• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:05
CET 11:05
KST 19:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block0GSL CK - New online series12BSL Season 224Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE20Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice6
StarCraft 2
General
GSL CK - New online series Hoppsy Robot Bunny Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 516 Specter of Death Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 BSL Season 22 battle.net problems ASL21 General Discussion
Tourneys
ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement [BSL22] Open Qualifier #1 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread Path of Exile No Man's Sky (PS4 and PC) Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Gaming-Related Deaths
TrAiDoS
ONE GREAT AMERICAN MARINE…
XenOsky
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1257 users

Blizzard's thoughts on Swarm Hosts - Page 18

Forum Index > SC2 General
1050 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 53 Next
Kevin_Sorbo
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada3217 Posts
May 06 2014 21:43 GMT
#341
lol after the last year of WOL who wouldve thought that free units were bad??

Im kinda glad they stated publicly they are aware of the fact that swarmhosts are pure poo entertainmentwise. They will probably think/implement a solution at the start of next ladder season or something like this.

I also like the fact that there are quite a few ideas that could work that were suggested in the thread already.

what I disagree with though are ''weird rules for the sake of a better game''. Doesnt make sense in a competitive and balanced rts imo.
The mind is like a parachute, it doesnt work unless its open. - Zappa
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:45 GMT
#342
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 21:56:05
May 06 2014 21:47 GMT
#343
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



So the WoL campaign can have things like Vultures, Goliaths and Wraiths but they cant be included in the multiplayer for what reasons, lorewise?

MP != Campaign lore. Blizzard has free will over the lore and could make up some silly BS thing that makes exceptions happen or whatever. its not that hard. Example: "The Queen of Blades felt weakness in her strongest flyers, the Brood Lords, so she incorporated a special carapace for them specifically to nullify the effects of any opposing Viper Abduct." There, Brood Lords cant be abducted. Or "Swarm Hosts have developed a problem where a slime has hindered the vision of Locusts, causing them to not be able to see other units. Abathur has designed a gene allowing them to use primal instinct and sensory to locate and attack other units, but problems have caused Locusts to not be able to sense eachother."

Blizzard, give me a job in your lore dept. Thx!
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
May 06 2014 21:48 GMT
#344
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.

It actually doesn't. Seriously, just implement and call it something sciency-sounding.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
May 06 2014 21:49 GMT
#345
On May 07 2014 06:48 Squat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.

It actually doesn't. Seriously, just implement and call it something sciency-sounding.

Could be like locusts secrete a chemical that makes whatever sensory perception locusts use confuse other locusts for friendly units so they ignore them
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
robih
Profile Joined September 2010
Austria1086 Posts
May 06 2014 21:50 GMT
#346

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 22:00:56
May 06 2014 21:50 GMT
#347
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, so ZvZ/P/T works.
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
B-rye88
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada168 Posts
May 06 2014 21:51 GMT
#348
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.


What states that starcraft multiplayer rules need to be bound by any scientific explanation whatsoever?

This is something you have an opinion on. It is OK to have this opinion. You could say something like "I strongly feel like they should only implement changes that are in-line with current lore or introduce new lore to account for the change".

Stating your opinion as fact and attempting to impose it on reality is almost as silly as the amount of effort I'm going to in explaining this to you.


Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:51 GMT
#349
On May 07 2014 06:47 vult wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



So the WoL campaign can have things like Vultures, Goliaths and Wraiths but they cant be included in the multiplayer for what reasons, lorewise?

MP != Campaign lore. Blizzard has free will over the lore and could make up some silly BS thing that makes exceptions happen or whatever. its not that hard.


Nah, its just that Blizzard don't want to put in those units because they don't want to follow the lore and was completely illogical.

Wouldn't one would rather play a game where the MP follows the premise and logic of the main storyline or would they want to play a game where it goes against it? Well that's an easy question.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
tadL
Profile Joined September 2010
Croatia679 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 21:55:20
May 06 2014 21:52 GMT
#350
Blizzard cares more about me bronze player than the pros that they pay to play and to promote their game. priceless!

ps: so playing roach and more roach and way more roach or just 10 pool is the way it has to be played?
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#351
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:
Show nested quote +

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#352
On May 07 2014 06:50 Josh_Video wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, no ZvZ/P/T works.


So that's really isn't a turtle games. Its long drawn out fighting into tiny mineral differences at the end.

Even if its for turtle games, if the result from the build up isn't worth it, then the game is effectively crap and time wasting.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
Undead1993
Profile Joined January 2012
Germany17651 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#353
thanks stephano, you solved this problem!
SEKO SEKO SEKO SEKO SEKO
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:55 GMT
#354
On May 07 2014 06:51 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.


What states that starcraft multiplayer rules need to be bound by any scientific explanation whatsoever?

This is something you have an opinion on. It is OK to have this opinion. You could say something like "I strongly feel like they should only implement changes that are in-line with current lore or introduce new lore to account for the change".

Stating your opinion as fact and attempting to impose it on reality is almost as silly as the amount of effort I'm going to in explaining this to you.




Well maybe because the creator marketed the game as a science fiction. And sci-fi are suppose to be explained through science. If they don't abide by some rules, then its simply bait and switch, cheating customers.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
suddendeathTV
Profile Joined January 2012
Sweden388 Posts
May 06 2014 21:55 GMT
#355
Just make "spawn locust" a cast-spell, not auto-cast. Suddenly it's an interesting unit that requires the usage of actions.
Information is everything
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
May 06 2014 21:57 GMT
#356
On May 07 2014 06:53 Ramiz1989 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.


Violet did some cool SH play this weekend vs. Seed at LSC3
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
May 06 2014 21:58 GMT
#357
On May 07 2014 06:53 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:50 Josh_Video wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, no ZvZ/P/T works.


So that's really isn't a turtle games. Its long drawn out fighting into tiny mineral differences at the end.

Even if its for turtle games, if the result from the build up isn't worth it, then the game is effectively crap and time wasting.


Its worth it to me. <3
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
May 06 2014 21:58 GMT
#358
On May 07 2014 06:42 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.

You are a monster. Or David Kim. It's not clear.


Well, sometimes i do feel like making poor design choices....
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
May 06 2014 21:59 GMT
#359
On May 07 2014 05:19 xTJx wrote:
This type of units that allow players to turtle just make the game worse. If i wanted to play like this i'd rather search for a tower defense game.

Anyways, i don't know what's worse, eventual SH vs SH, or roach vs roach every single ZvZ. Whatever, Blizzard doesn't seem to really care.

Funny thing, SH was advertised as unit to break turtles :D
Just like Immortal was made to be a tank for Toss armies.... Blizzard has no clue what they are doing..,.
neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
May 06 2014 22:01 GMT
#360
On May 07 2014 06:57 vult wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:53 Ramiz1989 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.


Violet did some cool SH play this weekend vs. Seed at LSC3


The only exciting part about those games were the sloppy and thereby induced uncertainty to who would win
maru G5L pls
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 55m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 182
ProTech129
Creator 5
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29220
Calm 9616
Hyuk 584
Larva 302
Light 276
Hyun 211
Soulkey 193
Shuttle 163
Stork 154
Leta 129
[ Show more ]
Aegong 94
ToSsGirL 77
Sharp 67
Killer 55
Hm[arnc] 35
Shine 33
ZerO 31
JulyZerg 27
Free 26
yabsab 21
Backho 18
910 17
Noble 16
GoRush 15
SilentControl 9
Terrorterran 5
Dota 2
XaKoH 510
NeuroSwarm103
League of Legends
JimRising 427
Counter-Strike
byalli1673
olofmeister1250
shoxiejesuss728
zeus170
edward48
Other Games
ceh9693
Liquid`RaSZi663
crisheroes188
Happy146
Fuzer 65
ZerO(Twitch)6
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream10616
Other Games
gamesdonequick890
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream812
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH147
• Light_VIP 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1446
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
1h 55m
PiGosaur Monday
13h 55m
GSL
23h 55m
WardiTV Team League
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 23h
WardiTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Team League
4 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Team League
5 days
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
BSL Season 22
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
NationLESS Cup
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.