• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:42
CET 01:42
KST 09:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies1ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server? How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle
Tourneys
[BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1900 users

Blizzard's Potential Balance Test Map Changes - Page 24

Forum Index > SC2 General
1113 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 56 Next
RinconH
Profile Joined April 2010
United States512 Posts
April 23 2013 15:53 GMT
#461
The Oracle change would be cool... I'd love to see Rain ducking and weaving through defenses, using all his APM rather than turtling to 3 bases.
danl9rm
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States3111 Posts
April 23 2013 16:05 GMT
#462
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?
"Science has so well established that the preborn baby in the womb is a living human being that most pro-choice activists have conceded the point. ..since the abortion proponents have lost the science argument, they are now advocating an existential one."
DavoS
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States4605 Posts
April 23 2013 16:09 GMT
#463
I'm not crazy about the idea of an oracle buff. Obviously good micro should be rewarded, but when the idea is to make it possible to not lose an oracle, it takes away a players ability to defend. It's like the problem in ZvT: Zerg can't really do anything to defend, it all comes down to how well the Terran controls. If ZvP also becomes "Hey this guy practices Oracle play a lot so you lose," I can't imagine many Zergs looking forward to playing anymore
"KDA is actually the most useless stat in the game" Aui_2000
RandomAccount#282689
Profile Joined September 2012
42 Posts
April 23 2013 16:12 GMT
#464
--- Nuked ---
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
April 23 2013 16:14 GMT
#465
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?

Would be fun against protoss, burrow your scout drone to block their nexus until observers are out. Alternatively burrow it to prevent wall-off and just early pool every game.
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
April 23 2013 16:24 GMT
#466
On April 24 2013 00:39 ishmoks wrote:
Regarding rewarding high level players, check out Artosis blog post "The Raised Skill Ceiling: HotS vs BW" at http://scdojo.tumblr.com/

What he wrote makes sense.

Sadly he only looks at how the new game mechanics affect high level players ... who can manage the additional power of not having to "battle the (movement) AI and unit selection mechanics" really nicely, but for the average players it is a totally different story. They are overwhelmed by the amount of stuff and thus the biggest part of being good is the ability to split-second-multitask. Just watch TLO streaming and you will see him switching his view 3-4 times per second in constant action while a normal player might switch once every 5 seconds maybe.

SC2 has the power, but for most people this amount of power is too much to handle and that is where BW was better, because the stuff you had to "fight" (unit selection limit, movement, low production) leveled the playing field between the players to such an extent that you games werent such easy walkovers as they are in SC2 on the lower end of the scale IF you manage to get one of several stupidly powerful and gimmicky units going. Banelings, warp-ins in the enemy base, Nydus worms are some of the examples, but now we have to add Oracles, Mutalisks, Speed-Medivacs and a few more to the list.
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
Gescom
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada3505 Posts
April 23 2013 16:25 GMT
#467
What if the oracle beam damage was lowered while the movement speed was buffed? I like the unit, but it's lame to see games lost to a single oracle, which still happens in some pro level games, especially PvP.
Jaedong Hyuk || Bisu Jangbi || Fantasy Flash
Patate
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada441 Posts
April 23 2013 16:26 GMT
#468
The real mind boggling thing is when you begin to wonder what the SC2 devs have been doing the past few months.. They probably come in to work every morning like normal salaried employees. How can they come up with THIS after so much reflexion?

How are hellbats in any way balanced? Simply put they are zealots ( without charge) with an AoE damage setup, better armor ( no 0 defense shields), biological ( yeah.....) so can be healed, but also mechanical ( yeah..) so can be repaired, and the ability to become a very cheap and fast harassing unit (helions).

How are oracles in any way balanced? Initially a "worker-friendly" harassing unit, it's now just a fast unit that 2-shots workers. With the exception of the opportunity cost of opening stargate instead of more late-game focused unit, this unit is unbelievably OP. You can clear a whole mineral line with 2 oracles in just a few seconds, and now they wonder if they should be even FASTER.

You know, I used to say " replace the SC2 team", but seeing how much of a trainwreck D3 and WoW are, I think it's their Ace team....
Dead game.
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
April 23 2013 16:42 GMT
#469
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
Free siege tech, free burrow?

Free boring game with nothing to decide? How about making Warp Gate or Blink free as well, because Protoss needs to get some free stuff too, eh?
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
DemigodcelpH
Profile Joined August 2011
1138 Posts
April 23 2013 16:53 GMT
#470
On April 24 2013 01:26 Patate wrote:
How are hellbats in any way balanced? Simply put they are zealots ( without charge) with an AoE damage setup, better armor ( no 0 defense shields), biological ( yeah.....) so can be healed, but also mechanical ( yeah..) so can be repaired, and the ability to become a very cheap and fast harassing unit (helions).

How are oracles in any way balanced? Initially a "worker-friendly" harassing unit, it's now just a fast unit that 2-shots workers. With the exception of the opportunity cost of opening stargate instead of more late-game focused unit, this unit is unbelievably OP. You can clear a whole mineral line with 2 oracles in just a few seconds, and now they wonder if they should be even FASTER.
.


They also have significantly less HP, are significantly slower, can't be built anywhere on the map, can't dash, and don't auto regen a large amount of their HP for free.
unsaintly
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany687 Posts
April 23 2013 16:56 GMT
#471
I hope they keep buffing stuff instead of nerfing certain units (hellbats etc,) and see how this will unfold for the next few months.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
April 23 2013 17:01 GMT
#472
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?


Free charge? Free Blink? Free Warp gate?
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
TimENT
Profile Joined November 2012
United States1425 Posts
April 23 2013 17:03 GMT
#473
What if Blizz put burrow on spawning pool?
Barcelona / Arsenal Fan!
MstrJinbo
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1251 Posts
April 23 2013 17:06 GMT
#474
On April 24 2013 01:24 Rabiator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 00:39 ishmoks wrote:
Regarding rewarding high level players, check out Artosis blog post "The Raised Skill Ceiling: HotS vs BW" at http://scdojo.tumblr.com/

What he wrote makes sense.

Sadly he only looks at how the new game mechanics affect high level players ... who can manage the additional power of not having to "battle the (movement) AI and unit selection mechanics" really nicely, but for the average players it is a totally different story. They are overwhelmed by the amount of stuff and thus the biggest part of being good is the ability to split-second-multitask. Just watch TLO streaming and you will see him switching his view 3-4 times per second in constant action while a normal player might switch once every 5 seconds maybe.

SC2 has the power, but for most people this amount of power is too much to handle and that is where BW was better, because the stuff you had to "fight" (unit selection limit, movement, low production) leveled the playing field between the players to such an extent that you games werent such easy walkovers as they are in SC2 on the lower end of the scale IF you manage to get one of several stupidly powerful and gimmicky units going. Banelings, warp-ins in the enemy base, Nydus worms are some of the examples, but now we have to add Oracles, Mutalisks, Speed-Medivacs and a few more to the list.


You have clearly never been wraith rushed or lurker dropped in brood war. You had all the goofy cheeses in addition to fighting the AI to do what you wanted. In sc2 it is easier to get the APM and focus to scout for that stuff.
Erik.TheRed
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:07:28
April 23 2013 17:06 GMT
#475
My main problem with the oracle is how it has this window of time where if it hasn't payed off by killing a ton of workers, it won't help at all vs any straight up counter attack (especially stim timings and the like). In fact the stargate is almost completely worthless vs terran if you haven't managed to make the oracles pay off early on and don't start to gain utility again until lategame with revelation in max army battles.

What if they added some other interesting utility to the oracle like a channeled shield generator that might actually help defend against marine/marauder or roach hydra counters? Maybe reduce the damage of the oracle attack as well and make it a normal attack rather than energy based. I think that would create for a more interesting and skill-based unit that can really pay for itself throughout the entire game if it's microd well.
"See you space cowboy"
Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11075 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:18:35
April 23 2013 17:09 GMT
#476
On April 24 2013 02:01 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?


Free charge? Free Blink? Free Warp gate?


OH my god. Can we start with free storm research? It would be lovely if Toss didn't to starve every bit of tech [relative to the other races]. There's a reason why the upgrade discounts only put us... on par.

edit; wonder if it is too easy to scout in HoTS. Just generally WoL overlord buff probably was too much and gave zergs too much of an edge in seeing things and reducing probabilities. Scan is always solid along with other aggressive scouts terrans have and now Toss really has no excuse for being blind between free hallus and revelation.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
Darksoldierr
Profile Joined May 2010
Hungary2012 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:13:29
April 23 2013 17:12 GMT
#477
On April 24 2013 01:24 Rabiator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 00:39 ishmoks wrote:
Regarding rewarding high level players, check out Artosis blog post "The Raised Skill Ceiling: HotS vs BW" at http://scdojo.tumblr.com/

What he wrote makes sense.

Sadly he only looks at how the new game mechanics affect high level players ... who can manage the additional power of not having to "battle the (movement) AI and unit selection mechanics" really nicely, but for the average players it is a totally different story. They are overwhelmed by the amount of stuff and thus the biggest part of being good is the ability to split-second-multitask. Just watch TLO streaming and you will see him switching his view 3-4 times per second in constant action while a normal player might switch once every 5 seconds maybe.

SC2 has the power, but for most people this amount of power is too much to handle and that is where BW was better, because the stuff you had to "fight" (unit selection limit, movement, low production) leveled the playing field between the players to such an extent that you games werent such easy walkovers as they are in SC2 on the lower end of the scale IF you manage to get one of several stupidly powerful and gimmicky units going. Banelings, warp-ins in the enemy base, Nydus worms are some of the examples, but now we have to add Oracles, Mutalisks, Speed-Medivacs and a few more to the list.


I dont want to be rude, but a good Brood War player would have destroyed a causal Brood War player even more than in Sc2. In Sc2 thanks to the lot of all ins, the weaker player (unless the skill difference is that high) has a chance to win.

Sc2 is lot more forgiving than BW was. Saying Sc2 is "harder" because you don't fight the AI or UI but units is like saying Football is hard, because the ball is rounded and can go anywhere.
What do humans know of our pain? We have sung songs of lament since before your ancestors crawled on their bellies from the sea.
wUndertUnge
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1125 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:34:21
April 23 2013 17:21 GMT
#478
EDIT: this is in direct response to the OP. Haven't had time to go through 22 pages of comments

That doesn't seem to be the solution to ZvZ. The problem isn't defending against mutas while in your base. The real problem is how vulnerable your muta counter army is while out on the map. Hydras and infestors, which are needed to counteract the mutas, just melt to a number of things that the muta player can throw at them. If you decide to go mutas yourself, the same problem remains in that it's really coin-flippey when actually engaging with the other guys mutas. The spore crawler buff might encourage more defensive play OR give you the option of leaving fewer units at home. Still, I'd like to see a hydra buff OR a corrupter buff in order to counteract mutas.

2nd edit: could a spore life buff be useful, too? The buff to bio damage won't matter when there are 700 mutas hovering over your defense. That could definitely affect medivac play, though...hm...

Oracles are kind of easily countered now if it's spotted early on. Still, I'm kind of in the middle on how or why this is being changed. Is there something more subtle and elegant that they could do for balance? Just throwing ideas out: range increase by 1? A bit more shields?

+1000 to the burrow buff. The other two races seem to have more potential for early aggression (which we haven't seen the breadth of yet with MSC & toss IMO), but anything to give zerg more early game aggression potential is good by me.

3rd Edit: What would a slight buff to hatch roaches look like? With the map sizes being so big, it could give zerg earlier rush potential that isn't totally game breaking.
Clan: QQGC - wundertunge#1850
TL+ Member
wUndertUnge
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1125 Posts
April 23 2013 17:29 GMT
#479
On April 24 2013 02:06 Erik.TheRed wrote:
My main problem with the oracle is how it has this window of time where if it hasn't payed off by killing a ton of workers, it won't help at all vs any straight up counter attack (especially stim timings and the like). In fact the stargate is almost completely worthless vs terran if you haven't managed to make the oracles pay off early on and don't start to gain utility again until lategame with revelation in max army battles.

What if they added some other interesting utility to the oracle like a channeled shield generator that might actually help defend against marine/marauder or roach hydra counters? Maybe reduce the damage of the oracle attack as well and make it a normal attack rather than energy based. I think that would create for a more interesting and skill-based unit that can really pay for itself throughout the entire game if it's microd well.


granting vision of an army without a robo doesn't help in the counterattack? I know it's not in direct damage, but still...

I understand, though, and I wonder if a +1 range increase might help with the raid on the mineral line and also in defending...

Not sure, though. Actually, not totally sure why Oracle buffing is even being discussed.
Clan: QQGC - wundertunge#1850
TL+ Member
RubixRambo
Profile Joined September 2012
United States9 Posts
April 23 2013 18:00 GMT
#480
I like all the proposed changes except the oracle one. Currently you can run your workers away if need be but if they increase the speed that wont be an option... but perhaps what they are thinking is oracles could be viable throughout the game and not as just a one time harass.

The burrow change would be "cool" but is it really necessary? Their reasoning of "Towards the beginning of HotS, early burrow attacks showed some decent potential but we never see it anymore. We thought this variety in opening especially on the Zerg that usually play a defensive early game was cool," isn't reason enough to patch it so early on. Admittedly no zerg ever gets burrow before lair because that 100/100 is a little to spending, and definitely not worth it if your roaches are still slow. So In short it might be cool but I wouldn't be sad to see this patch not happen.

Personally, at my level of play (mid diamond) I am a lot better at macro than the other players at my level so I usually win the muta battle, but its still no fun just to spam that there T button past a certain point in the game. So this patch is welcomed and I am excited to see how much it will change.
"Two things are infinite. The universe and human stupidity... and I'm not so sure about the universe." -Albert Einstein-
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1d 11h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft435
Nathanias 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 644
Yoon 26
NaDa 22
Dota 2
syndereN950
NeuroSwarm87
League of Legends
C9.Mang0173
Trikslyr57
Counter-Strike
summit1g8014
minikerr41
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken16
Other Games
Grubby3464
RotterdaM361
JimRising 214
Maynarde162
Mew2King56
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick746
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 66
• HeavenSC 26
• davetesta25
• Hupsaiya 25
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki10
• XenOsky 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22250
Other Games
• imaqtpie2062
• Scarra1815
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1d 11h
Gerald vs YoungYakov
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.