EPTStarbow - Page 124
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
IeZaeL
Italy991 Posts
| ||
|
Kakaru2
198 Posts
Nerf the DPS if you must but revert it back to kill the unit it's casted on. | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
| ||
|
StarscreamG1
Portugal1653 Posts
 The irradiate huge change it doesn't make any sense so soon... Let the players give the answers. | ||
|
Lorch
Germany3694 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:08 StarscreamG1 wrote: Do not patch the game like blizzard!! Stop it please, go back with that last patch The irradiate huge change it doesn't make any sense so soon... Let the players give the answers.Calm down FFS, these guys are not Blizzard. The game is in "beta", if the change is bad and doesn't play out like they wanted to, they will turn it back to the previous state... | ||
|
MapleLeafSirup
Germany950 Posts
| ||
|
StarscreamG1
Portugal1653 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:20 MapleLeafSirup wrote: I really want SCV calldown, chrono boost and larva inject to disappear. Why? They favor the higher apm player, and doesn't improves macro to sky!It's fine  | ||
iHirO
United Kingdom1381 Posts
| ||
|
dgwow
Canada1024 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:18 Ramiz1989 wrote: Calm down FFS, these guys are not Blizzard. The game is in "beta", if the change is bad and doesn't play out like they wanted to, they will turn it back to the previous state... I think some polls for each patch change by the mods would be good to gauge the community reaction. Although there are many changes in this balance patch so the poll would be large, it would still be helpful. I'll just do one for now since I"m heading out: Poll: Irradiate damage lowered from 180 over 30 sec to 120 over 20 sec Disapprove (49) Approve (16) 65 total votes Your vote: Irradiate damage lowered from 180 over 30 sec to 120 over 20 sec | ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
Change irradiate back. And also it is SUPPOSED to kill a lurker/muta/defiler like in brood war. Don't go the David Kim route and change shiot arbitrarily please. | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:32 dgwow wrote: I think some polls for each patch change by the mods would be good to gauge the community reaction. Although there are many changes in this balance patch so the poll would be large, it would still be helpful. Polls won't do much, since there are always at least three sides, those that don't like the changes, those that do, and those that don't care at all. There will always be some percentage of people that won't like the change. And if it is something like 50 - 50 for those who like it and for those who don't, what do you choose? On January 25 2014 03:26 StarscreamG1 wrote: Why? They favor the higher apm player, and doesn't improves macro to sky!It's fine I don't have problems with those mechanics except for having Chronoboost and Reactors at the same time for Terran race. Choose one, not both. It feels wrong that Terran can produce Marines faster than Zerg can Zerglings(not literally, but you get what I mean). | ||
|
Gasi
38 Posts
| ||
|
IeZaeL
Italy991 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:48 IeZaeL wrote: Which map should i remade ? Please post the name + overview Medusa/Python? But I prefer Medusa. That was among my favorite maps together with Python and Destination. Heartbreaker Ridge would be cool too. EDIT: Oh, and how could I forgot the Blue Storm? That one was amazing! | ||
|
Survivor61316
United States470 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:06 Kakaru2 wrote: I don't like the Irradiate change. In BW it always killed a Lurker/Muta/Guardian. You've changed it into a weaker plague at this moment and took away the uniqueness of the spell. Nerf the DPS if you must but revert it back to kill the unit it's casted on. I agree, a defiler with one health can still fuck your army up. edit: I agree with what people above have said. This patch sounds like something right out of David Kim's playbook. Patching things just to encourage "varied and dynamic gameplay" has not worked out for him, so why would it work for SB?? A good rule of thumb should be to do everything the complete opposite than him unless there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary.. | ||
|
Xiphias
Norway2223 Posts
On January 25 2014 02:21 insanesky wrote: I hope you guys will make a ladder. Without one the game is dead ;/. ________ TheWinD We are making a ladder but it will take time. Be patient  | ||
|
Xiphias
Norway2223 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:26 iHirO wrote: Total Biscuit did another Starbow feature on his channel as part of the free arcade. Yes! | ||
|
Season
United States301 Posts
| ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
In any case, if irradiate can't kill at least mutalisks all the identity of the spell is lost. Mutalisks can directly engage science vessels anyway. If you're too worried about the strength of irradiate then nerf the cast range, or give consume for defilers a +25 health effect. Also, I should echo the concerns that this patch justification is a little bit suspect. Basically, as a designer you have to design, not dictate the meta. It's okay if you truly think that the irradiate change is an improvement of the design (or alternatively, if you just want to experiment a bit with irradiate, which is a tricky ability to get right due to smartcasting), but otherwise it's dangerous and you shouldn't change anything just because you can and like to change things up. | ||
| ||
