• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:11
CEST 02:11
KST 09:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues25LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers?
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN CPL12 SIGN UP are open!!!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1128 users

Blizzard's Potential Balance Test Map Changes - Page 24

Forum Index > SC2 General
1113 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 56 Next
RinconH
Profile Joined April 2010
United States512 Posts
April 23 2013 15:53 GMT
#461
The Oracle change would be cool... I'd love to see Rain ducking and weaving through defenses, using all his APM rather than turtling to 3 bases.
danl9rm
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States3111 Posts
April 23 2013 16:05 GMT
#462
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?
"Science has so well established that the preborn baby in the womb is a living human being that most pro-choice activists have conceded the point. ..since the abortion proponents have lost the science argument, they are now advocating an existential one."
DavoS
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States4605 Posts
April 23 2013 16:09 GMT
#463
I'm not crazy about the idea of an oracle buff. Obviously good micro should be rewarded, but when the idea is to make it possible to not lose an oracle, it takes away a players ability to defend. It's like the problem in ZvT: Zerg can't really do anything to defend, it all comes down to how well the Terran controls. If ZvP also becomes "Hey this guy practices Oracle play a lot so you lose," I can't imagine many Zergs looking forward to playing anymore
"KDA is actually the most useless stat in the game" Aui_2000
RandomAccount#282689
Profile Joined September 2012
42 Posts
April 23 2013 16:12 GMT
#464
--- Nuked ---
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
April 23 2013 16:14 GMT
#465
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?

Would be fun against protoss, burrow your scout drone to block their nexus until observers are out. Alternatively burrow it to prevent wall-off and just early pool every game.
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
April 23 2013 16:24 GMT
#466
On April 24 2013 00:39 ishmoks wrote:
Regarding rewarding high level players, check out Artosis blog post "The Raised Skill Ceiling: HotS vs BW" at http://scdojo.tumblr.com/

What he wrote makes sense.

Sadly he only looks at how the new game mechanics affect high level players ... who can manage the additional power of not having to "battle the (movement) AI and unit selection mechanics" really nicely, but for the average players it is a totally different story. They are overwhelmed by the amount of stuff and thus the biggest part of being good is the ability to split-second-multitask. Just watch TLO streaming and you will see him switching his view 3-4 times per second in constant action while a normal player might switch once every 5 seconds maybe.

SC2 has the power, but for most people this amount of power is too much to handle and that is where BW was better, because the stuff you had to "fight" (unit selection limit, movement, low production) leveled the playing field between the players to such an extent that you games werent such easy walkovers as they are in SC2 on the lower end of the scale IF you manage to get one of several stupidly powerful and gimmicky units going. Banelings, warp-ins in the enemy base, Nydus worms are some of the examples, but now we have to add Oracles, Mutalisks, Speed-Medivacs and a few more to the list.
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
Gescom
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada3443 Posts
April 23 2013 16:25 GMT
#467
What if the oracle beam damage was lowered while the movement speed was buffed? I like the unit, but it's lame to see games lost to a single oracle, which still happens in some pro level games, especially PvP.
Jaedong Hyuk || Bisu Jangbi || Fantasy Flash
Patate
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada441 Posts
April 23 2013 16:26 GMT
#468
The real mind boggling thing is when you begin to wonder what the SC2 devs have been doing the past few months.. They probably come in to work every morning like normal salaried employees. How can they come up with THIS after so much reflexion?

How are hellbats in any way balanced? Simply put they are zealots ( without charge) with an AoE damage setup, better armor ( no 0 defense shields), biological ( yeah.....) so can be healed, but also mechanical ( yeah..) so can be repaired, and the ability to become a very cheap and fast harassing unit (helions).

How are oracles in any way balanced? Initially a "worker-friendly" harassing unit, it's now just a fast unit that 2-shots workers. With the exception of the opportunity cost of opening stargate instead of more late-game focused unit, this unit is unbelievably OP. You can clear a whole mineral line with 2 oracles in just a few seconds, and now they wonder if they should be even FASTER.

You know, I used to say " replace the SC2 team", but seeing how much of a trainwreck D3 and WoW are, I think it's their Ace team....
Dead game.
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
April 23 2013 16:42 GMT
#469
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
Free siege tech, free burrow?

Free boring game with nothing to decide? How about making Warp Gate or Blink free as well, because Protoss needs to get some free stuff too, eh?
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
DemigodcelpH
Profile Joined August 2011
1138 Posts
April 23 2013 16:53 GMT
#470
On April 24 2013 01:26 Patate wrote:
How are hellbats in any way balanced? Simply put they are zealots ( without charge) with an AoE damage setup, better armor ( no 0 defense shields), biological ( yeah.....) so can be healed, but also mechanical ( yeah..) so can be repaired, and the ability to become a very cheap and fast harassing unit (helions).

How are oracles in any way balanced? Initially a "worker-friendly" harassing unit, it's now just a fast unit that 2-shots workers. With the exception of the opportunity cost of opening stargate instead of more late-game focused unit, this unit is unbelievably OP. You can clear a whole mineral line with 2 oracles in just a few seconds, and now they wonder if they should be even FASTER.
.


They also have significantly less HP, are significantly slower, can't be built anywhere on the map, can't dash, and don't auto regen a large amount of their HP for free.
unsaintly
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany687 Posts
April 23 2013 16:56 GMT
#471
I hope they keep buffing stuff instead of nerfing certain units (hellbats etc,) and see how this will unfold for the next few months.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
April 23 2013 17:01 GMT
#472
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?


Free charge? Free Blink? Free Warp gate?
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
TimENT
Profile Joined November 2012
United States1425 Posts
April 23 2013 17:03 GMT
#473
What if Blizz put burrow on spawning pool?
Barcelona / Arsenal Fan!
MstrJinbo
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1251 Posts
April 23 2013 17:06 GMT
#474
On April 24 2013 01:24 Rabiator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 00:39 ishmoks wrote:
Regarding rewarding high level players, check out Artosis blog post "The Raised Skill Ceiling: HotS vs BW" at http://scdojo.tumblr.com/

What he wrote makes sense.

Sadly he only looks at how the new game mechanics affect high level players ... who can manage the additional power of not having to "battle the (movement) AI and unit selection mechanics" really nicely, but for the average players it is a totally different story. They are overwhelmed by the amount of stuff and thus the biggest part of being good is the ability to split-second-multitask. Just watch TLO streaming and you will see him switching his view 3-4 times per second in constant action while a normal player might switch once every 5 seconds maybe.

SC2 has the power, but for most people this amount of power is too much to handle and that is where BW was better, because the stuff you had to "fight" (unit selection limit, movement, low production) leveled the playing field between the players to such an extent that you games werent such easy walkovers as they are in SC2 on the lower end of the scale IF you manage to get one of several stupidly powerful and gimmicky units going. Banelings, warp-ins in the enemy base, Nydus worms are some of the examples, but now we have to add Oracles, Mutalisks, Speed-Medivacs and a few more to the list.


You have clearly never been wraith rushed or lurker dropped in brood war. You had all the goofy cheeses in addition to fighting the AI to do what you wanted. In sc2 it is easier to get the APM and focus to scout for that stuff.
Erik.TheRed
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:07:28
April 23 2013 17:06 GMT
#475
My main problem with the oracle is how it has this window of time where if it hasn't payed off by killing a ton of workers, it won't help at all vs any straight up counter attack (especially stim timings and the like). In fact the stargate is almost completely worthless vs terran if you haven't managed to make the oracles pay off early on and don't start to gain utility again until lategame with revelation in max army battles.

What if they added some other interesting utility to the oracle like a channeled shield generator that might actually help defend against marine/marauder or roach hydra counters? Maybe reduce the damage of the oracle attack as well and make it a normal attack rather than energy based. I think that would create for a more interesting and skill-based unit that can really pay for itself throughout the entire game if it's microd well.
"See you space cowboy"
Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11053 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:18:35
April 23 2013 17:09 GMT
#476
On April 24 2013 02:01 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 01:05 danl9rm wrote:
On April 23 2013 23:40 mprs wrote:
On April 23 2013 22:33 Bagi wrote:
A 50/50 burrow at hatch tech could bring a ton of variety to zerg early game plays. At that price, there's no reason NOT to get it early on.


Well, I think you still want players to make a cost analysis, otherwise you might as well just give it to them for free.


I'd be ok with that :p

Free siege tech, free burrow?


Free charge? Free Blink? Free Warp gate?


OH my god. Can we start with free storm research? It would be lovely if Toss didn't to starve every bit of tech [relative to the other races]. There's a reason why the upgrade discounts only put us... on par.

edit; wonder if it is too easy to scout in HoTS. Just generally WoL overlord buff probably was too much and gave zergs too much of an edge in seeing things and reducing probabilities. Scan is always solid along with other aggressive scouts terrans have and now Toss really has no excuse for being blind between free hallus and revelation.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
Darksoldierr
Profile Joined May 2010
Hungary2012 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:13:29
April 23 2013 17:12 GMT
#477
On April 24 2013 01:24 Rabiator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 00:39 ishmoks wrote:
Regarding rewarding high level players, check out Artosis blog post "The Raised Skill Ceiling: HotS vs BW" at http://scdojo.tumblr.com/

What he wrote makes sense.

Sadly he only looks at how the new game mechanics affect high level players ... who can manage the additional power of not having to "battle the (movement) AI and unit selection mechanics" really nicely, but for the average players it is a totally different story. They are overwhelmed by the amount of stuff and thus the biggest part of being good is the ability to split-second-multitask. Just watch TLO streaming and you will see him switching his view 3-4 times per second in constant action while a normal player might switch once every 5 seconds maybe.

SC2 has the power, but for most people this amount of power is too much to handle and that is where BW was better, because the stuff you had to "fight" (unit selection limit, movement, low production) leveled the playing field between the players to such an extent that you games werent such easy walkovers as they are in SC2 on the lower end of the scale IF you manage to get one of several stupidly powerful and gimmicky units going. Banelings, warp-ins in the enemy base, Nydus worms are some of the examples, but now we have to add Oracles, Mutalisks, Speed-Medivacs and a few more to the list.


I dont want to be rude, but a good Brood War player would have destroyed a causal Brood War player even more than in Sc2. In Sc2 thanks to the lot of all ins, the weaker player (unless the skill difference is that high) has a chance to win.

Sc2 is lot more forgiving than BW was. Saying Sc2 is "harder" because you don't fight the AI or UI but units is like saying Football is hard, because the ball is rounded and can go anywhere.
What do humans know of our pain? We have sung songs of lament since before your ancestors crawled on their bellies from the sea.
wUndertUnge
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1125 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-23 17:34:21
April 23 2013 17:21 GMT
#478
EDIT: this is in direct response to the OP. Haven't had time to go through 22 pages of comments

That doesn't seem to be the solution to ZvZ. The problem isn't defending against mutas while in your base. The real problem is how vulnerable your muta counter army is while out on the map. Hydras and infestors, which are needed to counteract the mutas, just melt to a number of things that the muta player can throw at them. If you decide to go mutas yourself, the same problem remains in that it's really coin-flippey when actually engaging with the other guys mutas. The spore crawler buff might encourage more defensive play OR give you the option of leaving fewer units at home. Still, I'd like to see a hydra buff OR a corrupter buff in order to counteract mutas.

2nd edit: could a spore life buff be useful, too? The buff to bio damage won't matter when there are 700 mutas hovering over your defense. That could definitely affect medivac play, though...hm...

Oracles are kind of easily countered now if it's spotted early on. Still, I'm kind of in the middle on how or why this is being changed. Is there something more subtle and elegant that they could do for balance? Just throwing ideas out: range increase by 1? A bit more shields?

+1000 to the burrow buff. The other two races seem to have more potential for early aggression (which we haven't seen the breadth of yet with MSC & toss IMO), but anything to give zerg more early game aggression potential is good by me.

3rd Edit: What would a slight buff to hatch roaches look like? With the map sizes being so big, it could give zerg earlier rush potential that isn't totally game breaking.
Clan: QQGC - wundertunge#1850
TL+ Member
wUndertUnge
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1125 Posts
April 23 2013 17:29 GMT
#479
On April 24 2013 02:06 Erik.TheRed wrote:
My main problem with the oracle is how it has this window of time where if it hasn't payed off by killing a ton of workers, it won't help at all vs any straight up counter attack (especially stim timings and the like). In fact the stargate is almost completely worthless vs terran if you haven't managed to make the oracles pay off early on and don't start to gain utility again until lategame with revelation in max army battles.

What if they added some other interesting utility to the oracle like a channeled shield generator that might actually help defend against marine/marauder or roach hydra counters? Maybe reduce the damage of the oracle attack as well and make it a normal attack rather than energy based. I think that would create for a more interesting and skill-based unit that can really pay for itself throughout the entire game if it's microd well.


granting vision of an army without a robo doesn't help in the counterattack? I know it's not in direct damage, but still...

I understand, though, and I wonder if a +1 range increase might help with the raid on the mineral line and also in defending...

Not sure, though. Actually, not totally sure why Oracle buffing is even being discussed.
Clan: QQGC - wundertunge#1850
TL+ Member
RubixRambo
Profile Joined September 2012
United States9 Posts
April 23 2013 18:00 GMT
#480
I like all the proposed changes except the oracle one. Currently you can run your workers away if need be but if they increase the speed that wont be an option... but perhaps what they are thinking is oracles could be viable throughout the game and not as just a one time harass.

The burrow change would be "cool" but is it really necessary? Their reasoning of "Towards the beginning of HotS, early burrow attacks showed some decent potential but we never see it anymore. We thought this variety in opening especially on the Zerg that usually play a defensive early game was cool," isn't reason enough to patch it so early on. Admittedly no zerg ever gets burrow before lair because that 100/100 is a little to spending, and definitely not worth it if your roaches are still slow. So In short it might be cool but I wouldn't be sad to see this patch not happen.

Personally, at my level of play (mid diamond) I am a lot better at macro than the other players at my level so I usually win the muta battle, but its still no fun just to spam that there T button past a certain point in the game. So this patch is welcomed and I am excited to see how much it will change.
"Two things are infinite. The universe and human stupidity... and I'm not so sure about the universe." -Albert Einstein-
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
[BSL 2025] Weekly
18:00
#14
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 1106
sSak 75
NaDa 20
Dota 2
monkeys_forever466
League of Legends
JimRising 550
Counter-Strike
fl0m1706
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox914
Other Games
summit1g5377
Grubby3798
FrodaN2490
XaKoH 107
Mew2King20
fpsfer 4
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2595
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 49
• davetesta38
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22334
League of Legends
• Doublelift5250
Other Games
• imaqtpie1147
• Scarra0
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
9h 49m
Maestros of the Game
16h 49m
BSL Team Wars
18h 49m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 9h
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
1d 10h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
LiuLi Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
[ Show More ]
[BSL 2025] Weekly
6 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.