EPTZerg Drop Pods.
+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://ugm.pixologic.com/registration/1307-Siggraph/img/gallery/blizzard/images/img03.jpg)
+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://38.media.tumblr.com/9c6c02f9561433633b3d0c2dcc2e594d/tumblr_mh1twkzu1k1rpf30bo5_r1_500.gif)
Blizzard shares a new SC II sound file - New Unit? - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
danbel1005
United States1319 Posts
Zerg Drop Pods. + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
FrozenProbe
Italy276 Posts
 | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:00 OtherWorld wrote: If this SH replacement is a long-range artillery unit I'm a bit scared of what it's going to be tbh. I feel like the SH could stay in the game with a rework to make it a more mobile, less range unit. This is actually exactly what the Lurker was. More mobile, less range unit. Make it a unit that can be very cost-effective, but in order to attack it also needs to get into attacking range of the enemy. A positional unit is exactly what zerg needs, and I hope that it's not a long-range artillery unit. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:08 BisuDagger wrote: If you want to go that route it would be better to have slower spawn times on locusts over a period of burrowed time. You could just unburrow and reburrow them, no? | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:40 The_Red_Viper wrote: You could just unburrow and reburrow them, no? You could as well have a manual locust spawn then | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:40 The_Red_Viper wrote: You could just unburrow and reburrow them, no? Perhaps there would be some location tracker so that they couldn't use the same location more than once, or not use it for a while | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
| ||
|
dUTtrOACh
Canada2339 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:51 juvenal wrote: Not hyped by this crap, fuck it. The add-on will be fun for 2 months, never gets my money. It'll last me at least 6 months. Will buy. | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:51 juvenal wrote: Not hyped by this crap, fuck it. The add-on will be fun for 2 months, never gets my money. 2 months is more than I get out of most games. | ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:51 juvenal wrote: Not hyped by this crap, fuck it. The add-on will be fun for 2 months, never gets my money. Negative nancy  | ||
|
b0ub0u
Canada445 Posts
Let's get real people.. if you're on TL there`s a good chance you will buy it lol | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
during the last two years what exactly Blizzard has made to make me positive about its future stuff? Whatever, I'm not trying to convince nobody. On October 31 2014 01:53 b0ub0u wrote: People taking the time to write on TL saying they won't buy it... Let's get real people.. if you're on TL there`s a good chance you will buy it lol I'm here because BW | ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
| ||
[Phantom]
Mexico2170 Posts
I think you are lost, the BW forums are that way <-- | ||
|
Advantageous
China1350 Posts
Or maybe it is a unit like the carrier or archon that has a lot of background noises. | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Let's say you're a new player and you build a queen from your hatchery. You mouse over its abilities and then you spot a grayed out upgrade: "morph to flying queen - powerful spellcaster. requires [x]". I think those sort of teasers are very fun aspects of the game. It's similar to hype created by a community over new unit suggestions, which derives from the same anticipation. Compare this to just seeing a unit in the larva's command card. There are units there to the point of overload so that the effect is lost and it feels less special, less like you can get to discover a new unit for yourself. | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
On October 31 2014 00:20 danbel1005 wrote: LMAO so ez. Zerg Drop Pods. + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + i'm with you on this one | ||
|
tomastaz
United States976 Posts
| ||
|
CrayonSc2
United States267 Posts
| ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
| ||
