• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 10:55
CET 16:55
KST 00:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets0$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)12Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1822
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list? Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns Spontaneous hotkey change zerg
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) WardiTV Winter Cup WardiTV Mondays SC2 AI Tournament 2026
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
Potential ASL qualifier breakthroughs? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1294 users

Floating to the gold base

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-04 13:44:12
August 02 2014 13:31 GMT
#1
After all the positive feedback I got for my post about the Phoenix micro (which I really apprecitate, by the way), I am back with another topic, Floating to the gold base (or Gangnam Terran, as some know it).
The question about this strategy is, is it worth doing at all, and if yes, how much of an advantage does it give? In other words, isn't the delay in economy caused by the floating time greater then the boost the gold patches provide? Here is what I found.

Edit: the following calculation in the spoiler tag is flawed. Sorry for that! See the pictures below for correct info.
+ Show Spoiler +
First of all, the gold base provides an income only 5% greater than a regular base, which is not much at all. The key is that you need much less workers (less money invested, shorter time) to reach an income even higher (if not that much higher) than normally.

The way to examine the problem is to introduce the functions for total minerals mined as a function of time, for both the gold and the blue bases. These functions comprise little linear functions, each 17 gs long, because that is the time required for building an SCV. In such a 17-gs-long interval the mineral collection rate is constant, so the function is linear.

Now the gold function is delayed by the time it takes to fly to the gold base. If this delayed function intersects the blue function before the gold base is depleted, it means you have a window of opportunity, where you actually have an economic advantage, until the gold patches run dry.

For Habitation Station, the map where this strategy was frequently used, the graphs look like this:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Surprisingly, the time it takes to fly to the gold is 45 gs on Habitation Station (much more than I expected), which results in the strategy only paying off after 6:17. The minerals are depleted around 13:58, when the economic advantage of the floating Terran is 227 minerals, so about 8 Marines, considering he needs 4 less SCVs, too. This may seem a good number of units, but at the 14 minute mark, it is not all that much (although it may decide the game in some cases).
You can decide to attack earlier, though. At 6:17, you will already have a 200 mineral = 4 Marine advantage, which gradually grows.

On Foxtrot Labs, depending on the spawn location, it can last either about 58 game seconds or 1:30 game minutes to fly to the gold base. In the closer spawn, the gold base will first pay off at 10:50, and the base will deplete at 14:11, with an advantage of only 82 minerals. In the longer spawn, this strategy never pays off, with a deficit of 277 minerals when the base depletes. This build does not work on Foxtrot Labs, especially not on longer spawn. Do not try it!

The effect of MULEs may not be taken into account, becase they only start when the CC is upgraded; their extra income is partially compensated by the SCVs taken from minerals due to building; and they are not alway used (sometimes a scan is preferred). These three factors cancel out the effect of MULEs almost entirely, so the calculations should remain valid.


As in the previous one, I attach a (more) thorough pdf as well: here it is!

Edit: This is the correct calculation in the spoiler tag below:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


I'm looking forward to your feedback!

Previous projects:
+ Show Spoiler +
Perfect Micro with Phoenixes
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
mau5mat
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
Northern Ireland461 Posts
August 02 2014 13:36 GMT
#2
So sick, keep up the posts, maybe do a Banshee shoot and scoot analysis with sick maths? :D
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12631 Posts
August 02 2014 13:42 GMT
#3
Very cool analysis!
Gonna read that pdf later :D
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
EngrishTeacher
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
Canada1109 Posts
August 02 2014 13:44 GMT
#4
Wait so TL;DR, not worth it?

Especially considering most all-ins hit much earlier than the 8 minute mark?

Korean pros should read this thread!
Seeker *
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
August 02 2014 13:45 GMT
#5
Bbyong wants a word with you >: (
ModeratorPeople ask me, "Seeker, what are you seeking?" My answer? "Sleep, damn it! Always sleep!"
TL+ Member
TBO
Profile Joined September 2009
Germany1350 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 13:47:18
August 02 2014 13:45 GMT
#6
Is it really 47 seconds or a few less, as all your scvs will already have mined the gold once the CC landed. Also 4 less Workers translates to half a supply depot less needed. So I think the advantage is a tiny bit bigger than what you have shown.

Edit: aside from the eco, when it comes to allins there is also obviously the factor that you moved - at least on hab station - towards your opponent a bit so your barracks will also be closer which gives a few additional seconds as well.
Zealously
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
East Gorteau22261 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 13:52:24
August 02 2014 13:49 GMT
#7
Floating to the gold on Habitation Station does not take 47 seconds. Rather, I believe it is 42 or 43. In addition (I don't know if you accounted for this), the player's six SCVs will all have mined one set of minerals that they turn in the moment the CC lands.

On August 02 2014 22:44 EngrishTeacher wrote:
Wait so TL;DR, not worth it?

Especially considering most all-ins hit much earlier than the 8 minute mark?

Korean pros should read this thread!


If you can pull it off well (Bbyong), it is worth it, but there are more factors than just the boost in mineral income.
AdministratorBreak the chains
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 16:31:50
August 02 2014 13:57 GMT
#8
You appear not to take into account that you need 4 less scvs to saturate the gold than the normal base. Well, I guess you did in the pdf as well as a few other caveats, but not in the post here. Perhaps it'll be better to post the contents of the pdf since it really isn't that long at all. At 7:53, the build is already "ahead" by 200 minerals simply by not spending that 200 minerals on scvs. Mineral income is not the only way to have more minerals for units; not spending on scvs is also part of it. Most strats using floating to the old base will be decide well before 12 minutes anyhow.

Really though, the best way to compare gangnam terran is to try to compare it with when gangnam terran is not used at all, and the differences in the unit/tech count and safety. Isn't there like a replay program that can count the amount mined? Mathematical modelling in this case isn't useful since you can physically go out and do it and then compare results.

On August 02 2014 22:49 Zealously wrote:
In addition (I don't know if you accounted for this), the player's six SCVs will all have mined one set of minerals that they turn in the moment the CC lands.
No, he didn't account for it.

If he did, the mathematical model immediately breaks down. As soon as the CC lands on the gold, it receives 300 minerals and is ahead of the amount of the normal base mined. So the gold base is ahead at 47 game seconds (gs). A failure in mathematical modelling by oversimplification.

Edit: Uh not 300, 30 lol. Ignore what I wrote. Using the modelling, the amount mined is equalled at 7:00 mins.
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 02 2014 19:02 GMT
#9
On August 02 2014 22:57 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
You appear not to take into account that you need 4 less scvs to saturate the gold than the normal base. Well, I guess you did in the pdf as well as a few other caveats, but not in the post here. Perhaps it'll be better to post the contents of the pdf since it really isn't that long at all. At 7:53, the build is already "ahead" by 200 minerals simply by not spending that 200 minerals on scvs. Mineral income is not the only way to have more minerals for units; not spending on scvs is also part of it.

I did take it into consideration in the pdf. The problem is, I can't upload it here on TL as a pdf, and it is full of tables and equations which I couldn't include in the post, so it has to be a pdf.

On August 02 2014 22:57 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Edit: Uh not 300, 30 lol. Ignore what I wrote. Using the modelling, the amount mined is equalled at 7:00 mins.

I believed that 300 for a moment! Actually, though, that 30 counts little in the grand scheme of things, but I included it in the pdf and I corrected the post as well. There seem to have been mistakes anyway, now it should be all right.

On August 02 2014 22:49 Zealously wrote:
Floating to the gold on Habitation Station does not take 47 seconds. Rather, I believe it is 42 or 43.

You are right, it isn't 47, nor 43, but 45 seconds. I tested it again.

On August 02 2014 22:44 EngrishTeacher wrote:
Wait so TL;DR, not worth it?

Especially considering most all-ins hit much earlier than the 8 minute mark?

No, TL;DR: it is worth on Habitation Station, so long as you attack after around 6:20. It is not worth on Foxtrot Labs in the long spawn. In the short spawn, if you attack at 8:00, you are about 100 minerals behind, but since you don't have to build 4 SCVs, you are barely ahead. If you attack much earlier, your situation is worse, of course.I think, though, that the map is worse for this strategy than Habitation Station in other aspects as well, and you restrain yourself to one build for minimal advantage, so I think even on the shorter spawn, it should not be used.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
August 02 2014 20:08 GMT
#10
Yeah, sorry about the 300 minerals thing. I didn't expect to read mathematical language in the pdf and my brain got scrambled. 30 minerals is significant in that it basically cuts off around 50 seconds in the calculation for equal amount of minerals mined.

Anyhow, I don't think mathematical modelling in this case can prove useful as this is something that is best compared by physically doing it and comparing it. There's probably some replay programs that can measure income mined at certain points in the game, though you'll probably need bbyong's replays for accuracy.

Btw, I really enjoyed the Phoenix article.
timchen1017
Profile Joined May 2014
37 Posts
August 02 2014 20:56 GMT
#11
I think one thing you might want to consider is that in the gold base you probably want to "oversaturate" your base: 3 extra scvs at 33.6 m/gmin is not that bad comparing to those 39 m/gmin at regular patches. I am not sure, but you can look at some replays see if pro players do it.

I can't do precise math here, but consider you spend extra 150 minerals around 3-4 gmin mark and gain ~100 m/gmin back per minute, you earn your extra investment back already before 6 minute mark, and every game minute after before you deplete the base you gain 100 mineral advantage. Seems worth it to me.
iHirO
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United Kingdom1381 Posts
August 02 2014 21:54 GMT
#12
I thought part of the advantage of lifting off was reducing the rush distance to your opponents base.
GraphicsThis is for all you new people: I only have one rule. Everyone fights. No one quits. You don't do your job, I'll shoot you myself. You get me?
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 02 2014 22:02 GMT
#13
On August 03 2014 05:56 timchen1017 wrote:
I think one thing you might want to consider is that in the gold base you probably want to "oversaturate" your base: 3 extra scvs at 33.6 m/gmin is not that bad comparing to those 39 m/gmin at regular patches. I am not sure, but you can look at some replays see if pro players do it.

I can't do precise math here, but consider you spend extra 150 minerals around 3-4 gmin mark and gain ~100 m/gmin back per minute, you earn your extra investment back already before 6 minute mark, and every game minute after before you deplete the base you gain 100 mineral advantage. Seems worth it to me.

Yeah, it seems to be worth it. I'll check some pro matches and test it.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Shuffleblade
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden1903 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 22:12:46
August 02 2014 22:12 GMT
#14
Really nice post and very well detailed, it seems it can be made work into a sizable advantage as long as you hit at the right window. The secret is probably attacking at a timing when you both have an econ/army lead and also attacks right before the opponent can get crucial tech out.

I don't like Gangnam Terran style, the main reasons is that its doing an all in that is harder to macro out of than other all-ins due to building placements(sacking depots and the big opening you leave if you lift off all your buildings). Also the all in is strongly telegraphed, its like saying in your face that I will kill you within 14 minutes or lose. It would many times be better to do an all in without the opponent knowing and have an easier way of expanding.

I'm guessing it might be better at pro level though were the players really can squeeze out the extra value out of those 4-8 marines and where the opponent would scout whats coming anyway. In a normal diamond level game however I would say, not worth.
Maru, Bomber, TY, Dear, Classic, DeParture and Rogue!
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
August 02 2014 22:23 GMT
#15
On August 03 2014 07:12 Shuffleblade wrote:

I don't like Gangnam Terran style, the main reasons is that its doing an all in that is harder to macro out of than other all-ins due to building placements(sacking depots and the big opening you leave if you lift off all your buildings). Also the all in is strongly telegraphed, its like saying in your face that I will kill you within 14 minutes or lose. It would many times be better to do an all in without the opponent knowing and have an easier way of expanding.

I'm guessing it might be better at pro level though were the players really can squeeze out the extra value out of those 4-8 marines and where the opponent would scout whats coming anyway. In a normal diamond level game however I would say, not worth.

To be fair, the protoss that Bbong plays against are among the best and they know it's coming, but they can't stop it anyways. So it really doesn't matter if the opponent scouts it.
MajorBiscuit
Profile Joined April 2010
83 Posts
August 02 2014 22:51 GMT
#16
Loving these threads keep them coming.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 22:57:05
August 02 2014 22:56 GMT
#17
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.
duckk
Profile Joined March 2013
United States622 Posts
August 02 2014 23:09 GMT
#18
On August 03 2014 07:56 darkness wrote:
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.


at one point every terran did this and I sent a drone at 0 seconds, and by the time I got to the watch tower they were already mining.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
August 02 2014 23:14 GMT
#19
On August 03 2014 08:09 duckk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2014 07:56 darkness wrote:
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.


at one point every terran did this and I sent a drone at 0 seconds, and by the time I got to the watch tower they were already mining.


Alright, so what about proxy/early pool?
Zealously
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
East Gorteau22261 Posts
August 02 2014 23:20 GMT
#20
On August 03 2014 08:14 darkness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2014 08:09 duckk wrote:
On August 03 2014 07:56 darkness wrote:
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.


at one point every terran did this and I sent a drone at 0 seconds, and by the time I got to the watch tower they were already mining.


Alright, so what about proxy/early pool?


I don't have the actual facts to back this up, but given that Bbyong beat sOs, Parting and Stork (at least one of them knew he'd play Gangnam Terran) with this I would imagine that proxying, too, is ineffective.
AdministratorBreak the chains
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
14:00
Group B
WardiTV1341
IndyStarCraft 185
Rex145
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 185
uThermal 169
Rex 145
SC2Nice 21
BRAT_OK 9
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 9456
Sea 6938
Horang2 2368
EffOrt 1126
Shuttle 1016
Stork 769
Soma 335
Light 298
firebathero 232
ggaemo 199
[ Show more ]
hero 161
Hyuk 136
Sharp 130
Mind 114
Rush 106
Mong 82
Hyun 82
Pusan 73
Snow 64
Aegong 40
JYJ 38
soO 25
Terrorterran 23
Sexy 16
Yoon 15
GoRush 14
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
scan(afreeca) 11
HiyA 9
Sacsri 7
Dota 2
qojqva4286
syndereN576
XcaliburYe177
ODPixel127
Counter-Strike
olofmeister3232
byalli258
Other Games
Gorgc2726
Liquid`RaSZi1250
B2W.Neo942
hiko809
crisheroes284
Hui .282
DeMusliM175
QueenE145
oskar93
ArmadaUGS88
Mew2King56
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3995
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos4214
• TFBlade891
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
9h 5m
WardiTV Invitational
20h 5m
The PondCast
1d 18h
OSC
1d 20h
OSC
2 days
All Star Teams
3 days
INnoVation vs soO
sOs vs Scarlett
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
All Star Teams
4 days
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
OSC
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-12
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.