Welcome to ZParcraft II - Page 68
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Terence Chill
Germany112 Posts
| ||
[PkF] Wire
France24192 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
Xinzoe
Korea (South)2373 Posts
On October 04 2014 22:42 [PkF] Wire wrote: How could they be happy ? Zest, that patchtoss, can still win a premier tournament. It clearly proves that P is still OP, the 11 other events won by (mostly) T and Z can be considered irrelevant. Well TvZ GSL finals so protoss is OP!!! :D :D | ||
[PkF] Wire
France24192 Posts
On October 04 2014 23:05 Shellshock wrote: someone should go bump the sad zealot fan club Yeah it's about time !!! ![]() | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On October 04 2014 23:26 [PkF] Wire wrote: Yeah it's about time !!! ![]() I was just joking too. it's usually funny when things like that get bumped. like they used to do with the elephant in the room article every once in a while last year | ||
Bodzilla
Australia472 Posts
The reason i'm bumping this is because of current PvT in Korea having shocking similarity's to the 2014 blink era. My points are as follows: * An early attack pins the other player in his base and makes him invest in tanks and static defense to survive. * The attack use's units that can quickly get from one place to another * normally accompanied by a warp prism * The attack can end the game instantly, and the other player cant counter attack or get a build order win to punish the aggressive protoss player. * The protoss can fake the attack, take an economic lead and then transition into a mid and lategame, getting an army that's too big for the terran player to counter and win. When i look at these similarity's i see that the 2 build orders function nearly identically. After this brilliant article was created, blizzard implemented the widow mine change, that allowed it to act as a counter to a blink all in, by killing a protoss players economy. Since then Photon overcharge has changed to pylons and when 2 are cast, they can snipe widow mines before they burrow, effectively killing this as a strategy and a counter to Adepts. I was hoping that by bumping this thread we can have a discussion on this aspect of TvP, as well as let newer players that havn't read this amazing article a chance at reading it. Thanks in advance | ||
royalroadweed
United States8301 Posts
| ||
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
| ||
evolsiefil
143 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
![]()
Nakajin
Canada8988 Posts
Yep indeed. | ||
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
On August 18 2016 01:36 evolsiefil wrote: what a joke of an article. cant believe TL posts such a biased, opinionated and stacked with false information / false interpretation of information pile of garbage as an official article. should be a post on battle net forums instead. This is an editorial. The opinions expressed by this article do not reflect the official position of TeamLiquid.net or its staff (other than TheDwf). It's an opinion piece from 2014. If anything here is Bnet level it's your kneejerk reaction. | ||
Primelot
51 Posts
| ||
YenFu
Canada6 Posts
Although the circumstances are different, I think we can all agree we're back to ZParcraft. | ||
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On January 29 2017 06:34 YenFu wrote: BUMP. Although the circumstances are different, I think we can all agree we're back to ZParcraft. ...how exactly? ZvT is at 50%, TvP at 60%. and Terran is the worst one? | ||
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
On January 29 2017 06:34 YenFu wrote: BUMP. Although the circumstances are different, I think we can all agree we're back to ZParcraft. What? | ||
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
On January 29 2017 06:34 YenFu wrote: BUMP. Although the circumstances are different, I think we can all agree we're back to ZParcraft. Yeah, nah. | ||
sketch90
4 Posts
Zest is out of code S, TY finally won something? Terran too strong obv. And they announce another nerf right before Stats and Classic games in GSL... | ||
CharAznable2
26 Posts
| ||
dragoon
United States695 Posts
in all seriousness nice article it was a fun read, even from a zerg player ![]() | ||
| ||