• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:51
CEST 19:51
KST 02:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double1Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2313Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon105
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Grand Finals ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Bot on ladder [ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6626 users

An Analysis of Upgrades - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
Jett.Jack.Alvir
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Canada2250 Posts
January 06 2015 02:48 GMT
#41
On January 06 2015 02:25 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2015 14:46 Jett.Jack.Alvir wrote:
On January 05 2015 14:24 worosei wrote:
On January 03 2015 17:49 skylinefan wrote:
I wonder why don't toss go for the shield upgrades? Even the pros usually leave it till the mid-late game...then only they upgrade shields..hmm..


Toss generally doesnt go for shield upgrades as
a) it can be destroyed by EMP; but more importantly;

b) units normally has more HP than shield, so the armour 'buffer' can occur more times in a fight than a 'shield' buffer will (eg with made-up numbers, a zealot's with no shield can take 4 hits before shield disappears vs 5 hits with +1 shield, a zealot with 0 armour can take 8 hits, but with +1 armour can take 10 hits - so the armour upgrades allows an extra hit before death that the shield doesnt).

i am curious when a shield upgrade is actually the preferred one (im guessing it'd be in situations where +3 armour is already upgraded)


I have seen many pros go +shields with blink stalkers into archon/zealots. It wrecks unprepared terrans, but this hardly happens because pros are so good at reading tech and scouting.

I can't think of any other scenario for protoss to go for shields.


Wouldn't a planned ground into air transition use shield over armour?

Perhaps, but that leaves a lot of protoss vulnerable. A ground to air tech switch costs loads of gas, and goes into the very late game.

By this time, air upgrades are the only thing left anyways.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
January 06 2015 12:36 GMT
#42
A bit uninspired Sholip.

You just do some very basic division and round. I know you can do more! In the end you leave out so many effects that the results are rarely useful or reliable in practice. Even misleading for the ling vs lots. I expected you to at least try to take a few more things into account to be able to get more useful results.

How about game theory on the choice of upgrades of lings and zealots? Upgrades with common unit compositions. Runtime for ranged vs melee. Splash damage.

I say this mainly tongue in cheek (thanks for op), but not only.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
January 06 2015 13:18 GMT
#43
On January 06 2015 11:48 Jett.Jack.Alvir wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2015 02:25 Yurie wrote:
On January 05 2015 14:46 Jett.Jack.Alvir wrote:
On January 05 2015 14:24 worosei wrote:
On January 03 2015 17:49 skylinefan wrote:
I wonder why don't toss go for the shield upgrades? Even the pros usually leave it till the mid-late game...then only they upgrade shields..hmm..


Toss generally doesnt go for shield upgrades as
a) it can be destroyed by EMP; but more importantly;

b) units normally has more HP than shield, so the armour 'buffer' can occur more times in a fight than a 'shield' buffer will (eg with made-up numbers, a zealot's with no shield can take 4 hits before shield disappears vs 5 hits with +1 shield, a zealot with 0 armour can take 8 hits, but with +1 armour can take 10 hits - so the armour upgrades allows an extra hit before death that the shield doesnt).

i am curious when a shield upgrade is actually the preferred one (im guessing it'd be in situations where +3 armour is already upgraded)


I have seen many pros go +shields with blink stalkers into archon/zealots. It wrecks unprepared terrans, but this hardly happens because pros are so good at reading tech and scouting.

I can't think of any other scenario for protoss to go for shields.


Wouldn't a planned ground into air transition use shield over armour?

Perhaps, but that leaves a lot of protoss vulnerable. A ground to air tech switch costs loads of gas, and goes into the very late game.

By this time, air upgrades are the only thing left anyways.

I've seen people start upgrading shields over armor in PvZ when doing air transitions
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Gowerly
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom916 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-01-15 15:56:11
January 15 2015 15:49 GMT
#44
Something to discuss with upgrades in general is cost.
Yesterday in the GSL there was the Roach vs Roach fighting that went on. Here is a rough breakdown of upgrades as they affect roach vs roach:

Roach: 145 HP - 16 (+2) Attack Damage - 1 (+1) Armour
Values here are Attack upgrade (left) vs armour upgrade (right)
Upgrade Level | Damage | Shots to Kill
0 - 0 | 16 - 1 | 10
1 - 0 | 18 - 1 | 9
2 - 0 | 20 - 1 | 8
3 - 0 | 22 - 1 | 7
0 - 1 | 16 - 2 | 11
1 - 1 | 18 - 2 | 10
2 - 1 | 20 - 2 | 9
3 - 1 | 22 - 2 | 8
0 - 2 | 16 - 3 | 12
1 - 2 | 18 - 3 | 10
2 - 2 | 20 - 3 | 9
3 - 2 | 22 - 3 | 8
0 - 3 | 16 - 4 | 13
1 - 3 | 18 - 4 | 11
2 - 3 | 20 - 4 | 10
3 - 3 | 22 - 4 | 9


This doesn't take into account regen, but base zerg regen is 0.27 hp/game second.
The only thing this would affect is anything that equates to values barely above 145. This only seems to concern values where the final number (attack - armour) is 21. This is because 7 * 21 = 147, so after 8 seconds from the first attack, the roach will heal enough to be on more than 0.0 HP after the next attack.

There was an attack where it was 2-2 vs 1-1.

This would equate to one set of roaches being on the 2-1 row and the others being on the 1-2 row.

Effectively this means that one set of roaches would take 9 shots to kill and the others would take 10.
This would mean that one player would need 11% more roaches to kill off the more upgraded roaches.

getting to 2-2 from 1-1 (excluding the cost of lair as you want that anyway for roach speed) is 375/375.
Mineral-wise this is 5 roaches, gas-wise it's 15.
So, depending on what's starving you, if your opponent has 45 or fewer roaches, the upgrade isn't worth it.
I will reduce you to a series of numbers.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
January 16 2015 06:25 GMT
#45
On January 16 2015 00:49 Gowerly wrote:
Something to discuss with upgrades in general is cost.
Yesterday in the GSL there was the Roach vs Roach fighting that went on. Here is a rough breakdown of upgrades as they affect roach vs roach:

Roach: 145 HP - 16 (+2) Attack Damage - 1 (+1) Armour
Values here are Attack upgrade (left) vs armour upgrade (right)
Upgrade Level | Damage | Shots to Kill
0 - 0 | 16 - 1 | 10
1 - 0 | 18 - 1 | 9
2 - 0 | 20 - 1 | 8
3 - 0 | 22 - 1 | 7
0 - 1 | 16 - 2 | 11
1 - 1 | 18 - 2 | 10
2 - 1 | 20 - 2 | 9
3 - 1 | 22 - 2 | 8
0 - 2 | 16 - 3 | 12
1 - 2 | 18 - 3 | 10
2 - 2 | 20 - 3 | 9
3 - 2 | 22 - 3 | 8
0 - 3 | 16 - 4 | 13
1 - 3 | 18 - 4 | 11
2 - 3 | 20 - 4 | 10
3 - 3 | 22 - 4 | 9


This doesn't take into account regen, but base zerg regen is 0.27 hp/game second.
The only thing this would affect is anything that equates to values barely above 145. This only seems to concern values where the final number (attack - armour) is 21. This is because 7 * 21 = 147, so after 8 seconds from the first attack, the roach will heal enough to be on more than 0.0 HP after the next attack.

There was an attack where it was 2-2 vs 1-1.

This would equate to one set of roaches being on the 2-1 row and the others being on the 1-2 row.

Effectively this means that one set of roaches would take 9 shots to kill and the others would take 10.
This would mean that one player would need 11% more roaches to kill off the more upgraded roaches.

getting to 2-2 from 1-1 (excluding the cost of lair as you want that anyway for roach speed) is 375/375.
Mineral-wise this is 5 roaches, gas-wise it's 15.
So, depending on what's starving you, if your opponent has 45 or fewer roaches, the upgrade isn't worth it.

I think you missed a few things here:
1) 11% more roaches would have the same effective dps (in roach kills per second), but would have more total hit points due to more roaches.
2) In large roach-roach, not all roaches can fire, which is why concaves and positioning is so important. This makes the upgrades more valuable, as you have more concentrated firepower.
3) If you max out at 200/200, you can't spend spare money on upgrades.

It is an important point you bring up, and a very relevant question: "should I build roaches or do the upgrade?", but I think you need to take more factors into account to be able to give a confident answer. It is an interesting observation that a 2-2 upgrade costs you at least 5 roaches, but I don't think your analysis is thorough enough to claim that it is a bad choice if the opponent has less than 45 roaches.

Also, I think the time factor is a huge deterrent against upgrades: you spend the money, but they'll give you nothing until they are done, no matter how good the upgrade is, essentially making you 5 (or up to 15) roaches short compared to not doing upgrades. Preferable you'd include that as well.
d3_crescentia
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4054 Posts
January 16 2015 07:03 GMT
#46
Cool! I've done some work on Starcraft and Lanchester's laws before, but my math has gotten pretty rusty since then. Still, it's nice to see that my work (mostly) matches yours.

Here's what I'm wondering - are you planning on creating something (a map, perhaps) that will test the theory through experimental evidence at any point in time? I'm aware you've done some preliminary testing, but it'd be cool to get a probability distribution or something like that.
once, not long ago, there was a moon here
Gowerly
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom916 Posts
January 16 2015 10:11 GMT
#47
On January 16 2015 15:25 Cascade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2015 00:49 Gowerly wrote:
Something to discuss with upgrades in general is cost.
Yesterday in the GSL there was the Roach vs Roach fighting that went on. Here is a rough breakdown of upgrades as they affect roach vs roach:

Roach: 145 HP - 16 (+2) Attack Damage - 1 (+1) Armour
Values here are Attack upgrade (left) vs armour upgrade (right)
Upgrade Level | Damage | Shots to Kill
0 - 0 | 16 - 1 | 10
1 - 0 | 18 - 1 | 9
2 - 0 | 20 - 1 | 8
3 - 0 | 22 - 1 | 7
0 - 1 | 16 - 2 | 11
1 - 1 | 18 - 2 | 10
2 - 1 | 20 - 2 | 9
3 - 1 | 22 - 2 | 8
0 - 2 | 16 - 3 | 12
1 - 2 | 18 - 3 | 10
2 - 2 | 20 - 3 | 9
3 - 2 | 22 - 3 | 8
0 - 3 | 16 - 4 | 13
1 - 3 | 18 - 4 | 11
2 - 3 | 20 - 4 | 10
3 - 3 | 22 - 4 | 9


This doesn't take into account regen, but base zerg regen is 0.27 hp/game second.
The only thing this would affect is anything that equates to values barely above 145. This only seems to concern values where the final number (attack - armour) is 21. This is because 7 * 21 = 147, so after 8 seconds from the first attack, the roach will heal enough to be on more than 0.0 HP after the next attack.

There was an attack where it was 2-2 vs 1-1.

This would equate to one set of roaches being on the 2-1 row and the others being on the 1-2 row.

Effectively this means that one set of roaches would take 9 shots to kill and the others would take 10.
This would mean that one player would need 11% more roaches to kill off the more upgraded roaches.

getting to 2-2 from 1-1 (excluding the cost of lair as you want that anyway for roach speed) is 375/375.
Mineral-wise this is 5 roaches, gas-wise it's 15.
So, depending on what's starving you, if your opponent has 45 or fewer roaches, the upgrade isn't worth it.

I think you missed a few things here:
1) 11% more roaches would have the same effective dps (in roach kills per second), but would have more total hit points due to more roaches.
2) In large roach-roach, not all roaches can fire, which is why concaves and positioning is so important. This makes the upgrades more valuable, as you have more concentrated firepower.
3) If you max out at 200/200, you can't spend spare money on upgrades.

It is an important point you bring up, and a very relevant question: "should I build roaches or do the upgrade?", but I think you need to take more factors into account to be able to give a confident answer. It is an interesting observation that a 2-2 upgrade costs you at least 5 roaches, but I don't think your analysis is thorough enough to claim that it is a bad choice if the opponent has less than 45 roaches.

Also, I think the time factor is a huge deterrent against upgrades: you spend the money, but they'll give you nothing until they are done, no matter how good the upgrade is, essentially making you 5 (or up to 15) roaches short compared to not doing upgrades. Preferable you'd include that as well.


Your first point is not quite correct. Yes, the more roaches will have more HP, but we're not just straight up talking about HP, we're talking more about Effective Hitpoints (EHP), which will be the same.
In roach vs roach, it is possible to ignore the actual 145HP of the roaches themselves and just have them as "number of hits to be killed".
If you are 2-2 vs the opponents 1-1, then your roaches have 10 EHP and theirs have 9. Both your roaches do 1 damage each. Thinking of it this way it's easier to show that once they have 11% more roaches than you they effectively then have the same number of hitpoints.

The second point is valid in that there's more to think about than simply numbers. Some roaches do not fire in RvR engagements. I will be looking at this with Stargraphed as and when I get the code in to see if there's a way of quantitatively measuring engagement efficiency. For the time being I just have to take it as read that all will fire.

If you're maxed you have two options: Bank up for re-maxing or spend them on upgrades. Each has plus and minus points there.

You make a very good point about the timing of the upgrades. This is something that should be taken into consideration when playing. If you see 1-1 roaches and the evo chambers going, you know you could just build roaches and attack before 2-2 is done because you'll have the numbers advantage.

Another thing I had missed from the first post was the act of killing off roaches.
When you have fewer, more powerful units, killing one of them off will hurt your overall DPS more than losing one of the more, less powerful units. However, you'll be losing more of the more units and fewer of the fewer units. I am unsure how this works out in larger battles.
I will reduce you to a series of numbers.
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-01-16 12:31:03
January 16 2015 12:10 GMT
#48
On January 16 2015 19:11 Gowerly wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2015 15:25 Cascade wrote:
On January 16 2015 00:49 Gowerly wrote:
Something to discuss with upgrades in general is cost.
Yesterday in the GSL there was the Roach vs Roach fighting that went on. Here is a rough breakdown of upgrades as they affect roach vs roach:

Roach: 145 HP - 16 (+2) Attack Damage - 1 (+1) Armour
Values here are Attack upgrade (left) vs armour upgrade (right)
Upgrade Level | Damage | Shots to Kill
0 - 0 | 16 - 1 | 10
1 - 0 | 18 - 1 | 9
2 - 0 | 20 - 1 | 8
3 - 0 | 22 - 1 | 7
0 - 1 | 16 - 2 | 11
1 - 1 | 18 - 2 | 10
2 - 1 | 20 - 2 | 9
3 - 1 | 22 - 2 | 8
0 - 2 | 16 - 3 | 12
1 - 2 | 18 - 3 | 10
2 - 2 | 20 - 3 | 9
3 - 2 | 22 - 3 | 8
0 - 3 | 16 - 4 | 13
1 - 3 | 18 - 4 | 11
2 - 3 | 20 - 4 | 10
3 - 3 | 22 - 4 | 9


This doesn't take into account regen, but base zerg regen is 0.27 hp/game second.
The only thing this would affect is anything that equates to values barely above 145. This only seems to concern values where the final number (attack - armour) is 21. This is because 7 * 21 = 147, so after 8 seconds from the first attack, the roach will heal enough to be on more than 0.0 HP after the next attack.

There was an attack where it was 2-2 vs 1-1.

This would equate to one set of roaches being on the 2-1 row and the others being on the 1-2 row.

Effectively this means that one set of roaches would take 9 shots to kill and the others would take 10.
This would mean that one player would need 11% more roaches to kill off the more upgraded roaches.

getting to 2-2 from 1-1 (excluding the cost of lair as you want that anyway for roach speed) is 375/375.
Mineral-wise this is 5 roaches, gas-wise it's 15.
So, depending on what's starving you, if your opponent has 45 or fewer roaches, the upgrade isn't worth it.

I think you missed a few things here:
1) 11% more roaches would have the same effective dps (in roach kills per second), but would have more total hit points due to more roaches.
2) In large roach-roach, not all roaches can fire, which is why concaves and positioning is so important. This makes the upgrades more valuable, as you have more concentrated firepower.
3) If you max out at 200/200, you can't spend spare money on upgrades.

It is an important point you bring up, and a very relevant question: "should I build roaches or do the upgrade?", but I think you need to take more factors into account to be able to give a confident answer. It is an interesting observation that a 2-2 upgrade costs you at least 5 roaches, but I don't think your analysis is thorough enough to claim that it is a bad choice if the opponent has less than 45 roaches.

Also, I think the time factor is a huge deterrent against upgrades: you spend the money, but they'll give you nothing until they are done, no matter how good the upgrade is, essentially making you 5 (or up to 15) roaches short compared to not doing upgrades. Preferable you'd include that as well.


Your first point is not quite correct. Yes, the more roaches will have more HP, but we're not just straight up talking about HP, we're talking more about Effective Hitpoints (EHP), which will be the same.
In roach vs roach, it is possible to ignore the actual 145HP of the roaches themselves and just have them as "number of hits to be killed".
If you are 2-2 vs the opponents 1-1, then your roaches have 10 EHP and theirs have 9. Both your roaches do 1 damage each. Thinking of it this way it's easier to show that once they have 11% more roaches than you they effectively then have the same number of hitpoints.

The second point is valid in that there's more to think about than simply numbers. Some roaches do not fire in RvR engagements. I will be looking at this with Stargraphed as and when I get the code in to see if there's a way of quantitatively measuring engagement efficiency. For the time being I just have to take it as read that all will fire.

If you're maxed you have two options: Bank up for re-maxing or spend them on upgrades. Each has plus and minus points there.

You make a very good point about the timing of the upgrades. This is something that should be taken into consideration when playing. If you see 1-1 roaches and the evo chambers going, you know you could just build roaches and attack before 2-2 is done because you'll have the numbers advantage.

Another thing I had missed from the first post was the act of killing off roaches.
When you have fewer, more powerful units, killing one of them off will hurt your overall DPS more than losing one of the more, less powerful units. However, you'll be losing more of the more units and fewer of the fewer units. I am unsure how this works out in larger battles.

Ok, let me explain the first point in detail then.

As you did in your second post, you can formulate it in terms of both doing same damage (1), but having different amounts of hitpoint (9 or 10), and the weaker side has 11% more roaches, then yes, they will have the same EHP, but the weaker side will have 11% more dps, as they are 11% as many with same dps per roach. It boils down to the fighting power of a (group of) units goes as the DPS times the EHP. You calculated that one side has 11% more DPS than the other per roach, or 11% more EHP, both increasing the fighting power by 11%. However, increasing the number of roaches by 11% will increase BOTH their DPS and EHP by 11%, thus giving them a factor 1.11^2 = 1.23 more power. So to make up for 11% more EHP per unit (unchanged DPS per unit), you need sqrt(1.11) times as many units, or about 5% more.

But that calculation is ofc assuming that every unit can attack straight away. If you fight in a tight choke, where only a fix (small) number of roaches can attack at the same time, then your calculation is accurate, as the power of a group of units will now only go linearly with the number of units, rather than quadratic as in the "everyone can attack" approximation. That shows that if you have an upgrade advantage (and thus possibly fewer roaches) it is advantageous to fight in a choke where numbers are as important, but upgrades still help you at full power. Which we already knew, but nice to reproduce known results, I guess.... Just goes to show how hard it is to find new knowledge by mathematical analsysis of sc2.

Problem with maxing out is that you wanted to have upgraded 2 minutes ago, as you would have maxed out anyway. So I think that if you think that you will reach max before a fight, you should almost always do upgrades. Actually, if you think that the upgrade will go through before you fight, it is almost always beneficial. Even if you just barely come out even in the fight against your opponent that didn't do the upgrade, you will be at an advantage as you now have the upgrade he doesn't, and you both have almost no roaches.

Does anyone ever stockpile resources at 200/200 to remax rather than doing the upgrade? I honestly don't know, but it'd surprise me if anyone does.

edit: typos
Dingodile
Profile Joined December 2011
4139 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-01-16 12:24:26
January 16 2015 12:22 GMT
#49
Gowerly shows perfectly why (we see) 200/200 vs 200/200 are "2sec" fights.

1-1 takes more shots to kill than 2-2 or 3-3.
0-1 takes more shots to kill than 1-2 or 2-3.
1-0 and 2-1 take more shots than 3-2.
We should assume that 200 vs 200 have some upgrades.
Grubby | ToD | Moon | Lyn | Sky
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
January 16 2015 21:15 GMT
#50
On January 16 2015 00:49 Gowerly wrote:
This doesn't take into account regen, but base zerg regen is 0.27 hp/game second.
The only thing this would affect is anything that equates to values barely above 145. This only seems to concern values where the final number (attack - armour) is 21. This is because 7 * 21 = 147, so after 8 seconds from the first attack, the roach will heal enough to be on more than 0.0 HP after the next attack.

When considering Zerg regeneration, I usually add one additional needed attack, when a number of attack would exactly kill a Zerg unit. For example, if a Zerg unit had, say, 50 HP, and another unit with 10 damage were to attack it, I would say it takes 6 hits to kill, because 50/10 = exactly 5. In any other case I usually just take hp/damage rounded upwards (I calculated in OP like this as well).
This means that for a unit with 49 HP, the number of attacks required would be 5. This may, or may not, be one more in reality, depending on how long the unit lives, which we can't really say. Because of the 0.27 HP/gs regeneration, a unit heals 1 HP in about 4 gs. So if the 49 HP unit lives longer than that, it will need one more hit to be killed. For units with 48, 47, etc. HP, this time allowance is 2*4 gs, 3*4 gs, etc.

On January 16 2015 16:03 d3_crescentia wrote:
Cool! I've done some work on Starcraft and Lanchester's laws before, but my math has gotten pretty rusty since then. Still, it's nice to see that my work (mostly) matches yours.

Here's what I'm wondering - are you planning on creating something (a map, perhaps) that will test the theory through experimental evidence at any point in time? I'm aware you've done some preliminary testing, but it'd be cool to get a probability distribution or something like that.

Well, as you said, I have done some testing already to make sure that Lanchester's Square Law works in SCII at least roughly. Testing what this upgrade analysis suggests would basically mean testing Lanchester's Square Law more thoroughly, which, honestly, I have not planned.
I am currently working on some kind of an engagement simulator, though, which is based on Lanchester's Square Law. My concern is, though, that melee units don't really obey that law, and from time to time even ranged units fail (with not all of them attacking at the same time). If you have any suggestions on a model that could be used here, it would be welcome.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#65
RotterdaM679
TKL 343
TaKeTV 228
IndyStarCraft 190
BRAT_OK 108
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 679
TKL 343
IndyStarCraft 190
ProTech148
MaxPax 143
BRAT_OK 108
UpATreeSC 86
MindelVK 22
EmSc Tv 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 909
EffOrt 561
Mini 529
ggaemo 177
firebathero 150
White-Ra 59
Barracks 57
910 50
Hyun 50
Shinee 45
[ Show more ]
Shine 35
Bale 26
Killer 25
Trap 22
ToSsGirL 18
soO 15
yabsab 12
Dota 2
qojqva4036
Counter-Strike
Fnx 755
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4455
crisheroes1545
Liquid`Hasu1044
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2860
singsing1670
B2W.Neo902
ceh9634
Beastyqt607
ArmadaUGS141
C9.Mang0116
Dewaltoss46
Trikslyr44
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream486
Other Games
BasetradeTV173
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 17
EmSc2Tv 17
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile116
• Reevou 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix19
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2494
• TFBlade824
Other Games
• Shiphtur266
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
16h 9m
Afreeca Starleague
16h 9m
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
1d 6h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 17h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Online Event
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-27
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.