EPTUpcoming Balance Update - May 3rd - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
AnSeTe
Ukraine3 Posts
| ||
|
Tyrhanius
France947 Posts
On April 30 2016 20:31 Gwavajuice wrote: Nowadays : you need liberators to both deal with the corruptos and the ultralisks. That's not really the case, it's zerg who build corruptors to deal with liberators not liberators built to deal with corruptors. Else zerg would prefer building mutas. | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
|
Psychobabas
2531 Posts
| ||
|
usopsama
6502 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16699 Posts
| ||
|
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
On April 30 2016 22:01 Ej_ wrote: lmao the cannon change went through so back to ravager all-ins every game I m saving this one so we can both laugh in a couple of months. | ||
|
SeriousLus
169 Posts
| ||
|
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
On April 30 2016 22:42 Tyrhanius wrote: That's not really the case, it's zerg who build corruptors to deal with liberators not liberators built to deal with corruptors. Else zerg would prefer building mutas. My bad,I should have phrased it like this : you need your liberators to deal with both the ultra and the corruptors. I was talking about the moment when ultras tear the terran ground army apart and the corruptors are sniping every sieged liberators. dunno if you've seen Lambo vs MarineLord game 3 on dusk towers in HSC euro qualifiers, that the kind of engagement I talking about.... | ||
|
TheWinks
United States572 Posts
On April 30 2016 17:53 Tyrhanius wrote: Thors had more range than broodlords on WOL/HOTS. And thors and broodlords have just 1 range difference on lotv, but are faster than broodlords. With micro you could get a brood lord to fire up to 12 range away and with broodlings the thor has no hope in reaching them. With the additional range you can be even farther. Even if you don't micro them, you can make sure you only fight like one thor at a time and pick the terran's army apart because the hitbox for thors make dealing with broodlings a very frustrating experience. | ||
|
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
On April 30 2016 22:49 Shield wrote: Just lost a PvT which I was winning very hard up to the point when he decides to get late 4th base, camp and mass these awesome liberators. I made some tempests but that didn't help too much. Maybe some liberator nerf (decreased damage) won't hurt. Protoss is already the least played race. Maybe give people a reason to play it more? did you read the patch notes? | ||
|
ihatevideogames
570 Posts
| ||
|
Mojzii1
30 Posts
On May 01 2016 00:08 ihatevideogames wrote: Legit question for higher ranked terrans, cause I'm a low diamond scrub: I like macro games, how am I supossed to go lategame in TvZ now? Should I even bother trying, or should I just learn how to play ultra-aggressive like other terrans? its not gonna be that BAD, you will not be able to play "Macro game" without harras right now, you will have to take a lead early / mid game in economy now to counter late game quick transition , (top master T playing vs gm-s) | ||
|
NKexquisite
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
weiliem
2071 Posts
| ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
I did and I don't care about liberators' anti-air damage. That's not the problem for protoss. It's the anti-ground damage that makes PvT awful sometimes. On May 01 2016 01:05 weiliem wrote: No nerf to immortal? If you nerf immortal, you definitely have to nerf lurker and possibly liberators' anti-ground damage. | ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
This isn't really "balance change" anymore, it just feels like random changes and blizzard is like "lets hope to god it looks like we still give a shit". Game's boring. Watching pro is the only fun thing anymore, such change sure as hell wont get old players to come back. | ||
|
RoomOfMush
1296 Posts
The cannon change though. I dont even know what to think anymore. Its like they are not even trying to keep us believing. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16699 Posts
On May 01 2016 01:30 RoomOfMush wrote: I can kind of understand the thor change. Terran has two other units with AA splash. Having 3 units is a little bit much. Having said that, I still dont think the thor change will make the unit more useful. The thor has not been great since the very beginning of SC2 and I am afraid it will stay that way. The cannon change though. I dont even know what to think anymore. Its like they are not even trying to keep us believing. i think the Thor is useful for sub 120 APM players. On May 01 2016 01:25 shid0x wrote: oh god the desesperation. This isn't really "balance change" anymore, it just feels like random changes and blizzard is like "lets hope to god it looks like we still give a shit". Game's boring. Watching pro is the only fun thing anymore, such change sure as hell wont get old players to come back. i'm having lots of fun. the silvers and golds i play 2v2s with (who are 10+ years older than me) are having a blast. at my best i'm a diamond player with all 3 races. On May 01 2016 01:25 shid0x wrote: it just feels like this makes your post reak of confirmation bias | ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On April 30 2016 11:28 MiniFotToss wrote: clearly you haven't been around lately, it was discussed since last week Yeah I've been busy, but this doesn't really make any sense.. at all. | ||
| ||
