• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:34
CET 00:34
KST 08:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier6Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League93
StarCraft 2
General
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? SC2 Power Rank: epic29 Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Ziemie's Starcraft 1 Prequel Campaign Bot on ladder Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[BSL23] RO24 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] IPSL Winter 26-27 Ro24 is HERE! [$1250] International ShieldBattery League
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Deus Ex 3!? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9265 users

Blizzard's thoughts on Swarm Hosts - Page 18

Forum Index > SC2 General
1050 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 53 Next
Kevin_Sorbo
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada3217 Posts
May 06 2014 21:43 GMT
#341
lol after the last year of WOL who wouldve thought that free units were bad??

Im kinda glad they stated publicly they are aware of the fact that swarmhosts are pure poo entertainmentwise. They will probably think/implement a solution at the start of next ladder season or something like this.

I also like the fact that there are quite a few ideas that could work that were suggested in the thread already.

what I disagree with though are ''weird rules for the sake of a better game''. Doesnt make sense in a competitive and balanced rts imo.
The mind is like a parachute, it doesnt work unless its open. - Zappa
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:45 GMT
#342
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 21:56:05
May 06 2014 21:47 GMT
#343
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



So the WoL campaign can have things like Vultures, Goliaths and Wraiths but they cant be included in the multiplayer for what reasons, lorewise?

MP != Campaign lore. Blizzard has free will over the lore and could make up some silly BS thing that makes exceptions happen or whatever. its not that hard. Example: "The Queen of Blades felt weakness in her strongest flyers, the Brood Lords, so she incorporated a special carapace for them specifically to nullify the effects of any opposing Viper Abduct." There, Brood Lords cant be abducted. Or "Swarm Hosts have developed a problem where a slime has hindered the vision of Locusts, causing them to not be able to see other units. Abathur has designed a gene allowing them to use primal instinct and sensory to locate and attack other units, but problems have caused Locusts to not be able to sense eachother."

Blizzard, give me a job in your lore dept. Thx!
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
May 06 2014 21:48 GMT
#344
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.

It actually doesn't. Seriously, just implement and call it something sciency-sounding.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97277 Posts
May 06 2014 21:49 GMT
#345
On May 07 2014 06:48 Squat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.

It actually doesn't. Seriously, just implement and call it something sciency-sounding.

Could be like locusts secrete a chemical that makes whatever sensory perception locusts use confuse other locusts for friendly units so they ignore them
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
robih
Profile Joined September 2010
Austria1086 Posts
May 06 2014 21:50 GMT
#346

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 22:00:56
May 06 2014 21:50 GMT
#347
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, so ZvZ/P/T works.
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
B-rye88
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada168 Posts
May 06 2014 21:51 GMT
#348
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.


What states that starcraft multiplayer rules need to be bound by any scientific explanation whatsoever?

This is something you have an opinion on. It is OK to have this opinion. You could say something like "I strongly feel like they should only implement changes that are in-line with current lore or introduce new lore to account for the change".

Stating your opinion as fact and attempting to impose it on reality is almost as silly as the amount of effort I'm going to in explaining this to you.


Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:51 GMT
#349
On May 07 2014 06:47 vult wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



So the WoL campaign can have things like Vultures, Goliaths and Wraiths but they cant be included in the multiplayer for what reasons, lorewise?

MP != Campaign lore. Blizzard has free will over the lore and could make up some silly BS thing that makes exceptions happen or whatever. its not that hard.


Nah, its just that Blizzard don't want to put in those units because they don't want to follow the lore and was completely illogical.

Wouldn't one would rather play a game where the MP follows the premise and logic of the main storyline or would they want to play a game where it goes against it? Well that's an easy question.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
tadL
Profile Joined September 2010
Croatia679 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 21:55:20
May 06 2014 21:52 GMT
#350
Blizzard cares more about me bronze player than the pros that they pay to play and to promote their game. priceless!

ps: so playing roach and more roach and way more roach or just 10 pool is the way it has to be played?
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#351
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:
Show nested quote +

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#352
On May 07 2014 06:50 Josh_Video wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, no ZvZ/P/T works.


So that's really isn't a turtle games. Its long drawn out fighting into tiny mineral differences at the end.

Even if its for turtle games, if the result from the build up isn't worth it, then the game is effectively crap and time wasting.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
Undead1993
Profile Joined January 2012
Germany17651 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#353
thanks stephano, you solved this problem!
SEKO SEKO SEKO SEKO SEKO
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:55 GMT
#354
On May 07 2014 06:51 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.


What states that starcraft multiplayer rules need to be bound by any scientific explanation whatsoever?

This is something you have an opinion on. It is OK to have this opinion. You could say something like "I strongly feel like they should only implement changes that are in-line with current lore or introduce new lore to account for the change".

Stating your opinion as fact and attempting to impose it on reality is almost as silly as the amount of effort I'm going to in explaining this to you.




Well maybe because the creator marketed the game as a science fiction. And sci-fi are suppose to be explained through science. If they don't abide by some rules, then its simply bait and switch, cheating customers.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
suddendeathTV
Profile Joined January 2012
Sweden388 Posts
May 06 2014 21:55 GMT
#355
Just make "spawn locust" a cast-spell, not auto-cast. Suddenly it's an interesting unit that requires the usage of actions.
Information is everything
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
May 06 2014 21:57 GMT
#356
On May 07 2014 06:53 Ramiz1989 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.


Violet did some cool SH play this weekend vs. Seed at LSC3
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
May 06 2014 21:58 GMT
#357
On May 07 2014 06:53 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:50 Josh_Video wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, no ZvZ/P/T works.


So that's really isn't a turtle games. Its long drawn out fighting into tiny mineral differences at the end.

Even if its for turtle games, if the result from the build up isn't worth it, then the game is effectively crap and time wasting.


Its worth it to me. <3
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
May 06 2014 21:58 GMT
#358
On May 07 2014 06:42 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.

You are a monster. Or David Kim. It's not clear.


Well, sometimes i do feel like making poor design choices....
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
May 06 2014 21:59 GMT
#359
On May 07 2014 05:19 xTJx wrote:
This type of units that allow players to turtle just make the game worse. If i wanted to play like this i'd rather search for a tower defense game.

Anyways, i don't know what's worse, eventual SH vs SH, or roach vs roach every single ZvZ. Whatever, Blizzard doesn't seem to really care.

Funny thing, SH was advertised as unit to break turtles :D
Just like Immortal was made to be a tank for Toss armies.... Blizzard has no clue what they are doing..,.
neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
May 06 2014 22:01 GMT
#360
On May 07 2014 06:57 vult wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:53 Ramiz1989 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.


Violet did some cool SH play this weekend vs. Seed at LSC3


The only exciting part about those games were the sloppy and thereby induced uncertainty to who would win
maru G5L pls
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 26m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 165
ViBE117
Codebar 41
StarCraft: Brood War
White-Ra 226
NaDa 20
Dota 2
monkeys_forever477
NeuroSwarm156
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 754
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4373
Other Games
FrodaN1818
PiGStarcraft329
C9.Mang0328
XaKoH 224
KnowMe197
syndereN150
JuggernautJason42
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1395
CranKy Ducklings21
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 33
• davetesta17
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21340
League of Legends
• Nemesis3245
• Jankos3004
• Scarra1185
Other Games
• imaqtpie529
Upcoming Events
OSC
14h 26m
Yamato Cup
15h 26m
IPSL
17h 26m
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
23h 26m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 12h
Ultimate Battle
1d 12h
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
IPSL
6 days
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-30
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.