• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:19
CET 07:19
KST 15:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool48Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
Recent recommended BW games ASL21 General Discussion Gypsy to Korea RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site KK Platform will provide 1 million CNY
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2026 Changsha Offline Cup [ASL21] Ro24 Group B [ASL21] Ro24 Group A
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon General RTS Discussion Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Formula 1 Discussion Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6231 users

Star Haeng Show Interview with David Kim - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
100 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Meavis
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Netherlands1300 Posts
July 17 2014 07:55 GMT
#81
On July 17 2014 04:41 Survivor61316 wrote:
and I believe that the only reason its not played by more people is because the ladder system is to complicated.


Well, there's also quite a bunch of people that think starbow is a balance mess, with unlimited selection muta flocks, no good protoss response to zerg t3 and lurkers/marines having buffed up stats.
"Not you."
aka_star
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United Kingdom1546 Posts
July 17 2014 08:37 GMT
#82
It's sad when the Q&A is 5 times the size of the patch :-/
FlashDave.999 aka Star
saddaromma
Profile Joined April 2013
1129 Posts
July 17 2014 09:30 GMT
#83
David Kim's posts make me zzzzzz...

I'd be really glad if they had some other guy with better communication skills to tell people what they are doing.

Fun fact, DK used "we feel" term 25 times. And it makes me sad that balance of the game relies on what they're feeling rather than solid reasonings.
KingAlphard
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Italy1705 Posts
July 17 2014 10:09 GMT
#84
On July 17 2014 18:30 saddaromma wrote:
David Kim's posts make me zzzzzz...

I'd be really glad if they had some other guy with better communication skills to tell people what they are doing.

Fun fact, DK used "we feel" term 25 times. And it makes me sad that balance of the game relies on what they're feeling rather than solid reasonings.


He is just being humble and respecting other's opinions rather than considering everything he thinks as a given fact.
andrewlt
Profile Joined August 2009
United States7702 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-17 15:09:20
July 17 2014 15:08 GMT
#85
On July 17 2014 12:32 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2014 12:20 Plansix wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:14 pure.Wasted wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:09 Plansix wrote:
I do like his comment about carriers and BCs, that they are both kinda deathbally and not really a blast to watch. Cause its true.


You kind of expect a little more analysis and insight from the man in charge after 4 years, though, don't you?

Until he actually does something about it (makes the units more interesting, then makes them viable), all it really is is a reasonable excuse for doing nothing to improve the game. I'd have been more impressed if he'd said this... say, as they were tinkering with Tempest/new BC abilities for HOTS, when this brilliant realization could have actually been acted upon.

The problem is "improving" things requires you to do a shit ton of testing. Because before you improve something, you need to make it shitty over and over and over. Since Blizzard is working on Hearthstone and Heroes, that time is not now. There is no awesome switch that they can just flip or just "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button either.


There is a "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button.

It's called Heart of the Swarm Beta. "Oops" isn't really a justifiable defense for not using it, as far as I'm concerned, especially not when they've never actually said "We didn't take enough advantage of it, but that'll change next time." I absolutely expect LOTV Beta to be the same polish-fest that WOL and HOTS Betas were.


This I agree with. I've been playing Blizzard games since Warcraft 1 and I feel that they completely wussed out with HotS. No Blizzard-made expansion has made fewer changes than HotS did (other than maybe Beyond the Dark Portal). Even the amount of attempted changes was depressingly low. They barely touched all the WoL units when designing HotS.

D3's RoS expansion made a lot of changes so it's just the SC2 team that decided not to make many changes with HotS. Maybe they procrastinated knowing they have another expansion planned to make fixes. But it feels like a wasted opportunity.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
July 17 2014 15:45 GMT
#86
On July 18 2014 00:08 andrewlt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2014 12:32 pure.Wasted wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:20 Plansix wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:14 pure.Wasted wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:09 Plansix wrote:
I do like his comment about carriers and BCs, that they are both kinda deathbally and not really a blast to watch. Cause its true.


You kind of expect a little more analysis and insight from the man in charge after 4 years, though, don't you?

Until he actually does something about it (makes the units more interesting, then makes them viable), all it really is is a reasonable excuse for doing nothing to improve the game. I'd have been more impressed if he'd said this... say, as they were tinkering with Tempest/new BC abilities for HOTS, when this brilliant realization could have actually been acted upon.

The problem is "improving" things requires you to do a shit ton of testing. Because before you improve something, you need to make it shitty over and over and over. Since Blizzard is working on Hearthstone and Heroes, that time is not now. There is no awesome switch that they can just flip or just "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button either.


There is a "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button.

It's called Heart of the Swarm Beta. "Oops" isn't really a justifiable defense for not using it, as far as I'm concerned, especially not when they've never actually said "We didn't take enough advantage of it, but that'll change next time." I absolutely expect LOTV Beta to be the same polish-fest that WOL and HOTS Betas were.


This I agree with. I've been playing Blizzard games since Warcraft 1 and I feel that they completely wussed out with HotS. No Blizzard-made expansion has made fewer changes than HotS did (other than maybe Beyond the Dark Portal). Even the amount of attempted changes was depressingly low. They barely touched all the WoL units when designing HotS.

D3's RoS expansion made a lot of changes so it's just the SC2 team that decided not to make many changes with HotS. Maybe they procrastinated knowing they have another expansion planned to make fixes. But it feels like a wasted opportunity.


Yeah Blizzard isn't the great company that we once knew and love.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
TopRamen
Profile Joined February 2011
United States96 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-17 17:14:55
July 17 2014 16:36 GMT
#87
On July 17 2014 11:56 sc2isnotdying wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2014 08:58 TopRamen wrote:
A game of SC2 has feedback that is just too wild for a great competitive game. It's a pretty balanced game between players A and B until A or B makes a move that gives them an insurmountable lead and they can then bludgeon their opponent to death with their unstoppable force.

An ideal game progression is one where the lead changes hands but the better player eventually wins.


I disagree. Honestly, it's not all that important that the better player eventually wins. This is not the case in Football(American or World), Poker, Settlers of Catan, or any number of popular competitive games. I would agree that good game design should avoid snowballing and award skill, but a great game should also be dramatic, unpredictable and open to any number of dynamic strategies.

It looks like LoTV is going to take multiplayer in a bit of more hardcore direction. This makes sense. Any number of casual players have left and at this point they're not coming back. (Though they should come back for the campaign. Give Blizzard credit; HoTS was a sizable improvement on WOL as a single player game) It was ambitious of Blizzard to think that a multiplayer RTS would have lasting appeal to "casual" gamers. I would expect some more micro-intensive units for LoTV. Which is not to say LoTV should turn SC2 into BW. I don't think I'd play the game if had BW's terrible pathing. Or if it didn't have auto-mining for that matter.


Well I guess it depends on what your definition of a 'better' player is.

I don't think we can say for sure that LoTV is going to take multiplayer in a hardcore direction. We still haven't seen anything, all we've heard is talk.

Any emphasis on the 'casual' gaming audience is a mistake. BW became a great competitive and casual game at the same time without the help of Blizzard.

HoTS was a sizable improvement at first, then slowly turned into WoLs stale metagame later.

I don't expect many micro-intensive units, because of the engine's limitations.

Pathing is a tricky issue, I understand from a programmer's perspective you want things to run smoothly. But on the other hand, bad pathing makes gathering up troops harder, creating sort of a supply-line esque feel to it. I don't know how to make an elegant solution that has smooth pathing and keep the benefit of a supply-line feel. Starbow tried a couple of things but they weren't very graceful.

Auto-mining you can keep. I don't think auto-mining does much in the long run.
Use your noodle!
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
July 17 2014 16:39 GMT
#88
I think HotS is a sizeable improvement on WoL, which was already a great game (at least for me). I have no doubt that LotV will further improve gameplay and enjoyability so SC2 can definitely be the a supreme RTS.
sm1995
Profile Joined July 2014
Korea (South)69 Posts
July 17 2014 16:55 GMT
#89
Protoss crying??? Even map is good for terran, can this change game balanced?? Protoss is balanced for foreigner maybe ,however for korean it is really hard to beat protoss.especially Warping unit really make game easy for protoss. Macro level b protoss can even beat top terran player with warp gate all in
h
buchaa
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
Pakistan77 Posts
July 17 2014 18:15 GMT
#90
In Diamond league I've noticed some things. The terran players' skill level is amazing in comparison to the TvZs and TvPs I'm playing... I've seen awesome marine tank positioning and micro the sort I just haven't seen from the other players. Zerg keeps trying to suicide 100 of his banes and protoss havent been doing much other than massing Zealot/Templar once they lose their armies and 'A' moving forward...

For the players that are playing well... for their sake... we need this patch as a community to be a success...
BoxeR, Michael Schumacher, Michael Jordan (Legends never get old)
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12421 Posts
July 17 2014 18:21 GMT
#91
"For the widow mine on the other hand, we received a lot of feedback saying that this is too much of a problem in TvZ in Heart of the Swarm. While we received many feedbacks from the players and community, we also felt that it was too strong, leading us to nerf the widow mine. However, for that instance, we feel that maybe it would have been better to leave it up to the players a little bit more. This is because when the widow mine came into the game, while it helped Terrans win more agaist Zerg, the match itself was really exciting with endless action from about the 10 minute mark. Since there was many fun matches, we feel that maybe it would have been better to wait."

This is the only part of the interview that I found debatable and a little dangerous. The reason why you should have let the widow mine like it was isn't that the game was fun. The reason is that zerg was doing good enough against it without a change, and the widow mine didn't look like it "helped terran win more games against zerg" anymore.

If you start balancing through excitement, you will be faced with the problem that excitement isn't balanced for all races. The majority of the audience likes terran, so they will be more excited when terrans play. A lot of people hate PvP, so excitement will drop fast anytime protoss does well. You should be doing the same test when terran looks like it's overpowered and when protoss looks like it's overpowered, otherwise the whole process makes no sense.
No will to live, no wish to die
FT.aCt)Sony
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States1048 Posts
July 17 2014 18:21 GMT
#92
I quit playing HotS after the initial season after beta because the game was just inconsistent. Countless imbalances were there and the unit compositions were always the same, never any rough changes in that matter.

Coming back playing after that, I still see the same thing going on. This is a problem and it shows that Blizzard hasn't really paid much attention to the actual gameplay.

It could be people living the past, or it could be it doesnt need to be changed because Blizzard feels it works, or it could be some underlying fact, but I still see the same stuff used and done in majority of games.
PinoKotsBeer
Profile Joined February 2014
Netherlands1385 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-17 19:07:11
July 17 2014 19:06 GMT
#93
To be honest, this interview gives me hope that the game will be fun again in the future. The answers from David kim are less political chosen than in his previous Q&A's and more understanding what the community wants.

Crossing my fingers!~!!!
http://www.twitch.tv/pinokotsbeer
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10366 Posts
July 17 2014 19:43 GMT
#94
On July 17 2014 16:55 19Meavis93 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2014 04:41 Survivor61316 wrote:
and I believe that the only reason its not played by more people is because the ladder system is to complicated.


Well, there's also quite a bunch of people that think starbow is a balance mess, with unlimited selection muta flocks, no good protoss response to zerg t3 and lurkers/marines having buffed up stats.


And people like me who just find it much less fun and awesome than SC2 ^^
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
ObeseHydra
Profile Joined March 2013
Brazil196 Posts
July 17 2014 21:13 GMT
#95
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to be the best interview DK has given so far. Sure, it's nothing special, but it's definitely an improvement over the previous ones.

It gives me hope that LOTV will be even better. (Cause, you know, "SC2 is a bad game" that for some reason I and tens of thounsands of people keep playing 4 years after it's launch).
imre
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
France9263 Posts
July 17 2014 21:25 GMT
#96
On July 17 2014 12:20 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2014 12:14 pure.Wasted wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:09 Plansix wrote:
I do like his comment about carriers and BCs, that they are both kinda deathbally and not really a blast to watch. Cause its true.


You kind of expect a little more analysis and insight from the man in charge after 4 years, though, don't you?

Until he actually does something about it (makes the units more interesting, then makes them viable), all it really is is a reasonable excuse for doing nothing to improve the game. I'd have been more impressed if he'd said this... say, as they were tinkering with Tempest/new BC abilities for HOTS, when this brilliant realization could have actually been acted upon.

The problem is "improving" things requires you to do a shit ton of testing. Because before you improve something, you need to make it shitty over and over and over. Since Blizzard is working on Hearthstone and Heroes, that time is not now. There is no awesome switch that they can just flip or just "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button either.

And you do know the reason why he doesn't elaborate right? English is his second language. He speaks English well, but you can tell he runs up against the limits of his vocabulary a lot. You can tell because he uses a lot of the same adjectives over and over.


not like the interview wasn't in english to begin with.
Zest fanboy.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
July 17 2014 21:39 GMT
#97
On July 17 2014 03:22 Musicus wrote:
I feel rather good now about LotV since they seem to work hard on it and test a lot. Considering iNcontrol once said, Blizzard didn't plan any major changes or new units in LotV, they definitely changed their plans for the better. New (or old ) units and a more micro intensive Protoss race! If they somehow change warpgate and forcefield, it might become great.

Can I interest you in some property I'm trying to sell?
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Iron_
Profile Joined April 2010
United States389 Posts
July 17 2014 23:21 GMT
#98
Man, it was really nice to hear him admit that the Broodlord Infestor was awful and allowed to go on far too long, and that they widow mine nerf was a knee jerk in response to not wanting to wait too long. Good stuff. I regained some of my faith here. While the upcoming patch I truly don't believe will do much for TvP, I'm at least going to try the mine and see what it does.
VArsovskiSC
Profile Joined July 2010
Macedonia563 Posts
July 18 2014 07:13 GMT
#99
Well that interview wasn't bad overall.. Hopefully we get to see the stuff they've been working on for LotV at this year's Blizzcon
Another world, another place, another universe, won the race.. :) ;) :P
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
July 18 2014 15:05 GMT
#100
On July 18 2014 00:08 andrewlt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2014 12:32 pure.Wasted wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:20 Plansix wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:14 pure.Wasted wrote:
On July 17 2014 12:09 Plansix wrote:
I do like his comment about carriers and BCs, that they are both kinda deathbally and not really a blast to watch. Cause its true.


You kind of expect a little more analysis and insight from the man in charge after 4 years, though, don't you?

Until he actually does something about it (makes the units more interesting, then makes them viable), all it really is is a reasonable excuse for doing nothing to improve the game. I'd have been more impressed if he'd said this... say, as they were tinkering with Tempest/new BC abilities for HOTS, when this brilliant realization could have actually been acted upon.

The problem is "improving" things requires you to do a shit ton of testing. Because before you improve something, you need to make it shitty over and over and over. Since Blizzard is working on Hearthstone and Heroes, that time is not now. There is no awesome switch that they can just flip or just "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button either.


There is a "take community suggests that are awesome, while not taking shitty ones" button.

It's called Heart of the Swarm Beta. "Oops" isn't really a justifiable defense for not using it, as far as I'm concerned, especially not when they've never actually said "We didn't take enough advantage of it, but that'll change next time." I absolutely expect LOTV Beta to be the same polish-fest that WOL and HOTS Betas were.


This I agree with. I've been playing Blizzard games since Warcraft 1 and I feel that they completely wussed out with HotS. No Blizzard-made expansion has made fewer changes than HotS did (other than maybe Beyond the Dark Portal). Even the amount of attempted changes was depressingly low. They barely touched all the WoL units when designing HotS.

D3's RoS expansion made a lot of changes so it's just the SC2 team that decided not to make many changes with HotS. Maybe they procrastinated knowing they have another expansion planned to make fixes. But it feels like a wasted opportunity.

How is HotS not at least as big a change as BW?

BW:
Terran:
Medics
Valkyries
Charon Boosters for Goliaths

Zerg:
Lurkers
Devourers
I thiiiiiiiiink ultra armor upgrade was a BW upgrade? I'm not sure about that tho.

Protoss:
DTs
Dark Archons
Corsairs

You could argue that the medic/lurker/dt made a bigger change to play styles than the HotS units, but I'm not really sure about that... The MSC change is bigger than any of them, and the rest are close at least.

TFT was a true game changer, they recognized some problems with the game and really made a big overhaul (if I recall correctly, they brought on Zileas for that and he was in charge of the overhaul?)
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
-ZergGirl 220
ProTech119
Livibee 53
StarCraft: Brood War
Tasteless 238
Dewaltoss 98
sSak 69
Leta 44
Noble 44
scan(afreeca) 29
Dota 2
febbydoto15
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 664
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv517
Other Games
summit1g8764
WinterStarcraft490
C9.Mang0399
crisheroes258
Nina64
amsayoshi0
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV99
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 18
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Sammyuel 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 41m
Cure vs Zoun
herO vs Rogue
Platinum Heroes Events
8h 41m
BSL
13h 41m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
1d 5h
BSL
1d 12h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
2026 Changsha Offline CUP
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.