WCS Austin Challenger: NA & Europe
The best StarCraft II players in the Western scene have started down the road to WCS Austin and they're just about to pull into a major, competitive pit-stop. The North American and European Challenger tournaments are set to begin on April 14, with the top four players from reach region winning precious seeds at WCS Austin.The NA and EU Challenger tournaments have been restructured into a familiar, GSL-lite format: Sixteen players face off in double-elimination groups, with eight players advancing to a single elimination bracket. The games will take place over a number of weeks, bringing back the feel of old WCS Europe and America tournaments from 2013~2015. Let's take a look at the week one games!
North American Challenger: RO16 Week 1
Despite the efforts of Neeb and Scarlett, North America has never been regarded as one of StarCraft II's stronger competitive regions. That's something StarCraft II commentator Ravi “feardragon” Pareek is well aware of, but he's never allowed his pride or hope to waver. Drawing on his years of experience in the NA scene, feardragon gave us his analysis on the upcoming Challenger matches. (*feardragon's commentary was transcribed and edited from a voice call.)Group A: Neeb, JonSnow, Future, Epic
Theorycrafting a scenario where Neeb doesn't win a WCS Austin seed
![](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Waxangel/misc/raviface.png)
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
I don't think that Neeb loses to Epic or Future, but I legitimately think that Neeb is in weird enough form, or off-balance enough that JonSnow has a 15-20% chance of finishing first place in the group. That's not high, but it's a lot higher than you would expect for JonSnow vs Neeb. If that happens, and we get to the playoffs with Neeb in second place, and he faces off against Scarlett... I could realistically see a scenario where he doesn't win a seed to Austin. But I guarantee he's going to make it out of his group."
JonSnow looks to find his edge
"
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
I can't recall how he phrased it exactly, but he said there are players who are 'dangerous,' and he feels that he has lost his 'dangerous' edge that he had in 2014. In 2014, he would take games off of players that were a lot better than him. He would either do some crazy cheese, or just pull off something crazy.
I think now, he's very consistent, he feels like he's leveled out a little bit. He's always been about gradual improvement over the course of the past three years. I think he's feeling the effects of slow growth, not being able to catch up with some of these other awesome players."
Future is the future?
"This is the first WCS event Future can compete in. He's a lot like Clem and Reynor. If you ask anyone who knows about the NA scene, 'Who's the up-and-comer you're on the lookout for?', EVERYONE says Future. This guy has been doing really well. One of his problems is that he plays to the level of his opponents. He's won series against Scarlett, but he'll lose series to players who are much worse than him.
The interesting thing about Future is that he's very cheesy and hyper-aggro to almost a ludicrous degree. But when it fails, or when things just settle into a normal macro game, he's actually still really good. It almost makes you question why exactly he plays that aggressive style. It feels like he takes more risks than he needs to.
I also think that in terms of his mindset—and I've heard a lot of other players say this—he's got an amazing mindset when it comes to improvement. Anytime he loses a series, he demands more practice games, where someone helps him work out that part of his game. But as a tournament player, I think he has a poor mindset. He gets frustrated, he tilts very easily."
Epic: Playing with house money
"A lot of things I said about Future, everyone was saying about
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
Group B: Scarlett, Semper, Silky, Kane
The difficulty in measuring Scarlett's skill level
![](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Waxangel/misc/raviface.png)
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
Last year, she almost talked about herself like player who had retired. She would say things along the the lines of "sometimes, I still get that competitive pang to compete and win a tournament." So I was really happy when she did well at IEM PyeongChang. It's hard to say if she's still super-motivated—I think that she is after PyeongChang.
It's almost impossible to judge Scarlett's true form until you watch her first match of a tournament. For example, WCS Leipzig was one week before IEM PyeongChang. She lost to Namshar twice in the RO32 of Leipzig, and then she won PyeongChang a week later. Not to take anything away from Namshar, who is a very good player, but Scarlett wasn't playing at the same level, one week apart. Something seemed to change in a very short time."
Semper sapped by studies
"
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
What I like about Semper in terms of play style is he has a lot of grit in his play. There's not many players I think about in this way—I think it's almost an underrated trait. Within the game, Semper just doesn't give up. He's the player who will be down a lot of supply, and he's actively working on ways to bring himself into a game when others would have tapped out already. And then, he DOES it. And you go, 'HOW?' I think that's one of his strong points."
Silky is no 'NA Zerg'
"Silky is a very standard player in a lot of ways. I think one thing that's notable is he plays more like a Korean Zerg than an NA Zerg. He plays almost entirely on the Korean ladder, so he's just always used to playing there. He picks up a lot of things there. He watches a lot of GSL—Dark, soO, etc—and he tries to emulate their playstyle. When people say NA Zerg, a lot of people think of NoRegret or something, whether that's fair or not. So he doesn't play quite like that kind of 'NA Zerg.'"
Kane the mystery man
"
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
European Challenger: RO16 Week 1
Unfortunately, we couldn't find a European scene expert to break things down like feardragon was able to do for NA, so you're stuck with some irreverent remarks from Wax. Hopefully this situation can be remedied by next week.Group A: ShoWTimE, HeRoMaRinE, DnS, Hellraiser
At first glance, the German duo of
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
Anyway...
ShoWTimE is one of the few players in Europe who is capable of making Serral look mortal. On that merit alone, he must be the second best player in Europe, or something close to that. HeRoMaRinE—who's adamant about being more of a streamer than a progamer every time I talk to him—still manages to do well whenever he shows up to a big international event. Amidst the chaos at IEM Katowice—where mostly everyone but Serral got killed by Koreans—HeRoMaRinE actually came out looking stronger with victories over Snute, Kelazhur, and Elazer.
But let's not sell the two other players short—throughout StarCraft II's competitive history, Europe has been second to only Korea in terms of depth.
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
Group B: Nerchio, uThermal, souL, Clem
On one hand, I want to cheer for
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
The Terran who is most likely to ruin Nerchio's day is
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
Alongside Reynor,
![(Wiki)](/images/forum/wiki_icon.png)
Finally, we have souL, a player who will be remembered forever in foreigner legend for eliminating Stats from IEM Katowice with a proxy-two-rax. Surely, that's where Maru drew his inspiration from when he went on to proxy-two-rax Stats in the GSL finals. When others were saying "just play like Maru," Maru was saying "just play like souL."
Credits and acknowledgements
North America analysis: feardragon
Europe 'analysis': Wax
Editor: Wax
Banner: Blizzard
North America analysis: feardragon
Europe 'analysis': Wax
Editor: Wax
Banner: Blizzard