could have two seperate models and not be visually confusing, do you honestly think Blizzard would have only made seperate models for the Dark Templar? And in such a late stage of development to boot?
EDIT: While I agree with Archer that that the community has influenced many of the changes in SC2, I wish Marine shields were one of them. -.-
|
If it means the women won't complain the game is sexist then for the love of god GIVE US A FEMALE GHOST
|
On June 15 2009 07:04 Archerofaiur wrote:
I also feel that there should only be one multiplayer model for each unit. But given that the DT already breaks that rule I see no reason Ghost shouldnt have a female version. I also dont think that every unit should have 2-3 models. Only the higly individualized special units (ghosts, DT maybe HT or a Zerg unit but no more).
I suggest, if there is a mirror match-up, the two unit models (DT clans) will be implemented for each side separately. Ghosts can have different skins too, but make the gender randomness a generic one.
|
I voted no because it is completely pointless. I care way more about how the game plays than whether or not I can have a male or female ghost. And if we can have a female ghost, why can't we have a female SCV, or male medic. It's just a useless addition to the game that does not need to be implemented. I should also note that I am strongly supportive of the less is more argument in gaming.
|
no , two models is too confusing for observers just 1 model for all
|
just make one model, either male of female. the female ghost should have less clothes, more skin.....and bigger boobs. id also like to hear the sound she makes when she dies nah meannnn
|
On June 15 2009 13:16 Probe. wrote: If it means the women won't complain the game is sexist then for the love of god GIVE US A FEMALE GHOST
I was gonna say "who gives a fucking shit whether or not it's male or female" but this reason owns
|
Actually why not make all ghosts female? Kinda makes everyone agree, sept those who dont want blizz to care about graphics and touch :/
|
Question:
When you select a group of Ghosts, what voice would they respond with? Male or female?
or do you want female only Ghosts?
|
On June 15 2009 06:06 Horangi wrote:every unit should be big breasted female 
fixed
|
|
Give me Asian marines, MILIIONS OF THEM
|
maybe it should be, when you produce a ghost, theres a 50% chance of the unit being a male and 50% chance of it being female. this way u can implement both models (with the same abilities and stats) and make it just based on chance
|
Alright, compromise
Have the ghost's voice go through a synthesizer of some kind so that it's impossible to tell what gender it is. Then everyone can buy into their own preference. Right?!
|
|
|
|