On September 02 2014 18:06 Uxon wrote: Die4Ever really great job! I have two questions for you:
1) Why did you use the Red Bull Washington tournament? According to liquipedia this isn't going to grant any wcs points. 2) I think it's very likely there will be no more wcs tournaments after kespa cup and the two dreamhacks. Then why keep the placeholder tournament? This fake tournament is increasing the chances of aligulac high-rated players, i don't think it's fair.
Thanks Circumstance, this answers to my first question but the second one still remains, the first link shows that there aren't other tournaments anymore after the ones i mentioned above. Then why keep the placeholder?
On September 02 2014 18:06 Uxon wrote: Die4Ever really great job! I have two questions for you:
1) Why did you use the Red Bull Washington tournament? According to liquipedia this isn't going to grant any wcs points. 2) I think it's very likely there will be no more wcs tournaments after kespa cup and the two dreamhacks. Then why keep the placeholder tournament? This fake tournament is increasing the chances of aligulac high-rated players, i don't think it's fair.
Thanks Circumstance, this answers to my first question but the second one still remains, the first link shows that there aren't other tournaments anymore after the ones i mentioned above. Then why keep the placeholder?
There's still a chance that a new tournament could be announced maybe, and the placeholder prevents prematurely giving players 0% or 100% chance prematurely due to unannounced tournaments. It is getting pretty late though, I wish I knew for sure if there was going to be anything else this year.
it's listed on both of those sites, so it seems to be giving WCS Points
My bad, I was looking on the event's liquipedia page. Interesting that it says TBD how many points are on offer...
Yea, I'm thinking they're negotiating with Blizzard between tier 2 and tier 3. Right now I'm assuming they're going to be a tier 2 (750 points to the winner like dreamhacks). Tier 3 would be 300 points to the winner. Either way the players can't get points if they lose in the 1st round, so they don't get any guaranteed points from it.
Red Bull only has 8 players while WCS events requires at least 16, but G3 infinity which only had 12 qualified to give out WCS point, not sure how that worked.
Your wcs predictor is relly cool but please, why using aligulac ( there standing isn't sure at 100% ) ? I think it's better to do a 2nd probabilities standing for blizzcon with all players are equal like in 2013. It will be amazing if you can do this.
Sorry for my bad english... I'm french :D
Congratulation and thanks for the giant job you done for SCII !
On September 05 2014 01:19 nikouli-makouli wrote: Hello
Your wcs predictor is relly cool but please, why using aligulac ( there standing isn't sure at 100% ) ? I think it's better to do a 2nd probabilities standing for blizzcon with all players are equal like in 2013. It will be amazing if you can do this.
Sorry for my bad english... I'm french :D
Congratulation and thanks for the giant job you done for SCII !
Thanks for the feedback. I will add an option to view stats for when all players are considered equal, should be done today after WCS EU.
On September 05 2014 01:19 nikouli-makouli wrote: Hello
Your wcs predictor is relly cool but please, why using aligulac ( there standing isn't sure at 100% ) ? I think it's better to do a 2nd probabilities standing for blizzcon with all players are equal like in 2013. It will be amazing if you can do this.
Sorry for my bad english... I'm french :D
Congratulation and thanks for the giant job you done for SCII !
On September 05 2014 01:19 nikouli-makouli wrote: Hello
Your wcs predictor is relly cool but please, why using aligulac ( there standing isn't sure at 100% ) ? I think it's better to do a 2nd probabilities standing for blizzcon with all players are equal like in 2013. It will be amazing if you can do this.
Sorry for my bad english... I'm french :D
Congratulation and thanks for the giant job you done for SCII !
On September 05 2014 01:19 nikouli-makouli wrote: Hello
Your wcs predictor is relly cool but please, why using aligulac ( there standing isn't sure at 100% ) ? I think it's better to do a 2nd probabilities standing for blizzcon with all players are equal like in 2013. It will be amazing if you can do this.
Sorry for my bad english... I'm french :D
Congratulation and thanks for the giant job you done for SCII !
On September 05 2014 01:19 nikouli-makouli wrote: Hello
Your wcs predictor is relly cool but please, why using aligulac ( there standing isn't sure at 100% ) ? I think it's better to do a 2nd probabilities standing for blizzcon with all players are equal like in 2013. It will be amazing if you can do this.
Sorry for my bad english... I'm french :D
Congratulation and thanks for the giant job you done for SCII !
EPT
