• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:53
CEST 11:53
KST 18:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High14Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments2[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon10
Community News
Classic wins RSL Revival Season 20Weekly Cups (Sept 15-21): herO Goes For Four2SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update239BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch4Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update Why Storm Should NOT Be Nerfed – A Core Part of Pr Classic wins RSL Revival Season 2 Question about resolution & DPI settings SC2 Weekly Cups (Sept 15-21): herO Goes For Four
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Prome's Evo #1 - Solar vs Classic (SC: Evo) Monday Nights Weeklies RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense
Brood War
General
A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Starcraft Beta Mod HELP!!!! BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Old rep packs of BW legends
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 1 [ASL20] Ro16 Group D BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Liquipedia App: Now Covering SC2 and Brood War! Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Kendrick, Eminem, and "Self…
Peanutsc
Too Many LANs? Tournament Ov…
TrAiDoS
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1907 users

Blizzard's thoughts on Swarm Hosts - Page 18

Forum Index > SC2 General
1050 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 53 Next
Kevin_Sorbo
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada3217 Posts
May 06 2014 21:43 GMT
#341
lol after the last year of WOL who wouldve thought that free units were bad??

Im kinda glad they stated publicly they are aware of the fact that swarmhosts are pure poo entertainmentwise. They will probably think/implement a solution at the start of next ladder season or something like this.

I also like the fact that there are quite a few ideas that could work that were suggested in the thread already.

what I disagree with though are ''weird rules for the sake of a better game''. Doesnt make sense in a competitive and balanced rts imo.
The mind is like a parachute, it doesnt work unless its open. - Zappa
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:45 GMT
#342
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 21:56:05
May 06 2014 21:47 GMT
#343
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



So the WoL campaign can have things like Vultures, Goliaths and Wraiths but they cant be included in the multiplayer for what reasons, lorewise?

MP != Campaign lore. Blizzard has free will over the lore and could make up some silly BS thing that makes exceptions happen or whatever. its not that hard. Example: "The Queen of Blades felt weakness in her strongest flyers, the Brood Lords, so she incorporated a special carapace for them specifically to nullify the effects of any opposing Viper Abduct." There, Brood Lords cant be abducted. Or "Swarm Hosts have developed a problem where a slime has hindered the vision of Locusts, causing them to not be able to see other units. Abathur has designed a gene allowing them to use primal instinct and sensory to locate and attack other units, but problems have caused Locusts to not be able to sense eachother."

Blizzard, give me a job in your lore dept. Thx!
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
May 06 2014 21:48 GMT
#344
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.

It actually doesn't. Seriously, just implement and call it something sciency-sounding.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
May 06 2014 21:49 GMT
#345
On May 07 2014 06:48 Squat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.

It actually doesn't. Seriously, just implement and call it something sciency-sounding.

Could be like locusts secrete a chemical that makes whatever sensory perception locusts use confuse other locusts for friendly units so they ignore them
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
robih
Profile Joined September 2010
Austria1086 Posts
May 06 2014 21:50 GMT
#346

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 22:00:56
May 06 2014 21:50 GMT
#347
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, so ZvZ/P/T works.
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
B-rye88
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada168 Posts
May 06 2014 21:51 GMT
#348
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.


What states that starcraft multiplayer rules need to be bound by any scientific explanation whatsoever?

This is something you have an opinion on. It is OK to have this opinion. You could say something like "I strongly feel like they should only implement changes that are in-line with current lore or introduce new lore to account for the change".

Stating your opinion as fact and attempting to impose it on reality is almost as silly as the amount of effort I'm going to in explaining this to you.


Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:51 GMT
#349
On May 07 2014 06:47 vult wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



So the WoL campaign can have things like Vultures, Goliaths and Wraiths but they cant be included in the multiplayer for what reasons, lorewise?

MP != Campaign lore. Blizzard has free will over the lore and could make up some silly BS thing that makes exceptions happen or whatever. its not that hard.


Nah, its just that Blizzard don't want to put in those units because they don't want to follow the lore and was completely illogical.

Wouldn't one would rather play a game where the MP follows the premise and logic of the main storyline or would they want to play a game where it goes against it? Well that's an easy question.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
tadL
Profile Joined September 2010
Croatia679 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 21:55:20
May 06 2014 21:52 GMT
#350
Blizzard cares more about me bronze player than the pros that they pay to play and to promote their game. priceless!

ps: so playing roach and more roach and way more roach or just 10 pool is the way it has to be played?
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#351
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:
Show nested quote +

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#352
On May 07 2014 06:50 Josh_Video wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, no ZvZ/P/T works.


So that's really isn't a turtle games. Its long drawn out fighting into tiny mineral differences at the end.

Even if its for turtle games, if the result from the build up isn't worth it, then the game is effectively crap and time wasting.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
Undead1993
Profile Joined January 2012
Germany17651 Posts
May 06 2014 21:53 GMT
#353
thanks stephano, you solved this problem!
SEKO SEKO SEKO SEKO SEKO
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
May 06 2014 21:55 GMT
#354
On May 07 2014 06:51 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:45 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:41 B-rye88 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:38 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:34 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:31 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:28 stenole wrote:
What if locusts can't target other locusts. Is that something that would work? It would make the swarmhost interaction more about sniping swarmhosts and staying clear of opponent locusts. It might completely mess up the metagame though.


Every single exception made here makes sense but they have to come up with a story that coherent to the lore of science fiction.

In terms of storyline, why wouldn't they able to do so based upon science fiction?

If their reasons for having exception is too far-fetched and doesn't make sense logically, then that's gimmicky.

You want to avoid that.

So what's your reasoning behind it?

Because reasons. There, done. Seriously, I cannot even pretend to be interested in the lore reasoning. If it makes the game better, do it. Say a wizard did it.


It doesn't though.

It mess inducing and totally takes the player out of the atmospherical ambiance.



Are you trolling us, or yourself?

There's no reason for blizzard to do anything of the kind. Maybe in campaign you can make an argument for having things be coherent with regards to the lore.

Unless you also think that having castles being able to move long distances in straight line needed to have a lore-appropriate backstory in chess?


Different intentions bro.

Chess is a game w/ simple premise at a time where the rules are rather arbitrary.

StarCraft on the other hand, needs to be bond by certain scientific explanation because its sci-fi.


What states that starcraft multiplayer rules need to be bound by any scientific explanation whatsoever?

This is something you have an opinion on. It is OK to have this opinion. You could say something like "I strongly feel like they should only implement changes that are in-line with current lore or introduce new lore to account for the change".

Stating your opinion as fact and attempting to impose it on reality is almost as silly as the amount of effort I'm going to in explaining this to you.




Well maybe because the creator marketed the game as a science fiction. And sci-fi are suppose to be explained through science. If they don't abide by some rules, then its simply bait and switch, cheating customers.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
suddendeathTV
Profile Joined January 2012
Sweden388 Posts
May 06 2014 21:55 GMT
#355
Just make "spawn locust" a cast-spell, not auto-cast. Suddenly it's an interesting unit that requires the usage of actions.
Information is everything
vult
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States9400 Posts
May 06 2014 21:57 GMT
#356
On May 07 2014 06:53 Ramiz1989 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.


Violet did some cool SH play this weekend vs. Seed at LSC3
I used to play random, but for you I play very specifically.
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
May 06 2014 21:58 GMT
#357
On May 07 2014 06:53 Xiphos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:50 Josh_Video wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:40 Xiphos wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.


Only if the final fight is REALLY awesome and long-lasting.

Its a buildup vs result situation.


Nope. I just like mega long games where every mineral counts because the whole map is basically mined out. Its better in TvT, but those games never happen, no ZvZ/P/T works.


So that's really isn't a turtle games. Its long drawn out fighting into tiny mineral differences at the end.

Even if its for turtle games, if the result from the build up isn't worth it, then the game is effectively crap and time wasting.


Its worth it to me. <3
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
Josh_Video
Profile Joined August 2013
Canada798 Posts
May 06 2014 21:58 GMT
#358
On May 07 2014 06:42 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:39 Josh_Video wrote:
I feel like i'm in the mega minority who actually like super long drawn out swarmhost turtle games.
Reality vs Soulkey was great
So was MaNa vs Firecake
and Stephano vs Petraeus
Those game that Miniraser got kicked out of i51 for, i loved them.

You are a monster. Or David Kim. It's not clear.


Well, sometimes i do feel like making poor design choices....
MKP :D ~ MMA ~ Scarlett ~ Taeja ~ Mvp ~ InnoVation ~ Polt | Prime ( RIP :( ) ~ Acer ~ SK Telecom T1 | I enjoyed the locust war of May 3, 2014.
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
May 06 2014 21:59 GMT
#359
On May 07 2014 05:19 xTJx wrote:
This type of units that allow players to turtle just make the game worse. If i wanted to play like this i'd rather search for a tower defense game.

Anyways, i don't know what's worse, eventual SH vs SH, or roach vs roach every single ZvZ. Whatever, Blizzard doesn't seem to really care.

Funny thing, SH was advertised as unit to break turtles :D
Just like Immortal was made to be a tank for Toss armies.... Blizzard has no clue what they are doing..,.
neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
May 06 2014 22:01 GMT
#360
On May 07 2014 06:57 vult wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 06:53 Ramiz1989 wrote:
On May 07 2014 06:50 robih wrote:

the interesting non-stalemate Swarm Host play we currently see.


hahaha wtf?
like srsly wtf?

where did they ever see interesting swarm host play?

There are games with interesting Swarm Host play, just because you don't think they are interesting, doesn't mean that they aren't to others.

From the latest games, Soulkey vs. Flash was great and Soulkey has shown how Swarm Hosts should be used without sitting in your base for 1 hour.


Violet did some cool SH play this weekend vs. Seed at LSC3


The only exciting part about those games were the sloppy and thereby induced uncertainty to who would win
maru G5L pls
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 62
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29375
Barracks 1913
GuemChi 1271
Jaedong 879
Bisu 813
Flash 715
Zeus 460
Rain 451
BeSt 378
Hyuk 316
[ Show more ]
hero 207
PianO 206
sSak 142
Hyun 123
Soma 118
Light 96
Killer 85
Larva 83
ZerO 73
Shine 49
Free 34
Sharp 26
ivOry 24
zelot 20
Noble 17
Sacsri 16
soO 7
Hm[arnc] 2
Dota 2
XcaliburYe194
League of Legends
JimRising 381
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1460
shoxiejesuss533
allub273
x6flipin31
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor117
Other Games
ceh9694
B2W.Neo593
crisheroes228
Pyrionflax203
SortOf126
NeuroSwarm80
Trikslyr23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick488
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 0
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt806
• Jankos476
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
7m
CranKy Ducklings47
Afreeca Starleague
7m
Snow vs EffOrt
sctven
Wardi Open
1h 7m
PiGosaur Monday
14h 7m
LiuLi Cup
1d 1h
OSC
1d 5h
The PondCast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
Serral vs herO
Clem vs Reynor
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
[ Show More ]
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
RSL Revival: Season 2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.