On March 26 2019 20:48 AxiomBlurr wrote:
''
That the round of 32 of each GSL boiling down into the round of 16 then a round of 8 that consistently shows equal race distribution over the entirety of SC2's history is remarkable.
The sample size is big enough to allow discrepancies to have an influence (like the case you mentioned). But we are still getting ro8 equal distribution - how do you account for this? An extremely long run of flukes? No, odds are that it is because each race has an equal chance to make it to the ro8.
How can this be if the races are not or have not been balanced? A bizarre coincidence in player skill/ race strength-weakness consistently balancing out to allow for a ro8 equal distribution? Occam's razor argues against that theory and I do also.
Imagine a scenario where we start with equal numbers in race but ended up with consistently having say 5+ Terrans (for example) on average in the ro8. What conclusions could we draw from this? We of course would allow for some anomalies...but if it was consistently 5+ Terrans in the ro8 over the entirety of SC2 history, it would be pretty damning evidence of uneven balance favoring Terran.
Thus equal race distribution in the ro8 on average over the entirety of SC2 history is very good evidence of balance.
Q.E.D![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif)
''
That the round of 32 of each GSL boiling down into the round of 16 then a round of 8 that consistently shows equal race distribution over the entirety of SC2's history is remarkable.
The sample size is big enough to allow discrepancies to have an influence (like the case you mentioned). But we are still getting ro8 equal distribution - how do you account for this? An extremely long run of flukes? No, odds are that it is because each race has an equal chance to make it to the ro8.
How can this be if the races are not or have not been balanced? A bizarre coincidence in player skill/ race strength-weakness consistently balancing out to allow for a ro8 equal distribution? Occam's razor argues against that theory and I do also.
Imagine a scenario where we start with equal numbers in race but ended up with consistently having say 5+ Terrans (for example) on average in the ro8. What conclusions could we draw from this? We of course would allow for some anomalies...but if it was consistently 5+ Terrans in the ro8 over the entirety of SC2 history, it would be pretty damning evidence of uneven balance favoring Terran.
Thus equal race distribution in the ro8 on average over the entirety of SC2 history is very good evidence of balance.
Q.E.D
![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif)
The fuck dude, GSL 2014 Season 2 RO32
14/4/14 -> 4/1/3
And I'm not mentioning GomTvT
If you insist on the entire history of SC2 then check the history first, please
Edit> 2014 S1
16/3/13 -> 5/1/2
2014 S3
16/7/9 -> 3/2/3 which is as equal as we can get but RO32 suggest the game isn't as balanced as it should be(or were just Protoss players better?)
At the same time 2013 S3
12/11/9 (kinda equal) -> 4/2/2 (not equal)
QED?
![](/mirror/smilies/clown.gif)
Edit 2> We have a whole unbalanced year but hey... qed