• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:17
CET 07:17
KST 15:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview1TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners11Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation10Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada Craziest Micro Moments Of All Time?
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion Terran 1:35 12 Gas Optimization
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1725 users

Floating to the gold base

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-04 13:44:12
August 02 2014 13:31 GMT
#1
After all the positive feedback I got for my post about the Phoenix micro (which I really apprecitate, by the way), I am back with another topic, Floating to the gold base (or Gangnam Terran, as some know it).
The question about this strategy is, is it worth doing at all, and if yes, how much of an advantage does it give? In other words, isn't the delay in economy caused by the floating time greater then the boost the gold patches provide? Here is what I found.

Edit: the following calculation in the spoiler tag is flawed. Sorry for that! See the pictures below for correct info.
+ Show Spoiler +
First of all, the gold base provides an income only 5% greater than a regular base, which is not much at all. The key is that you need much less workers (less money invested, shorter time) to reach an income even higher (if not that much higher) than normally.

The way to examine the problem is to introduce the functions for total minerals mined as a function of time, for both the gold and the blue bases. These functions comprise little linear functions, each 17 gs long, because that is the time required for building an SCV. In such a 17-gs-long interval the mineral collection rate is constant, so the function is linear.

Now the gold function is delayed by the time it takes to fly to the gold base. If this delayed function intersects the blue function before the gold base is depleted, it means you have a window of opportunity, where you actually have an economic advantage, until the gold patches run dry.

For Habitation Station, the map where this strategy was frequently used, the graphs look like this:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Surprisingly, the time it takes to fly to the gold is 45 gs on Habitation Station (much more than I expected), which results in the strategy only paying off after 6:17. The minerals are depleted around 13:58, when the economic advantage of the floating Terran is 227 minerals, so about 8 Marines, considering he needs 4 less SCVs, too. This may seem a good number of units, but at the 14 minute mark, it is not all that much (although it may decide the game in some cases).
You can decide to attack earlier, though. At 6:17, you will already have a 200 mineral = 4 Marine advantage, which gradually grows.

On Foxtrot Labs, depending on the spawn location, it can last either about 58 game seconds or 1:30 game minutes to fly to the gold base. In the closer spawn, the gold base will first pay off at 10:50, and the base will deplete at 14:11, with an advantage of only 82 minerals. In the longer spawn, this strategy never pays off, with a deficit of 277 minerals when the base depletes. This build does not work on Foxtrot Labs, especially not on longer spawn. Do not try it!

The effect of MULEs may not be taken into account, becase they only start when the CC is upgraded; their extra income is partially compensated by the SCVs taken from minerals due to building; and they are not alway used (sometimes a scan is preferred). These three factors cancel out the effect of MULEs almost entirely, so the calculations should remain valid.


As in the previous one, I attach a (more) thorough pdf as well: here it is!

Edit: This is the correct calculation in the spoiler tag below:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


I'm looking forward to your feedback!

Previous projects:
+ Show Spoiler +
Perfect Micro with Phoenixes
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
mau5mat
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
Northern Ireland461 Posts
August 02 2014 13:36 GMT
#2
So sick, keep up the posts, maybe do a Banshee shoot and scoot analysis with sick maths? :D
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12516 Posts
August 02 2014 13:42 GMT
#3
Very cool analysis!
Gonna read that pdf later :D
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
EngrishTeacher
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
Canada1109 Posts
August 02 2014 13:44 GMT
#4
Wait so TL;DR, not worth it?

Especially considering most all-ins hit much earlier than the 8 minute mark?

Korean pros should read this thread!
Seeker *
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
August 02 2014 13:45 GMT
#5
Bbyong wants a word with you >: (
ModeratorPeople ask me, "Seeker, what are you seeking?" My answer? "Sleep, damn it! Always sleep!"
TL+ Member
TBO
Profile Joined September 2009
Germany1350 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 13:47:18
August 02 2014 13:45 GMT
#6
Is it really 47 seconds or a few less, as all your scvs will already have mined the gold once the CC landed. Also 4 less Workers translates to half a supply depot less needed. So I think the advantage is a tiny bit bigger than what you have shown.

Edit: aside from the eco, when it comes to allins there is also obviously the factor that you moved - at least on hab station - towards your opponent a bit so your barracks will also be closer which gives a few additional seconds as well.
Zealously
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
East Gorteau22261 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 13:52:24
August 02 2014 13:49 GMT
#7
Floating to the gold on Habitation Station does not take 47 seconds. Rather, I believe it is 42 or 43. In addition (I don't know if you accounted for this), the player's six SCVs will all have mined one set of minerals that they turn in the moment the CC lands.

On August 02 2014 22:44 EngrishTeacher wrote:
Wait so TL;DR, not worth it?

Especially considering most all-ins hit much earlier than the 8 minute mark?

Korean pros should read this thread!


If you can pull it off well (Bbyong), it is worth it, but there are more factors than just the boost in mineral income.
AdministratorBreak the chains
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 16:31:50
August 02 2014 13:57 GMT
#8
You appear not to take into account that you need 4 less scvs to saturate the gold than the normal base. Well, I guess you did in the pdf as well as a few other caveats, but not in the post here. Perhaps it'll be better to post the contents of the pdf since it really isn't that long at all. At 7:53, the build is already "ahead" by 200 minerals simply by not spending that 200 minerals on scvs. Mineral income is not the only way to have more minerals for units; not spending on scvs is also part of it. Most strats using floating to the old base will be decide well before 12 minutes anyhow.

Really though, the best way to compare gangnam terran is to try to compare it with when gangnam terran is not used at all, and the differences in the unit/tech count and safety. Isn't there like a replay program that can count the amount mined? Mathematical modelling in this case isn't useful since you can physically go out and do it and then compare results.

On August 02 2014 22:49 Zealously wrote:
In addition (I don't know if you accounted for this), the player's six SCVs will all have mined one set of minerals that they turn in the moment the CC lands.
No, he didn't account for it.

If he did, the mathematical model immediately breaks down. As soon as the CC lands on the gold, it receives 300 minerals and is ahead of the amount of the normal base mined. So the gold base is ahead at 47 game seconds (gs). A failure in mathematical modelling by oversimplification.

Edit: Uh not 300, 30 lol. Ignore what I wrote. Using the modelling, the amount mined is equalled at 7:00 mins.
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 02 2014 19:02 GMT
#9
On August 02 2014 22:57 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
You appear not to take into account that you need 4 less scvs to saturate the gold than the normal base. Well, I guess you did in the pdf as well as a few other caveats, but not in the post here. Perhaps it'll be better to post the contents of the pdf since it really isn't that long at all. At 7:53, the build is already "ahead" by 200 minerals simply by not spending that 200 minerals on scvs. Mineral income is not the only way to have more minerals for units; not spending on scvs is also part of it.

I did take it into consideration in the pdf. The problem is, I can't upload it here on TL as a pdf, and it is full of tables and equations which I couldn't include in the post, so it has to be a pdf.

On August 02 2014 22:57 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Edit: Uh not 300, 30 lol. Ignore what I wrote. Using the modelling, the amount mined is equalled at 7:00 mins.

I believed that 300 for a moment! Actually, though, that 30 counts little in the grand scheme of things, but I included it in the pdf and I corrected the post as well. There seem to have been mistakes anyway, now it should be all right.

On August 02 2014 22:49 Zealously wrote:
Floating to the gold on Habitation Station does not take 47 seconds. Rather, I believe it is 42 or 43.

You are right, it isn't 47, nor 43, but 45 seconds. I tested it again.

On August 02 2014 22:44 EngrishTeacher wrote:
Wait so TL;DR, not worth it?

Especially considering most all-ins hit much earlier than the 8 minute mark?

No, TL;DR: it is worth on Habitation Station, so long as you attack after around 6:20. It is not worth on Foxtrot Labs in the long spawn. In the short spawn, if you attack at 8:00, you are about 100 minerals behind, but since you don't have to build 4 SCVs, you are barely ahead. If you attack much earlier, your situation is worse, of course.I think, though, that the map is worse for this strategy than Habitation Station in other aspects as well, and you restrain yourself to one build for minimal advantage, so I think even on the shorter spawn, it should not be used.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
August 02 2014 20:08 GMT
#10
Yeah, sorry about the 300 minerals thing. I didn't expect to read mathematical language in the pdf and my brain got scrambled. 30 minerals is significant in that it basically cuts off around 50 seconds in the calculation for equal amount of minerals mined.

Anyhow, I don't think mathematical modelling in this case can prove useful as this is something that is best compared by physically doing it and comparing it. There's probably some replay programs that can measure income mined at certain points in the game, though you'll probably need bbyong's replays for accuracy.

Btw, I really enjoyed the Phoenix article.
timchen1017
Profile Joined May 2014
37 Posts
August 02 2014 20:56 GMT
#11
I think one thing you might want to consider is that in the gold base you probably want to "oversaturate" your base: 3 extra scvs at 33.6 m/gmin is not that bad comparing to those 39 m/gmin at regular patches. I am not sure, but you can look at some replays see if pro players do it.

I can't do precise math here, but consider you spend extra 150 minerals around 3-4 gmin mark and gain ~100 m/gmin back per minute, you earn your extra investment back already before 6 minute mark, and every game minute after before you deplete the base you gain 100 mineral advantage. Seems worth it to me.
iHirO
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United Kingdom1381 Posts
August 02 2014 21:54 GMT
#12
I thought part of the advantage of lifting off was reducing the rush distance to your opponents base.
GraphicsThis is for all you new people: I only have one rule. Everyone fights. No one quits. You don't do your job, I'll shoot you myself. You get me?
Sholip
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
Hungary422 Posts
August 02 2014 22:02 GMT
#13
On August 03 2014 05:56 timchen1017 wrote:
I think one thing you might want to consider is that in the gold base you probably want to "oversaturate" your base: 3 extra scvs at 33.6 m/gmin is not that bad comparing to those 39 m/gmin at regular patches. I am not sure, but you can look at some replays see if pro players do it.

I can't do precise math here, but consider you spend extra 150 minerals around 3-4 gmin mark and gain ~100 m/gmin back per minute, you earn your extra investment back already before 6 minute mark, and every game minute after before you deplete the base you gain 100 mineral advantage. Seems worth it to me.

Yeah, it seems to be worth it. I'll check some pro matches and test it.
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. Also, Zest is best." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Shuffleblade
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden1903 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 22:12:46
August 02 2014 22:12 GMT
#14
Really nice post and very well detailed, it seems it can be made work into a sizable advantage as long as you hit at the right window. The secret is probably attacking at a timing when you both have an econ/army lead and also attacks right before the opponent can get crucial tech out.

I don't like Gangnam Terran style, the main reasons is that its doing an all in that is harder to macro out of than other all-ins due to building placements(sacking depots and the big opening you leave if you lift off all your buildings). Also the all in is strongly telegraphed, its like saying in your face that I will kill you within 14 minutes or lose. It would many times be better to do an all in without the opponent knowing and have an easier way of expanding.

I'm guessing it might be better at pro level though were the players really can squeeze out the extra value out of those 4-8 marines and where the opponent would scout whats coming anyway. In a normal diamond level game however I would say, not worth.
Maru, Bomber, TY, Dear, Classic, DeParture and Rogue!
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
August 02 2014 22:23 GMT
#15
On August 03 2014 07:12 Shuffleblade wrote:

I don't like Gangnam Terran style, the main reasons is that its doing an all in that is harder to macro out of than other all-ins due to building placements(sacking depots and the big opening you leave if you lift off all your buildings). Also the all in is strongly telegraphed, its like saying in your face that I will kill you within 14 minutes or lose. It would many times be better to do an all in without the opponent knowing and have an easier way of expanding.

I'm guessing it might be better at pro level though were the players really can squeeze out the extra value out of those 4-8 marines and where the opponent would scout whats coming anyway. In a normal diamond level game however I would say, not worth.

To be fair, the protoss that Bbong plays against are among the best and they know it's coming, but they can't stop it anyways. So it really doesn't matter if the opponent scouts it.
MajorBiscuit
Profile Joined April 2010
83 Posts
August 02 2014 22:51 GMT
#16
Loving these threads keep them coming.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-02 22:57:05
August 02 2014 22:56 GMT
#17
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.
duckk
Profile Joined March 2013
United States622 Posts
August 02 2014 23:09 GMT
#18
On August 03 2014 07:56 darkness wrote:
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.


at one point every terran did this and I sent a drone at 0 seconds, and by the time I got to the watch tower they were already mining.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
August 02 2014 23:14 GMT
#19
On August 03 2014 08:09 duckk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2014 07:56 darkness wrote:
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.


at one point every terran did this and I sent a drone at 0 seconds, and by the time I got to the watch tower they were already mining.


Alright, so what about proxy/early pool?
Zealously
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
East Gorteau22261 Posts
August 02 2014 23:20 GMT
#20
On August 03 2014 08:14 darkness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2014 08:09 duckk wrote:
On August 03 2014 07:56 darkness wrote:
There is always a risk with this I think, what if you do this so frequently that your opponent sends their first worker to block? Even worse, proxy gateway or any early pool. I think it's a build that is good for one game only.


at one point every terran did this and I sent a drone at 0 seconds, and by the time I got to the watch tower they were already mining.


Alright, so what about proxy/early pool?


I don't have the actual facts to back this up, but given that Bbyong beat sOs, Parting and Stork (at least one of them knew he'd play Gangnam Terran) with this I would imagine that proxying, too, is ineffective.
AdministratorBreak the chains
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 1446
Leta 649
EffOrt 123
Bale 58
ivOry 11
Icarus 7
Dota 2
XaKoH 650
monkeys_forever450
League of Legends
JimRising 604
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0219
Mew2King80
Other Games
summit1g20081
shahzam356
NeuroSwarm92
kaitlyn38
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick859
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21559
League of Legends
• Lourlo839
• Stunt470
Other Games
• Scarra1162
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 43m
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
5h 43m
GuMiho vs MaNa
herO vs ShoWTimE
Classic vs TBD
WardiTV Korean Royale
5h 43m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 3h
RSL Revival
1d 3h
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
1d 5h
Cure vs Reynor
IPSL
1d 10h
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
BSL 21
1d 13h
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
BSL 21
2 days
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
2 days
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
BSL: GosuLeague
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
BSL: GosuLeague
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
RSL Revival: Season 3
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.