• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:33
CEST 23:33
KST 06:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL51Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Unit and Spell Similarities Help: rep cant save
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 663 users

AlphaStar AI goes 10-1 against human pros in demonstration

Forum Index > SC2 General
374 CommentsPost a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All
TL.net ESPORTS
Profile Joined July 2011
4 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-24 23:41:26
January 24 2019 21:36 GMT
#1


A series of exhibition matches between DeepMind's 'AlphaStar' and StarCraft II pros (Wiki)TLO and (Wiki)MaNa ended in a one-sided victory for the artificial intelligence which went a combined 10-1 against its human opponents.

The matches (broadcast from in-game replay) were played under the parameters of Protoss vs. Protoss and on the map Catalyst. AlphaStar was also restricted in the speed of its actions to keep it in line with human pros, such as having a 350 millisecond delay time between perceiving information and issuing commands. The AI also played with an average APM (actions per minute) of 280, compared to 390 for MaNa and 678 for TLO.

Despite making a number of decisions that would be considered questionable by human pro standards—such as over-saturated minerals with Probes, making very large number of Disruptors (and inflicting self-damage with them), or aggressively attacking high-ground defenses—AlphaStar was able to overpower its human opponents. Some of its plays resembled that of extremely-high APM bots (inhuman speed), such as complicated flanking actions or extremely precise Blink micro.

Check out DeepMind's blog to learn more about learning process of AlphaStar
(Please read this before you discuss technical topics)

TLO and MaNa faced a number of different AlphaStar 'agents'—versions of the AI that trained through matches against each other in an internal league (combined with initial, imitation learning from human replays). With accelerated training, the agents were able to accrue around 200 years of real-time StarCraft II training over 14 days. The agents in the demonstration showed different preferences for strategies—for example one opted for mass Disruptors while others chose mass Blink-Stalkers.



While AlphaStar defeated both TLO and MaNa 5-0 in previous recorded matches, MaNa was able take a victory in a final, live exhibition game against a new agent. While the first ten agents agents were effectively able to 'see' the entire map at once (NOT a maphack—more akin to a max zoom-out), the new agent was given restrictions to mimic human player's field-of-vision limitations during a game. While this new agent still had an estimated MMR of over 7000, MaNa was able to defeat its mass-Stalker strategy with careful scouting and an overpowering army of Immortals.

While AlphaStar chose Protoss and map to expedite the training process, DeepMind said the process could be applied to any race. Deepmind previously achieved notoriety for developing the AlphaGo AI which defeated a number of top Go players in exhibition matches.

Download replays from the exhibition

Check out the Reddit AMA with DeepMind's AlphaStar team!
Facebook Twitter Reddit
TL+ Member
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12790 Posts
January 24 2019 21:43 GMT
#2
I think the title is kinda misleading.
Raw interface AI goes 10-0, camera interface AI goes 0-1, would be more appropriate
WriterMaru
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33339 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-24 21:45:42
January 24 2019 21:44 GMT
#3
On January 25 2019 06:43 Poopi wrote:
I think the title is kinda misleading.
Raw interface AI goes 10-0, camera interface AI goes 0-1, would be more appropriate

This is a really, really insignificant nit to pick. It's a ~200 MMR difference according to their estimation, which is not worth putting in the TITLE. I'll forgive you though because you're just trying to defend mankind's pride.
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15919 Posts
January 24 2019 21:48 GMT
#4
I don't think we will ever get to a consensus that the AI outsmarted us at the game due to mechanical aspect of the game.
A good number of those games were won due to completely inhuman stalker micro.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
ArtyK
Profile Joined June 2011
France3143 Posts
January 24 2019 21:48 GMT
#5
I'd like to know epms and not worthless apms for this, considering the AI was capable of microing stalkers in 3 different places at once and win vs mass immortals.
Sup dood ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ KiWiKaKi | SLush | uThermal | PtitDrogo | SortOf | Clem ~ "I told my mom she should vote for me in Nation Wars, she said 'I dunno, I kinda want Finland to win'" – Luolis ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_NScWV9h8k#t=1h01m
TL+ Member
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33339 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-24 21:53:46
January 24 2019 21:52 GMT
#6
On January 25 2019 06:48 ArtyK wrote:
I'd like to know epms and not worthless apms for this, considering the AI was capable of microing stalkers in 3 different places at once and win vs mass immortals.


Honestly I feel that StarCraft II is much more of a mechanics game than 'strategy' game than most people think, (it's more real-time connect-four than chess), so I also felt this demonstration wasn't quite as impressive as it could have been.

At least for my personal taste, the truly impressive way to hold his exhibition would be to have an AI that's actually considerably BAD mechanically but still crushes human opponents based on strategies and tactics (and, I guess, EXTREME efficiency of actions).
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15919 Posts
January 24 2019 21:53 GMT
#7
On January 25 2019 06:48 ArtyK wrote:
I'd like to know epms and not worthless apms for this, considering the AI was capable of microing stalkers in 3 different places at once and win vs mass immortals.

I'm pretty sure apm = epm for the AI
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12790 Posts
January 24 2019 21:54 GMT
#8
On January 25 2019 06:44 Waxangel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2019 06:43 Poopi wrote:
I think the title is kinda misleading.
Raw interface AI goes 10-0, camera interface AI goes 0-1, would be more appropriate

This is a really, really insignificant nit to pick. It's a ~200 MMR difference according to their estimation, which is not worth putting in the TITLE. I'll forgive you though because you're just trying to defend mankind's pride.

How is that insignificant?
The raw interface didn't lose, yet the camera interface lost the first game its played. That means there is a huge actual difference between the two. Keep in mind that it's an estimated MMR, it's not like the AI played human ladder and only managed to go to 7300 MMR instead of 7500. It's the internal MMR from their internal league "The version of AlphaStar using the camera interface was almost as strong as the raw interface, exceeding 7000 MMR on our internal leaderboard."
WriterMaru
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33339 Posts
January 24 2019 21:56 GMT
#9
On January 25 2019 06:54 Poopi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2019 06:44 Waxangel wrote:
On January 25 2019 06:43 Poopi wrote:
I think the title is kinda misleading.
Raw interface AI goes 10-0, camera interface AI goes 0-1, would be more appropriate

This is a really, really insignificant nit to pick. It's a ~200 MMR difference according to their estimation, which is not worth putting in the TITLE. I'll forgive you though because you're just trying to defend mankind's pride.

How is that insignificant?
The raw interface didn't lose, yet the camera interface lost the first game its played. That means there is a huge actual difference between the two.


This is where I stop engaging you in discussion ^_^
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
DieuCure
Profile Joined January 2017
France3713 Posts
January 24 2019 21:57 GMT
#10
It's worth nothing until they can beat KR terrans !

More seriously, it was fun to watch ( + science and all ).
TL+ Member
Achamian
Profile Joined May 2017
82 Posts
January 24 2019 21:57 GMT
#11
On January 25 2019 06:54 Poopi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2019 06:44 Waxangel wrote:
On January 25 2019 06:43 Poopi wrote:
I think the title is kinda misleading.
Raw interface AI goes 10-0, camera interface AI goes 0-1, would be more appropriate

This is a really, really insignificant nit to pick. It's a ~200 MMR difference according to their estimation, which is not worth putting in the TITLE. I'll forgive you though because you're just trying to defend mankind's pride.

How is that insignificant?
The raw interface didn't lose, yet the camera interface lost the first game its played. That means there is a huge actual difference between the two. Keep in mind that it's an estimated MMR, it's not like the AI played human ladder and only managed to go to 7300 MMR instead of 7500. It's the internal MMR from their internal league "The version of AlphaStar using the camera interface was almost as strong as the raw interface, exceeding 7000 MMR on our internal leaderboard."

Alphastar lost because Mana adapted and new what to expect going in. All you have to do is defend like a regular insane AI and prioritize ramp defenses. I bet Mana could do a clean sweep of 5-0 if he played again.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
January 24 2019 22:00 GMT
#12
I would also tend to put more weight in the results (despite low sample size of the camera-restricted agent) than their estimated MMR, at least without information about how those estimations are made. They said on the stream they really didn't know how powerful the agents would be or even if they had selected the agents which would have the best chance against human players. They don't seem to have a lot of faith in these MMR estimations. It seems to just be the MMR from the internal leaderboard.

all's fair in love and melodies
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-24 22:03:09
January 24 2019 22:01 GMT
#13
All these people underestimating AlphaStar.....you realize it learns by losing, right? Just wait for a couple months and it will be invincible.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12790 Posts
January 24 2019 22:02 GMT
#14
On January 25 2019 06:57 Achamian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2019 06:54 Poopi wrote:
On January 25 2019 06:44 Waxangel wrote:
On January 25 2019 06:43 Poopi wrote:
I think the title is kinda misleading.
Raw interface AI goes 10-0, camera interface AI goes 0-1, would be more appropriate

This is a really, really insignificant nit to pick. It's a ~200 MMR difference according to their estimation, which is not worth putting in the TITLE. I'll forgive you though because you're just trying to defend mankind's pride.

How is that insignificant?
The raw interface didn't lose, yet the camera interface lost the first game its played. That means there is a huge actual difference between the two. Keep in mind that it's an estimated MMR, it's not like the AI played human ladder and only managed to go to 7300 MMR instead of 7500. It's the internal MMR from their internal league "The version of AlphaStar using the camera interface was almost as strong as the raw interface, exceeding 7000 MMR on our internal leaderboard."

Alphastar lost because Mana adapted and new what to expect going in. All you have to do is defend like a regular insane AI and prioritize ramp defenses. I bet Mana could do a clean sweep of 5-0 if he played again.

Not really, I watched the replay and, even tho I don't know PvP much, I'm pretty sure AlphaStar had the game somewhat won after the successful harass (yeah, even after the adept counter harass from MaNa), it had far better income, and sufficiently higher army value to have time to build a good composition.

But it got stuck really bad on the warp prism harass, and when MaNa started to attack near the 2nd base it was really indecisive.

So it feels like the AI can have a good start because it's relatively easy, but isn't able to change plans according to current situation (2nd oracle was queued up during the harass, no split of stalkers in the main base when the warp prism got cornered).

Reading the article, I'm not sure if their approach can overcome these difficulties given more time.
WriterMaru
PhoenixVoid
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Canada32740 Posts
January 24 2019 22:02 GMT
#15
Remember when BoxeR said AlphaGo couldn't beat a human at SC? Well, he was technically right, because AlphaStar did.
I'm afraid of demented knife-wielding escaped lunatic libertarian zombie mutants
Kafka777
Profile Joined December 2015
361 Posts
January 24 2019 22:06 GMT
#16
This was interesting. Nevertheless right now AI is playing a different game. It has much higher effective APM, by far superior micro management and superior vision, it will not be distracted in terms of sight. That is why it won games.
The strategies presented by AI were rather poor and reactions questionable. I would say that AI has still a long way to go before it beats any pro players on equal terms, as successfull AI must prove itself beat players mainly by adopting superior strategies.
ArtyK
Profile Joined June 2011
France3143 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-24 22:15:58
January 24 2019 22:14 GMT
#17
On January 25 2019 06:53 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2019 06:48 ArtyK wrote:
I'd like to know epms and not worthless apms for this, considering the AI was capable of microing stalkers in 3 different places at once and win vs mass immortals.

I'm pretty sure apm = epm for the AI


yeah that's what made sense to me but i'd still like to know for all 3 during the matches

or i could download the replays if i wasnt lazy
Sup dood ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ KiWiKaKi | SLush | uThermal | PtitDrogo | SortOf | Clem ~ "I told my mom she should vote for me in Nation Wars, she said 'I dunno, I kinda want Finland to win'" – Luolis ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_NScWV9h8k#t=1h01m
TL+ Member
Doko
Profile Joined May 2010
Argentina1737 Posts
January 24 2019 22:15 GMT
#18
Is AlphaStar gonna be the new barcode!?

I'm quite impressed by the decision making and overall gameplan the AI showed but after looking at the replays the micro its displaying is completely inhuman, its basically playing with 10-20% more supply in terms of how efficient its units are.
No_Roo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States905 Posts
January 24 2019 22:17 GMT
#19
As many others are pointing out, there's not much to be impressed with while the AI is playing a different game. We already know that a microbot using an API can outmicro a human using a mouse. I look forward to seeing what they come up with in the future, but what I saw today was no more interesting than if they had been feeding the AI bonus minerals.

Also looking forward to detailed replay analysis, I expect that will reveal that "APM" is a very misleading metric to be using.
(US) NoRoo.fighting
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15919 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-24 22:23:39
January 24 2019 22:22 GMT
#20
On January 25 2019 07:17 No_Roo wrote:
As many others are pointing out, there's not much to be impressed with while the AI is playing a different game. We already know that a microbot using an API can outmicro a human using a mouse. I look forward to seeing what they come up with in the future, but what I saw today was no more interesting than if they had been feeding the AI bonus minerals.

Also looking forward to detailed replay analysis, I expect that will reveal that "APM" is a very misleading metric to be using.

I mean - what we saw today was FAR superior to any bot we've ever seen in terms of strategy/decisionmaking so I wouldn't call it not impressive.
It's definitely not on the level that it has better decion-making than a pro though.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 27m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 183
JuggernautJason119
ProTech72
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2619
Dewaltoss 124
ZZZero.O 92
NaDa 32
Shine 11
MaD[AoV]4
Dota 2
capcasts131
NeuroSwarm25
League of Legends
Grubby4508
JimRising 597
Counter-Strike
flusha861
Foxcn247
taco 33
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu567
Other Games
summit1g6294
tarik_tv3111
FrodaN1774
fl0m885
ZombieGrub258
Pyrionflax160
ViBE109
Sick76
PPMD27
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV40
StarCraft 2
angryscii 20
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 58
• davetesta40
• LUISG 21
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21083
League of Legends
• Doublelift4543
• Jankos3013
Other Games
• Scarra1315
• imaqtpie786
• Shiphtur296
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
5h 27m
CranKy Ducklings
12h 27m
RSL Revival
12h 27m
ByuN vs Cham
herO vs Reynor
FEL
18h 27m
RSL Revival
1d 12h
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
1d 14h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 20h
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.