• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
TeamLiquid Liquipedia LiquidDota LiquidLegends
EDT 05:07
CEST 11:07
KST 18:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[BSL15] Ro16 Recap Pt.13Lore of the Nexus: The Angiris Council0DHM Valencia: Power Rank52[TSL9] Prize Pool & Talent18Code S RO10 - Group B, Day 1 Preview (Season 2)7
Community News
2022 AfreecaTV Challengers Starleague Season 211BSL 2v2 ProLeague x ShieldBattery - SIGN UP NOW!14Code S RO10 Groups announced, RO20 final results1ESL Open #128: ByuN, MaxPax, Scarlett win3Artosis to leave Korea after GSL Season 3, possibility of online GSL casts?87
StarCraft 2
General
Forbidden Ground buildings Looking for a herO game Rogue & Trap out for DHM Valencia? Doublelift on State of SC2 and the Various Regions Zest Retires
Tourneys
DreamHack Masters: Valencia 2022 - Main Event [TSL 9] Qualifiers HSC XXI Qualifiers [GSL 2022] Code S:Season 2 - Ro10 Group A ProBots 2022 Season 2
Strategy
herO's PvZ Simple Questions Simple Answers What should I try to work on to improve my TvZ [G] YAKS LOTV: Yet Another hotKey Setup - zerg
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [A] SC Real Scale
External Content
Mutation # 324 Violent Night Mutation # 323 Well Trained Mutation # 322 Warp Zone Mutation # 321 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion repmastered.app: replay sharing and analyzer site [BSL15] Ro16 Recap Pt.1 YellOw wins poker tournament for $696,000 USD
Tourneys
Hawk vs Artosis Show match July 6th 50$ prize pool No-Worries League - Similar-Skill Match-Making Deathfate Pro Team League 2 Announcement [BSL15] - RO16 Group C - Friday 17:00 CEST
Strategy
A new RTS map for scbw Project: Strat Update ZvT Guardian Hydra Optimized Strategy before the gosus
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Final Fantasy XIV Diablo Immoral The PlayStation 5 Crossfire: Legion - A new RTS combining C&C and SC
Dota 2
[DPC 21-22] Tour 3 Discussion/LR Official Dota and Chess General Discussion TL.net migration megathread + LiquidDota archive LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net LiquidDota Site Rules
League of Legends
[Patch 12.7] Arcana Skins Release Discussion LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net [Summer Split] LoL Esports General Discussion [Patch Notes] Release General Discussion
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments Lore of the Nexus: The Angiris Council Mapping Heroes: Battleground Stats
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread British Empire Mini Mafia II Chezinu streak(s) Mafia Sengoku Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread TL.net Community Site Consolidation NASA and the Private Sector If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting happened and people disagree on what to do
Fan Clubs
Day[9] Fan Club soO Fan Club Zest Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [TV] HBO Game of Thrones [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2021 - 2022 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion 2021 NFL/CFB Season McBoner: A hockey love story
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Starcraft 2 No longer going on top of Start Bar The Ultimate Mouse Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Helping
ChristianS
On Radicalization and S…
plasmidghost
Bravery and cowardice…
Starlightsun
My daughter wants to pla…
JoinTheRain
On gun violence in America…
MrBitter
First time having "S*X".
Garnet
Gomorrah
Broodwar4lyf
Getting Back to it..!.20 years…
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1241 users

What balance / design changes do you want to see? - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States9565 Posts
May 26 2022 03:06 GMT
#181
I like the idea of having Queens more at the forefront and allowing for more skirmishes when spreading/denying creep.

However, instead of something big like making tumors not able to spread, how about we just increase the cooldown that it takes for tumors to spread? That would be a good first step to try out, and will already help a lot. It would encourage queens to be more active if they want to aggressively spread as fast as possible. Safer spreading (keeping queens more at home to defend harass) would be nerfed a little.

It takes 11 seconds right now before tumor can spread. Why not try nerfing that to 13 or maybe 15 seconds?

Also, currently, you can spread a tumor before the tumor finishes spreading the max creep. This means that players with high APM/multitasking can spread creep faster than other players if they are on top of it and spread as fast as possible.
If we make tumors take 13-15 seconds to spread instead of 11, it will lower the mechnical skill ceiling of Zerg, make Zerg easier to play at lower levels, and ultimately make it easier to balance Zerg around the top players without making Zerg as hard for lower levels. We don't have to worry about a few top pros being super good at spreading creep.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
archi1491
Profile Joined May 2022
1 Post
May 26 2022 03:37 GMT
#182
--- Nuked ---
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
464 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-05-26 10:14:59
May 26 2022 10:14 GMT
#183
On May 26 2022 12:06 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
I like the idea of having Queens more at the forefront and allowing for more skirmishes when spreading/denying creep.

However, instead of something big like making tumors not able to spread, how about we just increase the cooldown that it takes for tumors to spread? That would be a good first step to try out, and will already help a lot. It would encourage queens to be more active if they want to aggressively spread as fast as possible. Safer spreading (keeping queens more at home to defend harass) would be nerfed a little.

It takes 11 seconds right now before tumor can spread. Why not try nerfing that to 13 or maybe 15 seconds?

Also, currently, you can spread a tumor before the tumor finishes spreading the max creep. This means that players with high APM/multitasking can spread creep faster than other players if they are on top of it and spread as fast as possible.
If we make tumors take 13-15 seconds to spread instead of 11, it will lower the mechnical skill ceiling of Zerg, make Zerg easier to play at lower levels, and ultimately make it easier to balance Zerg around the top players without making Zerg as hard for lower levels. We don't have to worry about a few top pros being super good at spreading creep.


Yeah like ! --- Double Nuked ---
Jameeack
Profile Joined May 2022
1 Post
May 26 2022 11:03 GMT
#184
--- Nuked ---
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark2987 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-05-27 10:12:39
May 26 2022 20:14 GMT
#185
About the Zerg players getting better at spreading creep. I think the Inject change so that it's stackable had a huge impact on this. It's actually crazy how hard Zerg was to play in HotS, SoO basically made his career by being the best Injector. But now it's become a lot more trivial, which allows Zergs to spend these actions on spreading Creep.

I think removing the ability from Tumours to spread can be a good change. I also think you can just as easily increase the cost of Creep Tumours from 25->50.

The thing is, Zerg is not actually OP right now, so there needs to be other changes to not simply nerf Zerg. Zerg just has OP Corruptors, Lurkers, Spores, Fungal and Abduct, but I put Terran as the stronger race.

I like this change:
Queen starting energy from 25->50.
Transfuse back to pre-LotV.
Creep Tumour energy cost from 25->50.

As for Hatch tech Hydra, I think it can be interesting, but I don't see it solving any issues.
I like the idea of Hydras being higher tech than the Roach, then as Roach evolves into the Ravager it becomes higher tech than the Hydra, then lastly, Hydra evolves into the Lurker and is now again higher tech than the Ravager.
That said I don't see the issue with Queens being the anti air unit for Zerg, Actually not at all and I also think it's a cool gimmick that Queen walks exist.

Aesthetically, I think though that Hydras should be mega fast like they were in BW and I think actually a cool change could be to nerf their range from 5->4 in exchange for giving them A LOT of move speed. One of the worst parts of Hydralisk timing attacks is that they are actually as all in as Queen walks are. Because, Hydras just can't retreat off of Creep. But then this would also be a stealth buff to Lurker, since they are now more mobile, in evolving into Lurkers.
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany14675 Posts
May 26 2022 20:38 GMT
#186
On May 27 2022 05:14 ejozl wrote:
About the Zerg players getting better at spreading creep. I think the Inject change so that it's stackable had a huge impact on this. It's actually crazy how hard Zerg was to play in HotS, SoO basically made his career by being the best Injector. But now it's become a lot more trivial, which allows Zergs to spend these actions on spreading Creep.

Also the addition of the steal unit from control group hotkey made it way easier to split up your army and set up counterattacks, also freeing up a lot of APM Zerg can use on other tasks. I think this often gets overlooked
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7659 Posts
May 26 2022 23:36 GMT
#187
@ejozi My suggestion about the hydra is because I think we have gotten these ideas about balance and design in our heads over the last decade. Some of them are right and some of them are wrong, but they are there.
"zerg has no anti-air"
"zerg can't defend early harass"
"zerg needs time to drone"
These are the ideas that have seen most forms of early harass gutted. It's why the Void Ray has been dogshit for 10 of 12 years. It's why the Oracle is only allowed to get a couple of kills, despite being made of wet single-ply toilet paper. So my idea is, let Zerg have their early anti-air. That way when they lose because they can't be arsed to keep vison over their own natural, it's their own fault.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
464 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-05-27 13:39:34
May 27 2022 13:35 GMT
#188
Damned,I have never read so many messages pointing the same solution. I just can t guess who thinks Hydralisks need a 1 supply cost or 2 (eventually if patch)

Poll: With an eventual patch must hydralisk supply cost be equal to 1 or 2 ?

2 supply cost (7)
 
88%

1 supply cost (1)
 
13%

8 total votes

Your vote: With an eventual patch must hydralisk supply cost be equal to 1 or 2 ?

(Vote): 1 supply cost
(Vote): 2 supply cost




Poll: Then how many minerals and gas ?

(2 supply) unchanged (3)
 
60%

(1 supply) 75 / 25 (2)
 
40%

(1 supply) 50 / 25 (0)
 
0%

5 total votes

Your vote: Then how many minerals and gas ?

(Vote): (1 supply) 75 / 25
(Vote): (1 supply) 50 / 25
(Vote): (2 supply) unchanged

InfCereal
Profile Joined December 2011
Canada1690 Posts
May 27 2022 16:06 GMT
#189
On May 27 2022 05:38 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 27 2022 05:14 ejozl wrote:
About the Zerg players getting better at spreading creep. I think the Inject change so that it's stackable had a huge impact on this. It's actually crazy how hard Zerg was to play in HotS, SoO basically made his career by being the best Injector. But now it's become a lot more trivial, which allows Zergs to spend these actions on spreading Creep.

Also the addition of the steal unit from control group hotkey made it way easier to split up your army and set up counterattacks, also freeing up a lot of APM Zerg can use on other tasks. I think this often gets overlooked


Being able to see worker counts on supply hover also helped.

I've harped on this a lot in discord and reddit - every "helper" you add to the game removes a factor that differentiates players.

They add up.
Cereal :: AllThingsZerg.com :: SC2Overwatch.com
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7659 Posts
May 27 2022 19:58 GMT
#190
I don't think the change should be to resources or supply. I know some people yearn for the days of SC:BW when the hydra was the core of the Zerg army, but we don't want to see mass hydra now or see a big buff to roach/hydra. Hydras should be a situational unit built in moderate numbers.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
851 Posts
May 27 2022 22:52 GMT
#191
On May 28 2022 04:58 Jerubaal wrote:
I don't think the change should be to resources or supply. I know some people yearn for the days of SC:BW when the hydra was the core of the Zerg army, but we don't want to see mass hydra now or see a big buff to roach/hydra. Hydras should be a situational unit built in moderate numbers.


I agree, the Hydralisk doesn't need to be changed. It's already had a few meta eras based around it as well so it's not like it's weak or without use.

The balance team should start by adjusting creep to what another poster on the previous page mentioned where creep doesn't get spread by tumors. Instead Queens have to manually place every tumor which would create a skirmish zone on the creep where alot of fighting would be done to contest creep spread.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany14675 Posts
May 28 2022 07:49 GMT
#192
On May 26 2022 12:06 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
I like the idea of having Queens more at the forefront and allowing for more skirmishes when spreading/denying creep.

However, instead of something big like making tumors not able to spread, how about we just increase the cooldown that it takes for tumors to spread? That would be a good first step to try out, and will already help a lot. It would encourage queens to be more active if they want to aggressively spread as fast as possible. Safer spreading (keeping queens more at home to defend harass) would be nerfed a little.

It takes 11 seconds right now before tumor can spread. Why not try nerfing that to 13 or maybe 15 seconds?

Also, currently, you can spread a tumor before the tumor finishes spreading the max creep. This means that players with high APM/multitasking can spread creep faster than other players if they are on top of it and spread as fast as possible.
If we make tumors take 13-15 seconds to spread instead of 11, it will lower the mechnical skill ceiling of Zerg, make Zerg easier to play at lower levels, and ultimately make it easier to balance Zerg around the top players without making Zerg as hard for lower levels. We don't have to worry about a few top pros being super good at spreading creep.

This is imo the best suggestion so far. A change that doesn't affect low-level players too much but definitely will have an impact at the pro level.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
464 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-05-29 12:14:52
May 29 2022 12:05 GMT
#193
Having an eye on the previous video i linked some days ago, hydralisks aren t enought cost efficient against marines/medivacs.. Of course you can argue that Zergs need a mixed army composition with Banelings, but their cost is the same amount of minerals and gas (and Tier 1...).

I feel like it s more dependant about player skill injection than a true strategic decision and Zergs can run out of bankrupt if his parry (of paying hydralisks) isn t enought cost-effective.

That s why adding one point to the hydralisks range (and lower his damage in consequence) possibly not have such a big impact (in term of priority) on the units range ladder ((Wiki)Range ), ... And with reducing medivacs range from 4 to 3, you could get a new relationship/interaction between units (by now it s about mediv : 4 + 5 = 9 (marines) against 6 for hydralisks).

With these changes, a skilled Zerg could snipe more medivacs. Just my feelings
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
851 Posts
May 29 2022 13:33 GMT
#194
On May 29 2022 21:05 Vision_ wrote:
Having an eye on the previous video i linked some days ago, hydralisks aren t enought cost efficient against marines/medivacs.. Of course you can argue that Zergs need a mixed army composition with Banelings, but their cost is the same amount of minerals and gas (and Tier 1...).

I feel like it s more dependant about player skill injection than a true strategic decision and Zergs can run out of bankrupt if his parry (of paying hydralisks) isn t enought cost-effective.

That s why adding one point to the hydralisks range (and lower his damage in consequence) possibly not have such a big impact (in term of priority) on the units range ladder ((Wiki)Range ), ... And with reducing medivacs range from 4 to 3, you could get a new relationship/interaction between units (by now it s about mediv : 4 + 5 = 9 (marines) against 6 for hydralisks).

With these changes, a skilled Zerg could snipe more medivacs. Just my feelings


But why? Hydralisks are not a balance issue, they aren't weak, they aren't strong. Why would they need a buff to snipe medivacs? lol
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
464 Posts
May 29 2022 15:12 GMT
#195
On May 29 2022 22:33 Beelzebub1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2022 21:05 Vision_ wrote:
Having an eye on the previous video i linked some days ago, hydralisks aren t enought cost efficient against marines/medivacs.. Of course you can argue that Zergs need a mixed army composition with Banelings, but their cost is the same amount of minerals and gas (and Tier 1...).

I feel like it s more dependant about player skill injection than a true strategic decision and Zergs can run out of bankrupt if his parry (of paying hydralisks) isn t enought cost-effective.

That s why adding one point to the hydralisks range (and lower his damage in consequence) possibly not have such a big impact (in term of priority) on the units range ladder ((Wiki)Range ), ... And with reducing medivacs range from 4 to 3, you could get a new relationship/interaction between units (by now it s about mediv : 4 + 5 = 9 (marines) against 6 for hydralisks).

With these changes, a skilled Zerg could snipe more medivacs. Just my feelings


But why? Hydralisks are not a balance issue, they aren't weak, they aren't strong. Why would they need a buff to snipe medivacs? lol


because marines/medivacs rapes hydralisks.
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States806 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-05-29 17:19:40
May 29 2022 17:18 GMT
#196
Something worth looking at might be projectile speed and (I'm pretty sure) preswing.

Unlike almost every other ranged unit in Starcraft 2, Marines don't have a projectile. Combined with SC2's smart targeting AI, this means that they don't waste damage on overkill. All else being equal, units without a projectile absolutely massacre units with a projectile.
The original thread on this is here, but the video seems to be gone. The person tweaked hydralisks to be identical to marines. The fight was only equal when the projectile unit had 50% more damage (+3 attack) over the instant hit unit.
https://tl.net/forum/starcraft-2/198860-insta-vs-missile-shot

What this really highlights is how much of a difference overkill makes in unit performance in large battles. I am pretty sure how much damage is lost to overkill can be adjusted by changing projectile speed or preswing. Changing preswing probably has the side effect of making the unit more or less responsive.

Anyway, tweaking those numbers is a way to change how units perform in large battles without changing the core stats like attack speed or damage and significantly changing how they perform in very small engagements or when attacking things with a lot of health. Also, there is probably a lot more room for fine-grained adjustment with this.



But anyway, the difference between projectile and not projectile is probably a very significant element in why marine/medivac destroys hydralisks.

EDIT: I can't take full credit for this idea. Increasing Stalker projectile speed by 50% was suggested earlier in this thread.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany14675 Posts
May 29 2022 19:07 GMT
#197
On May 30 2022 00:12 Vision_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2022 22:33 Beelzebub1 wrote:
On May 29 2022 21:05 Vision_ wrote:
Having an eye on the previous video i linked some days ago, hydralisks aren t enought cost efficient against marines/medivacs.. Of course you can argue that Zergs need a mixed army composition with Banelings, but their cost is the same amount of minerals and gas (and Tier 1...).

I feel like it s more dependant about player skill injection than a true strategic decision and Zergs can run out of bankrupt if his parry (of paying hydralisks) isn t enought cost-effective.

That s why adding one point to the hydralisks range (and lower his damage in consequence) possibly not have such a big impact (in term of priority) on the units range ladder ((Wiki)Range ), ... And with reducing medivacs range from 4 to 3, you could get a new relationship/interaction between units (by now it s about mediv : 4 + 5 = 9 (marines) against 6 for hydralisks).

With these changes, a skilled Zerg could snipe more medivacs. Just my feelings


But why? Hydralisks are not a balance issue, they aren't weak, they aren't strong. Why would they need a buff to snipe medivacs? lol


because marines/medivacs rapes hydralisks.

Building other units than the hydralisk is not an option?
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
dph114
Profile Joined May 2022
12 Posts
May 30 2022 04:12 GMT
#198
On May 30 2022 00:12 Vision_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2022 22:33 Beelzebub1 wrote:
On May 29 2022 21:05 Vision_ wrote:
Having an eye on the previous video i linked some days ago, hydralisks aren t enought cost efficient against marines/medivacs.. Of course you can argue that Zergs need a mixed army composition with Banelings, but their cost is the same amount of minerals and gas (and Tier 1...).

I feel like it s more dependant about player skill injection than a true strategic decision and Zergs can run out of bankrupt if his parry (of paying hydralisks) isn t enought cost-effective.

That s why adding one point to the hydralisks range (and lower his damage in consequence) possibly not have such a big impact (in term of priority) on the units range ladder ((Wiki)Range ), ... And with reducing medivacs range from 4 to 3, you could get a new relationship/interaction between units (by now it s about mediv : 4 + 5 = 9 (marines) against 6 for hydralisks).

With these changes, a skilled Zerg could snipe more medivacs. Just my feelings


But why? Hydralisks are not a balance issue, they aren't weak, they aren't strong. Why would they need a buff to snipe medivacs? lol


because marines/medivacs rapes hydralisks.

and? Should BC's be buffed because corrupters rape them?
syndbg
Profile Joined February 2018
22 Posts
May 30 2022 11:11 GMT
#199
On May 30 2022 13:12 dph114 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 30 2022 00:12 Vision_ wrote:
On May 29 2022 22:33 Beelzebub1 wrote:
On May 29 2022 21:05 Vision_ wrote:
Having an eye on the previous video i linked some days ago, hydralisks aren t enought cost efficient against marines/medivacs.. Of course you can argue that Zergs need a mixed army composition with Banelings, but their cost is the same amount of minerals and gas (and Tier 1...).

I feel like it s more dependant about player skill injection than a true strategic decision and Zergs can run out of bankrupt if his parry (of paying hydralisks) isn t enought cost-effective.

That s why adding one point to the hydralisks range (and lower his damage in consequence) possibly not have such a big impact (in term of priority) on the units range ladder ((Wiki)Range ), ... And with reducing medivacs range from 4 to 3, you could get a new relationship/interaction between units (by now it s about mediv : 4 + 5 = 9 (marines) against 6 for hydralisks).

With these changes, a skilled Zerg could snipe more medivacs. Just my feelings


But why? Hydralisks are not a balance issue, they aren't weak, they aren't strong. Why would they need a buff to snipe medivacs? lol


because marines/medivacs rapes hydralisks.

and? Should BC's be buffed because corrupters rape them?


Woah R-word. D:
I don't t think the analogy is correct. BCs have a good window where they're strong, which is pretty much until you have enough corruptors to 1shot BCs.

Hydras... I don't think there's a time when the hydra is better.

However, the idea of playing with the default hydra range might be useful.
Note that queens are extremely needed to defend proxy raxes. In the current state with awful range w/o upgrades and the current hp/cost, hydra is just useless vs that.

serendipitous
Profile Joined November 2017
Canada173 Posts
May 30 2022 11:42 GMT
#200
Hydras are meant to be a squishy long range backline unit with high dps and they do that job wonderfully. Dunno why we'd want to buff them.
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Livibee 292
OGKoka 224
ROOTSuperNova 220
ProTech147
Dragon 59
AusProbe 44
OG.YoGo 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 3014
actioN 677
Tasteless 583
Jumperer 184
sSak 121
Hm[arnc] 76
Killer 48
Rush 18
Bale 16
Noble 6
[ Show more ]
Rain 0
Dota 2
resolut1ontv 1083
XcaliburYe1066
BananaSlamJamma976
XaKoH 933
canceldota211
Fuzer 119
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
officialf0rest1902
fl0m685
Other Games
summit1g21657
tarik_tv20652
m0e_tv1944
singsing1141
ceh9858
Grubby466
Pyrionflax337
Crank 192
febbydoto109
DeMusliM17
Organizations
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO8010
ESL CS:GO B4224
Dota 2
BeyondTheSummit647
DreamLeague175
StarCraft 2
OGamingTV SC2 89
Blizzard YouTube
[ Show 23 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Light_VIP 9
• Adnapsc2 7
• Bosshoore 4
• LUISG 2
• Migwel
• Laughngamez YouTube
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• Gussbus
• CSOeSports
• intothetv
• aXEnki
• Alpha X_
• Poblha
• nightgamer69 0
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament2
• STPLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush11627
• Ambition2769
• Stunt591
Upcoming Events
KCM Race Survival
53m
DPC 2021/2022 Tour 3
9h 53m
Evil Geniuses vs TBD
OSC
10h 53m
TeamLiquid StarLeague
1d 1h
OSC
1d 4h
Showmatch
1d 15h
Artosis vs Hawk
TeamLiquid StarLeague
2 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
3 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
3 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
4 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
4 days
ESL Pro Tour
4 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
4 days
BSL: ProLeague
5 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
5 days
TeamLiquid StarLeague
5 days
ESL Pro Tour
6 days
ESL Pro Tour
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2022 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
DH Masters Valencia
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 5
ESL Challenger Valencia 2022

Ongoing

BSL Season 15: GosuLeague
Luck Over Strength
STL37
RCG 2021
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2022 Season 2
Nine-Tathlon Invitational
HoneyCai Friendlies Season 4
GAN Race Survival Season 4
CWCL Season 4
FS Mania
Big Baby Popularity Contest
KCM Race Survival 2022 Season 2
BSL Season 15
Deathfate Pro Team League
TOP Challenge Qualifier
WTL 2022 Summer
2022 GSL S2: Code S
StarCraft II: NationWars 7
Community Clash League S4
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Quals.
Masters Clash Champ. 2022
IEM Cologne 2022

Upcoming

Deathfate Pro Team League 2: Qualifier
Future Cup 4 (U18)
NiuPi Cup CN vs KR 1: Mihu vs Mighty
TOP Challenge
2022 ACS Season 2
NiuPi Cup 7: Soma vs sOrry
WSL Season 3
IEM Katowice 2023
2022 GSL: ST 2
DH Masters Atlanta
2022 GSL S3: Code S
TSL 9
HomeStory Cup XXI
X-Cup Summer 2022
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 10
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 9
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 8
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 7
X-Cup Summer 2022 - Qual. 6
IEM Rio Major 2022
ESL Challenger Melbourne 2022
ESL Pro League Season 16
BLAST Premier Fall Groups
ESL Challenger League S42 NA
ESL Challenger League S42 EU
ESL Challenger League S42 AP
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2022 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.