EPT[Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Mutaller
United States1051 Posts
| ||
|
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
| ||
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
On July 15 2023 20:56 WombaT wrote: Starcraft 2 didn’t make WoW/League/Fortnite kinda money but it’s still pretty high up there in terms of all-time PC sales It just seems the publisher wants these perpetually monetisible games and it doesn’t naturally fit into that. But it still was wildly successful. If an SC3 launched with co-op, regular skins and announcer packs, the odd war chest etc, I think there’d be tons of potential for squeezing some extra cash out. Unfortunately it felt like it got the structure in place too late for many of the non-hardcore players who’d already moved on to other things. it absolutely COULD fit into that, but they opted for a box model with the shop coming in far too late to save the development in the game. they'll figure it out with diablo and hopefully come in with something compelling if Starcraft 3 is real. | ||
Waxangel
United States33705 Posts
| ||
|
Latham
9592 Posts
On July 15 2023 22:17 dbRic1203 wrote: In no World this is going to be a RTS Game. They ->might<- work on something that is using the lore/setting/IP of SC, but I can t see them making a RTS game. They simply Don t even have the know-how in the Company anymore. This is my take on it as well. All the competent and seasoned veterans of the RTS genre have long since departed Acti-Blizz. If anything, I'd expect a shooter a la Starcraft: Ghost: RE. If Acti-Blizz would already be under Microsoft, I could see a snowball's chance in hell for a Starcraft 3 spearheaded by the people who made Age of Empires 2: Definitive Edition, but since it's not the case yet, as far as I'm concerned Blizzard in-house RTSes are dead and buried. | ||
|
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
On July 16 2023 05:49 Waxangel wrote: It's completely realistic that some kind of new StarCraft IP game is in the works, but I seriously doubt that it's a traditional RTS. Honestly, I'd be surprised if Blizzard ever made a PC-only game again (besides WoW expansions & remasters). this is more true today than it was yesterday that's for sure haha | ||
|
__Coin_Ciden_Ce__
11 Posts
Do not trust Bl**zard. | ||
|
Ludwigvan
Germany2373 Posts
EDIT: I looked at whom Blizzard is hiring. And they are hiring a lot of people for an "unannounced survival game". I hope that that is not it...  | ||
|
Latham
9592 Posts
On July 16 2023 20:26 Ludwigvan wrote: does that mean that I have to watch BlizzCon? EDIT: I looked at whom Blizzard is hiring. And they are hiring a lot of people for an "unannounced survival game". I hope that that is not it... Supposedly that one is a completely new IP. There were leaks from it already. Unless they decided to slap a SC skin on it now... | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17890 Posts
On July 15 2023 20:56 WombaT wrote: Starcraft 2 didn’t make WoW/League/Fortnite kinda money but it’s still pretty high up there in terms of all-time PC sales It just seems the publisher wants these perpetually monetisible games and it doesn’t naturally fit into that. But it still was wildly successful. If an SC3 launched with co-op, regular skins and announcer packs, the odd war chest etc, I think there’d be tons of potential for squeezing some extra cash out. Unfortunately it felt like it got the structure in place too late for many of the non-hardcore players who’d already moved on to other things. SC2 continues to be awesome. The game has a metric tonne of content. A person with full time IRL responsibilities can play the game forever. | ||
|
Beelzebub1
1005 Posts
On July 16 2023 23:15 JimmyJRaynor wrote: SC2 continues to be awesome. The game has a metric tonne of content. A person with full time IRL responsibilities can play the game forever. On top of just being head and shoulders X10 above any other RTS on the market, I'm in mid diamond and never have to wait for more then 30 seconds for a match and anytime I hop on the arcade it's either 30 seconds or a few minutes and I'm in game. This game has a surprisingly stable player base over this decade and some change. Tbh I know everyone (myself included) is stoked for StormGate but looking at the alpha or pre alpha or whatever test video they put out I'm kinda.....yeesh....looks like they are trying to stray away from a Starcraft type RTS and make some type of futuristic version of Warcraft 3 and AOE 4. Obviously it took years and years for SC2 to take it's current peak form but I'm very much so hoping they design SG with a SC2/SCBW approach and not the other RTS games which to me quite honestly just kind of suck as far as an E-Sport goes. WC3 and AOE are great games, but do they hold a candle to SC as far as a competitive RTS? Hell no. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17890 Posts
My mmr ranges from D-1 to P-2 depending on how out of practice I am; I find games fast. My sister in law is in Gold and she finds games quickly as well. I play the game when I have time. So in any 6 months time period I will go several weeks without playing. My great experience with SC2 is part of what convinced me to give D4 a shot. So ATVI is seeing some kind of return for it's continued support of SC2. A lot of old games disappear. 87% of all games released before 2010 are unplayable without piracy. Pretty brutal. "We won't sell you this game but we will litigate if you try to play our game." This is the absurd state of the video game industry. It is a tragic-comedy. Examined from this context Blizzard and ATVI have done a great job supporting a 13 year old game. | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States14003 Posts
On July 15 2023 06:10 mutantmagnet wrote: He didn't confirm SC3 only that something SC related is coming. I would bet on it being a third person shooter instead of an RTS. Starcraft: Fire Emblem or just a Hearthstone Expansion would be sick | ||
|
IIEclipseII
Germany157 Posts
| ||
|
AirbladeOrange
United States2574 Posts
| ||
|
Gescom
Canada3516 Posts
| ||
|
Harris1st
Germany7420 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland27446 Posts
On July 16 2023 23:15 JimmyJRaynor wrote: SC2 continues to be awesome. The game has a metric tonne of content. A person with full time IRL responsibilities can play the game forever. It’s still an awesome game but it took a long time for them to get it right with additional content for more casual players. They did eventually get it right, but it launched as a pretty antisocial experience, things like Co-op that worked great weren’t implemented for some time etc. Warcraft 3 was a more social experience and custom games felt a bigger part of the overall experience Things a hypothetical SC3 could nail easily out the gate. And they’ll probably have to, it really depends what model they go down, F2P or a retail purchase. | ||
|
SHODAN
United Kingdom1162 Posts
| ||
|
gTank
Austria2668 Posts
Also, I hope they wont do another "dont you guys have phones" move on us. | ||
| ||
