• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:48
CEST 16:48
KST 23:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy12ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple5Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research3Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample ASL21 General Discussion RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group D [ASL21] Ro24 Group C
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2541 users

Community Feedback Update - February 4 - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
298 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Next All
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
February 04 2016 23:24 GMT
#41
If so many protosses think PvZ isn't ok, why don't we get any feedback from Blizzard?
SirPinky
Profile Joined February 2011
United States525 Posts
February 04 2016 23:26 GMT
#42
On February 05 2016 07:32 DinoMight wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2016 07:27 Lexender wrote:
Give tanks +6 flat damage and change upgrades from 3+2 each to 2+3 each.

Makes tanks kill most zerg and toss units in 1 shot less while keeping the amount of shots required to kill marines the same, even when fully upgrade.


Tank damage buff doesn't really address any issues with the game at the moment.

Lifting them makes TvT unplayable.

Not lifting them makes Ravagers kill them too easily.

Removing Ravagers' ability makes Zerg too weak to Liberator rushes.


A series of bad designs just outdoing each other...


Tank damage does matter. If you remove tank-vac lift and buff the tank base damage then it will offset this nerf. For instance, as a mech player, if I see early ravager rush what I may do is decide to go for 2 siege tanks instead of 1tank/1medivac. Furthermore, if you give the tank a buff, not just for siege mode, but tank mode, then you can just decide NOT to siege versus any early roach ravager and the units will be more effective. Right now unsieged tanks are pretty pathetic, while the siege tank isn't too far behind.
How much better to get wisdom than gold; to get insight rather than silver!
y0su
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Finland7871 Posts
February 04 2016 23:28 GMT
#43
Give tanks an extra 2-3 range (sieged) through an upgrade.

Radical. Allows armies that moved too close to still pull back after just one shot but also makes it a little more dangerous to commit to attacking into them. Since it still requires vision and an upgrade it might not be totally broken.
Thaniri
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
1264 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-04 23:35:49
February 04 2016 23:35 GMT
#44
Might start playing again if tankivacs are removed.

I stopped playing not long after I lost to avilo on ladder for the first time ever because of how stupid TvT is. I don't care much what TvP and TvZ are like, so long as TvT goes back to being the most interesting matchup.
rockslave
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Brazil318 Posts
February 04 2016 23:35 GMT
#45
Tankivacs are boring! I want to see more positioning, not more apm. Just buff them tanks directly!
What qxc said.
Fran_
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1024 Posts
February 04 2016 23:37 GMT
#46
Tank pickups is working at Pro level to differentiate good players from better players, and it's exciting to watch. I wouldn't want to see it go.
Darkdwarf
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Sweden960 Posts
February 04 2016 23:39 GMT
#47
I agree with:

* Nerfing the disruptor damage vs shields slightly.

* Removing the ability to drop tanks in siege mode while retaining the ability to pick them up.
Teams: IM, Jin Air, Invictus || Players: Maru, GuMiho, INnoVation, Ryung, sOs, Squirtle, NaNiwa, Has, Zoun, Life, Rogue, Dark
Mozdk
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark6989 Posts
February 04 2016 23:39 GMT
#48
Worried about what a change to banshee speed will mean for other matchups. Might turn out to be very broken.

Map changes are definately welcome. I still wont play Central Protocol. The others I will have to try out.
"It's really hard to Protoss" - White-Ra |||| "Apedts are dfucking amazing" - Lorning
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
February 04 2016 23:40 GMT
#49
First, this is a really cool update and I want to say that you please keep up the discussion about gameplay. The last few updates have been a bit lackluster and felt mainly like reports of the sort "we will put down a balance test map", "we will really put out the balance test map for these issues", "the balance test map is out now and we will patch next week", "we have patched". I.e. keep the discussion about various topics going, even if there are more pressing issues and the discussed topics are not on a balance test map (yet).


Siege tank, here is my simple suggestion:
[image loading]

The reasoning is rather simple: Siege tanks have high burst damage, but rather low damage over time. This makes them strong against units which they can burst down easily and which are greatly affected by their splash damage like zerglings, banelings or marines.
They are still decent against the middle-health, middle-size units like marauders, roaches or stalkers because they deal 15 extra against armored.
But the tank is very weak at doing this job against units with higher health and greater size, for example immortals, archons or ultralisks or even smaller high health units without the armor tag like zealots or adepts. This buff would leave the most common scenarios in which tanks are used as splash damage dealer widely unchanged but give the tank a greater range of units it can work well against.
This effect could also be introduced as an upgrade effect, e.g. by the iconic name of Maelstrom Rounds from the Wings of Liberty campagin.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20326 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-04 23:42:55
February 04 2016 23:41 GMT
#50
On February 05 2016 08:24 Shield wrote:
If so many protosses think PvZ isn't ok, why don't we get any feedback from Blizzard?


There's a 3 week lag time between reality and blizzard response, give it a week or 2

We could look into things many players have pointed out already such as: increasing Siege Tank damage


at least 3 years overdue
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Thaniri
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
1264 Posts
February 04 2016 23:45 GMT
#51
On February 05 2016 08:37 Fran_ wrote:
Tank pickups is working at Pro level to differentiate good players from better players, and it's exciting to watch. I wouldn't want to see it go.


Upsets have been traditionally quite rare in TvT. I'd expect that the tankivac mechanic would make the situation worse.

And frankly, everyone hates 1a'ing a bio ball into the enemy team and then dropping all the tanks simultaneously behind it. It's dumb to play. It's dumb to watch. It needs to go.

I don't personally think this point is a boon for the matchup, but some do, and that is that early game cliff jumping and contains are much more intense and fast. Past that point, there is no redeeming quality to the tankivac.
StarscreamG1
Profile Joined February 2011
Portugal1653 Posts
February 04 2016 23:48 GMT
#52
On February 05 2016 08:40 Big J wrote:
First, this is a really cool update and I want to say that you please keep up the discussion about gameplay. The last few updates have been a bit lackluster and felt mainly like reports of the sort "we will put down a balance test map", "we will really put out the balance test map for these issues", "the balance test map is out now and we will patch next week", "we have patched". I.e. keep the discussion about various topics going, even if there are more pressing issues and the discussed topics are not on a balance test map (yet).


Siege tank, here is my simple suggestion:
[image loading]

The reasoning is rather simple: Siege tanks have high burst damage, but rather low damage over time. This makes them strong against units which they can burst down easily and which are greatly affected by their splash damage like zerglings, banelings or marines.
They are still decent against the middle-health, middle-size units like marauders, roaches or stalkers because they deal 15 extra against armored.
But the tank is very weak at doing this job against units with higher health and greater size, for example immortals, archons or ultralisks or even smaller high health units without the armor tag like zealots or adepts. This buff would leave the most common scenarios in which tanks are used as splash damage dealer widely unchanged but give the tank a greater range of units it can work well against.
This effect could also be introduced as an upgrade effect, e.g. by the iconic name of Maelstrom Rounds from the Wings of Liberty campagin.

GREAT suggestion!
jackacea
Profile Joined April 2014
66 Posts
February 04 2016 23:48 GMT
#53
I think a good solution would be if the Siege Tank could still be picked up in siege mode, but only dropped unsieged. That way defensive micro against Ravagers would still be possible if you're good and fast enough. Maybe also a slight buff to unsieged mode in general to make it more viable to play.
praise kek
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28524 Posts
February 04 2016 23:51 GMT
#54
Ehm.. PvZ? No?

Somehow I feel this update isn't quite complete
I Protoss winner, could it be?
zealotstim
Profile Joined February 2015
United States455 Posts
February 04 2016 23:52 GMT
#55
On February 05 2016 07:41 inken wrote:
as a massive balance whiner, zerg fanboy, protoss hater (a-move, no honor), terran hater (total abusers), and so on...

let me just say that the sieged tank medivac pickup should STAY in the game ffs please. it's too cool of a feature to be removed just because it dominates tvt. so what, every mirror match has a focus, just think about ling bane or roach ravager wars in zvz. the tank pickup is just too freakin cool even to a total zerg racist.

you can't support nerfing the sieged tank pickup and still call yourself a starcraft fan.

the siege tank deserves <3 <3 <3


This post is wonderful. As a pure viewer of sc2 (I don't play) I love tank lifts.
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13993 Posts
February 04 2016 23:55 GMT
#56
Yay disruptor tank mirror nerf
Chain 1 Arthalion Chain 2 Urgula Chain 3 Mululu Chain 4 Lukias
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12422 Posts
February 04 2016 23:59 GMT
#57
On February 05 2016 08:11 blade55555 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2016 07:21 Heyjoray wrote:
On February 05 2016 07:17 SC2Toastie wrote:
Okay, DK, superconstructive as to not demotivate your team:

Tank pickup can be changed. Nice change would be to drop the tanks unsieged, but still allow them to be picked up in Siege mode. The main scary interaction is Siege Tank vs Ravager All Ins from Zerg. I think buffing Siege Tank damage could be a way to go, but experimenting with an Armored tag on Ravagers might also work.

For PvT, I really dislike the opening phase where Terran HAS to play hyperdefensive and cannot really attack with anything other than Mine Drops, have you considered making Overcharge a (distinguishable) upgrade at Cycore? If Protoss wants to play defensively, they can get this upgrade, and the opponent can see this, so they won't have to fear Warpgate aggression.

Making Disruptors so they dont one shot full health stalkers sounds awesome.

And please have a look at PvZ. It's been avoided like the plague but could probably considered the most problematic matchup.

Ciao!

PvZ is problematic? Odd, because i watch protoss win against zerg constantly. Why are so many people ignoring that? Ravager with Armor tag was hilarious: They disappeared instantly.


Tends to be NA Protosses that complain who are still opening Robo first and going into sentry/stalker/disruptor (what an awful composition). Once the Protosses complaining start doing a phoenix into chargelot/archon/immortal, they will enjoy pvz a lot more.


Terrans would have enjoyed TvP a lot more if they opened like jjakji did in first map vs Classic. Don't recall that this was a compelling argument at the time. And this was for a close to 50% match-up, we're talking 42-45% here.
No will to live, no wish to die
usopsama
Profile Joined April 2008
6502 Posts
February 05 2016 00:04 GMT
#58
On February 05 2016 08:40 Big J wrote:
First, this is a really cool update and I want to say that you please keep up the discussion about gameplay. The last few updates have been a bit lackluster and felt mainly like reports of the sort "we will put down a balance test map", "we will really put out the balance test map for these issues", "the balance test map is out now and we will patch next week", "we have patched". I.e. keep the discussion about various topics going, even if there are more pressing issues and the discussed topics are not on a balance test map (yet).


Siege tank, here is my simple suggestion:
[image loading]

The reasoning is rather simple: Siege tanks have high burst damage, but rather low damage over time. This makes them strong against units which they can burst down easily and which are greatly affected by their splash damage like zerglings, banelings or marines.
They are still decent against the middle-health, middle-size units like marauders, roaches or stalkers because they deal 15 extra against armored.
But the tank is very weak at doing this job against units with higher health and greater size, for example immortals, archons or ultralisks or even smaller high health units without the armor tag like zealots or adepts. This buff would leave the most common scenarios in which tanks are used as splash damage dealer widely unchanged but give the tank a greater range of units it can work well against.
This effect could also be introduced as an upgrade effect, e.g. by the iconic name of Maelstrom Rounds from the Wings of Liberty campagin.

I agree. 150% damage is necessary. Seige tanks need to be units that are feared. It is kind of like how Ultralisks are finally units that are feared in LotV. Seige tanks need to undergo a similar buff.
PPN
Profile Joined August 2011
France248 Posts
February 05 2016 00:08 GMT
#59
I'm mostly ok with all that has been said but PvZ still in the void apparently. Not even a word. Just great...
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
February 05 2016 00:12 GMT
#60
On February 05 2016 07:16 Jer99 wrote:
is it even worth it to float? you start with so many workers now that you hit max saturation much earlier, where's Sholip, we need some numbers :D

Haha I have a lot of studying to do but maybe I can do an analysis tomorrow...
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Team League
11:00
Group B
WardiTV999
IndyStarCraft 215
TKL 176
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .316
IndyStarCraft 215
LamboSC2 195
TKL 176
ProTech120
Rex 103
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3495
PianO 1289
Mini 1278
EffOrt 1193
Larva 1049
actioN 652
Stork 574
Snow 484
firebathero 342
hero 247
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 209
Soma 151
Barracks 104
Aegong 103
Dewaltoss 102
Sea.KH 83
sSak 80
Backho 75
Sharp 44
[sc1f]eonzerg 44
sorry 37
JulyZerg 20
Shine 20
GoRush 18
Noble 17
Bale 16
Terrorterran 13
SilentControl 11
Dota 2
qojqva2890
syndereN485
BananaSlamJamma433
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1826
kennyS1074
byalli289
fl0m165
edward50
Other Games
singsing2317
Liquid`RaSZi1070
B2W.Neo999
hiko763
Lowko321
crisheroes304
DeMusliM201
XaKoH 134
Fuzer 130
QueenE107
Sick87
Mew2King52
oskar33
Trikslyr1
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 24
• iHatsuTV 13
• LUISG 9
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV719
• lizZardDota249
League of Legends
• Nemesis3668
• TFBlade961
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
9h 12m
Replay Cast
18h 12m
Afreeca Starleague
19h 12m
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 19h
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS6
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.