EPT1) Spores have +15 vs biological
2) Queens also provide a bit of an extra AA defense.
This should make Hydras heavy vs Muta better (ceteris paribus). It might not be enough ofc - time will tell.
Starbow - Page 149
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Hider
Denmark9341 Posts
1) Spores have +15 vs biological 2) Queens also provide a bit of an extra AA defense. This should make Hydras heavy vs Muta better (ceteris paribus). It might not be enough ofc - time will tell. | ||
|
HaRuHi
1220 Posts
On January 29 2014 22:43 Xiphias wrote: http://starbow.wikia.com/wiki/Spore_Crawler They do have bonus vs bio. Also, banelings changes ZvZ compared to BW. I think a community website + ladder will make Starbow self-sustainable. Kinda like iccup.com. We are working on that and hopefully that will make a vibrant community. I agree. We don't have to be the next DoTA, just enough players to find an opponent and have fun. This and sorry, but I love ZvZ, was my favourite match up in BW, SC2 and is in Starbow, if you don't like it, don't play ZvZ? (If you play in a tourney or something you could race pick if ZvZ comes up and if you like the other two matchups enough) Also, I don't go around and call TvT a On January 29 2014 22:35 Atlasy wrote: boring ass shit BW matchup , I go clean my room while I wait for the next match to be streamed and let Terrans enjoy it. | ||
|
HaRuHi
1220 Posts
On January 29 2014 22:16 Laertes wrote: I'm pretty sure people will figure out a new way of spreading, try playing around with selected units that don't move, larvae is a good choice because they count as units and not structures. I'm thinking there's a way to manipulate Mutas that the devs don't even realize, do some experimentation, you might find something cool. I already did countless times, I was pretty happy when I found the highspeed slowdown, but now it got "balanced", on the other hand, maybe you need no more way to spread, they are far enough appart now to just pick the one you want with 90%+ accuracy, just overall a change that has not grown on me and feels like removed micro, maybe muta's were too strong in their "superclump", but that was while irradiate could not kill a single one of them. | ||
|
marconi
Croatia220 Posts
On January 29 2014 22:43 Xiphias wrote: http://starbow.wikia.com/wiki/Spore_Crawler They do have bonus vs bio. Also, banelings changes ZvZ compared to BW. I think a community website + ladder will make Starbow self-sustainable. Kinda like iccup.com. We are working on that and hopefully that will make a vibrant community. I agree. We don't have to be the next DoTA, just enough players to find an opponent and have fun. spot-on good sir | ||
|
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
| ||
|
Hider
Denmark9341 Posts
On January 30 2014 00:23 TT1 wrote: sairs need some tinkering, they die too easily vs muta/scourge unless u have +1 and a shitload of them. but sairs are meant to control z's air in the early game.. I always try and watch your stream, but since you didn't stream replays, would you mind sending me your replays vs Zergs? | ||
|
Piy
Scotland3152 Posts
On January 30 2014 00:23 TT1 wrote: sairs need some tinkering, they die too easily vs muta/scourge unless u have +1 and a shitload of them. but sairs are meant to control z's air in the early game.. I've also noticed this. Even with the fast +1 air weapons that became popular towards the end of BW (Bisu still does it a lot on Afreeca) you can't kill scourge that effectively. Becomes a little to difficult to deal with muta sniping on templar if even corsairs aren't adequate to deal with zerg air. | ||
|
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On January 30 2014 00:24 Hider wrote: I always try and watch your stream, but since you didn't stream replays, would you mind sending me your replays vs Zergs? http://drop.sc/372432 http://drop.sc/372433 | ||
|
TopRamen
United States96 Posts
This is why I love your design team.  | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
| ||
|
fickazzz
Germany152 Posts
On January 30 2014 03:50 Ramiz1989 wrote: Scourges do 110 damage, 30% from that is small AoE damage, and have 35 HP instead of 25 HP. Maybe they should remove the AoE or remove the bonus HP and leave them at 25? They need aoe against mutas and large amount of corsairs. | ||
|
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On January 29 2014 22:35 Atlasy wrote: Hey Kabel what if you would kill the boring ass shit BW matchups? Like ZvZ. And make something interesting out of it? BW ZvZ is boring? If you say so... | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
| ||
|
Xiphias
Norway2223 Posts
 | ||
|
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On January 30 2014 03:50 Ramiz1989 wrote: Scourges do 110 damage, 30% from that is small AoE damage, and have 35 HP instead of 25 HP. Maybe they should remove the AoE or remove the bonus HP and leave them at 25? this is it, they just feel much tankier | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
Its extremely fun and the better player always wins the micro war. Only if you go for the same build tho. | ||
|
.swz.
73 Posts
| ||
|
Zhadez10
Iceland39 Posts
On January 30 2014 04:30 Xiphias wrote: Since when was tanks suppose to do well vs ultras under dark swarm? I dont think tanks are doing any splash damage to units under dark swarm tho, maybe other units too (firebats, archons, lurkers) should prolly check that out. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On January 30 2014 05:34 Zhadez10 wrote: I dont think tanks are doing any splash damage to units under dark swarm tho, maybe other units too (firebats, archons, lurkers) should prolly check that out. I also feel tanks are particularly useless in Swarm compared to BW. | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On January 30 2014 03:52 fickazzz wrote: They need aoe against mutas and large amount of corsairs. I figured that they need AoE to prevent too much stacking and to force the enemy to spread and actually micro. But large amount of Corsais usually kill them before they manage to hit them. On January 30 2014 05:34 Zhadez10 wrote: I dont think tanks are doing any splash damage to units under dark swarm tho, maybe other units too (firebats, archons, lurkers) should prolly check that out. As far as I know other do but Tanks don't. | ||
| ||
