• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:44
CEST 13:44
KST 20:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash ASL21 General Discussion How Can I Add Timer & APM Count? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group F [ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1643 users

[S] Terran Mobile Base - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Shadowfury333
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada314 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-01-31 22:06:56
January 31 2009 20:35 GMT
#41
On February 01 2009 05:29 Sonu wrote:actually that would be perfect XD

but then it would be like C&C


How would that be like C&C? The only games I can think of that operated like that were the Homeworld Series and Universe at War (Hierarchy Walkers).

For the record, I like the the whole idea.
Darkness called...but I was on the phone, so I missed him. I tried to *69 darkness, but his machine picked up. I yelled "Pick up the phone, Darkness", but he ignored me. Darkness must have been screening his calls.
Sonu
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada577 Posts
January 31 2009 20:38 GMT
#42
this is gold
"I really like this wall-in, because its not a fucking wall" - DAy[9]
obesechicken13
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States10467 Posts
February 01 2009 01:59 GMT
#43
Not to be mean or anything, but what would this do to team games? A slow push takes time, time that is robbed from your nonterran ally meaning he has to fend off superior forces due to your reduced mobility.
I think in our modern age technology has evolved to become more addictive. The things that don't give us pleasure aren't used as much. Work was never meant to be fun, but doing it makes us happier in the long run.
djdolber
Profile Joined May 2008
Sweden85 Posts
February 01 2009 02:48 GMT
#44
very nice post! love it! Would have very high potential of interesting mechanics and situations!

TERRAN POWER GOGOGO!!
SCV good to go sir!
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 03:15:08
February 01 2009 03:14 GMT
#45
On February 01 2009 05:26 InRaged wrote:
Archerofaiur, I wanted to try that already and not only that, but no luck :[
That's worth effort in WC3 only with Project Revolution mod but it's dead, apparently, and I'm not even sure it's as easy to tweak as regular UMS.
And in SC making buildings produce stuff while uplifted or simply increasing their flying speed requires hacking of starcraft.exe ...


I fiddled around with the WC3 editor this morning and it definatly is possible to model it.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Kwidowmaker
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Canada978 Posts
February 01 2009 04:29 GMT
#46
Why not make production buildings have a secondary role while flying? It would make the Terran be able to switch between roles on the fly and encourage the use of lift off while diversifying the game.

In the context of SCBW:

If factories had a repair ability while lifted off then they would be ideal in accompanying a push. While the tank line isn't threatened, they could land and reinforce the push. To those that complain that SC2 is dumbed down: this adds a new unit to manage with different purpose and method.

If the barracks' scouting ability were increased while it was floating then it wouldn't quite be set apart from its current role - after all, it is an annoying eye that just floats there in PvT - but it would be the choice for building scouting. If it were able to build outposts (some sort of bunker/turret/bunker-turret-hybrid! that would be like Pardot Kynes' environment-monitoring stations) it would be something that would move around the map and prepare areas for Terran use, and as a bonus, could be used in some sort of a rush.

The science facility could be a floating umm... science facility that repairs and recharges science vessels (one at a time, now). Those that scream "Imbalance! Irradiates and EMP too soon!" should remember that this function could not be used as a rush to those little green clouds or the Devil's tsunami of annoyance that blankets my noble warriors; and instead would only be useful after the necessary upgrades were purchased (after that it's pretty awesome though - the dome could depress and the vessel could land there. Very erotic).

The engineering bay can upgrade SCVs or something and increase worker management micro!

Starports can fly around being a freaking air-aircraft carrier (emphasise the wraith, yo). Benefits don't number very high and are pretty much limited to encouraging wraith usage (and only if it is viable), but heh, the Intrepid is sick and this would be too. Maybe if it recharged energy it would increase the use of stealth. Who knows?

Also, the armory should fly over infantry and drop guns (Ak-47s for everyone) and rocket launchers and stuff. This would increase bio in TvP (ignore this, this is stupid).
Kk.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5771 Posts
February 01 2009 10:09 GMT
#47
Yes, I think adding a secondary role for lifted production structures is the way to go. Non-production structures shouldn't have those - that'd make things a bit too complex, imo.

As said previously, buildings shouldn't be able to drop units they produce but simply store them inside, and unload when the building finally lands. The limit of stored units would be subject to balance.

Additionally, I think that the buildings capable of lifting off should have an engine-like extention on top of them that can be targeted separately from the core structure (by ranged units), and when killed the building would be unable to float anymore, unless repaired by an SCV. If the engine is destroyed during the flight, the building crashes onto the ground and loses a portion of its HP; if it's above unbuildable ground (be it water, cliff edge or whatever) - it loses all HP.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5771 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 22:55:05
February 01 2009 13:52 GMT
#48
This is how I see this (based heavily on InRaged's OP). I bolded the changes I made.


Salvage

- accessed by building Nomad Facility add-on at the Command Center
- Salvage can be used on any building except defensive ones (and except Command Center)
- requires SCV (add-ons are built without SCV – salvaged without SCV either)
- completes in less than 5 seconds for any structure
- costs 30% and returns 130% of the building cost (subject to balance)
- reconstructing building after it has been salvaged takes 80% less time (Take your SCV, salvage the Supply Depot, and next time you build it with any other SCV, construction of this single new Supply Depot will be completed in a matter of couple seconds.)

+ Show Spoiler [Salvage process by InRaged] +
[image loading]


Lift-off mode

- buildings float at Brood War speed (faster speed can be accessed by building Nomad Facility add-on at the Command Center)
- Factory/Barracks can train units but not spawn them (when the unit is 100% finished it's stored inside the building, the production of the unit next in queue starts; unit storage limit subject to balance); allows to relocate buildings without wasting production time (subject to balance)
- Starport can normally produce units

- Command Center cannot produce units when lifted at all (SCVs currently queued need to be cancelled before the CC can lift off)
- lifted structures have decreased base armor (to enable the enemy to prevent the Terran from relocating structures and/or using their secondary roles)
- lifted off structures have secondary roles (inspired by Kwidowmaker) (does not require Nomad Facility):

Command Center: can carry up to 5 SCVs
Engineering Bay: increases range of friendly units by 1 within a certain radius
Barracks: increases healing rate of Medivacs within a certain radius
Factory: increases repair rate of SCVs within a certain radius
Starport: can produce units normally


Enemy players can disable the secondary roles by bringing the structures to the ground (i.e. killing the Lift-off Module).


Salvage vs. Lift-off (solely by InRaged)

To move just one building using Salvage:
1. Select SCV;
2. Use it to Salvage Building;
3. Select SCV at new location;
4. Rebuild Building.
All of them should be performed individually for each building and require player to have screen centered at SCV/Building.

To move one or group of the buildings using ability to fly:
1. Salvage add-on;
2. Lift off;
3. Move to new location;
4. Once each building arrived, land it and rebuild add-on.
Whether they can be performed for all buildings in the group at once or not depends on the current game situation. Action 4 should be issued individually for each building in the group


Add-ons

- less space required

+ Show Spoiler [ New Size by InRaged] +
[image loading]


Lab: unlocks advanced units at the structure it's connected to; unlocks tech when connected to a proper structure (available at Barracks, Factory and Starport)

Reactor: adds an extra prduction queue (available at Barracks, Factory and Starport)

Surveillance Station: works like in BW (available at Command Center; unavialable at Planetary Fortress)
tech requirements: Barracks with Lab attached

Nomad Facility: unlocks Salvage and Faster Floating
tech requirements: Engineering Bay + Factory with Lab attached

Planetary Fortress (technically a building 'evolution'): adds a defensive turret on top of the CC; makes the CC unable to lift off or attach any add-ons
tech requirements: Engineering Bay + Planetary Fortress upgrade at Engineering Bay



edit: ** small corrections
additional corrections
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 16:17:18
February 01 2009 16:15 GMT
#49
These kind of threads are why I love theorycrafting :p


Maybenexttime, any reason you don't think lift-off buildings shouldn't incorporate drop pods in some form. Personally, I think giving buildings the ability to store units overlaps with the medivac. Then again one of the issues with drop pods is differentiating it from warp-in. So I can see where you are coming from if thats it.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5771 Posts
February 01 2009 17:31 GMT
#50
The storage is just for newly created units - you wouldn't be able to load them like you do with CC and SCVs.

The reason for introducing a (limited) storage capacity is to offset the negative aspect of relocation time. Currently, in BW this type of strategies are largely unviable due to having to halt unit production - this is too much of a disadvantage, resulting in building relocation working only on a small scale (proxy Barracks or Factory, floating into the enemy's main with a single building, etc.).

If buffed floating speed turns out to solve this problem alone then we can drop being able to produce when lifted altogether.

In other words, buildings wouldn't be used to relocate units - they'd just work sort of analogically to Warp-in (newly produced units only, that is).


As for Drop Pods, I personally like the idea but think it overlaps with Warp-in too much. On the other hand, this mechanic(s) allow for similar mobility but in a completely unique way, and it fits Terran just as much (and WarHammer fans won't whine).


What do you think of the secondary roles I suggested? I think the synergy they require (Barracks + Medivacs; Factories + SCVs; E-Bays + Siege Tanks/any sort of ranged units) add to their uniqueness.

On the other hand, the Lift-off Module allows the enemy to shut those secondary roles down and unable the buildings to lift off in general.

It brings macro to the battlefield, makes it so much more interesting, and yet keeps the whole dynamic balanced.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 20:37:53
February 01 2009 20:36 GMT
#51
On February 02 2009 02:31 maybenexttime wrote:


On the other hand, the Lift-off Module allows the enemy to shut those secondary roles down and unable the buildings to lift off in general.



Your proposal is good but I would perfer if we made it simpler. For instance why do we need the lift-off module? Couldn't I just shoot down the rax?
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5771 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 21:03:33
February 01 2009 21:03 GMT
#52
It has tons of HP.

The Lift-off Module is there to offset buffed movement speed, unit storage/producing when lifted and secondary roles.

Shooting down (several) 1000+ HP building(s) doesn't sound like the best idea.

So I decided it's best to go the 'diversity but fragility' way.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
February 01 2009 21:32 GMT
#53
On February 02 2009 06:03 maybenexttime wrote:
It has tons of HP.

The Lift-off Module is there to offset buffed movement speed, unit storage/producing when lifted and secondary roles.

Shooting down (several) 1000+ HP building(s) doesn't sound like the best idea.

So I decided it's best to go the 'diversity but fragility' way.


It has allot of HP but if I kill your barracks thats a huge setback.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Unentschieden
Profile Joined August 2007
Germany1471 Posts
February 01 2009 22:10 GMT
#54
Archer is right, your solution is needlessly complicated. Simply reduce armor while floating if buildings are to hard to kill.

Your proposals are quite bold, it would turn the Terran base into a Flotilla. It is interesting and so different I can´t say how that would effect gameplay - what I´d change either way are the needless complications.
Nomad Facility? Salvage changes? Secondary roles for Buildings? Liftoff Modules? Do we REALLY need that?

You changes show a kaskading nature which you definetly need to look out for.
It went a bit like this:

Buildings should be usefull in the air -> can produce while flying -> Need "exit storage" -> needs additional incentive to keep in air -> Secondary functionality -> needs additional weakness to be fair -> Liftoff Module

zobz
Profile Joined November 2005
Canada2175 Posts
February 01 2009 22:20 GMT
#55
I like this idea. What if instead of dropping the ground units below a floating factory or barracks, the units built up inside it like scvs loaded into a cc, and unloaded when the building lands? That way the buildings could lift off and inch forward a bit and then land again periodically to release its units, expanding on the idea of the leapfrogging terran push. Also would give you a bit more macro to do, if you were going to try and push your rally this way.

The problem is, though, that i'm not sure sc2 really encourages leapfrog like movement in any way, so much that i'm not sure moving your rally forward, at least continuously, would even be beneficial in general. I mean with harassment significantly more viable i assume in any matchup, does slow pushing really work? Now it would be interesting if maps commonly provided blocked off areas where you could defend your mobile infrastructure from a choke point, like it was an expansion, and anyway you could use your buildings as blockades obviously, especially for tanks. But still it might be awkward to have them relatively vulnerable in the middle of the map, always needing some defense.

Also, you could salvage your add-ons so that you could rebuild them repeatedly when you needed to land to build tanks.

And i think this shouldn't require an upgrade, thus spicing up terran even more, and that you should be able to load up units into any production building the same way you can already load a cc, perhaps any unit into any production building. Imagine the possibilities: you could lift off a command center and a barracks together to an island for extra scv transfer, you could lift a cc loaded with marines instead of scvs for instant basic defense, or you could even proxy a factory midgame, load it with some units and lift it into a dark corner of an enemy base to produce the rest on site and then salvage it when you're done.
"That's not gonna be good for business." "That's not gonna be good for anybody."
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5771 Posts
February 01 2009 22:52 GMT
#56
On February 02 2009 07:10 Unentschieden wrote:
Archer is right, your solution is needlessly complicated. Simply reduce armor while floating if buildings are to hard to kill.

Your proposals are quite bold, it would turn the Terran base into a Flotilla. It is interesting and so different I can´t say how that would effect gameplay - what I´d change either way are the needless complications.
Nomad Facility? Salvage changes? Secondary roles for Buildings? Liftoff Modules? Do we REALLY need that?

You changes show a kaskading nature which you definetly need to look out for.
It went a bit like this:

Buildings should be usefull in the air -> can produce while flying -> Need "exit storage" -> needs additional incentive to keep in air -> Secondary functionality -> needs additional weakness to be fair -> Liftoff Module



I agree.

How about this:

- salvage changes subject to change
- lift-off module out

- Nomad Facility stays - Salvage & Faster Floating are way too useful/strong to be available to the Terran player right away - same as Warp-in or Nydus Network
- instead of Lift-off Modules lifted buildings' armor gets a debuff
- secondary roles stay (not necessarily for all buildings mentioned, probably just for Barracks/Factory/Starport) - there has to be more of an incentive to bring your production structures to the front
zobz
Profile Joined November 2005
Canada2175 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 23:14:48
February 01 2009 23:11 GMT
#57
On February 02 2009 07:52 maybenexttime wrote:
there has to be more of an incentive to bring your production structures to the front
If this is true than this idea just sucks ass. Forwarding your production line is a nice simple idea and a few features that make this possible for one race is interesting to me. But floating buildings with buff auras is very lame. If we have to try that hard to make the basis of this idea (a slow pushing production line) actually strategically beneficial then i think we need a new basis.
"That's not gonna be good for business." "That's not gonna be good for anybody."
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5771 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-02-01 23:16:57
February 01 2009 23:15 GMT
#58
How is this not simple or lame? ;;

And, no, we're not "trying that hard" - I just wanted to add some damn diversity...
Unentschieden
Profile Joined August 2007
Germany1471 Posts
February 01 2009 23:16 GMT
#59
I can live with making fastfloat and salvage upgrades but I´m not to happy with the Nomad Facillity as it is right now. By your description it´s basically a "sacrificed" Command center.

Random idea: Nomad Facility is a seperate, naturally floating building (immeadiately lifts off when build, can´t land) that is responsible for deconstruction/salvaging (I´d especially love if that wasn´t limited to OWN buildings). That would also justify more than just one.


The advantage of bringing production structures to the front are faster reinforcements. If anything Tech Buildings would need a incentive to be at the front.
If anything give secondary effects to Tech buildings, might even be a incentive to build more than just one of each.
But overall I´m not to insistant on having the Terrans move their buildings close to the Frontlines.(With warp-in you risk a Pylon/Prism, not the gate for example).
Building Addons serve as another incentive NOT to move your Buildings.
Pendragon
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada23 Posts
February 01 2009 23:50 GMT
#60
I think the secondary affects are pointless. There's already huge incentives to move your base forward, due to being able to reinforce faster. There's also a draw back of having to rebuild add-ons if you decide you want to produce higher teched units with your flotilla and the fact that your production buildings are more vulnerable of getting wiped out.

I like mechanics simple, yet elegant and deep. I think floating buildings producing units fits the bill pretty well, but cluttering this idea up with secondary effects detracts, not adds to it.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko244
SortOf 194
Rex 83
trigger 78
BRAT_OK 57
Creator 19
MindelVK 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 30743
Horang2 1100
Bisu 521
Shuttle 520
Mini 299
Last 195
BeSt 183
Rush 146
Soulkey 85
Dewaltoss 83
[ Show more ]
Soma 76
ggaemo 67
Mind 57
sSak 57
sorry 30
Movie 19
GoRush 18
Noble 17
[sc1f]eonzerg 17
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
IntoTheRainbow 11
Bale 10
Shine 8
Shinee 8
Dota 2
Gorgc3473
XaKoH 709
League of Legends
JimRising 352
Counter-Strike
fl0m1500
zeus552
Other Games
gofns13444
B2W.Neo1245
ProTech113
Sick98
Mew2King84
QueenE27
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL8569
Other Games
BasetradeTV257
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 69
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1755
• Stunt630
Upcoming Events
BSL
7h 17m
RSL Revival
19h 17m
Cure vs Rogue
Maru vs TBD
MaxPax vs TBD
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 2h
BSL
1d 7h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 22h
Wardi Open
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.