• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:01
CEST 05:01
KST 12:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence5Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups3WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL [ASL20] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1335 users

Imbalanced Hatcheries

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 15 2014 08:03 GMT
#1
Hi, I am back with another topic to analyze. This time it is about the possible imbalance in ZvZ due to the Hatcheries' Larvae always spawning on the south side.
The legend says that if a mineral line is to the south of the base, rather than to the north, then the spawning Drones will have to travel much less to the minerals when they begin working, and this materializes in an advantage for that player. Is it true, though?
Here is what I found:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


As always, here is the pdf for convinience and better quality.

TL;DR: If one player has a base with a southward mineral line, the other with a northward one, the former does have an advantage, but it is minimal. If the mineral lines are diagonal, the difference is even smaller; if they face east and west, respectively, then there should be no imbalance.

I'm looking forward to your opinions, criticisms, etc.

Previous projects:
+ Show Spoiler +
The Effects of Worker Pairing
Perfect Micro with Phonixes
Floating to the Gold Base
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
algue
Profile Joined July 2011
France1436 Posts
August 15 2014 08:07 GMT
#2
I don't think it makes that much of a difference. However it would be interesting if someone could give us the win rate in ZvZ based on the players spawn.
rly ?
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
August 15 2014 08:14 GMT
#3
The biggest difference in hatch-mineral positioning is the defense of early pools. If you are at a north hatch, your lings can easily be surrounded by enemy lings. If you are at the south hatch, your lings can never be surrounded without the risk of a drone surround.
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
SCguineapig
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Netherlands289 Posts
August 15 2014 08:35 GMT
#4
loving these series keep it up. although i know nothing of the mathematical talk .
broodwar wasn't perfect
Dapper_Cad
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United Kingdom964 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-15 08:56:13
August 15 2014 08:54 GMT
#5
Licheter makes a strong point.

There should have hatch orientation and an option to set it in melee initialisation as a minimum, that way mappers can use it if they wish.

More completely Blizzard could give players access to building orientation on hatches for other possible minuscule advantages, like spawning larvae away from potential bunker rushes.

Assuming you've done that in a way which works - isn't ugly as hell, is ignorable for newer players, doesn't require 6 fingers a hand to do, that sort of thing - the same for Terran addons at Barracks/Factory/Starport could be implemented as I'd guess that's decided more games than larva spawning.

For the Terran case though the can of worms(!) is larger: Addon only or whole building? Rotating or mirroring? Can you rotate flying buildings? Which adjacent building does the addon prioritise? The answers maybe straightforward but the implementation might not be.

What were we talking about again? Oh yea, 23 minerals @ first base saturation isn't that big a deal, but this is interesting stuff - would read more!
But he is never making short-term prediction, everyone of his prediction are based on fundenmentals, but he doesn't exactly know when it will happen... So using these kind of narrowed "who-is-right" empirical analysis makes little sense.
JoeCool
Profile Joined January 2012
Germany2520 Posts
August 15 2014 08:57 GMT
#6
On August 15 2014 17:07 algue wrote:
I don't think it makes that much of a difference. However it would be interesting if someone could give us the win rate in ZvZ based on the players spawn.


You could use a probitmodel and use all the factors that affect if you win or lose. Like, skill (which is unobservable so you might use a proxy), mapsize, apm, experience, race choice and so on... But I am quite sure that the coefficient on "spawn" is statistically insignificant. Although the idea is interesting.
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 15 2014 09:08 GMT
#7
On August 15 2014 17:14 lichter wrote:
The biggest difference in hatch-mineral positioning is the defense of early pools. If you are at a north hatch, your lings can easily be surrounded by enemy lings. If you are at the south hatch, your lings can never be surrounded without the risk of a drone surround.

This is without a doubt a more important factor than losing mining time. I can't calculate this, though, but the mining time loss I could, so at least we now know that that is negligible.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
August 15 2014 09:12 GMT
#8
Not wanting to take anything away from that analysis - but the tl;dr part was rather obvious . Though you seem to love those mathematics, so keep going!
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
August 15 2014 09:25 GMT
#9
I think there's a small imbalance with spawns in any match-up; for terrans, it's useful to get a spawn where your rax can build an add-on inside the wall instead of as part of it, for example. Without statistics, however, it's impossible to say if it matters over the course of an entire game.
Cogito, ergo toss.
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
August 15 2014 09:29 GMT
#10
How do you obtain the images? You are not using Latex and Tikz, do you? :o
GERMasta
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany212 Posts
August 15 2014 09:38 GMT
#11
If you take slightly less time to reach a certain amount of minerals, then you can make a new drone slightly faster, which is going to mean that you can mine with the new drones slightly sooner. I think OP didn't take this into account, but merely calculated the mineral disparity resulting from the distances that the drones would have to travel. It still shouldn't be a big difference even if you took the faster access to new drones into account, but it is something to consider if you want to be thorough with the analysis.
StatixEx
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United Kingdom779 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-15 09:41:27
August 15 2014 09:38 GMT
#12
i tested it using the ai, set urself to ref in a custom game and get 2 ais to play against each other, i used zerg and the lingRoach timing, on all 8 goes the northward position had a 5 second lead of his warren timing which is something i didnt expect but their builds are literally identical each time . . .but that initial mineral assignment tho! worker acceleration play a factor in this? I would of expected the ai to mine super efficient in the south position, but was never the case. always seemed to be just under a split second behind on the mineral tick. this is a good example of how the game snowballs when one player gets a slight advantage . . . .hmm considering never drone scouting again!
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 15 2014 10:09 GMT
#13
On August 15 2014 18:38 GERMasta wrote:
If you take slightly less time to reach a certain amount of minerals, then you can make a new drone slightly faster, which is going to mean that you can mine with the new drones slightly sooner. I think OP didn't take this into account, but merely calculated the mineral disparity resulting from the distances that the drones would have to travel. It still shouldn't be a big difference even if you took the faster access to new drones into account, but it is something to consider if you want to be thorough with the analysis.

Yes, only the Larva system of the Zerg screws up things, insomuch as being able to morph additional Drones does not only depend on whether you have enough minerals. I think, though, the effect is so marginal that even if it snowballs, it remains negligible.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Faust852
Profile Joined February 2012
Luxembourg4004 Posts
August 15 2014 10:31 GMT
#14
I don't think you can fix this tho. Putting larvas on the otherside would make them almost unclicable.
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-15 10:49:24
August 15 2014 10:47 GMT
#15
On August 15 2014 19:31 Faust852 wrote:
I don't think you can fix this tho. Putting larvas on the otherside would make them almost unclicable.

That can't be an argument. You would have to exclude northern high grounds then . Also, there's very few opportunities to actually click larva manually (eg. hellions sniping larva, or running banes into it). Most zerg players will use the hatchery to access larva.

On August 15 2014 19:09 Sholip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2014 18:38 GERMasta wrote:
If you take slightly less time to reach a certain amount of minerals, then you can make a new drone slightly faster, which is going to mean that you can mine with the new drones slightly sooner. I think OP didn't take this into account, but merely calculated the mineral disparity resulting from the distances that the drones would have to travel. It still shouldn't be a big difference even if you took the faster access to new drones into account, but it is something to consider if you want to be thorough with the analysis.

Yes, only the Larva system of the Zerg screws up things, insomuch as being able to morph additional Drones does not only depend on whether you have enough minerals. I think, though, the effect is so marginal that even if it snowballs, it remains negligible.



That would be the real thing to find out I think. Sometimes, I have the very subjective feeling of "gosh I'm so slow", which is really more than a feeling then some proven thing. That might explain what happens, because though I'm only a diamond/masters player (rather diamond then masters), I'm quite capable of executing a perfect hatch first build until 28-ish supply. Sometimes, I just feel slow. Dunno exactly why.
EsportsJohn
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4883 Posts
August 15 2014 10:50 GMT
#16
Artosis wants the math on hatch first nexus blocking in ZvP GOGOGOGO
StrategyAllyssa Grey <3<3
StatixEx
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United Kingdom779 Posts
August 15 2014 10:52 GMT
#17
only way it can be solved if this EVER poses some kind of issue is that the camera is relative to you so you always spawn south
EsportsJohn
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4883 Posts
August 15 2014 10:52 GMT
#18
On August 15 2014 19:47 boxerfred wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2014 19:31 Faust852 wrote:
I don't think you can fix this tho. Putting larvas on the otherside would make them almost unclicable.

That can't be an argument. You would have to exclude northern high grounds then . Also, there's very few opportunities to actually click larva manually (eg. hellions sniping larva, or running banes into it). Most zerg players will use the hatchery to access larva.

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2014 19:09 Sholip wrote:
On August 15 2014 18:38 GERMasta wrote:
If you take slightly less time to reach a certain amount of minerals, then you can make a new drone slightly faster, which is going to mean that you can mine with the new drones slightly sooner. I think OP didn't take this into account, but merely calculated the mineral disparity resulting from the distances that the drones would have to travel. It still shouldn't be a big difference even if you took the faster access to new drones into account, but it is something to consider if you want to be thorough with the analysis.

Yes, only the Larva system of the Zerg screws up things, insomuch as being able to morph additional Drones does not only depend on whether you have enough minerals. I think, though, the effect is so marginal that even if it snowballs, it remains negligible.



That would be the real thing to find out I think. Sometimes, I have the very subjective feeling of "gosh I'm so slow", which is really more than a feeling then some proven thing. That might explain what happens, because though I'm only a diamond/masters player (rather diamond then masters), I'm quite capable of executing a perfect hatch first build until 28-ish supply. Sometimes, I just feel slow. Dunno exactly why.


The feeling of being "slow" has mostly to do with mineral stacking. On some maps, the natural minerals that workers mine from suck more than others, but if you are really paying attention to drone stacking for the first minute or two of the game, you can really minimize a lot of this inefficiency.
StrategyAllyssa Grey <3<3
HaRuHi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
1220 Posts
August 15 2014 10:53 GMT
#19
Great math as usual! Thank you.

I wish you would take on a "bigger" aspect in future posts, of course it is not easy to know beforehand wether something will have a big or small influence.
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-15 10:58:09
August 15 2014 10:56 GMT
#20
On August 15 2014 19:52 SC2John wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2014 19:47 boxerfred wrote:
On August 15 2014 19:31 Faust852 wrote:
I don't think you can fix this tho. Putting larvas on the otherside would make them almost unclicable.

That can't be an argument. You would have to exclude northern high grounds then . Also, there's very few opportunities to actually click larva manually (eg. hellions sniping larva, or running banes into it). Most zerg players will use the hatchery to access larva.

On August 15 2014 19:09 Sholip wrote:
On August 15 2014 18:38 GERMasta wrote:
If you take slightly less time to reach a certain amount of minerals, then you can make a new drone slightly faster, which is going to mean that you can mine with the new drones slightly sooner. I think OP didn't take this into account, but merely calculated the mineral disparity resulting from the distances that the drones would have to travel. It still shouldn't be a big difference even if you took the faster access to new drones into account, but it is something to consider if you want to be thorough with the analysis.

Yes, only the Larva system of the Zerg screws up things, insomuch as being able to morph additional Drones does not only depend on whether you have enough minerals. I think, though, the effect is so marginal that even if it snowballs, it remains negligible.



That would be the real thing to find out I think. Sometimes, I have the very subjective feeling of "gosh I'm so slow", which is really more than a feeling then some proven thing. That might explain what happens, because though I'm only a diamond/masters player (rather diamond then masters), I'm quite capable of executing a perfect hatch first build until 28-ish supply. Sometimes, I just feel slow. Dunno exactly why.


The feeling of being "slow" has mostly to do with mineral stacking. On some maps, the natural minerals that workers mine from suck more than others, but if you are really paying attention to drone stacking for the first minute or two of the game, you can really minimize a lot of this inefficiency.

Hm, I do pay attention to mineral stacking. Seriously. Thing is, I mostly play 3v3/4v4 these days, and on many of those maps, the mineral patches are truely poor placed, so that might be the reason? (ofc, I do not always stack perfectly, so that might be the reason, too, yep)
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
Mid Season Playoffs #2
CranKy Ducklings180
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 129
Livibee 48
ROOTCatZ 42
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 65
ajuk12(nOOB) 29
sSak 16
Icarus 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever352
NeuroSwarm164
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K836
Coldzera 288
Other Games
summit1g7013
shahzam918
JimRising 537
Day[9].tv392
C9.Mang0376
SortOf143
Maynarde134
Trikslyr65
CosmosSc2 29
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick946
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush971
• Lourlo196
Other Games
• Scarra1150
• Day9tv392
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6h 59m
Afreeca Starleague
6h 59m
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
2v2
7h 59m
OSC
9h 59m
PiGosaur Monday
20h 59m
LiuLi Cup
1d 7h
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.